212564, Dayum. 100. Posted by Brew, Tue Oct-27-20 09:24 PM
https://imgur.com/a/HpUV6
>RE: "This thread" is your thread, and you decide if you argue in good faith >There's nothing that anyone else says or does that has any >bearing on whether or not you choose to discuss anything in >good faith. > >That's a choice you make for yourself. > >Meanwhile, in your own thread, which you created under the >guise of sincere concern for those who aren't you. > >When those who aren't you expressed in good faith negative >feedback for the tone deaf nature of your post? > >You made the choice to abandon the stance where you're >terrified for those who aren't you be abandoning any semblance >of good faith in favor of sarcasm and condescension. > >The second your Concerned White Ally prose was rejected by >Those Who Aren't You, you lost every ounce of that concern. > >And now, when pressed on that dramatic shift in demeanor? > >You said... "you expect good faith arguments here?", as >though nobody here is capable of good faith arguments, as >though any argument that rejected your initial premise >couldn't possibly be made in good faith. > >All of this strongly suggests that your initial expression of >"terror for those who aren't you" was feigned. > >You chose to take your own supposedly sincere initial premise, >and devolve it to smug, garden variety message board snark, >all because your Deeply Concerned, Rich White Guy Ally >presentation wasn't welcome by all with open arms. > >The sum of your words in this one thread is a microcosm of >white fragility, white savior complex, white superiority, >white liberal racism, and a host of other things, and you >doubly down on that with each successive reply. This is >underscored by the fact that you have no interest in changing >that perception with clarifying statements. >
|