>couple of days without you smearing my name
>
>c'mon fam, you better than that (I hope)
>
>what I said, and follow me here, I'm going to type it out
>
>read slowly, I'm tired of re-explaining it
>
>EFFICIENCY will be his legacy
>
>if you PROJECT his career
>
>he has A CHANCE at being
>
>#1 in points, all-time
>top 10 in assists, all-time
>and top 20 in rebounds, all-time
>
>add those up, and it equates to the most efficient player of
>all time.
>
>in the era of analytics and stat geeks

No, it equates to the biggest stat stuffer of all time. Jordan's efficiency stats are actually better with a higher PER and WS/48 than lebron. And bron's efficiency #'s will only continue to decline going forward.


>
>that will be their case for Bron and GOAT (+ all the hardware,
>you are aware he's won about every award possible at this
>point in his career, including rings)
>
>in case you aren't, here's what he's done at 30 Y.O.:
>
>2× NBA Champion (2012–2013)
>2× NBA Finals MVP (2012–2013)
>4× NBA Most Valuable Player (2009–2010, 2012–2013)
>11× NBA All-Star (2005–2015)
>2× NBA All-Star Game MVP (2006, 2008)
>9× All-NBA First Team (2006, 2008–2015)
>2× All-NBA Second Team (2005, 2007)
>5× NBA All-Defensive First Team (2009–2013)
>NBA Rookie of the Year (2004)
>NBA scoring champion (2008)
>
>yes, rings may not be his legacy*
>
>rings are Bill Russell's legacy, for NBA history
>
>rings are MJ's legacy, in the modern era, based on his
>incredible runs

Rings AND numbers + hardware are MJ's legacy. Or are you forgetting that he won a record 10 scoring titles, 5 MVPs, DPOY, and has the highest career scoring average in NBA history?

>
>given that Bron will probably not execute 2 3-peats in his
>career
>
>or win 11 chips
>
>and I'll go out on a limb here and say NO ONE WILL
>
>that will always give MJ the edge based on JUST rings <---
>that's HIS legacy

No. His legacy is the totality of all his accomplishments (some briefly mentioned above.) the rings are his trump card.

>
>now if we consider a player in his 11th season, playing in his
>6th finals
>
>I think it's safe to say he gets some more chips
>
>how many...IDK
>
>*but there is a possibility that he does end up with 6
>
>an outside chance, but still a chance
>
>so if he does retire ranked all-time in those stats I listed
>
>the question is
>
>not how many does he win
>
>but how many does he need + the stats to be GOAT?

Yeah, that's not what you said.


>BYE!

Bye, liar.