>Exactly, to the University. Not to Jim Tressel. If they deemed
>that what he did was a fireable offense, they would have fired
>him IMO. No one down played anything. They treated it like a
>major violation once they were aware, they informed the NCAA
>and proceeded. Jim Tressel tried to cover it up, and he'll pay
>the consequences (along with TOSU to an extent,
>unfortunately).

They down played it. When asked if Gee would fire Tressel, Gee said "No. Are you kidding me? I just hope the coach doesn't dismiss me." What kind of BS is that? That was Gee's attempt to down play the situation. Jim Tressel is part of the University, he is a very notable figure and face of the university, thus it is in their best interest to protect him. Especially since they have decided to retain him as their HC.

I agree that journalist aren't the ones who decide whether Tressel is fired or not but it is their job to at least ask the question. It is their job to discuss and debate whether the punishment fits the crime. Nothing wrong with that.

I am sorry but IMO a major violation calls for more than a 2 game suspension and 250K fine. As mentioned by Will, look what happened to Pearl when he was caught lying.