Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend
Lobby Okay Sports topic #2128141

Subject: "Do you see the NFL expanding in the near future?" Previous topic | Next topic
OldPro
Member since Dec 10th 2002
34401 posts
Fri Feb-08-13 11:49 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
"Poll question: Do you see the NFL expanding in the near future?"


  

          

Andy Dolich was on 95.7 in the Bay Area this morning talking about the Oakland stadium situation and made an interesting point.. He said it's more likely we'll see an expansion team come to LA rather than the relocation of an existing one. He said the recent Dodger sale has set the market so high the owners are going to have a hard time settling for a relocation fee when billions could be had with expansion rights.. or as he put it "If you were an owner what would you rather have? 1/32 of 200 million or 1/32 of 2.5 billion"? When it's put that way it seems expansion is a very real possibility.

And if you don't know who Dolich is, rest assured he's no media hack just talking out his ass... dude has served in the front offices of all 4 major sports leagues.. his positions include Executive Vice President of the Oakland A's, Memphis Grizzlies President of Business Operations & the 49ers Chief Operating Officer. So the man knows the business of sports.

If you want to listen to the interview it's available here
http://957thegame.com/topic/play_window.php?audioType=Episode&audioId=6233022

So the question is.. do you see the league expanding or not? And if so what city other than LA would you pick... seeing as they usually do these expansions in twos.

Poll result (9 votes)
Yes (3 votes)Vote
No (6 votes)Vote

  

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top


Topic Outline
Subject Author Message Date ID
i don't see why they wouldn't
Feb 08th 2013
1
the fact that you play one game a week most weeks allows for
Feb 08th 2013
2
I think going overseas would be a mistake
Feb 08th 2013
5
yeah, I'm not for or against per say.. just saying the 1 game a week
Feb 08th 2013
9
London makes zero sense for an international team
Feb 08th 2013
13
      Seriously - the 2 biggest cities in South America are basically on EST
Feb 12th 2013
30
a London team would be at a huge disadvantage
Feb 08th 2013
8
      the nfl wants london
Feb 10th 2013
22
if the NCAA can realign + get paid, NFL must be jealous
Feb 08th 2013
3
Yeah I think we're in for some form of realignment either way
Feb 08th 2013
6
Ugh.
Feb 08th 2013
4
I feel the same way
Feb 08th 2013
7
The Chargers home is San Diego, they played 1 season in LA
Feb 08th 2013
12
^^^ This is where I'm at.
Feb 08th 2013
10
I'd love to see Philadelphia get a team.
Feb 08th 2013
11
They could have had one 12 years ago...
Feb 08th 2013
14
That is false...
Feb 09th 2013
15
      Ummm...where did you get this info?
Feb 10th 2013
23
They can't just add one team though...
Feb 09th 2013
16
Each of the last three came on their own, 3 years apart
Feb 10th 2013
21
No, but I'd like to see teams in Vegas and LA
Feb 09th 2013
17
Fuck that, move one of these new teams....
Feb 10th 2013
18
No. There's enough garbage franchises now
Feb 10th 2013
19
The Jags had some success...
Feb 10th 2013
24
Fuck Modell, that move should have never happened
Feb 10th 2013
26
I wasn't trying to open old wounds
Feb 11th 2013
27
      this I agree with
Feb 11th 2013
29
None of those teams are relocating
Feb 12th 2013
34
Too many current teams you can relocate
Feb 10th 2013
20
not really though
Feb 12th 2013
35
yeah and going global
Feb 10th 2013
25
appparrently.
Feb 11th 2013
28
They're idiots for even thinking about shit like this
Feb 12th 2013
31
how is it dumb?
Feb 12th 2013
33
there is no way the owners would allow that.
Feb 13th 2013
36
He is right but it's not imminent IMO
Feb 12th 2013
32

thejerseytornado
Member since Dec 24th 2005
26424 posts
Fri Feb-08-13 12:36 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
1. "i don't see why they wouldn't"
In response to Reply # 0


  

          

i also wouldn't be surprised to see it be London + LA as the two new cities.

-----------
It's only funny till someone gets mad. Then it's hilarious.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
LegacyNS
Member since Jan 16th 2004
38095 posts
Fri Feb-08-13 12:47 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
2. "the fact that you play one game a week most weeks allows for"
In response to Reply # 1


  

          

international travel. I could definitely see a team in London @ some point.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<---- 5....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dlgiritpmfo

=======================================
Occupy Big Government..

Fannie, Freddie dole out big bonuses
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1011/67292.html

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
OldPro
Member since Dec 10th 2002
34401 posts
Fri Feb-08-13 12:56 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
5. "I think going overseas would be a mistake"
In response to Reply # 2
Fri Feb-08-13 12:56 PM by OldPro

  

          

right now it's a novelty but I'd be really worried what would happen beyond one game a year... especially an expansion team that goes through 4-6 years of really bad football. Putting a team in that market and having it fail would be a black eye on the league.
_________________________________
Reunion Radio Podcasts
http://reunionradio.blogspot.com/
Twitter @therealoldpro

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
LegacyNS
Member since Jan 16th 2004
38095 posts
Fri Feb-08-13 01:50 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
9. "yeah, I'm not for or against per say.. just saying the 1 game a week"
In response to Reply # 5


  

          

schedule opens up options for travel.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<---- 5....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dlgiritpmfo

=======================================
Occupy Big Government..

Fannie, Freddie dole out big bonuses
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1011/67292.html

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
calij81
Member since Jan 17th 2007
13928 posts
Fri Feb-08-13 05:39 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
13. "London makes zero sense for an international team"
In response to Reply # 2


          

If the NFL were smart they would have continued having a game in Mexico City each year and focus their efforts in expanding the brand in Latin America.

If they want to put a team in another country put it in Mexico City.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
jorge123
Member since Jun 02nd 2012
376 posts
Tue Feb-12-13 12:07 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
30. "Seriously - the 2 biggest cities in South America are basically on EST"
In response to Reply # 13


          

Rio de Janeiro and Sao Paulo Brazil, during September and October, are 1 only 1 hour ahead of the east coast. It's a real easy flight - 9 hours. Meaning, the players go to sleep on the plane and wake up the next morning with a full night of sleep.

There's a lot of rich folks down here, a lot of people interested in English and American culture, and a few stadiums that seat upwards of 100K people.

It should also be much more mild weather during August and September, and the weather during October, November, and December is summer weather compared to winter in the US.

Seems like a no-brainer, but that's probably why they haven't done it. I think the only potential detractor is the violence and kidnapping, but there's plenty of rich athletes that do just fine down here.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
colonelk
Member since Dec 10th 2002
5058 posts
Fri Feb-08-13 01:33 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
8. "a London team would be at a huge disadvantage"
In response to Reply # 1


  

          

-The travel and time zone issues would be brutal.
-Much higher British taxes would deter free agents.
-Even if they sell out for a few seasons, half the fan base will be there to see the stars from the opposing team

--------

hell-below.com

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
thejerseytornado
Member since Dec 24th 2005
26424 posts
Sun Feb-10-13 02:00 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
22. "the nfl wants london"
In response to Reply # 8


  

          

huge and very rich market that is an international hub of finance. speaks english already. it's a gimmick to me, but i see why it's appealing.


-----------
It's only funny till someone gets mad. Then it's hilarious.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

celery77
Member since Aug 04th 2005
25307 posts
Fri Feb-08-13 12:54 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
3. "if the NCAA can realign + get paid, NFL must be jealous"
In response to Reply # 0


  

          

___________

HOPE!
https://vine.co/v/i7JjIBL3Qix
https://vine.co/v/i7JtqEFwxDu

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
OldPro
Member since Dec 10th 2002
34401 posts
Fri Feb-08-13 01:01 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
6. "Yeah I think we're in for some form of realignment either way"
In response to Reply # 3


  

          

If the Rams, Chargers or Raiders move down there the current alignment works.. but you relocate a Jacksonville, Minnesota or Atlanta franchise and your divisions will look crazy. How ironic would it be for the Falcons to play on the west coast but be in the 'South' division after decades in the NFC West.
_________________________________
Reunion Radio Podcasts
http://reunionradio.blogspot.com/
Twitter @therealoldpro

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Frank Longo
Member since Nov 18th 2003
86672 posts
Fri Feb-08-13 12:54 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
4. "Ugh."
In response to Reply # 0


  

          

I'm sure they will, I'm just not for it.

My movies: http://russellhainline.com
My movie reviews: https://letterboxd.com/RussellHFilm/
My beer TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@thebeertravelguide

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
OldPro
Member since Dec 10th 2002
34401 posts
Fri Feb-08-13 01:04 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
7. "I feel the same way"
In response to Reply # 4


  

          

The league has good balance now with 4 team divisions in each conference... I'd like to see the Rams or Chargers come home to LA, or the Raiders return so they can just leave the divisions as is.

But as you said, I expect them to make the decision based on money more than whats best for the game.
_________________________________
Reunion Radio Podcasts
http://reunionradio.blogspot.com/
Twitter @therealoldpro

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
calij81
Member since Jan 17th 2007
13928 posts
Fri Feb-08-13 05:36 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
12. "The Chargers home is San Diego, they played 1 season in LA"
In response to Reply # 7


          

The Rams should just move back to LA.

I don't like the idea of expansion. 32 team, 4 divisions of 4 teams is perfect right now.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
wallysmith
Charter member
7808 posts
Fri Feb-08-13 02:03 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
10. "^^^ This is where I'm at."
In response to Reply # 4


  

          

I absolutely love the eight division, two conference, 32 team format. Great parity, great rivalries and great playoff structure.

Adding teams disrupts that, even though I'd love to see a team in LA.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Pinko_Panther
Member since Dec 11th 2002
11808 posts
Fri Feb-08-13 04:37 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
11. "I'd love to see Philadelphia get a team. "
In response to Reply # 0


  

          

********************************************
"If you think you're too small to make a difference, try sleeping in a closed room with a mosquito."

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Overqualified
Member since May 03rd 2006
4543 posts
Fri Feb-08-13 09:57 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
14. "They could have had one 12 years ago..."
In response to Reply # 0


  

          

if their ownership situation wasn't so shaky again and again...the NFL giftwrapped the damn franchise and allowed them to get their package together and they STILL couldn't do it. Viola! You were given the Houston Texans.

The NFL expansion process is rigged...look at how in '93 Baltimore, Memphis', and St. Louis' bids - arguably the best on the table were spurned in favor of Charlotte and Jacksonville (WTF?) only to have existing franchises move to the rejected cities immediately after.

Just get the Jags to LA and get this nonsense over with.

Streets won't let me chill.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
ChampD1012
Member since Sep 27th 2003
8355 posts
Sat Feb-09-13 05:34 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
15. "That is false..."
In response to Reply # 14


  

          


>The NFL expansion process is rigged...look at how in '93
>Baltimore, Memphis', and St. Louis' bids - arguably the best
>on the table were spurned in favor of Charlotte and
>Jacksonville (WTF?) only to have existing franchises move to
>the rejected cities immediately after.


Charlotte had the BEST presentation and already shown that interest in a Franchise in Carolina...they even sold alot of PSLs before the team even was approved to be in Charlotte...now Jacksonville on the other hand was the 2nd best team which at the time wasn't saying much...Baltimore, Memphis, and St. Louis didn't have the interest at that time compared to the Carolinas and Jacksonville...its not an accident that Carolina was the 29th franchise...nobody was more ready than Richardson at the time...

Why does LA deserve a team again? The city has had a team on multiple occasions and it's been proven that they don't support the team...bringing the Jags to LA won't solve the problem either because LA obviously needs a good team to go there to keep the fans interested...the Panthers have only had one game that hasn't sold out...and there were rumblings of sending them to LA...but it won't happen...they just signed a 15 year deal to stay in Charlotte...

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
Overqualified
Member since May 03rd 2006
4543 posts
Sun Feb-10-13 08:48 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
23. "Ummm...where did you get this info?"
In response to Reply # 15


  

          

>Charlotte had the BEST presentation and already shown that
>interest in a Franchise in Carolina...they even sold alot of
>PSLs before the team even was approved to be in
>Charlotte...now Jacksonville on the other hand was the 2nd
>best team which at the time wasn't saying much...Baltimore,
>Memphis, and St. Louis didn't have the interest at that time
>compared to the Carolinas and Jacksonville...

Your memory has failed you. The reason Jacksonville has a franchise is because Tagliabue wanted one there as part of his "sunbelt strategy". The front runners at the time were Carolina and Baltimore. True Carolina sold out their PSLs, but Baltimore already had the money on hand from a lottery to fund the stadium as well as PSLs as well as THREE ownership groups on the table. They also sold out an exhibition game at Memorial Stadium between New Orleans and Miami to prove their interest to the NFL. They should have been a lock.

Once awarding Carolina, the league rigged the process by giving Jacksonville extra time to get their bid together AFTER they dropped out.

http://www.nytimes.com/1993/12/01/sports/pro-football-nfl-expansion-surprise-jacksonville-jaguars.html

It was a complete shock for them to award Jacksonville. They were the 56 TV market (lowest among the bidding cities) and also offered up the dilapidated Gator Bowl for the new franchise to play in.

http://articles.latimes.com/1993-10-17/sports/sp-46706_1_kansas-city

http://articles.baltimoresun.com/1993-12-01/news/1993335004_1_team-owners-baltimore-prospective-owner

The reason they kept the NFL out of Baltimore, Memphis, and St. Louis was to save those markets or provide leverage for owners who had designs on moving (like what is currently happening with LA). In the particular case of Baltimore, it was also so Jack Kent Cooke could continue to claim Baltimore as Redskins territory in the years since the Colts departure.

To say that there was no interest on behalf of the declined cities (especially Baltimore) and that Jax had one of the best bids on the table is laughable. That team should have never existed.

Streets won't let me chill.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

ChampD1012
Member since Sep 27th 2003
8355 posts
Sat Feb-09-13 05:37 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
16. "They can't just add one team though..."
In response to Reply # 0


  

          

They would have to 2 or 4 teams to try to keep the divisions even...

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
Nodima
Member since Jul 30th 2008
15297 posts
Sun Feb-10-13 01:51 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
21. "Each of the last three came on their own, 3 years apart"
In response to Reply # 16


  

          


~~~~~~~~~
"This is the streets, and I am the trap." © Jay Bilas
"I don't read pages of rap lyrics, I listen to rap music." © Bombastic
http://www.popmatters.com/pm/archive/contributor/517
Hip Hop Handbook: http://tinyurl.com/ll4kzz

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Tiger Woods
Member since Feb 15th 2004
18386 posts
Sat Feb-09-13 06:05 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
17. "No, but I'd like to see teams in Vegas and LA"
In response to Reply # 0


  

          

If I had my way, you'd move the Bolts to LA and the Jags to Vegas. The Vegas team replaces the Chiefs in that division and the Chiefs pretty easily slide into the AFC South.
I care not for your "what about tradition!?!?" gripes. There's no tradition or even current interest in San Diego right now and the AFC West has been a joke for far too long. Furthermore, how great does "LVJ" (Las Vegas Jags) sound?

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
KCPlayer21
Charter member
30076 posts
Sun Feb-10-13 03:42 AM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
18. "Fuck that, move one of these new teams...."
In response to Reply # 17


  

          

the Chiefs are an original AFL team, no way we get moved out of the AFC West, move the Chargers since they're the only team in the division no one really has a rivalry with or gives a shit about....




You gon' live forever
Whether you want to or not
Some of us gon' end up holy
Some of us gon' end up hot.....

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

bentagain
Member since Mar 19th 2008
16595 posts
Sun Feb-10-13 12:47 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
19. "No. There's enough garbage franchises now"
In response to Reply # 0


  

          

If you look at the expansion teams

the only franchise that's been quality

was CLE relocating to BAL

JAX, CAR, CLE and TEX

were the last teams added

CAR and TEX have had success

and have had some failures (more underachieving in TEX and regressing in CAR)

but CLE and JAX might as well have never have happened

anyway

expansion would start to water down the quality of the games, IMO

there's too many crap games now

---------------------------------------------------------------

If you can't understand it without an explanation

you can't understand it with an explanation

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
ChampD1012
Member since Sep 27th 2003
8355 posts
Sun Feb-10-13 09:03 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
24. "The Jags had some success..."
In response to Reply # 19


  

          

went to an AFC championship games and a few playoff appearances as well...

Now the Browns are valid...but you had to give them the team back...they didn't deserve to lose the first one...

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
Dr Claw
Member since Jun 25th 2003
132214 posts
Sun Feb-10-13 11:51 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
26. "Fuck Modell, that move should have never happened"
In response to Reply # 19
Sun Feb-10-13 11:52 PM by Dr Claw

  

          

Baltimore should have gotten a team in '93 as payback for their OWN team getting yanked from them.

Granted, every city I can remember in my lifetime getting jacked over some Modell-type bullshit found a new team in its place except for LA.
And honestly I don't think LA would even care if the NFL were back there UNLESS it was the Rams.

The league is perfect as it is. 2 conferences, 8 divisions with 4 teams each. They don't need to expand, anything past this point is just pure greed and oversaturation ala the NBA IMO.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
bentagain
Member since Mar 19th 2008
16595 posts
Mon Feb-11-13 10:48 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
27. "I wasn't trying to open old wounds"
In response to Reply # 26


  

          

I just get the impression that relocating a franchise

is more conducive to winning

than an expansion team

Rams - LA to StL = Chip

Raiders - OAK to LA = Chip - back to OAK = SB

Oilers - HOU to TEN = SB

etc...

I think TB is the only expansion team added after the AFL merger

to win a chip

after 25 years of being the laughing stock of the league

I get the feeling that adding an expansion team

would mean adding a terrible team

compared to relocating a team that might flourish under new management, fanbase, etc...

---------------------------------------------------------------

If you can't understand it without an explanation

you can't understand it with an explanation

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
Dr Claw
Member since Jun 25th 2003
132214 posts
Mon Feb-11-13 11:29 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
29. "this I agree with"
In response to Reply # 27


  

          

>I get the feeling that adding an expansion team
>
>would mean adding a terrible team

they don't need another one.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
ConcreteCharlie
Member since Nov 21st 2002
71387 posts
Tue Feb-12-13 03:28 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
34. "None of those teams are relocating"
In response to Reply # 19


  

          

And you will know MY JACKET IS GOLD when I lay my vengeance upon thee.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

NoShelter
Charter member
8725 posts
Sun Feb-10-13 12:54 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
20. "Too many current teams you can relocate"
In response to Reply # 0


  

          

Vikings, Chargers, Raiders, Jaguars, Bills, Rams can all be moved to other locations at this point so there's cities you can squeeze in that sense already.
Plus I think the NFL is more concerned about CTE and about a possible backlash to building new stadiums at this point to be concerned about expansion.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
ConcreteCharlie
Member since Nov 21st 2002
71387 posts
Tue Feb-12-13 03:33 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
35. "not really though"
In response to Reply # 20


  

          

the nfl is not going to let some demon deacon about its future get in the way of its money. if anything, that would make them more likely to cash in now, including expanson.

minnesota is not moving, they got a new stadium deal. the chargers will get one, the city has money and they won't risk losing another franchise, let alone to los angeles. jags and panthers are both staying put for the foreseeable future. the bills just signed a ten-year stadium deal not two months ago.

the rams are an interesting case but they are mounting pressure to get their $700M or so in renovations now. the city will have to come up with the money or face losing them in a season or three. i think they will come up with the money. they have a lot invested in the team as it is and it would be a major blow to lose them.

And you will know MY JACKET IS GOLD when I lay my vengeance upon thee.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

mistermaxxx08
Member since Dec 31st 2010
16076 posts
Sun Feb-10-13 11:41 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
25. "yeah and going global"
In response to Reply # 0


          

i can see it being placed overseas. i could see the Super bowl going overseas as well, i expect something different in the future.

mistermaxxx R.Kelly, Michael Jackson,Stevie wonder,Rick James,Marvin Gaye,El Debarge, Barry WHite Lionel RIchie,Isleys EWF,Lady T.,Kid creole and coconuts,the crusaders,kc sunshine band,bee gees,jW,sd,NE,JB

Miami Heat, New York Yankees,buffalo bills

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Cenario
Member since Aug 24th 2005
59180 posts
Mon Feb-11-13 10:20 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
28. "appparrently."
In response to Reply # 0


  

          

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/nfl-considered-widening-playing-field-35-feet-may-190404198--nfl.html

-The Knicks’ coaching search still includes a lone frontrunner, Kurt Rambis, whose qualifications for the position include a strong relationship with Jackson and a willingness to take the job.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
OldPro
Member since Dec 10th 2002
34401 posts
Tue Feb-12-13 02:18 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
31. "They're idiots for even thinking about shit like this"
In response to Reply # 28


  

          

As a 9er fan I should love this... it would make Kaepernick even harder to contain... problem is its dumb ass idea
_________________________________
Reunion Radio Podcasts
http://reunionradio.blogspot.com/
Twitter @therealoldpro

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
ConcreteCharlie
Member since Nov 21st 2002
71387 posts
Tue Feb-12-13 03:09 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
33. "how is it dumb?"
In response to Reply # 31


  

          

i will send you a check for $1000 if you can explain to me why linemen are 100 pounds heavier than they were 40 years ago yet we are still using the exact same size field.

in both the NFL and the NBA, the playing surface dimensions need serious re-examination. the nba maybe even more so. i don't get why we still have the same ten-foot hoop Tarzan Cooper and them were shooting on when centers were 6'2". why is the court so fucking narrow? spread it out. same thing with the NFL, although there we have a test case with a wider, longer field (CFL).

And you will know MY JACKET IS GOLD when I lay my vengeance upon thee.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
pretentious username
Member since Jun 18th 2010
12493 posts
Wed Feb-13-13 02:28 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
36. "there is no way the owners would allow that."
In response to Reply # 28


  

          

probably most of the stadiums would have to cut out a few rows. that's a pretty expensive way to cut into your revenue stream.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

ConcreteCharlie
Member since Nov 21st 2002
71387 posts
Tue Feb-12-13 03:07 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
32. "He is right but it's not imminent IMO"
In response to Reply # 0


  

          

I have said for years that no team is relocating to Los Angeles, it will be the ongoing leverage for teams needing new stadium deals.

I don't see the NFL expanding *soon* but eventually, yes. They might fuck around and put TWO teams in LA to make it worth the struggle. That said, I still think even with an expansion team there are logistical issues. It's a city with too many venues, for openers, which means the typical benefit of a new state of the art facility is not there.

And you will know MY JACKET IS GOLD when I lay my vengeance upon thee.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Lobby Okay Sports topic #2128141 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.25
Copyright © DCScripts.com