>>that first case being a set up. Even people who
>investigated
>>it...going in with the idea that Mike was guilty, came out
>>saying that he was innocent and extorted.
>>
>>My point is that if you aren't seeing this dealt with at all
>>on the mainstream (with the exception of Geraldo Rivera) how
>>can you say Mike is getting softball treatment from the
>>press??
>
>I thought the '94 GQ article does a better job of articulating
>the first case than this fake recant but basically we're on
>the same side of the MJ thing, because unlike some of the
>truly deluded cats in the Lesson I saw you acknowledging his
>clearly flawed/drug-addled behavior while not altogether
>condemning the dude or discrediting the legacy he left
>behind.

People on drugs do weird shit...lol. That's just how life is. When the real story comes out about the shit Mike was on, and how he was getting it..and from whom....a lot of this other shit is going to make more sense. This man was taken advantage of in a major way..on a very large scale.