>There's nothing that anyone else says or does that has any
>bearing on whether or not you choose to discuss anything in
>good faith.
>
>That's a choice you make for yourself.
>
>Meanwhile, in your own thread, which you created under the
>guise of sincere concern for those who aren't you.
>
>When those who aren't you expressed in good faith negative
>feedback for the tone deaf nature of your post?
>
>You made the choice to abandon the stance where you're
>terrified for those who aren't you be abandoning any semblance
>of good faith in favor of sarcasm and condescension.
>
>The second your Concerned White Ally prose was rejected by
>Those Who Aren't You, you lost every ounce of that concern.
>
>And now, when pressed on that dramatic shift in demeanor?
>
>You said... "you expect good faith arguments here?", as
>though nobody here is capable of good faith arguments, as
>though any argument that rejected your initial premise
>couldn't possibly be made in good faith.
>
>All of this strongly suggests that your initial expression of
>"terror for those who aren't you" was feigned.
>
>You chose to take your own supposedly sincere initial premise,
>and devolve it to smug, garden variety message board snark,
>all because your Deeply Concerned, Rich White Guy Ally
>presentation wasn't welcome by all with open arms.
>
>The sum of your words in this one thread is a microcosm of
>white fragility, white savior complex, white superiority,
>white liberal racism, and a host of other things, and you
>doubly down on that with each successive reply. This is
>underscored by the fact that you have no interest in changing
>that perception with clarifying statements.
>