>We tried diplomacy with the UN, and it failed. And trying
>to fight terrorism with diplomacy hasn't done anything to
>stop terrorist attacks.
>

But using violence has decreased terrorism and increased civil liberties world wide, has ensured that less people want to become a terrorists and has meant that the terrorists have less coverage of their respective causes, right?

By the way, what did terrorists have to do with Iraq before the invasion meant that any nutter with a cause and some explosives wanted to go there and blow some people up?

>You have it twisted. Al Queda would definitely want Kerry
>to win because he'll be softer on terrorist-harboring
>nations. Why would terrorists want Bush in if he's being
>hard on the nations who support them?
>

Ever heard the phrase "red rag to a bull", thats what Bush is.