>for one, rockstar has BEEN saying for months what the game
>was gonna be like
>
>and the other thing is...if you want *that* game, play
>GTA...this is SUPPOSED to be a different type of game, but set
>in an open world

They BEEN touting a faithfully recreated L.A. to roam and explore, and the level of interactivity with the city itself is the lowest of any of their open world games.

And that's what you expect from a R* game.

For the record, I said that I liked the game. I don't expect just a 1940's GTA. I like the fact that they are making you think.

But people are fulla shit if they said they expected a linear game with NO real side quests/extras.

You trying to tell me, you bought an open world R* game and didn't expect any side quests beyond just looking for landmarks? Or that they couldn't have thrown in some side plot/minigame AT ALL for you to play?

Nah B.

Storytelling - great.
Atmosphere - great.
Immersiveness - great.
Huge, huge city with no interactivity so far other than police boxes and landmarks? - they could've done better.

______________________________________________________________________________

"There's a fine line between persistence and foolishness..."
-unknown

"To Each His Reach"
-George Clinton