>A transsexual person needn't change their biological make-up
>in order for their identity to be acceptable. We want to be
>accepting of transsexuals who are fine with 'passing' as well.
> Also, according to your criteria....it was only legitimate to
>be a transsexual AFTER our technology allowed for biological
>transition.

Transwomen still have no uterus, no ovaries, no cervix, and no eggs. They still don't have periods and god forbid they stop taking their hormones and start showing tell-tale signs of being biologically male (i.e. facial hair, changes in musculature, fat redistribution, etc).

Transmen have similar issues, Technology still can't give them a functional dick, balls, or prostate which means no semen or sperm and no fucking her right in the pussy. Also, if for some reason they're without their hormones for a period of time they will begin to show signs of being biologically female (i.e. loss of facial hair, changes in musculature, and fat redistribution).

Bottom line, technology only allows for a more convincing level of passing, but make no mistake: It's still just passing.


---------------------------

"Where was the peace when we were getting shot? Where's the peace when we were getting laid out?
Where is the peace when we are in the back of ambulances? Where is the peace then?
They don't want to call for peace then.