>You can kid yourself into thinking Shaq is missing Kobe. If
>Miami loses, it won't be because Shaq didn't have Kobe.

lol okay.


*edit* you know what, i typed all these rebuttals to your points

but then i realized....that's a waste of time.

this is really all that matters:

1. dallas is the better team.

2. if it was shaq and kobe, it'd be different.

3. therefore...miami will lose.


kobe doesn't need shaq to succeed. he just needs a better team. just like shaq doesn't need kobe to succeed, he just needs another great player. but he does need kobe to win it all. it's been proven. he's been there twice without him, and will lose twice.

whether kobe needs shaq to win it all is yet to be seen. he hasn't even gotten good players around him to take to the finals TO SEE IF HE CAN WIN YET! Shaq has had good players with him his entire career...he got the help to get to the finals... he didnt win.... end of story.

2 years with trash around him, and he's supposed to win a championship?! or else "he's proven he needs shaq" and "can't win without him?!" lmao. that's ridiculous. i mean, he might as well retire right now then lol. what's the use of playing.


• Okay Sports Rookie of the Year
___________________________________________
http://www.blacksportsonline.com/images/kobe80.jpg