please baby no more tanking in la.

https://twitter.com/PerSources14/status/727903835914686464

Rumor via B/R: Lakers interested in trading top 3 draft pick for Indiana Pacers' Paul George. WHAT!


http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2637876-paul-george-trade-rumors-latest-news-speculation-surrounding-pacers-star

Lakers Eye Trade for George to Jump-Start Rebuilding Process

Bill Simmons of The Ringer reported Wednesday the Lakers and the Boston Celtics are both looking to parlay lottery selections into a star player or two this offseason. Simmons noted the Lakers will attempt to build a major package around their top-three pick for George.

It seems unlikely the Pacers would even consider offers for the 26-year-old star. He's coming off a strong bounce-back campaign after missing most of the 2014-15 season and remains under contract with Indiana through 2018-19, according to Spotrac.

That said, it's no surprise the Lakers are shooting for the moon as they look to acquire a new face of the franchise following the retirement of Kobe Bryant. Acquiring a player like George in his prime is far more attractive than using their lottery pick and hoping the prospect pans out over time.

Furthermore, it's an even more intriguing link when you consider the comments made by Toronto Raptors head coach Dwane Casey after his team eliminated the Pacers in Round 1. He came away impressed with how favorable George compares to the longtime Lakers superstar, per Nick Friedell of ESPN.com:

Unbelievable. I tell you what, I remember trying to prepare for a young . And this young man reminds me of trying to prepare for a young back in the Laker days, like I was back in Seattle. ... I think he's back and I'm happy for him. Now that we're finished with him, I'm happy for him because he's a super young man. He represents everything basketball should be about. And he's back to his ... All-Star form.

Los Angeles' roster features several promising pieces in the likes of Jordan Clarkson, D'Angelo Russell and Julius Randle. But the team is going to need somebody to lead the offensive charge on a nightly basis in order to return to playoff contention.

George could be that player should the Pacers even consider entertaining offers. Candace Buckner of the Indianapolis Star passed along George's comments after the series loss to Toronto about becoming more comfortable in a leadership role this season:

I play this game the only way I know how to play; to play hard and leave everything on the floor. The last thing I want to say is, 'I didn't give it enough, played without the heart.'

Unfortunately, it wasn't enough in this series, but it's a lot to take away from it. It's the first year as being a prime leader and I can only build off of that.

He could fill the same void with the Lakers. Of course, the idea becoming reality is a long shot after he averaged 23.1 points, 7.0 rebounds and 4.1 assists in his first full season after a leg injury caused him to miss most of the 2014-15 campaign.

George represents exactly the type of player the Lakers need, which is why the rumors will probably send shock waves throughout the fanbase. But, in a league where star power is vital to success, it's hard to imagine the Pacers moving him in a deal where the main chip is a draft pick.

The Celtics have been trying to trade the draft picks for stars for years and most people expect the Lakers to try to acquire stars to win now rather than build around Russell and Randle. Is that news?

Can I break the news that every team in the league is going to want to sign Kevin Durant?

The Pacers are likely dumping Vogel as their coach; it's not so they can start over from scratch.

----
NBA MOCK DRAFT #1 - https://thecourierclass.com/whole-shebang/2017/5/18/2017-nba-mock-draft-1-just-lotto-and-lotta-trades

>The Celtics have been trying to trade the draft picks for
>stars for years and most people expect the Lakers to try to
>acquire stars to win now rather than build around Russell and
>Randle. Is that news?
>
>Can I break the news that every team in the league is going to
>want to sign Kevin Durant?
>
>The Pacers are likely dumping Vogel as their coach; it's not
>so they can start over from scratch.

So they're going to swindle the pacers for George, sign durant and get westbrook next year because LA. Voila! Instant re-build.

By July, reality will set in tho.


----------------------------
Same as it ever was!

24/7 news cycle, so much drivel

---------------------------------
<--The drought is over

"have fun reveling in your pettiness tho" (C) Dula summing up 98% of OKS

"I didnt finish a damn thing...matter of fact I jerked off after she left."
-Kobe speaking to investigators

L D E A

Sounds about right.

But we both know you're playing a character.

Lolz

---------------------------------
<--The drought is over

"have fun reveling in your pettiness tho" (C) Dula summing up 98% of OKS

"I didnt finish a damn thing...matter of fact I jerked off after she left."
-Kobe speaking to investigators

L D E A

>Lolz

But he didn't get that chance, did he?

His contract had a team option. A better option was a available.

Byron deserved a shot next year more for putting up with the circus on both sides of the personnel ball than for any of his actual coaching and there are plenty of justifiable reasons not to stay the course with him. I’d have understood them giving him a shot but I also understand passing on his option. It’s a coin flip…. Except for the fact that the hottest head coaching prospect in at least five years was available. It made more sense to snag Luke before someone else did.

Much as you and a few others want to scream “nepotism” at the top of your lungs, Luke was getting a head coaching gig from someone this year and if you don’t think the Rockets, Kings, Knicks, Indiana, or any other team with a coaching vacancy this offseason would have come calling for his services, you’re an idiot.

EVERY TEAM WITH A VACANCY WOULD HAVE HIRED HIM. Without exception. The Lakers made the same choice pretty much every other team would have made. There’s a reason the interview went long and they canceled on an older guy from the best managed team in the last decade to hire Luke.

Byron deserved a shot to coach this team without the Kobe circus…. But not at the expense of better options. Luke is a better option for several reasons, none of which you’ll accept because you’re more interested in your dumbass agendas and doubling down on this race baiting troll character you’ve invested far too heavily in. You’re the equivalent to a hard line political talking head at this point.

That was his last GOOD team with actual competitive
talent.

And he was FIRED WHILE HIS TEAM WAS IN FIRST FUCKING
PLACE!!!!

http://espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=1718853

So why hasn't he received an opportunity to coach
another GOOD team?

Oh, *Insert some bullshit excuse about his IQ not being
as high as D'Antoni*

It's the same bullshit every coaching cycle.

>Byron deserved a shot next year more for putting up with the
>circus on both sides of the personnel ball than for any of his
>actual coaching and there are plenty of justifiable reasons
>not to stay the course with him.

Like? I want a real reason. One you'd apply to every coach.

Give me a reason that was HIS FAULT and was CLEARLY demonstrative
of a guy you didn't think deserved the chance.

I’d have understood them
>giving him a shot but I also understand passing on his option.
>It’s a coin flip….

Except for the fact that the hottest
>head coaching prospect in at least five years was available.

LMAO

This shit here.


>Byron deserved a shot to coach this team without the Kobe
>circus…. But not at the expense of better options. Luke is a
>better option for several reasons, none of which you’ll
>accept because you’re more interested in your dumbass
>agendas and doubling down on this race baiting troll character
>you’ve invested far too heavily in. You’re the equivalent
>to a hard line political talking head at this point.
>


----------------------------



O_E: "Acts like an asshole and posts with imperial disdain"




"I ORBITs the solar system, listenin..."

(C)Keith Murray, "

Once AgendaBot gains sentience and is able to properly understand the circumstances of the subject he's questioning, there's no way to converse with AgendaBot as it can only converse in two tones.

Apology accepted, hoe



----------------------------



O_E: "Acts like an asshole and posts with imperial disdain"




"I ORBITs the solar system, listenin..."

(C)Keith Murray, "

Note the way you ignore d specific contextual elements of this situation in favor of broader philosophical questions.

>Note the way you ignore d specific contextual elements of
>this situation in favor of broader philosophical questions.

Bwhaha

You always go "there's context"


----------------------------



O_E: "Acts like an asshole and posts with imperial disdain"




"I ORBITs the solar system, listenin..."

(C)Keith Murray, "

.

Yowzers

----------------------------



O_E: "Acts like an asshole and posts with imperial disdain"




"I ORBITs the solar system, listenin..."

(C)Keith Murray, "

But we both know how much you love to present things out of context, AgendaBot.

go on....

shit, did i even capitalize anything?

OMG OMG OMGZ

not you who took a post about LA trading its top pick and throwing sandusky shots over a meh analogy.

-----------
you think we playing chess, but i'm playing mad-making. Basaglia

-----------
you think we playing chess, but i'm playing mad-making. Basaglia

Instead of three more variants of this lame ass "please respond again" schtick.

----------------------------



O_E: "Acts like an asshole and posts with imperial disdain"




"I ORBITs the solar system, listenin..."

(C)Keith Murray, "

... basically infer that Kidd was the driving force behind that firing, not cuz of 'cism.

2003:
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/18/sports/sports-of-the-times-kidd-may-have-misused-his-clout.html

2013:
http://www.netsdaily.com/2013/12/4/5176916/jay-williams-jason-kidd-lawrence-frank-nets-interview-friction

2015:
http://www.ocregister.com/articles/scott-650270-kidd-coach.html


Also, did you read your own link? You point to them being in "FIRST FUCKING PLACE!!!" but that "first place" was in the shitty Atlantic Division during a time of shitty Eastern Conference teams. The second place Atlantic team was Boston at 22-24. The Nets were fifth overall in the conference with a 22-20 record. So "first place in the shitty Atlantic" is technically accurate, but it's not something to be proudly shouting to the rooftops about.

In any case, an underachieving team coupled with a star player who's far more protected than the coach, led to Scott's firing. With Kidd on the warpath, there is no coach that could have survived those circumstances.

Sometimes the reasons for these things are more nuanced than the agenda.

I didn't say he was FIRED because of 'Cism.

I'm saying he hasn't been given ANY CHANCES TO
WIN AT ALL SINCE.

A HORRID Cavs team and a TANKING Lakers team.

And he doesn't ever get a chance to develop some talent?

THAT is racism.


----------------------------



O_E: "Acts like an asshole and posts with imperial disdain"




"I ORBITs the solar system, listenin..."

(C)Keith Murray, "

He brought the Hornets to the second seed of the playoffs in his third year and lost to the defending champs. It was the following year they underachieved, got the 7th seed then got BLOWN OUT against the Nuggets:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_NBA_Playoffs#.282.29_Denver_Nuggets_vs._.287.29_New_Orleans_Hornets

They won game 3 by two points, then lost the other four games by an AVERAGE of over thirty points, including a FIFTY EIGHT point loss at home in game 4 (worst margin in NBA history). They started the next season slowly, then got fired after starting 3-6. This was the second year into his two-year extension after getting CotY in 2007. This time the star PG (Paul) wanted to keep him around, but you can't blame the front office for wanting to get away from the specter of last season's playoffs.

After the Hornets, he was then chosen to be the Cavs' head coach right before Lebron bounced:

http://www.cleveland.com/ohio-sports-blog/index.ssf/2010/07/cavaliers_byron_scott_agree_to.html

He wasn't picked to be the head of a failed team but rather to help entice Lebron to stay. Thats a ton of (deserved) faith in a guy that's done well but has lost his teams along the way. Massive credit to Byron, he stuck around in their worst years. But he was eventually fired because his defensive efficiency (which he's supposedly known for) was awful:

http://hangtime.blogs.nba.com/2014/07/25/scott-returns-to-l-a-brings-along-sketchy-defensive-history/

And he was hired by the Lakers in part because he's supposed to be the defensive guru (coming off of shitty ass D'antoni). So what happened with the Lakers?

http://www.foxsports.com/nba/story/report-lakers-have-fired-head-coach-byron-scott-042416

"Scott talked a lot about improving things on the defensive end, but he has consistently shown an inability to coach in a way that would achieve the desired results. His teams have finished in the bottom five in the league in defensive efficiency in each of his last five seasons as a head coach (three with the Cavaliers from 2010-13), and his antiquated motivational tactics no longer seem to be a match for today's NBA."

While it's true that he had very young, inexperienced teams, defensive identity is one of those things that a good coach can instill, regardless of personnel. We have not seen that from Byron, five years running now (bottom five in the NBA consistently!).

So, yes, to parrot other Laker fans I would have understood if Byron gets his year. But the confluence of factors (declining his option, hot coach/former Laker available, fresh start top to bottom) was just too much to ignore.

And on top of all that, I don't think Scott's coach style as a hard ass that learned from Pat Riley can be denied (same rep that followed Rambis). Today's millennial players are more likely to respond better to the "player's coach" than the authoritarian that yells at them all the time.

http://www.lakersnation.com/mychal-thompson-warriors-players-believed-in-luke-walton-as-much-as-steve-kerr/2016/04/29/

"Trudell: What did Klay say about Luke?

Thompson: He made the right adjustments, used the right tone as far as speaking with his players and motivating his players. He made the right moves. They believed in him a lot, just as much as Steve Kerr. So the players, they endorsed him. They said, “This guy knows what he’s doing.” He’s a good coach and he’s young, he communicates with young guys, he understands young guys. He will bring a new system here a lot like what the Warriors employ up there."


Again, sometimes the reasons for these things are more nuanced than the agenda.

This dude just spent at least an hour of his morning
looking up random fodder to argue that Byron Scott is
a nigger that doesn't deserve good jobs, all because he's
mad at Orbit_Established.

On the way, this idiot not only outright lies and makes
shit up out of thin air, he ends up proving MY point.

Who else makes you do this?

I mean, I can make love to a sexy woman in an hour. Get in some
'Angry Birds'. Write a poem about the sunshine, or my dick.

Y'all?

And this is what I mean:

I am not bringing agendas. This half-assed attempt to shit
on Byron is an "agenda."

Y'all just aren't smart enough to argue. And so you get mad
and make shit up

>He brought the Hornets to the second seed of the playoffs in
>his third year and lost to the defending champs. It was the
>following year they underachieved, got the 7th seed then got
>BLOWN OUT against the Nuggets:

See, y'all. Right out the gate:

BANG!

Nuggets went to the Western Conference Finals that year, you
imbecile. They blew through the Mavericks 4-1, and And took
the eventual NBA champion LA Lakers to 6 games (MORE than
Eastern Conference champ Orlando did in the NBA FINALS).
They lost to an outstanding team, in a 5-game series.

To put this in perspective, there's a post lauding the
coaching of Stan Van Gundy, who got swept by the Cavs.

So Stan Van Gundy is an excellent coach for leading his
team to getting swept, but Scott is a terrible coach for
leading his to losing in a 5-game series?

These are the racist double standards I'm talking about.

Not to mention the Chris Paul Hornets are some of the greatest
overachievers we've seen in the 2000s...they were an excellent
TEAM, but had very little talent. Paul loved Byron Scott, but
had to leave because he was working with NOTHING.

>They won game 3 by two points, then lost the other four games
>by an AVERAGE of over thirty points, including a FIFTY EIGHT
>point loss at home in game 4 (worst margin in NBA history).
>They started the next season slowly, then got fired after
>starting 3-6. This was the second year into his two-year
>extension after getting CotY in 2007. This time the star PG
>(Paul) wanted to keep him around, but you can't blame the
>front office for wanting to get away from the specter of last
>season's playoffs.

The Chris Paul Hornets are one of the most overachieving
under-talented bunches of the last decade. This is why
Chris Paul had some of the best point guard seasons ever;
they were a good TEAM. Talent for talent, they had nothing.

Paul loved Byron Scott, and for good reason.

>He wasn't picked to be the head of a failed team but rather to
>help entice Lebron to stay.

See how you lie?

a) Lebron was going to do what he was going to do.

b) Lebron LOVED Mike Brown, so keeping Mike Brown would have
been the smartest thing to do.

So no, you're lying. Byron Scott was brought into a failed
situation and was expected to succeed. As was Mike Brown
after him.

That is not an agenda. It is a fact.

Thats a ton of (deserved) faith
>in a guy that's done well but has lost his teams along the
>way. Massive credit to Byron, he stuck around in their worst
>years. But he was eventually fired because his defensive
>efficiency (which he's supposedly known for) was awful:

LMAO "what he's known for."

He's a coach. He was never given a chance to build anything,
never given talent to coach in Cleveland or LA.

>http://hangtime.blogs.nba.com/2014/07/25/scott-returns-to-l-a-brings-along-sketchy-defensive-history/
>
>And he was hired by the Lakers in part because he's supposed
>to be the defensive guru (coming off of shitty ass D'antoni).
>So what happened with the Lakers?

No, you fucking imbecile, he was hired to stabilize a tanking
team with an old bum superstar and young kids who have no
idea WTF they are doing.

And ALL young players improved under him. ALL of them
were peaking by season's end.

BUT they were OPENLY tanking, and he was BLAMED for it.


So you're a stinking liar.


>Again, sometimes the reasons for these things are more nuanced
>than the agenda.

Right, the agenda here is that Byron Scott = Bad coach

You've cut and pasted and tried to talk your out into that
agenda being true, but NUANCES are the ones I'm talking about:

a) Byron took teams to the NBA Finals back to back
b) Byron took an undermanned Hornets team to the playofs
several seasons
c) Byron was given no chance to succeed in Cleveland
d) Byron was asked to stabilize a tanking Lakers team, with
the idea that he'd get a chance to coach and develop the
young guys and potential free agents.

^That is nuance.

You spending your whole morning trying to shit on a black
coach because you don't like Orbit_Sexy = an agenda.

Do better

They were 22-20.

------------------------------

17x NBA Champions

>They were 22-20.

And he's gotten ZERO real opportunities since then


----------------------------



O_E: "Acts like an asshole and posts with imperial disdain"




"I ORBITs the solar system, listenin..."

(C)Keith Murray, "

without a doubt, the worst thing the sports board was ever introduced to.

************************************************************

Firing one guy for tanking in a bad season,
hiring another, and the deciding to actively
improve the roster...that's an "agenda"

I'm simply discussing it, because I'm not a Lemming
the way you are.

----------------------------



O_E: "Acts like an asshole and posts with imperial disdain"




"I ORBITs the solar system, listenin..."

(C)Keith Murray, "

Byron took a team to the NBA Finals

Why shouldn't get the chance to coach a Laker
team that is actually good!?!?

What is your reason?



----------------------------



O_E: "Acts like an asshole and posts with imperial disdain"




"I ORBITs the solar system, listenin..."

(C)Keith Murray, "

This two tone option you've installed in this model makes it impossible to converse with AgendaBot.

Which is generally the case with me.

Byron coached a team to back to back NBA Finals,
was fired while his team was leading his division,
hasn't received a chance to coach a GOOD TEAM
since.

So why wouldn't he get the chance to coach a competitive
Laker team?


----------------------------



O_E: "Acts like an asshole and posts with imperial disdain"




"I ORBITs the solar system, listenin..."

(C)Keith Murray, "

It happens sometimes

----------------------------



O_E: "Acts like an asshole and posts with imperial disdain"




"I ORBITs the solar system, listenin..."

(C)Keith Murray, "

Like I said before, you know people will look at the header.

Nice try.

Yikes

----------------------------



O_E: "Acts like an asshole and posts with imperial disdain"




"I ORBITs the solar system, listenin..."

(C)Keith Murray, "

To me the "so-and-so did a good enough job last year to deserve to coach the team next year" logic is really backward thinking. In fact the people you hear using that logic are the other members of the coaching fraternity, who always close ranks and protect their own, and don't have the best interests of any particular team at heart (apart from the one they happen to be coaching, if employed at that moment). But management's proper obligation is indeed to doing what's in the best interests of their team. Even if the coach did a great job last year, if there's a guy available and gettable whom management has reason to believe would do a better job next year, they should go out and get him.

For example, how long did Scott Brooks "deserve" to keep coaching OKC? The team went from expectedly awful in his first year (22 wins!) to 50 wins (playoffs), to 55 wins (WCF), and then to the Finals (beating a supposedly invincible Spurs team along the way). And Westbrook, Durant, and Harden sure developed under him, if we're using that metric! Yet IMO Brooks should've been fired immediately after those 2012 Finals for failing to bench Kendrick Perkins, because to me Brooks more or less threw that series by refusing to make a blindingly obvious adjustment. He clearly wasn't the coach to take them to the next level.

You should absolutely slam the Sixers and all these organizations who give white coaches more time even after they've demonstrated they don't have what it takes. And you can criticize LA for firing Byron, if you don't believe Luke will do better going forward than Byron would have. But this "earned it" shit is just the wrong paradigm.

>For example, how long did Scott Brooks "deserve" to keep
>coaching OKC? The team went from expectedly awful in his first
>year (22 wins!) to 50 wins (playoffs), to 55 wins (WCF), and
>then to the Finals (beating a supposedly invincible Spurs team
>along the way).

Brooks absolutely DESERVED to coach his superstar players
past their early years and was GIVEN A CHANCE TO WORK AND
DEVELOP HIS TALENT.

AFTER HE HAD MAXED OUT, he was fired.

AFTER HE had put his fingerprint on the team.

But DO NOT HIRE A GUY AT ALL if you're not going to
give him the chances to coach a team.

SCOTT BROOKS had that opportunity.

BYRON was never given that chance.

The LAST TIME Byron DID have a chance to coach
a decent team, he coached them to the NBA Finals BACK
TO BACK.

It's racism.



And Westbrook, Durant, and Harden sure
>developed under him, if we're using that metric! Yet IMO
>Brooks should've been fired immediately after those 2012
>Finals for failing to bench Kendrick Perkins, because to me
>Brooks more or less threw that series by refusing to make a
>blindingly obvious adjustment. He clearly wasn't the coach to
>take them to the next level.
>
>You should absolutely slam the Sixers and all these
>organizations who give white coaches more time even after
>they've demonstrated they don't have what it takes. And you
>can criticize LA for firing Byron, if you don't believe Luke
>will do better going forward than Byron would have. But this
>"earned it" shit is just the wrong paradigm.




----------------------------



O_E: "Acts like an asshole and posts with imperial disdain"




"I ORBITs the solar system, listenin..."

(C)Keith Murray, "

When you HIRE a coach, you should give them the CHANCE
to demonstrate their ability to manage talent.

Scott Brooks was GIVEN THAT CHANCE and DID DESERVE THE
RIGHT TO.

Byron Scott coached a good team to TWO NBA Finals.

After that?

A HORRID Cavs team, and a HORRID Lakers team.

He's been given NO CHANCES to develop talent.


----------------------------



O_E: "Acts like an asshole and posts with imperial disdain"




"I ORBITs the solar system, listenin..."

(C)Keith Murray, "

I disagree with you about Scott Brooks "deserving a chance" even after he showed a massive limitation. And I used that as an EXAMPLE of why I think "does this coach deserve to keep coaching the team?" is the WRONG question for someone whose obligation is to doing what's best for the TEAM to ask. And you refuse to engage with that larger point.

Why do you think "does this coach deserve to keep coaching the team?" is a better way to make decisions than being forward-looking and asking "what's best for the team going forward?"???

I assume you're smart enough to understand and engage and just aren't willing to.

>I disagree with you about Scott Brooks "deserving a chance"
>even after he showed a massive limitation.

I think we're hitting the ceiling of your reasoning ability, so
I'll talk slow:

Scott Brooks proves my point because, unlike Byron Scott,
he was allowed to coach and develop his talent, enough to
see his effect max out (NBA Finals).

Byron Scott has never coached talent like in OKC, nor
was given the opportunity to truly develop multiple young
potential stars.

So the Scott Brooks example actually proves my point:

Byron Scott deserves that kind of opportunity: multiple
potential franchise players, young, where he's allowed to
nurture and develop and oversee their growth.

He didn't have that in Cleveland. He didn't get that in LA.

Let me know if I need to dial it down to 3rd grade.


----------------------------



O_E: "Acts like an asshole and posts with imperial disdain"




"I ORBITs the solar system, listenin..."

(C)Keith Murray, "

Get them neurons up, get back to me


----------------------------



O_E: "Acts like an asshole and posts with imperial disdain"




"I ORBITs the solar system, listenin..."

(C)Keith Murray, "

Good luck recovering.

Your decision to go full method with this character of yours is an agenda.

Your complete lack of nuance and desire for hard line shock jock tactics over nuanced perspective is agenda.

You're not a person.
You're AgendaBot.

>Your decision to go full method with this character of yours
>is an agenda.
>
>Your complete lack of nuance and desire for hard line shock
>jock tactics over nuanced perspective is agenda.
>
>You're not a person.
>You're AgendaBot.


----------------------------



O_E: "Acts like an asshole and posts with imperial disdain"




"I ORBITs the solar system, listenin..."

(C)Keith Murray, "

I'd much rather him go to LA. Sigh.

My movies: http://russellhainline.com
My movie reviews: https://letterboxd.com/RussellHFilm/
My beer TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@thebeertravelguide

i low key want the Lakers to sign him but i haven't seen his name brought up at all, so i'm guessing there's something fucked up about the guy

Friday night tryna make it into Staples
Breakneck speeds, sign a star in time for the morning paper
Thinking bout how we get here in the first place
They let kobe do work, and now we sitting in last place
A rat face nigga with non existent shot selection
Russell, Randle, and a few scrubs we won’t even mention
Recording bout pussy and putting it on snapchat
How you get in trouble for cheating, and you ain’t even tap that?
Black coaches getting fired, and the white boy get hired
Watch em sign some stars, man this story gettin tired
I been like damn since Mike Brown got canned
He coached 5 games but they still blamed the man.
Talking bout a black coach OE ears gon tingle
And bring up how ya’ll never said shit about pringles
But ya’ll said plenty, its in the archives
But this okp, truth matter less than lies.
And until laker fans wanna discuss the race issue
The team’ll still suck and suffer from draft misuse.
I can’t fault em really
Yes I can, they fired Byron Scott when we all know they was tanking like Philly
Back to our regularly scheduled agenda
Is Jeanie Bush a co-owner or not playa
I’m not sure the relevance
But ya’ll argue about it every thread so I had to mention it.
I be thinking every day,
Luke Walton the coach, now watch them throw up some goddamn barricades
I be paranoid every time
They’ll fault the roster, the trainer, the vendor but Luke won’t catch any blame.


damn that's a long verse..i'm out.

-The Knicks’ coaching search still includes a lone frontrunner, Kurt Rambis, whose qualifications for the position include a strong relationship with Jackson and a willingness to take the job.

------------------------------

50+ FREE Mixes on www.DJR-Tistic.com!

Twitter and Instagram - @DJ_RTistic

------------------------------

17x NBA Champions

http://soundcloud.com/djshinobishaw
http://www.rareformnyc.com
http://twitter.com/DJShinobiShaw
https://twitter.com/RareFormNYC
PSN: ShinobiShaw

"Arm Leg Leg Arm How you doin?" (c)T510

----------------------------
Same as it ever was!

______________________________
http://i.imgur.com/Gj5Wy56.jpg

---
"though time has passed, im still the future" (c) black thought

lol...

GOAT of his era......long live Prince.....God is alive....

---------------------------------
<--The drought is over

"have fun reveling in your pettiness tho" (C) Dula summing up 98% of OKS

"I didnt finish a damn thing...matter of fact I jerked off after she left."
-Kobe speaking to investigators

L D E A

----
bshelly

"You (Fisher) could get fired, Les Snead could get fired, Kevin Demoff could get fired, but I will always be Eric Dickerson.” (c) The God

Shelly trading a coupon that allows for possible sex with Beyonce in three or four years for actual sex with Beyonce today.

A Top 3 pick ain't pocket lint for teams who aren't ready to have sex today and never get the chance to have sex with someone like Beyonce in free agency. But LA? They're ready for that jelly.

My movies: http://russellhainline.com
My movie reviews: https://letterboxd.com/RussellHFilm/
My beer TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@thebeertravelguide

you should be ashamed.

----
bshelly

"You (Fisher) could get fired, Les Snead could get fired, Kevin Demoff could get fired, but I will always be Eric Dickerson.” (c) The God