>>This is the reason that next Xbox needs the Tegra 8. The
>Tegra
>>3 looks better than a PSP. Smartphones caught up graphically
>>on the high end. It's going to take a lot to convince the
>>consumer to shell out $700 for a console and games.
>
>No integrated chip can compete with a dedicated GPU. Yeah, it
>may look fancy in tech demos, but real world applications?
>LOL. It's why on the PC we are decades into the tech and it
>still sucks compared to $50 dollar discounted GPU's.
>Cellphone's are like at BEST 5 year's behind...notice you said
>PSP and not Vita. And still the frame rates you get on them
>suck...you're lucky to see shit in 30fps. (and we won't get
>into the dumbed down gameplay)

This is somewhat true but Microsoft needs its' integrated chip to be two years ahead of whatever PC card comes out this year.
>
>>Then again anything is a step up graphically for a 360 owner
>>after the debacle that was early 360 games.
>
>Still pushing the 360=PS2 and PS3=dah God nonsense? Id argue
>that graphically this is the closet generation graphically
>we've had between the leaders ever. The ports are
>indistinguishable, and the exclusives (Uncharted 3 vs Halo 4
>for instance) have the same high quality.
>

Final Fantasy 13 defecates on your statement as do a few other games released in that same window. If I was trolling like Wally I'd post a bunch of links from crap sources which prove my point. But I'm not so I'll K.I.M. I just hope Kaz demos the PS4 Madden and talks about the football having more RAM than their system.