>i think she would describe what you just wrote as an 'argument
>by intimidation'

I'm not trying to argue that you're wrong for liking her, or that it indicates your immaturity. It's just an observation that has been made by many people (including former acolytes) that her philosophies tend to appeal to the romantic youth but that they later grow out of it.

Even her some of her fiercely loyal pupils like Allan Greenspan had to eventually admit that maybe some of her ideas don't really work in the real world.