>>i think "fear of difference" was
>>used to justify the murder
>>of africans.
>
>i'mmmmmmm, not sure i agree w/
>this. the excuse given was
>inferiority, sub-humanness.
>

sub-humanness = beast.

difference is that. "they are beasts, we are men. we must control/limit the beasts or else they will go wild on us."

see?

>i'm glad u said this, b/c
>someone metntioned "everyone" having the
>need to control or else
>they'll feel vulnerable. this is
>not true. again i must
>ask ppl to specify who
>they mean by "everyone."
>this "need" for control is
>behavior exhibited (collectively) by whites.

well, i would say it has been exhibited collectively by all EFFECTIVE imperialists, which of course = whites, since they have been among the best.

>>i think many africans today are
>>"fearful" of whites.........which is a
>>product of their development in
>>a hostile world to them.

>>
>>africans are scared of revolution..................
>
>yes, this may be true but
>it is not a part
>of their consciousness rather a
>reaction to the current situation.

not a part of the consciousness?

so "consciousness" isnt dymanic and changing? past AND present events, enviornmental factors do not affect it?

the "consciousness" of blacks (collectively) is a constant?

sounds like b.s. to me......


>
>Also Yuckwheat, do u believe that
>there is a "Zone of
>Confluence"? i notice u put
>arabs and asians into the
>"white" group. i however see
>them as a hybrid of
>both the northern and southern
>cradles, which explains their display
>of both characteristics. what do
>u think?

well, interesting theory, and if it's true, i would put groups like african-americans in that category as well. - hybrids.

i only called them white, because that's a lot of them physically appear to me. they resemble "white" europeans more than anybody else.