|
As a regular reader of Polygon, I'm well aware that they've aggressively pivoted to the same enthusiast coverage many other sites have, but somehow I managed to take this nuclear-level glowing description of this movie's stunt production at face value.
https://www.polygon.com/23824292/heart-stone-gal-gadot-netflix-movie-locations-stunts
I made it about 40 minutes into the movie, which runs just over 2 hours, so maybe I'll go back to see what all the fuss is about, but as somebody who's self-described as a sort of Netflix action bloodhound what I've seen of this movie seems to want to marry '80s coincidence writing to post-Marvel self-aware quips without any understanding of why the former was so charming and the latter can be absolutely depressing when it's not delivered by superhumans and literal gods.
Yea, my disappointment's heavily on me considering, again, I just read that one article and thought "everything else aside, practical effects kick ass" without digging deeper, and AGAIN, the first hour of this movie plays more like a rejected TV adaptation of a video game interpretation of the first two Mission Impossible movies. So MAYBE the practical stunts described in that article are super cool (my Letterboxd circle says otherwise, sadly).
The meanest thing I can say about the third of this movie I watched is that, accepting at least two real people wrote this movie, this is one of those situations where it's hard to imagine an AI doing worse, but in any case, it'd have been nice if these people talked almost never and kept jumping off and sliding under shit instead. AI can't make Gal Gadot look awesome doing stunts - though without spoiling anything, this movie's "best" joke comes early, and its punchline is that AI can.
~~~~~~~~~ "This is the streets, and I am the trap." � Jay Bilas http://www.popmatters.com/pm/archive/contributor/517 Hip Hop Handbook: http://tinyurl.com/ll4kzz
|