PHILLY WINS.

RADIN LOSES.

GLORIOUSNESS!

YOU BET YOUR LOGIN. NO BACKING OUT!

THANK YOU BASED LOWER BODIES OF BULLS PLAYERS!

http://assets.sbnation.com/assets/1100396/sixers.gif

two most annoying fanbases on here out in the 1st round lol
hopefully lakers get bounced somehow this round too

MMMMMMMMUH!

Congrats to the Sixers

My last officially reply to a post on the okaysports forum

Buncha weirdos

_______________________________
Killer Mike - R.A.P. Music
L.E.P. Bogus Boys - Now Or Neva
Jadakiss/DJ Drama - The Consignment

*almost* a palindrome!

It came in ugly fashion to be sure, but them's the breaks.

I thought you were going to be saved, man, Philly could not come up with a fucking defensive rebound to save their sister's virginity in that second half.

I know what it was.

No big loss to me

nm

>Congrats to the Sixers
>
>My last officially reply to a post on the okaysports forum
>
>

.

>.

>
>My last officially reply to a post on the okaysports forum
>
>

And I'm pretty shitty myself so that's saying something.

Turn off the battery in your back. The Suxxers get swept next round. That's the life of rabid fanbase filled full of mouthbreathing hating ass niggas.

I'll put money on Philly not getting swept though. They won't WIN the series unless Boston has a sudden, ubiquitous onset of osteoporosis (oddly possible) but I am not expecting to be embarrassed by these old farts.

How have the Cavs fared in their series? Or how about in:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleveland_Cavaliers


?

Zero titles and one man who the fanbase despises was their entire "legacy"

You beat a depleted team, your bench sucks and your forwards are going to get beasted down low.

Enjoy playing the 4th seed.

Sixers, better franchise than the Cavs, better team than the Cavs.

You don't think I REALIZE Chicago didn't have their two best players? Who the fuck are you?

>I'll put money on Philly not getting swept though. They won't
>WIN the series unless Boston has a sudden, ubiquitous onset of
>osteoporosis (oddly possible) but I am not expecting to be
>embarrassed by these old farts.
>
>How have the Cavs fared in their series? Or how about in:
>
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleveland_Cavaliers
>

I'm glad you brought up the Cavs. We've had more success in the past decade than the Suxxers. You don't want to start misinterpreting wiki stats. Your franchise will always suck and you shitty mouth breathing hating ass niggas will evangelize this to all other NBA fan bases.
>
>?
>
>Zero titles and one man who the fanbase despises was their
>entire "legacy"

Hall of Famers:

Iverson
Barkley
Cheeks
Erving
Malone
Cunningham
WILT
Greer
Schayes
Cervi

to the Cavs' NO ONE. I will give you James since I credited AI already. They had guys play out the string as scrubs like Thurmond and Clyde Frazier but I didn't count Bailey Howell for the Sixers either.

I mean, in what way could the Cavs be considered superior? Even your ten-year statement is tenuous and could only be said THIS year with the Sixers' last finals appearance now being 11 years ago.

This is not a debate to anyone with eyes or ears.

>Hall of Famers:
>
>Iverson
>Barkley
>Cheeks
>Erving
>Malone
>Cunningham
>WILT
>Greer
>Schayes
>Cervi
>
>to the Cavs' NO ONE. I will give you James since I credited AI
>already. They had guys play out the string as scrubs like
>Thurmond and Clyde Frazier but I didn't count Bailey Howell
>for the Sixers either.
>
>I mean, in what way could the Cavs be considered superior?
>Even your ten-year statement is tenuous and could only be said
>THIS year with the Sixers' last finals appearance now being 11
>years ago.
>
>This is not a debate to anyone with eyes or ears.

We do have hall of famers. You know this since you linked the wiki.

Your bum ass franchise went 9-73.... Nine and Seventy fucking three. You always have and will forever be a doormat. Those are just the facts. There are fanbases that can pop shit to me. However, your wack squad ain't one of them. You mouth breathing hating ass niggas can look forward to rooting for a middle of the pack squad for the next decade.

9-73

How the fuck does a team only win 9 games?

So what if it's 2-0 ... and???? Besides, we are the same franchise. Do the Lakers count their chips in Minneapolis? Thanks for playing, retard.

The Cavs FUCKING SUCK and they have always FUCKING SUCKED. Once you get past the storied franchises like the Lakers, Boston and, thanks to Jordan, the Bulls, the Sixers are right there with any franchise.

You fucking morons can look down on the Clippers.

WHO are these HOF'ers? Frazier, Thurmond (and Wilkens) I already named and you know goddamn well those guys don't count. That's like calling Namath a Rams great or Unitas a Chargers legend. Who else ya got? Fucking no one. You don't even know the history of your team and worse yet you cannot read it an inch from your eyes. Which comes as NO surprise.

You could talk about a contributor or two but so what? Sixers have those, too, guys like Harvey Pollak and Alex Hannum. So?

Oh, and you're talking 9-73? LOL, one season 40 years ago. You guys have 15 games twice, I can remember LESS than ten years ago you were actually courting our record, lol, although you made it to a might 17-win total with a brief streak.

LAST YEAR you won 19 games. LAST YEAR.

Do you know how fucking dumb you look carrying on this argument? Walking down the fucking street? God I wish Radin took your stupid ass with him!

>So what if it's 2-0 ... and???? Besides, we are the same
>franchise. Do the Lakers count their chips in Minneapolis?
>Thank for playing, retard.
>
>The Cavs FUCKING SUCK and they have always FUCKING SUCKED.
>Once you get past the storied franchises like the Lakers,
>Boston and, thanks to Jordan, the Bulls, the Sixers are right
>there with any franchise.

STOP. You should never be mentioned in the same breath as the Lakers or Celtics. You're not even in the category of the San Antonio Spurs. Fucking Suxxers fans...
>
>You fucking morons can look down on the Clippers.
>
>WHO are these HOF'ers? Frazier, Thurmond I already named and
>you know goddamn well those guys don't count. That's like
>calling Namath a Rams great or Unitas a Chargers legend. Who
>else ya got? Fucking no one. You don't even know the history
>of your team and worse yet you cannot read it an inch from
>your eyes. Which comes as NO surprise.

They Hall of Fame and count. CRY YOU HERMAPHRODITE MORON.
>
>
>Oh, and you're talking 9-73? LOL, one season 40 years ago. You
>guys have 15 games twice, I can remember LESS than ten years
>ago you were actually courting our record, lol, although you
>made it to a might 17-win total with a brief streak.
>
>LAST YEAR you won 19 games. LAST YEAR.

Once again, how does a squad ONLY WIN 9 GAMES?

HOW?
HOW?
HOW?

9-73 Cocksucker deal with it.

>
>Do you know how fucking dumb you look carrying on this
>argument? Walking down the fucking street? God I wish Radin
>took your stupid ass with him!

You look like an even bigger idiot popping shit like your team is best franchise in the history of the league. You lost the second you started popping shit about the Cavs as a FUCKING SIXERS FAN. Constantly hating on other franchises when we all know you're not shit. I love shitting on such a horrible fanbase.


























































U MAD?














































BE MAD AT 9-73.

BE MAD AT YOUR CONSTANT STATUS AS FUCKING LOSERS.

Very poor showing by Kira, here.

MANY times.

Did I put us in the same breath as the Lakers and Celtics? That's one tier, Bulls behind them. Then sure, San Antonio probably after that. Then you have a mess of franchises with pretty good histories (Sixers, Knicks, Rockets, etc) and then you have the average teams, then you have the below average teams, then you have Slovenian league dynasties, then you have shitty teams and then you have the CAVS.

Did you blow a vein typing that response and sprain an ankle dodging all those points?

You and the Cavs were made for each other, bunch of weirdos whose trophy case consists of Larry Nance's athletic supporter and all your extra chromosomes.

>MANY times.
>
>Did I put us in the same breath as the Lakers and Celtics?
>That's one tier, Bulls behind them. Then sure, San Antonio
>probably after that. Then you have a mess of franchises with
>pretty good histories (Sixers, Knicks, Rockets, etc) and then
>you have the average teams, then you have the below average
>teams, then you have Slovenian league dynasties, then you have
>shitty teams and then you have the CAVS.

Your frranchise nowhere NEAR the level of excellence you're proclaiming. NOWHERE NEAR IT. So stop it with the feigned sense of superiority. 9-73 as well as history are on my side. But don't let that stop you from claiming championships won before niggas had voting rights.

>
>Did you blow a vein typing that response and sprain an ankle
>dodging all those points?

Nope, I'm chilling. My franchise is in a better long-term position than yours. We're also not a fanbase of mouthbreathing haters quick to jump on the misfortunes of others.

>
>You and the Cavs were made for each other, bunch of weirdos
>whose trophy case consists of Larry Nance's athletic supporter
>and all your extra chromosomes.

This is some pot meets kettle shit right here. Y'all niggas threw batteries at Santa Claus and booed Destiny's Child.Once again you're claiming pre-integration chips won under another team's name. Niggas jackin off to black and white highlight reels from the last time they were relevant and using that to elevate themselves to a fallevel of greatness.











































U MAD?




























HOLLA AT 9-73 FAM

Answer me this, top ten NBA franchises, Sixers there? If not, give me ten. Cavs there? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Iverson era was like the third or fourth best ever and it was as good as the LBJ era basically (went to second round three times, Finals once). We considered it a mitigated failure, not a banner-hanging occasion.

Black and white LMAO, have you ever heard of Julius Erving? More recent and much better than some fluky trip the conference Finals that was the best moment in your history for years running.

There's nothing wrong with booing a drunk ass Santa, a bitch ass Kobe or some fake ass R&B singers. I wish I could throw batteries at your bitch ass.

Convenient how you went from "WE GOT HALL OF FAMERS" to "_____________"

As silent as the Cavs championship parades lmao. I know half your family has given Austin Carr some bobblehead, but that doesn't mean anything to the rest of the world.

>Answer me this, top ten NBA franchises, Sixers there? If
>not, give me ten. Cavs there? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>
>There's nothing wrong with booing a drunk ass Santa, a bitch
>ass Kobe or some fake ass R&B singers. I wish I could throw
>batteries at your bitch ass.

Yes, there is something wrong with that. Most people refer to it as "classless" However, you'd know a thing or two about that...

>Convenient how you went from "WE GOT HALL OF FAMERS" to
>"_____________"
>

The Cavs do have hall of famers. That's irrefutable. I don't have to keep bringing it up. Once again you checked the wiki so you know this.

>As silent as the Cavs championship parades lmao. I know half
>your family has given Austin Carr some bobblehead, but that
>doesn't mean anything to the rest of the world.

Enjoy those pre-integration championships won by other teams. The Suxxers aren't in my top 10 franchises. You were one of the philly fans slobbing Lebron's babies when he played for the Cavs. I guess Philly fans need something to distract them from their FUCKING HISTORICAL MEDIOCRITY. Awwww, the poor philly fan is crying himself to sleep with AI's dusty ass headband that functions as collector's item for niggas that wear Jean shorts.

Now you're telling me about "class" after ripping apart a stadium RECENTLY after a meaningless loss to the Jags or some bullshit? About "faded glory" when your "team" (or some reincarnation of it) is riding success from leagues people consider unfamiliar abbreviations? Jim Brown must be spinnin' in his grave (c) Charles Barkley.

I notice you failed to offer a top ten, just like you failed to say who these Cavs hall of famers were. Convenient.

WHO ARE THEY? Wayne Embry? You're riding that? Lenny Wilkens on one of his 85 head coaching stops? You are full of shit and too fucking ignorant of your own shitty team's shitty history. Take a look, it was a depressing read. People probably have it open every time there is a suicide in Cleveland, but the cops are too dumb to figure it out since there are so many reasons to kill yourself in your lovely city.


>Enjoy those pre-integration championships won by other teams.

You're just as ignorant of American history, I guess, another dude with no knowledge or sense of self. 1967, 1983, that's after integration. Is NEVER before or after the Voting Rights Act? I always have trouble finding those successful Cavs seasons on a calendar, I wonder why.


>The Suxxers aren't in my top 10 franchises.

OK so name ten better. Pussy.

You were one of
>the philly fans slobbing Lebron's babies when he played for
>the Cavs. I guess Philly fans need something to distract them
>from their FUCKING HISTORICAL MEDIOCRITY. Awwww, the poor
>philly fan is crying himself to sleep with AI's dusty ass
>headband that functions as collector's item for niggas that
>wear Jean shorts.

LeBron is a great player who wrote the entire history of your franchise as a footnote to his career. If he were drafted by a real team with respectable ownership and fans, he'd already have a ring or three.

>Now you're telling me about "class" after ripping apart a
>stadium RECENTLY after a meaningless loss to the Jags or some
>bullshit? About "faded glory" when your "team" (or some
>reincarnation of it) is riding success from leagues people
>consider unfamiliar abbreviations? Jim Brown must be spinnin'
>in his grave (c) Charles Barkley.

Jim Brown is better than the Eagles entire history. You REALLY don't want to talk football trust me.

>
>I notice you failed to offer a top ten, just like you failed
>to say who these Cavs hall of famers were. Convenient.

Once again you saw the wiki page. There's no need to state facts that you already know. As for the top 10. I gave you one that consisted of not the Sixers.

>
>WHO ARE THEY? Wayne Embry? You're riding that? Lenny Wilkens
>on one of his 85 head coaching stops? You are full of shit and
>too fucking ignorant of your own shitty team's shitty history.
>Take a look, it was a depressing read. People probably have it
>open every time there is a suicide in Cleveland, but the cops
>are too dumb to figure it out since there are so many reasons
>to kill yourself in your lovely city.

You talk about as if it's a utopia. Honestly, both fucking suck. But you look extra foolish pulling rank when we all know Philly fucking sucks.

>
>
>>Enjoy those pre-integration championships won by other
>teams.
>
>You're just as ignorant of American history, I guess, another
>dude with no knowledge or sense of self. 1967, 1983, that's
>after integration. Is NEVER before or after the Voting Rights
>Act? I always have trouble finding those successful Cavs
>seasons on a calendar, I wonder why.

You mentioned three chios. One of those was won under a different name before niggas had voting rights. My point stands and you are the idiot for jot recognizing it.

>
>>The Suxxers aren't in my top 10 franchises.
>
>OK so name ten better. Pussy.
>
>You were one of
>>the philly fans slobbing Lebron's babies when he played for
>>the Cavs. I guess Philly fans need something to distract
>them
>>from their FUCKING HISTORICAL MEDIOCRITY. Awwww, the poor
>>philly fan is crying himself to sleep with AI's dusty ass
>>headband that functions as collector's item for niggas that
>>wear Jean shorts.
>
>LeBron is a great player who wrote the entire history of your
>franchise as a footnote to his career. If he were drafted by a
>real team with respectable ownership and fans, he'd already
>have a ring or three.
>
>

The Sixers aren't a real franchise so fall back. Lebron is better than your entire franchise: LOL at Philly being a real franchise. The Suxxers did a GREAT JOB surrounding AI with talent. You typed the single dumbest most hypocritical statement ever typed in OKS history. Shavlik Randolph was a monster. Chris Webber was the piece AI needed to get over the hump... OH WAIT.

There's only aThe few GMs who could pull off Pat Riley's move. That's more revisonist history on your point.

Wonderful, have fun living for a bunch of last-place teams in a last place city.

I just got done watching two teams from Philly advance in the playoffs, how was your spring?

>Wonderful, have fun living for a bunch of last-place teams in
>a last place city.

If the Eagles played in the AFC North they'd win 4 games a year tops. *Picks off argument like it's a pass from Michael Vick*

>I just got done watching two teams from Philly advance in the
>playoffs, how was your spring?

I'm proud my team is entering its second year of a rebuilding phase not stuck in situation where we're not nearly at the level of elite teams but can't obtain draft picks to get there.Fortunately, all fanbases cannot be AS FUCKING MISERABLE as Philadelphia's.

Have a productive night.

Cmon dude I could have used a laugh.

Go re-read everything you typed about the supposed greatness of the Suxxers, the mystique of Philadelphia as well as rank among US cities.

While you're using the search button check for Lebron. Check for all the times Philly fans dickrode him because their franchise was and arguably still is in the shitter.

Oh and before I go, just remember your shitty basketball team isn't shit. It never was and will be a stepping stone for the rest of the league. It's not on the level of any of the great franchises. You can't even talk shit to Knicks fans. That's no shot to Knicks fans. The Mavs son you. AI is out the league and his legacy is tarnished due in part to the inability of Philly's front office to surround him with talent. A real GM would've surrounded him with talent to make consistent runs at a chip. Kobe's better and you haters are all mad.

I'm not going to get into HOW FUCKING HORRIBLE your football franchise is. NOPE I gotta save that for tomorrow.

*wishes you the best as you jackoff to vintage AI highlights on youtube*

YES! Keep them coming! First the NFC (the traditionally dominant league) is some inferior feeder for the AFC and now the Mavs have a prouder history than the Sixers! And the Cavs have hall of famers that you are mysteriously incapable of naming. Dude, seriously, I was going to watch Delirious but now I will save it for another night.

Knicks have same number of titles as us, fewer HOF'ers, fewer finals appearances and I mentioned them specifically as a team with a fairly similar history to the Sixers ... Mavs were essentially a joke until the Cuban era, as crappy as the Cavs I'd dare say.

The best part about this is that you're losing sleep over it. I'm working, getting paid for my thoughts on sports in a much earlier time zone. You're sitting there shook staying up all night writing fan fiction about me and fabrications about NBA history.

Awesome.

>YES! Keep them coming! First the NFC (the traditionally
>dominant league) is some inferior feeder for the AFC and now
>the Mavs have a prouder history than the Sixers! And the Cavs
>have hall of famers that you are mysteriously incapable of
>naming. Dude, seriously, I was going to watch Delirious but
>now I will save it for another night.

You're the typical Philly fan reaching for some mythological status to hold your head high. You need something to entertain you when your basketball team has little hope for the future. If the Eagles played in AFC North they might win six games at most a year if that. You know who these hall of famers are so me repeating a known fact makes you look stupid.
>
>Knicks have same number of titles as us, fewer HOF'ers, fewer
>finals appearances and I mentioned them specifically as a team
>with a fairly similar history to the Sixers ... Mavs were
>essentially a joke until the Cuban era, as crappy as the Cavs
>I'd dare say.

The Knicks are better sorry. Keep reaching this is great! You'll tell me that the Celtics aren't better than you next.

>The best part about this is that you're losing sleep over it.
>I'm working, getting paid for my thoughts on sports in a much
>earlier time zone. You're sitting there shook staying up all
>night writing fan fiction about me and fabrications about NBA
>history.
>
>Awesome.

You don't live an earlier time zone. I'm getting paper on the side. Keep elevating your franchise to some mythological level that few franchises can reach and basking in the glow of AI's legacy. The rest of us are laughing at you.
>
>

You have to love that one, how about the Nuggets? Milwaukee Bucks? Bobcats? Cmon dude you are starting to repeat yourself, you need NEW absurdly stupid things to make us laugh at you or this will run out of steam quickly.

>You have to love that one, how about the Nuggets? Milwaukee
>Bucks? Bobcats? Cmon dude you are starting to repeat yourself,
>you need NEW absurdly stupid things to make us laugh at you or
>this will run out of steam quickly.

You're the idiot. Your keyboard's about to break from the speed at which you're furiously responding to my points. None of which you can refute.









































































































































U MAD?






























It feels great to ether you and your shitty franchise.

Cavs, fewer wins, fewer winning seasons, fewer playoff appearances, fewer hall of famers (ZERO), fewer all star, fewer all-nba selections, fewer MVPs, fewer titles, fewer scoring champions, FEWER EVERYTHING except brain dead clowns like you in the fucking seats.

You can say the same thing for the OVERWHELMING majority of NBA franchises vis-a-vis the Sixers. They are somewhere between five and eight all-time among NBA franchises with all kinds of history. The Cavs history fits on a condom wrapper, the kind that's small enough to fit you.

The "fact" that a team that wins division titles consistently in the NFC could not "compete" in the "vaunted" AFC North with sandbag squads like the Bengals and sorry ass Browns who are living off glory that only sedated World War II veterans remember?

Please, keep droppin' science!

>Cavs, fewer wins, fewer winning seasons, fewer playoff
>appearances, fewer hall of famers (ZERO), fewer all star,
>fewer all-nba selections, fewer MVPs, fewer titles, fewer
>scoring champions, FEWER EVERYTHING except brain dead clowns
>like you in the fucking seats.

Suxxxers: 9-73, reaching all for accomplishments, consistently low wins across seasons, taking credit for championships won by other franchises, dickriding other franchises in order to gain some semblance of glory because Philly doesn't have a winning culture.
>
>You can say the same thing for the OVERWHELMING majority of
>NBA franchises vis-a-vis the Sixers. They are somewhere
>between five and eight all-time among NBA franchises with all
>kinds of history. The Cavs history fits on a condom wrapper,
>the kind that's small enough to fit you.

And the Suxxers history is filled greatness? GTFOHWTBS. EVERYONE KNOWS YOUR FRANCHISE AIN'T SHIT NOW AND FOREVER.

>The "fact" that a team that wins division titles consistently
>in the NFC could not "compete" in the "vaunted" AFC North with
>sandbag squads like the Bengals and sorry ass Browns who are
>living off glory that only sedated World War II veterans
>remember?

1st off football's different from basketball. Therefore, past chips count. You REALLY don't want to talk football. There are no sandbag squads in the AFC North. The current Bengals could make just as many Championship games as your squad in the down years of the Skins, Cowboys and periodically Giants. This is no shot at any of those fanbases because they are storied and great.

I'm in awe that AN EAGLES FAN is trying to talk shit to me. THE FUCKING EAGLES?!!!

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Holla at the trophy case.


























































































I'm just speaking tha truth!
































BE MAD

I don't think OE even does that shit anymore yet you rockin it like its that new Hilfiger sweater vest.

>>Cavs, fewer wins, fewer winning seasons, fewer playoff
>>appearances, fewer hall of famers (ZERO), fewer all star,
>>fewer all-nba selections, fewer MVPs, fewer titles, fewer
>>scoring champions, FEWER EVERYTHING except brain dead clowns
>>like you in the fucking seats.
>
>Suxxxers: 9-73, reaching all for accomplishments, consistently
>low wins across seasons, taking credit for championships won
>by other franchises, dickriding other franchises in order to
>gain some semblance of glory because Philly doesn't have a
>winning culture.
>>
>>You can say the same thing for the OVERWHELMING majority of
>>NBA franchises vis-a-vis the Sixers. They are somewhere
>>between five and eight all-time among NBA franchises with
>all
>>kinds of history. The Cavs history fits on a condom wrapper,
>>the kind that's small enough to fit you.
>
>And the Suxxers history is filled greatness? GTFOHWTBS.
>EVERYONE KNOWS YOUR FRANCHISE AIN'T SHIT NOW AND FOREVER.
>
>>The "fact" that a team that wins division titles
>consistently
>>in the NFC could not "compete" in the "vaunted" AFC North
>with
>>sandbag squads like the Bengals and sorry ass Browns who are
>>living off glory that only sedated World War II veterans
>>remember?
>
>1st off football's different from basketball. Therefore, past
>chips count. You REALLY don't want to talk football. There are
>no sandbag squads in the AFC North. The current Bengals could
>make just as many Championship games as your squad in the down
>years of the Skins, Cowboys and periodically Giants. This is
>no shot at any of those fanbases because they are storied and
>great.
>
>I'm in awe that AN EAGLES FAN is trying to talk shit to me.
>THE FUCKING EAGLES?!!!
>
>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>
>Holla at the trophy case.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>I'm just speaking tha truth!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>BE MAD

>his legacy is tarnished due in part to the inability of
>Philly's front office to surround him with talent. A real GM
>would've surrounded him with talent to make consistent runs at
>a chip.

I mean, forget about the fact you mofos never won A SINGLE GAME IN THE FINALS out of the lone trip you made up there... that's too easy...

But, you won as many division titles as we won championships.

....

You won as many division titles as our franchise won championships.

Let that sink in.

We won more conference titles then you won DIVISION titles.

Please, we won the conference 11 times, if you wanna narrow it down to our Philly stronghole 9 times. You only won the DIVISION 3 times

3 times you won your DIVISION.

2 of which came from Prince James himself.

You're seriously not fucking serious with ranking your franchise up there with us right? Give me a history where we had a shitty 9 win season yet more hall of famers who played for us in their primes then you have all-stars.

Your Cavs history outside of Lebron is a injury riddled all-star tandum of Brad & Price who at their best became Jordan's victims. This is your history.

I'm sorry, I can't... I won't...

nm

those 15 players played in a combined 31 All Star Games

in contrast, the 76ers have had 14 HALL OF FAMERS, and their 29 all stars played in 99 All Star Games.

The Cavs have won 12 Playoff series in their history (8 of those 12 came in the LeBron era). They've made the finals once, the conference finals 4 times, and have zero titles.

The 76ers (only counting from the 70-71 season when the Cavs came into existence) have won 30 playoff series. They've made the finals five times in that time span, the conference finals 8 times, and won a title.

From their inception to today, the Cavs have a record of 1,561-1,835 for a winning percentage of .460

From the year of the Cavs' inception to today, the 76ers have a record of 1,713-1,683 for a winning percentage of .504

That means a 68-13 season (the third best in league history, at the time the best and would likely be the second best if they had played the full 82) is gone, along with winning seasons between 1965 and 1969. Oh, and they beat Russell's Celtics en route to a championship on a team with HOF'er Wilt Chamberlain, HOF'er Hal Greer, HOF'er Billy Cunningham, HOF coach Alex Hannum, All-Star Chet Walker and All-Star Luke Jackson.

Just the chick/dude fume.

We better than y'all. You referred to the king as a prince when you've dickrode him.


That's how classless and worthless you historical fucking losers are. Oh yeah 9-73. Y'all acting like your franchise is important. NOPE! You're losers reaching for accomplishments.

Oh yeah the Mavs shit on you as a franchise. Let the dogpile continue. I'm not even out of things to slam your franchise for.

>Oh yeah the Mavs shit on you as a franchise. Let the dogpile
>continue. I'm not even out of things to slam your franchise
>for.

Keep this up tho. I'm enjoying it.

.

Your ignorance is bridging gaps, dumbfuck.

than the sixers/nationals. If you only count the Philly years, they'd be in a tie for 5th.

Going by titles, the sixers are tied for 5th with three titles. If you only count the philly years, they'd still be only one of 9 teams in the NBA to win more than one NBA title.

The sixers/nats have made the playoffs 47 times, 3rd most behind the lakers and celtics. Just the philly years, they've made it 33 times, good for 5th place all time.

The Cavs have made the playoffs 18 times, which ranks 21st in the league. The only team in the league that has been around for as long as the Cavs and has fewer playoff appearances is the Clippers.

The sixers' all time winning percentage in the regular season is 7th best all time, while the Cavs' is 22nd best.

but please continue

>Proceed with caution. I am overtly racist.


_______________________________
Killer Mike - R.A.P. Music
L.E.P. Bogus Boys - Now Or Neva
Jadakiss/DJ Drama - The Consignment

when I posted about it, and said that I'm concerned for her safety, Aquaman said I was racist.

Something about how I wouldn't be concerned for her safety if the school wasn't 80% minority students.... nevermind the fact that I was concerned for her safety because an actual person got actually stabbed inside the actual building.

So I just co-opted it and put it in my sig.

nm

Thanks for saving me the typing.

.

PARADE RAINING SPECIALIST IN THE HOUSE!

People are betting logins now?

.

Why take away someone's crack?

and dying inside.

God damn, I've never seen Concrete Charlie snap like that. That dude released a Hiroshima!

Just a Sixers playoff W?

Regardless, this has the potential to be the first login bet someone actually follows through on.

From what I recall, the bet was made (obviously) post-LeBron leaving but pre-drafting of Irving.

the best was he started trying to goad me into taking the same bet after they'd already made it, meanwhile I offered to bet him any dollar amount of his choice on the same thing.

He couldn't quite seem to grasp that a) I ain't putting a log-in on the line even in jest anymore after 2003's RMJr bullshit & b) it wouldn't make any sense for me to take on a bet that chuck already assumed the risk on anyway.

He was never a very sharp poster though to begin with, which is why the passing of the proverbial torch to kira in here feels oddly appropriate.

two lotto picks, was after the davis trade.

i can't remember if it was before or right after the draft lotto, like if we knew they had Nos. 1 and 4 yet.

matters not!

this got fun.

-----------
It's only funny till someone gets mad. Then it's hilarious.

during those lebron years. He never wanted to listen though. Well, he was a faggot.

and you looked much much worse than radin in that regard ...

I can't wait until your faggot fan base hypes up the annual September Heisman winner for the 3rd year in a row.

And as much as I see people throwing around the word retard/retarded on this board, you all need to relax about the word "faggot"


_______________________________
Killer Mike - R.A.P. Music
L.E.P. Bogus Boys - Now Or Neva
Jadakiss/DJ Drama - The Consignment

>And as much as I see people throwing around the word
>retard/retarded on this board, you all need to relax about the
>word "faggot"

maybe

you're retarded.

people who say retarded derogatorily choose to be idiots.

And at least "retarded" is used in a context that somewhat comports with it's literal meaning ("generalized disorder characterized by significantly impaired cognitive functioning").

Using "gay" in a context that has nothing to do with homosexuality has nothing to do with the underlying meaning of the word itself and is offensive. Using "faggot" at all is inexcusable hate language that doesn't have an appropriate place in our society. Whether it's in public or hiding behind your computer acting like an Internet thug.

I'm not saying using "retarded" is non-offensive -- but it's relatively less so. I cringe when I catch myself saying it (obviously not when clearly in jest as I did above).

is a losing race for all parties.

retarded and faggot are both offensive terms. needing a qualifier to explain usage is a poor defense for either (esp. one as banal as "in jest" -- many people use that same excuse when saying faggot, as well).

the internet is better off without either noun, regardless of where it falls on your personal spectrum of offensiveness.

i used "retarded" pointedly after the word was brought up by someone else. also, there is a clear and explicit difference between using a word in a context that comports with its literal meaning and using a word for its purely derogatory connotation. maybe a distinction without moral consequence, but a pretty important difference in my opinion.

overall, i agree with your general point.

as for the rest, nice try.

a long-running explanation for using faggot is as a joking term of endearment. not unlike the word motherfucker.

I'm sorry you assumed I meant to make a point about you (I've not been above using either term myself), I just don't believe there are many nuances to either word. debating their offensiveness level is usually insipid ("well, faggot is less offensive than gook" / "jew is not derogatory!") and best avoided.

and despite what the dictionary says, we both know that retard is not used in the same way as stupid or dumb -- it specifically evokes a comic image of mentally disabled people. been that way since kickball was invented.

then why not use stupid or dumb instead and avoid the problem with no loss of meaning?

-----------
It's only funny till someone gets mad. Then it's hilarious.

but if you cant distinguish one person saying to another, "shut up, you are retarded" vs. "shut up you faggot" then i give up.

both are offensive, but in my opinion the latter is coded hate language. i'm not sure that's the case with the former.

it was not the worst choice of words ever. awesome job!

-----------
It's only funny till someone gets mad. Then it's hilarious.

if you still don't understand, PM me and I can try to phrase it in language you might understand.

you defended the use of the term "retarded" because it is not as damaging as the "coded" meaning as "faggot."

bottomline, you should have just shut the fuck up and taken the L on using retarded to tell people not to say faggot.

not only would I debate that basic claim (hint: both are dehumanizing a category of people. there's not much difference and like this started, the 100 m of bigotry is a stupid race to enter), but it doesn't matter: YOU SHOULD NEVER HAVE USED THE WORD "retarded" AND YOU SAID SO.

so why you continue to make some dumbfuckery of an argument in here about it is likely linked to the reality that many lawyers are obnoxious, condescending shits and law school's implicit definition of intellect is last word standing. maybe you're not one of those lawyer types, but you sure are typing like one right now.

are they both offensive terms? yes. does any arguable nuanced difference between the use of two matter? not nearly as much as the fact that they're both offensive terms.

-----------
It's only funny till someone gets mad. Then it's hilarious.

>you defended the use of the term "retarded" because it is not
>as damaging as the "coded" meaning as "faggot."

i didn't "defend" its use. i pointed out what in my opinion is an essential distinction between the use of the word "retarded" and "faggot"

>bottomline, you should have just shut the fuck up and taken
>the L on using retarded to tell people not to say faggot.

if you couldn't tell that was an obvious, blatant joke then i might as well give up now because we won't be able to level on any common ground. might not have been as funny as louis c.k. dropping "faggot" in his defense of gay marriage routine, but the intent was clear in my opinion.

>not only would I debate that basic claim (hint: both are
>dehumanizing a category of people. there's not much difference
>and like this started, the 100 m of bigotry is a stupid race
>to enter), but it doesn't matter: YOU SHOULD NEVER HAVE USED
>THE WORD "retarded" AND YOU SAID SO.

i admit both are dehumanizing. battery is a crime and so is homicide. there is a spectrum. whether there is a moral distinction between the two is a personal viewpoint. i also conceded that the use of "retard"/"retarded" is wrong AND that i often catch myself still saying it and cringe when i do. it's something i'm working on rooting out, which isn't something some posters on here can say.

>so why you continue to make some dumbfuckery of an argument in
>here about it is likely linked to the reality that many
>lawyers are obnoxious, condescending shits and law school's
>implicit definition of intellect is last word standing. maybe
>you're not one of those lawyer types, but you sure are typing
>like one right now.

nice ad hominem bro. "last word standing" isn't the "definition of intellect" at my law school. regardless, i'm not going to be a litigator, so i have no idea how this applies to me. try to stay on point and not regress into fallacious logic.

>are they both offensive terms? yes. does any arguable nuanced
>difference between the use of two matter? not nearly as much
>as the fact that they're both offensive terms.

i think this is a personal opinion. i probably shouldn't have been so matter-of-fact about it above. but according to your logic, the "n-word" and "retard" are on a level playing field in terms of magnitude of hate (that is assuming you accept the academic consensus of sexual orientation as a genetic characteristic/predisposition)

>It's only funny till someone gets mad. Then it's hilarious.

i guess this conversation has become hilarious, no?

heh.

>i didn't "defend" its use. i pointed out what in my opinion is
>an essential distinction between the use of the word
>"retarded" and "faggot"

making a distinction is response to someone calling you out for using it = defending. FOH with that plea. you shoulda just copped to a bad joke and kept it moving.

>if you couldn't tell that was an obvious, blatant joke then i
>might as well give up now because we won't be able to level on
>any common ground. might not have been as funny as louis c.k.
>dropping "faggot" in his defense of gay marriage routine, but
>the intent was clear in my opinion.

oh, the joke defense. nice. that's always good ground to stand on, right? the bottomline is, neither terms have any justification for being used on a message board. point blank, period. doesn't matter which is awful and which is godawful, neither should be used and claiming humor to justify its use is fucking dumb as shit (notice how I didn't need to use that word to say that?)

>i admit both are dehumanizing. battery is a crime and so is
>homicide. there is a spectrum. whether there is a moral
>distinction between the two is a personal viewpoint.

heh, lawyer talking lawyer for no reason. why u mad?

>conceded that the use of "retard"/"retarded" is wrong AND that
>i often catch myself still saying it and cringe when i do.
>it's something i'm working on rooting out, which isn't
>something some posters on here can say.

and yet you used it in a (terrible) joke on this board and caught feeling for getting called out for said joke. so no, you aren't doing a good job rooting it out.

>nice ad hominem bro. "last word standing" isn't the
>"definition of intellect" at my law school. regardless, i'm
>not going to be a litigator, so i have no idea how this
>applies to me. try to stay on point and not regress into
>fallacious logic.

it was a good ad hominem. lawyers suck. u mad?

>
>>are they both offensive terms? yes. does any arguable
>nuanced
>>difference between the use of two matter? not nearly as much
>>as the fact that they're both offensive terms.
>
>i think this is a personal opinion. i probably shouldn't have
>been so matter-of-fact about it above. but according to your
>logic, the "n-word" and "retard" are on a level playing field
>in terms of magnitude of hate (that is assuming you accept the
>academic consensus of sexual orientation as a genetic
>characteristic/predisposition)

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA. and before you were saying my logic failed? Words may have different levels of offensiveness, but that's irrelevant to the discussion. the flow chart is simple: Is the word offensive? If no, use. If yes, DON'T USE IT. all that levels of offensiveness stuff is what will first pointed out as unnecessary--this is a categorical issue, not a spectrum issue. If a word fits into the category of "offensive" do not use. not even in a bad joke. mad?

>i guess this conversation has become hilarious, no?

it's been hilarious. you've just made it funny enough to convince me to join. good work.

-----------
It's only funny till someone gets mad. Then it's hilarious.

This whole "argument" (I feel dirty even calling it that because it's been a one-sided drubbing) began with someone comparing "retarded" to "faggot" which is a silly comparison in my opinion and one that robs the special vitriol and hate that has become intertwined with the f-word. Its parallel to someone dropping the n-word and someone casually responding that using "retarded" is just as bigoted.

Yeah anyone can dumb an argument down/ oversimplify an argument like you did, but that misses the entire point of the discussion. I guess this isn't the forum for debating complex issues because, as you just demonstrated, everything gets distilled to "u mad."

*shrug*.

Sure ok, take your kantian flow chart of good words and bad words -- we can only hope the rest of society follows suit.

I think it's pretty clear what happened here. You didn't read what I wrote, jumped the gun, made some gross generalizations, got called out on it, and had to resort to petty argumentation and the usual "u mad" defense mechanism.

I'm sorry you weren't sharp enough to catch the intent (or non-intent) of my earlier post. Maybe next time I'll put (joke) after to make it easier for you.

The offer still stands if you want me to spell it out for you further via PM, but I'm done here.

>This whole "argument" (I feel dirty even calling it that
>because it's been a one-sided drubbing) began with someone
>comparing "retarded" to "faggot" which is a silly comparison
>in my opinion and one that robs the special vitriol and hate
>that has become intertwined with the f-word. Its parallel to
>someone dropping the n-word and someone casually responding
>that using "retarded" is just as bigoted.

this is like the offensive words version of goodwin's law. you really want to say the n-word, don't you? guru's point probably could have been made with more "nuance" but he's not wrong--people use both words on this board ridiculously frequently. u using it in a joke in response doesn't help with that at all.

>Yeah anyone can dumb an argument down/ oversimplify an
>argument like you did,

ooo...can i call that ad hominem? feels pretty ad hominem. lol.

>discussion. I guess this isn't the forum for debating complex
>issues because, as you just demonstrated, everything gets
>distilled to "u mad."

which u really are. and lol @ starting this "debate" of "complex issues" with a joke and now getting all condescending (sidenote: IT ISN'T COMPLEX. DON'T USE THOSE WORDS. IT'S QUITE F*CKING SIMPLE, ACTUALLY). Want to play the smart people credential game (hint: I'll win).

>Sure ok, take your kantian flow chart of good words and bad
>words -- we can only hope the rest of society follows suit.

indeed. I hope you will be not using either word on here. that's how you get people to follow--you lead.

>I think it's pretty clear what happened here. You didn't read
>what I wrote, jumped the gun, made some gross generalizations,
>got called out on it, and had to resort to petty argumentation
>and the usual "u mad" defense mechanism.

yes, that's it. Or, you made a bad joke, no one found it funny. people pointed out that your defense of that joke was pretty awful and you caught feelings and i enjoyed making fun of you.

others can decide which interpretation is more realistic. there is no objective reality, only subjective. now i'm getting postmodern. ooooo.

>I'm sorry you weren't sharp enough to catch the intent (or
>non-intent) of my earlier post. Maybe next time I'll put
>(joke) after to make it easier for you.

maybe next time YOU SHOULDN'T HAVE MADE THAT JOKE.

>The offer still stands if you want me to spell it out for you
>further via PM, but I'm done here.

hahahaha. in what world is that not you being scared to keep this going. you can do whatever the fuck you want, but this isn't deep to me and anything you write will not justify the use of any offensive term or mitigate that.

but why u mad?
-----------
It's only funny till someone gets mad. Then it's hilarious.

.

You were the only person who pointed out that my defense as a joke "was awful" ... Not "people"... Just you. Will retracted, which you would have surmised if you READ the above posts. Its apparent though that reading comprehension is something you struggle with.

And thank you for making my point and proving I won by stating guru could have made his point more nuanced. That's my entire point. This is a complex issue with nuances that he and you have been oversimplifying. So with that, thanks. Lol. You didnt have to waste all that breath when a simple "cosign" on my original post would have been sufficient.


Btw lol at u turning into a sniveling 7 year old and resorting to "I have more smart person credentials than you!". True intellectuals don't have to say that. Their words speak for them. And yours spoke volumes.

And, you probably don't*********

I rest my case.


********* THIS IS A JOKE/SARCASM

>Btw lol at u turning into a sniveling 7 year old and resorting
>to "I have more smart person credentials than you!".


_______________________________
Killer Mike - R.A.P. Music
L.E.P. Bogus Boys - Now Or Neva
Jadakiss/DJ Drama - The Consignment

i love this thread.
>You were the only person who pointed out that my defense as a
>joke "was awful" ... Not "people"... Just you. Will retracted,

oh word, where? he said the internet is better without either word. never retracted that. gimme a quote in which he retracts his point.

>which you would have surmised if you READ the above posts. Its
>apparent though that reading comprehension is something you
>struggle with.

hey look, it's the guy who got mad at ad hominem attacks MAKING ONE! just like the guy who says we shouldn't use offensive terms on the internet using one. you, sir, have proven to be a hypocrite.

>And thank you for making my point and proving I won by stating
>guru could have made his point more nuanced.

damn, then you should have just said that and apologized for making that point in an inappropriate way. that'd have deaded this before you looked like a moron.

>point. This is a complex issue with nuances that he and you
>have been oversimplifying.

again, no--it's not complicated. neither word is appropriate for use. that's NOT COMPLEX.

>didnt have to waste all that breath when a simple "cosign" on
>my original post would have been sufficient.

but see, i don't cosign your post and i never will.

>Btw lol at u turning into a sniveling 7 year old and resorting
>to "I have more smart person credentials than you!". True
>intellectuals don't have to say that. Their words speak for
>them. And yours spoke volumes.

says the guy who started dismissing this entire board as a place where you can't have smart conversation. sorry, you pulled the "i'm too smart for this" card first. no use backing out later.

>********* THIS IS A JOKE/SARCASM

once again, your attempts at humor have failed miserably. stop posting like this.

and shit, honestly, if you REALLY wanted to PM me, you coulda. so that's whatever.

-----------
It's only funny till someone gets mad. Then it's hilarious.

i had a whole scathing response typed up in here but the bottom line is we are not conversing on the same wave-length right now. i'd rather concede defeat and at least retain some semblance of legitimacy to our discourse so that it can even educate/be helpful to even one person on this message board. ultimately, we both agree that both words are inappropriate and shouldn't be used.


i agree with your argument, but you are stuck on the fact that i used "retarded" above and think for some reason i'm backpedaling or defending it as a "joke" after the fact. if you really look at the context in which i used it i think you'll see what i mean. guru specifically put "retarded" and "faggot" on the same level and i fundamentally believe that -- WHILE BOTH ARE OFFENSIVE -- such a comparison minimizes the unique hate aspects inherent in "faggot" that (in my opinion) are not embedded in "retarded." so i said such a comparison was "retarded" as an absurdist statement to emphasize the irrationality of the comparison. maybe it was a poor attempt at humor, but i stand by the intent.

anyways, at least you're a decent guy on the internet and opposed to using both words instead of someone who just spews offensive and hate-filled language. so i don't want to waste time having a bitchfest with you. in the end, we are just arguing entirely different concepts so it's all good. it's the nature of the medium (message boards, you'll agree, are probably not the ideal debate format).



btw, when i said "retracted" i should have said "clarified" (see will's statement beginning with "I'm sorry..."). i was just trying to point out no one else thought my "joke defense" was "awful."

edit, not even worth a serious rebuttal to that lame duck logic you applied.

you're as bigoted as the rest of us supposedly are. accept it.




_______________________________
Killer Mike - R.A.P. Music
L.E.P. Bogus Boys - Now Or Neva
Jadakiss/DJ Drama - The Consignment

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

I'd much rather sit back and laugh at your dumb ass reasoning.

I'm still laughing @ sexual preference/orientation not being a choice.

http://www.apa.org/helpcenter/sexual-orientation.aspx

http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/113/6/1827.full

http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/pdf/Submission%20to%20the%20Church%20of%20England.pdf


LOL just LOL @ your uninformed, back-asswards way of thinking. Also LOL @ you once again engaging in an ad hominem attack instead of engaging in any coherent semblance of an argument.

nm

and lol @ me being mad...

on the contrary, you're going to be mad after I mercilessly clown your once upon a time storied (edit, storied in a second tier middle of the pack sorta way) program relentlessly as it crashes and burns this year.

hold on tight Chuckie!



_______________________________
Killer Mike - R.A.P. Music
L.E.P. Bogus Boys - Now Or Neva
Jadakiss/DJ Drama - The Consignment

I haven't said a word about college football since the end of the season and that was your response to a post with a title only.

Pussy. It makes you feel better. Try it.

and you chimed in with your inane "you mad" comment

>I haven't said a word about college football since the end of
>the season

Gee I wonder why.

and that was your response to a post with a title
>only.

I'm chomping at the bit for some CFB banter. Unfortunately for you, being a Ped State fan/supporter has completely nullified any trash talking opportunity for you to engage in, so I can see why you'd jump into this.







_______________________________
Killer Mike - R.A.P. Music
L.E.P. Bogus Boys - Now Or Neva
Jadakiss/DJ Drama - The Consignment

like we were Columbus tattoo artists

We hire a future hall of fame coach to replace the hall of fame coach we lost..

You hire Brady Hoke to replace the bum before him, lol


_______________________________
Killer Mike - R.A.P. Music
L.E.P. Bogus Boys - Now Or Neva
Jadakiss/DJ Drama - The Consignment

We'll see what he's made of this season.


_______________________________
Killer Mike - R.A.P. Music
L.E.P. Bogus Boys - Now Or Neva
Jadakiss/DJ Drama - The Consignment

pertaining to Ann Arbor

After Nick Saban picks his teeth with wolverine bones, you'll be lucky to finish the season with less than 4 losses.

I'm willing put some $$ on that too, just not my log-in.


_______________________________
Killer Mike - R.A.P. Music
L.E.P. Bogus Boys - Now Or Neva
Jadakiss/DJ Drama - The Consignment

Brutus

After last year, beating the brakes off michigan in the Shoe will be more fulfilling than a Rose Bowl.


_______________________________
Killer Mike - R.A.P. Music
L.E.P. Bogus Boys - Now Or Neva
Jadakiss/DJ Drama - The Consignment

_______________________________
Killer Mike - R.A.P. Music
L.E.P. Bogus Boys - Now Or Neva
Jadakiss/DJ Drama - The Consignment

too...Look at your boy now.

and 'Nard sonned yall. You just a bitch with your period on.

>too...Look at your boy now.
>
>and 'Nard sonned yall. You just a bitch with your period on.

he's now 1-1 and will finish his career 1-2 vs big brother,

Dude will leave UM a loser, just like Henne and Tate "Street Smart" Forcier before him.

Better hope he can return kicks @ the next level.

_______________________________
Killer Mike - R.A.P. Music
L.E.P. Bogus Boys - Now Or Neva
Jadakiss/DJ Drama - The Consignment

But he won. Keep the excuses coming, please. Im enjoying this

>But he won. Keep the excuses coming, please. Im enjoying

You won. Congrats. Bragging on last year's win is like me bragging about the wins during the Dick Rod era. TOSU fans here know that isn't worth crowing about (but it sure was fun to clown) given the status of your raggedy ass football program during that time.

Things will get back to normal this year though, and all will be right in the (CFB) world.

_______________________________
Killer Mike - R.A.P. Music
L.E.P. Bogus Boys - Now Or Neva
Jadakiss/DJ Drama - The Consignment

_______________________________
Killer Mike - R.A.P. Music
L.E.P. Bogus Boys - Now Or Neva
Jadakiss/DJ Drama - The Consignment

booking the cavs as ring winners from 07-10? Word? Who mad? You mad.

but you thinking some bum ass QB from a family of bum ass QBs was better than Pryor will always be funny, and clown worthy.
_______________________________
Killer Mike - R.A.P. Music
L.E.P. Bogus Boys - Now Or Neva
Jadakiss/DJ Drama - The Consignment

Wanna know where lil man Tate is?

"On January 9, 2012, Forcier withdrew from the San Jose State football program. Although he was expected to be the starting quarterback for the 2012 Spartans, academics played a role in his leaving the program"



_______________________________
Killer Mike - R.A.P. Music
L.E.P. Bogus Boys - Now Or Neva
Jadakiss/DJ Drama - The Consignment

trying to have a Ryan Mallet agenda...just stop it.

<--- ...watch out Mountain West?

no longer lives in Cleveland either.

I mean if you went to Philadelphia in the 80s or even the early 90s, it was really fucking dumpy. It has improved considerably.

Cmon man I've been to every city in North America with a sports team. There are WAY dumpier cities with WAY less to do.

pay it no mind.

didn't know he was a dustbowl head ass nigga too

nm

is in ATL.

goddam, philly is winning--even as i hate some of its recent developments on the urban planning tip (GODDAMIT FIX THE MOTHERFUCKING DIVINE LORRAINE), but whatever. he can stay hating, i'll stay enjoying it being the most affordable big city in the country.

-----------
It's only funny till someone gets mad. Then it's hilarious.

this got even more fun.

-----------
It's only funny till someone gets mad. Then it's hilarious.

this has to be turned into the RANDOM MAD THREAD because there is far too much in here for one login bet to sustain.

you're mad and can't take it? step in here and pick a fight.

This really doesn't differ much from my job where at any second 10 or more guys could be beating the shit out of each other a few inches from my face.

i'll pass.

http://i49.tinypic.com/678niv.jpg

_____________________
<---- At least we have this

..and they all decided to go all out in this poast

wtf just happened?

...shit has the capacity of exceeding sports period

We are just a spark on the gasoline lake away from having a violent race/gender/religion/computer OS/Late Night Talk Show/phone/Puppies vs Kittens war up in here.

-------
"..i was born a free man. nobody beat me accept i beat them right back..."

..and miles to go before i sleep...