>I have studied the Qur'an as
>much as anyone

You are Hafiz-ul-Qur'an? You have memorized the entire Qur'an along with the Tafsir? Of course not. I invite you to open your eyes to reality and come to the conclusion that reading a few books by non-Muslims who write about Islam with a negative intent to mislead people is not studying the Qur'an, especially not "as much as anyone."

>For
>instance take the story of
>Simon Greenleaf one of the
>great minds in American legal
>history. He not only taught
>law at Harvard University and
>produced the standard three volume
>study of lagal services still
>used to teach lawyers the
>rules of legal evidence.
> When
>challenge to apply these rules
>to the New Testament documents,
>Greenleaf produced (The Testament
>of the Evangelist)
>His conclusion was that every document,
>apparently ancient, coming from the
>proper repository or custody, and
>bearing on its face no
>evidence of forgery, the law
>presumes to be gunuine, and
>doevolves on the opposing the
>party the burden of proveing
>to be otherwise.
> In
>other words this professor states
>that in a court of
>law the authencity of New
>Testament account claiming that there
>is no forgery and are
>credited due to the testimony
>of eye witnesses. Amem

Huh? Are you serious?? You actually think this will convince anyone or hold as weight to be the truth? Get real.