|
So if you don't mind, I'm going to speak to you in a way even your inbred ass can understand, dipshit.
>again, kobe was a guy in the first three titles that could
>have been replaced. not EASILY, but yes, by a handful of guys.
This is a bullshit argument based on a lot of what ifs.
Shaq could have been replaced too, you know that right?
You do realize he didn't win shit until Kobe matured and Phil showed up, right?
You do realize that Kobe- a lesser version than the one who won with Shaq, mind you- won with Pau, a considerably lesser version of Shaq.
SO, I mean.... put Kobe and KG together, since we're playing the what if game. That shit would've beasted a few titles, possibly even three, especially with Phil in the mix. After all, a lesser Kobe won with a guy who, at his best, can't even approach KG at his peak. Or CWebb, for that matter.
But again... This is a lot of what ifs, and you need a lot of caveats to really make this one stick, you fucking dolt. This is a pretty shitty argument to get around the fact that Shaq and Kobe together won three straight, something Showtime, 80's Celtics, Pistons, etc couldn't do. It's a rare feat. Shaq was like 8 years in and it wasn't til Bean came into his own that Shaq won. those are fucking FACTS, not what ifs. Not deflections. FUCKING FACTS.
>on no team that bron has competed on at any level outside of
>international play (2004 USA team) could he have been
>replaced.
What the fuck does this have to do with trying to downgrade Kobe's rings because he had Shaq on his team?
>kobe LED the lakers on their second run, but in between he
>showed that he was mortal. the actual comparison that was
>destroyed by kobe's lameness and resurgence when he got the
>best frontcourt in the NBA was not kobe vs bron, but kobe vs
>jordan.
WHAT DOES THIS HAVE TO DO WITH DOWNGRADING KOBE'S RINGS FOR PLAYING WITH SHAQ? Bunch of fucking deflections. Kill yourself, pussy. You bore me.
>his legacy does not compare to JORDAN'S and that is
>what people have said. jordan is singular in that he did not
>need anything close to a dominant big man (all due respect to
>Horace Grant and the Worm but cmon) to win a chip, let alone
>SIX of them.
Rodman was a fucking defensive monster and insane rebounder, like 16-17 per through the threepeat. Like, you know, shit that nobody else was doing or has done sense. Kind of remarkable. He's a HOF level player who proved greatness can be had with defense, hustle, and rebounding. Fuck out of here trying to downgrade Rodman. He ain't Shaq but lets be reasonable you fucking moron. I hope somebody curb stomps you, you fucking idiot.
>not being jordan is hardly a huge insult, yet people like you
>and LB's finest buy out all the kleenex and tampax in costco
>over it. i could not explain why.
Yes, so please, stop being a fucking jackass with this nonsensical deflection. Goddamn you really should have wound up on a kleenex or your mothers chin.
>lebron never moaned or whined, he just went about his
>business. he made it clear that he wanted other stars and a
>better situation. so has every other player that's ever played
>without one.
WHAT THE FUCK DOES THIS HAVE TO DO WITH DOWNGRADING KOBE'S RINGS FOR PLAYING WITH A GREAT PLAYER?
>the one kinda sorta exception to that is kobe. he wanted to do
>things a particular that featured him and made him the man. so
>yes, he did set up a separate expectations for him and if
>people want to hold him to a higher standard, i don't blame
>them.
HUH? He set up a separate expectation? You dumb fuck, shut the fuck up. This is the worst fucking argument imaginable. Oh, and he fucking delivered on that shit two. So fuck you and your shit for brains argument.
>but i don't think you can say he is being singled
>out UNFAIRLY as you are here or that you can use the lebron
>situation as a way of proving that.
LOL. YES, IT IS UNFAIR. Because... again, you fucking moron, like your stupid ass already said, everyone who wins does so with other great players, with scant few exceptions. This whole bullshit of "well he wanted to win as the man" is retarded, because he fucking proved that the threepeat wasn't a fluke with a repeat. He fucking validated the first three BIG TIME and your stupid ass is to stubborn to let go of that shit.
>i don't expect you to understand that because you, my friend,
>are a stan. a kobestan, a kobestani, the sort of zealots who
>would hurt people if they themselves were not constantly
>butthurt and trying to tear the legacy of everyone from
>michael jordan and oscar robertson to pau gasol and lamar odom
>to prop up their man.
zzzzzzzzz
LOL the "legacy" of Pau and Lamar is "Thank god we got to play with Kobe". Pau's "legacy" was 3 straight round one sweeps.
Anyhow, thanks for playing. It's been fun. I've decided that, for you and you alone, I'm going to speak to you in your language. So if you're game to go twenty rounds of me parroting the hilarious little temper tantrum you had earlier, feel free to respond bitch.
|
