And its true that he doesn't have the WRs that other QBs have which he's compared to. That's THA TRUTH. We're not talking about defenses or team success with that statement because he's won without the top WRs. It was just a thought on what he could do with great WRs in addition to what he already has. What's so bad about that? Because when you compare him to past great QBs like Montana, they had a lot of weapons on offense in addition to their great defenses. But what you seem to ignore are the great defenses that EVERY great or good QB who has won a superbowl has had.