|
>>I do feel that it is not always about race. I never said he >>can not perform at the pro level. I did make a general >>statement as to what commentators said about his QB skills. > >The commentators are the ones whose opinions fans use and are >conditioned to view these quarterbacks. They are the >filter/lens through which the story is told on the careers of >these quarterbacks. No, not ALL situations are strictly based >on race. No one ever said that, nor spoke in any kind of >absolutes like that.
First, I appreciate the civil response. I hope we can continue to debate without allowing emotions to derail the thread. now...let me address your retorts..
The commentators are entitled to their opinions. Also, some may have biases and preferences, but at the end of the day, they are just opinions. I give more credence to a coach and player than a commentator. As for fans, consider that those people came to the game with preconceived notions and prejudices, to boot. EJ could ball out and some fans would still hate because they are ignorant haters. Their opinion do not mean shit because their punk asses still attending games. When they vote with their feet and wallet, then I will take their "opinions" into consideration. Lastly, you seem intelligent enough to know not to take every opinion as gospel from a commentator and certainly don't give credence to fans who may be racist. As a Black person, you live with the notion that non Blacks are going to have negative opinions about you. But, you do not let that affect what you have to do in life. You know who is good on the field and who is not good on the field. Your opinion is the only one that should matter to you. > >>Next, how do you prove that race is a factor when he has not >>been benched yet? He is still the starting QB, no? So, based >>on that fact, how does race play a factor? Now, if your >issue >>is with commentators, then cool. But, they are paid to be >>critical. They are not on the coaching staff. > >Really the burden is not to prove that race is a factor. The >burden of proof is to show that race IS NOT a factor. Once >again, we're talking about the NFL here, which as we all know >has a loooooong history with race determining of who plays at >this most important position. All we (I) can do is point out >where we see the remnants of what has been the status quo for >the league historically.
Who has this burden to prove? The Bills? Well, they are proving by giving EJ a chance to start for their team and I have not heard any talk of him being benched. Also, should he get benched for Kyle Orton, do you honestly think the Bills will be in a better position to win a championship? Lol lately, you see more Black QBs than ever before. Speaking on past history, it was not just QBs that were reserved for whites. Centers, middle linebackers and strong safeties were also reserved for whites, historically. Now, you see a lot of Blacks in these "thinking positions". So, things has got better since the early days of football.
>Why do you assume that the league has all of a sudden become >this bastion of racial equality? I don't see it.
I never said that. I just think that Black players can not use the race card as a crutch. If you are talented enough to play in the league, then the onus is on you to take advantage. If you don't, the it is probably your fault, not because you are Black. > >> >>I want E.J. to win, but I would be lying if I said he could >>lead the Bills to a championship, right now. Lastly, people >>are all about instant gratification. It does not matter who >>you are. If you are in the spotlight, then you will be >>scrutinized as well as have a different set of expectations >>placed upon you. Oh, let's not act like every white QB gets >>long passes, but I think we can agree that the media and >fans >>tend to favor white QBs. >>> > >My point has always been the level of scrutiny, versus the >willingness to mold a particular prospect into good to >elite-level of quarterback. Do we really have to continually >make statistical comparisons to the rookie seasons of other >(re: white) quarterback's rookie seasons every time a >situation like this comes up? > >Troy Aikman, Steve Young, Drew Brees, etc... Look at their >first FEW years, this is what I'm saying. I'm not necessarily >riding for EJ here and saying he's going to have a career >close to those names, ONE of the main differences between >those greats and players like EJ (re: Black), is the level of >support they get, from the jump.
Once again, commentators are who they are. I mean, let's take Johnny Football. He is a mobile QB who gets praise by the media and fans, but Mike Vick has been scrutinized for being the same type of QB. Same with Tim Tebow. He could not throw for shit, but got passes from the fans and some commentator when T. Pryor gets vilified for it. In all, I agree that QBs are preferred to be played by whites and they do get less scrutiny., however, my point is that EJs situation may be due to him not being ready to lead a team for now. It is not because he is Black. I am talking about coaches and ownership here making this determination, not some commentator or bigot fan. > > > > >... >
|