>I didn't say that and that's not the context. The context is
>would a white (or other non black or perhaps non latino child)
>act out in such a way that would get the situation to that
>level? The answer is "yes" the debate is with what degree of
>regularity.

this doesn't matter. the comparison has no room in this conversation.

>>why look at it like that?
>
>Looking at it like that (in the context I outlined) is an
>attempt by me to illustrate what I believe is a need for our
>children to be taught survival strategies as the nature of
>life in this country will always come at them in a way similar
>to the way this officer did. They need to learn how to avoid
>this particular type of scenario which is and was entirely
>possible (had that knowledge been there). The officer and
>teacher are too far gone to be reached the student can still
>be taught. Got to get them while they're young.

survival strategies??

she's in school. a 'safe place'. there is no survival strategy for a child being in a classroom. that institution needs to be held fully accountable.

the officer and teacher are too far gone? that thinking needs to be reversed. and the situation needs to be fixed.

those people don't need to be neither an officer nor a teacher.

get it?