>>What kind of church amasses wealth
>
>ask your boy Creflo $$$
^ The exact same type of "church" which is what I'm getting at. Both the Church of Creflo and the Vatican are equally corrupt in that they amass gross amounts of wealth and do not distribute or utilize said wealth to care for the poor, widowed, and orphaned (to say the least) which is exactly what they should be doing with it.


>>and holds secret and
>>mysterious rituals?
>
>Mormons?
^ just as wrong (not sure how your bringing a religion with heavily racist undertones into the conversation helps your point)


>Prays to statues and the dead for
>>miracles?
>
>Lutherans?
^ Also just as wrong (if in fact they do this)

(you do know that these branches are all interconnected? -- I want to say since the first council of Nicaea)

>>Read a history book or two chief?
>
>This from the guy who thinks a book of mythology is historical
>fact?

A mythological book containing records of historically accurate kingdoms and rulers would be a little closer to the truth, however your opinion about words you don't believe is pretty much irrelevant.

>> Maybe even know a
>>little something about what you're trying to defend(?) which
>I
>>think is what you're doing. Not sure.
>
>That's the thing - you don't actually know what you are
>talking about. I'm sure you think you do, but you have an
>extreme case of confirmation bias where you only see what
>you want to see to fit your preconceived notions. I'm just
>pointing out the fallacies of your arguments.

But you haven't really done that -- at least not by pointing out non Christian practices as practiced by other entities which may or may not be christian themselves. So again I'm not sure what you're getting at. Other than saying "hey these religions/churches that also don't adhere to what's written in a book of mythology are doing it wrong too" which I could have told you and saved you some typing.