>it's a terrible rule, it really is, but it wasn't
>misinterpreted. i think they were told to call everything by
>the book before this game and so they did, for fear of the job
>more or less. so basically its a good call on a bad rule, and
>i'm surprised this rule hasn't been changed yet. i knew they
>wouldnt change it right away after the season cuz that would
>be admitting that they were wrong. and its actually gotten
>even worse since, now they have to call it on things like that
>rookie throwing the ball down after he was down, but not by
>contact. ruled an incomplete forward pass, lol.
>
>do i think they got lucky? absolutely. do i think it
>completely negates the fact that they won the super bowl that
>year, as you suggested earlier in the post? no, thats fucking
>ridiculous.

Even according to the rule it was a bullshit call. His arm is in forward motion, then OBVIOUSLY changes motion as he pulls it into his body. Any sane, rational, clear-minded observer can see his throwing motion had been terminated. His arm was coming IN to his body, NOT moving forward. It's idiotic to suggest otherwise. IDIOTIC. The rule was MISINTERPRETED, so miss me with that "bad rule, right call" bullshit the NFL and Pats fans feed us to pretend like that whole post-season was in any way legit.

IT'S A FUCKING LIE, AND THE MOST BULLSHIT SPORTS CALL I'VE SEEN IN MY ENTIRE LIFE*.



*(minus the Hand of God goal and the 5th Down)