Maybe to your eyes. But to mine the Spurs didn't do too great a job of stopping Nash-to-Amare at the end of Game 4 when Phoenix fought back to retake home court.

And this is how you know the suspension were unfair- no neutral observer, not even any Spurs fan in their right mind and certainly none of the players or Pop, would have tried to claim the Spurs were being jobbed if Diaw and Amare hadn't been suspended. Think about what that means.

And then people try to use the fact the Phoenix almost won Game 5 without Diaw or Amare as evidence that the Spurs were better?!

Maybe to your eyes the Spurs were "easily the best team in the league." But we still don't know if they could have beaten a full-strength Suns team in a 7game series...and isn't finding out who wins, even when some observers think it's obvious to "anyone with 2 eyes" who is the better team, the reason they PLAY THE FUCKING GAMES in the first place?