>No, he failed to answer a softball

No he answered the question, he just did it poorly.

If he had failed to answer the question he either would have remained silent or given an answer that didn't pertain to the question.

You can see where he was trying to go with his answer, he was trying to say that he used the criticism to fuel his desire to improve his game, he just botched the analogy.

Simple as that.


>No, he was criticizing and nitpicking him

Great, so we agree that you were wrong when you said he was "roasting" him.

>He probably didn't do that to Cam because he thought
>Cam couldn't handle it, and Gruden is probably right

Or the people who worked on the video selected the portions of the interview they thought would make for good television.


>Nah, but Gruden was tossing Cam softballs

Ok


>Sounds like you're mad

Then you should work on your powers of perception.

"Jack of all trades, master of none, though ofttimes better than master of one"-Anonymous

http://api.ning.com/files/ibhtJCHk2ouN7HlTkIP92YIUq