>>Driver had 1000+ receiving and Jennings had like 12tds in
>>'07
>>
>The QB actually listening to his coach and playing within the
>scheme of the offense had a little something to do with that.
>Stands to reason he might be able to do something resembling
>that to some degree if he's fully recovered from that
>surgery.
>
>It's certainly not a lock but a coin-flip chance of 2007 Favre
>is better than a guaranteed deficiency.
>

if it works, i'll be happy for the Vikes cuz i like the Vikes. i just couldn't have drawn up a screwier set of characters, moves and rationales to meet the stated goal of 'steadying the offense'.

>>my basic point: even if Favre plays poorly (a 50-50
>>proposition), he's going to be the QB this year for more
>than
>>half of the games (assuming health). they can still win
>games
>>with the run & defense, but i'll be damned if they couldn't
>do
>>that with the guys they already have...
>>
>if healthy is he better than the two bums they have? the
>answer is yes.
>

i don't think he'll be better than Sage outdoors this winter.

>>i refuse to believe that the Ghost of Brett Favre Past will
>>cast a fearsome shadow over the Norris for a full season,
>let
>>alone playoffs. if anything, cats are gonna line up to
>drill
>>this bama like they did Jordan on his last go at it.
>>
>That's different from '07 or '08 how?
>

'07 was actually Favre, the Greeen Bay HOF'er
'08 foreshadows what's going down in '09, 'cept this time its in the division the Ghost of Favre played in...

>>IMO they slobbered over the wrong old-ass qb (if you take
>'em
>>at their word that they were in the market for a caretaking
>>game manager); Jeff Garcia must've stabbed one of Chilly's
>>kids back in philly.
>>
>Jeff Garcia is done.

you might be right. favre might be done too- he's said it himself, and the team went out of their way to beg him to test it NOT in training camp, but on the 2009 season. helluva gamble- should've rolled the dice on Cutler if they truly believed their QBs suck that badly...