if anything he's saying that this pope was a fraud before this meeting and that guy had already identified such. which doesn't support your contention that the clandestine meeting w/KD caused ppl to shift their thinking and decry everything the pope has said in recent months where the ppl had previously lauded the pope.

>You are making a distinction that really doesn't make a
>difference.

you are using that phrase incorrectly. i'm not sure you know what it means.