What I meant to get across is: why should the perception of a bullet used by the government against innocent people be different from that of a bomb?? I understand that a bomb looks worse from a PR standpoint. My point is, ANY unjustly violent action the government takes against it's own citizens should be scrutinized. Shootings of civilians need to carry the same wieght as bombings when they both result in death as far as liability goes. If this was the case, there would (hopefully) be hesitance to send deadly force into a situation so readily.

----------------------------------------
404 signature not found