>
>as it is beyonce holds a title that has no current value, she
>reigns because there are no options. who else is there? she
>also reigns because of a serious lowering of standards in a
>generation of lazy, simpleton standard novelty ring tones.
>yonce ain't even mariahs heir, or whitneys heir. i mean..
>halo? replaceable? if i were a boy? these songs are so
>mundane, cliche and void of imagination i can't even pencil
>her in as the next toni braxton. how the fuck is she the next
>MIKE? a once in a lifetime artist?