>http://www.intercollegiatereview.com/index.php/2014/05/07/heinlein-hugos-and-hogwash/
>
>Of course its worth noting the audience there. But objectively
>speaking it is a good counter argument.

I admittedly posted this only halfway through, right before he started really going over the cliff. The last paragraph basically sums it up though:

"The lunatic Left planned and struggled for years, decades, to achieve their cultural influence. Let us imitate their perseverance, and retake our lost home one mind, one institution, at a time. Start by praying."

The absurdity of that is hillarious, but to a point I wonder. It would seem there is no middle ground. If either side is ahead in 'influence' the other must be brought down. So then there comes the question is either side objectively right, and can the other be made to see that. Hmmmmmm.

At any rate having finished it was nice to see there have been some nice detractors to that piece:

https://fozmeadows.wordpress.com/2014/05/07/silence-is-not-synonymous-with-uproar-a-response-to-john-c-wright/

http://thisblogisaploy.blogspot.com/2014/05/the-loudest-sound-in-world-is-bigot.html


█▆▇▅▇█▇▆▄▁▃
Big PEMFin H & z's
"I ain't no entertainer, and ain't trying to be one. I am 1 thing, a musician." � Miles

"When the music stops he falls back in the abyss."