>>>nicely for me.
>>>
>>>Just know that you're the only muhfucka in the universe who
>>>thinks this team, as currently constructed, has a shot at a
>>>championship once Kobe starts passing the ball the minute
>>kobe
>>>starts passing the ball night in and night out, regardless
>>of
>>>the outcome.
>>
>>Did you ignore me talk about rebuilding???
>
>Then why are you worried about what the fuck this team learns
>after one fucking game? this team is not going to win anything
>without better talent. you're really playing yourself.
>

I don't give a fuck about this game. Pretend it didn't happen. I'm not talking about this game. I've told you that already. You'd have figured that out on your own if you were an intelligent person.


>>I'm all for Kobe playing within the offense when
>>>the team is obviously playing well around him and I have
>>been
>>>very vocal early on in the season when Kobe's game actually
>>>inhibited the good flow of the offense. With that said,
>last
>>>night was not one of those nights and this team as a whole
>>has
>>>not shown the consistency to be able to exclusively rely on
>>>the triangle night in and night out. So you can pretend the
>>>celtics are just growing as a team by getting their asses
>>>handed to them all you want. With this team, I'll take a
>win
>>>anyway I can get it.
>>
>>A win is just keeping you from getting better draft picks in
>>the long run.
>
>Because this year should be all about learning and losing to
>get a lottery pick. hahha shut theee fuck up. Well you go
>ahead let your celtics learn with no regards for winning. In
>the meantime, the lakers have 95% of their roster full of
>players on two year guaranteed contracts and don't plan on
>resigning any of them. They're not winning a ring in the next
>two years, learning or no learning. If we end up getting
>artest, then we can go back to scrutinizing how well the
>offense is or isn't flowing.

So you're saying the window is TWO YEARS?