Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend
Lobby Pass The Popcorn topic #722256

Subject: "Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Men Tell No Tales (the 5th one)" Previous topic | Next topic
bwood
Member since Apr 03rd 2006
8614 posts
Fri May-26-17 01:23 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
"Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Men Tell No Tales (the 5th one)"


          

Look it is what is at this point.

I don't hate as much as everyone else. And it's MILES BETTER than Baywatch.

It's just lazy and tired to be honest. And they have the nerve to set-up a return in the after credits stinger that makes no sense to be honest.

Since​ this is part one of the (long) goodbye, let's have this next last one be 90 minutes and at least try to do something fresh instead of a greatest hits.

------------------------------------------
America from 9:00 on: https://youtu.be/GUwLCQU10KQ

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top


Topic Outline
Subject Author Message Date ID
A few clever action scenes. Def better than Baywatch.
May 28th 2017
1
Yes, these movies should be 88 minutes long
May 28th 2017
2
After part 3's length, I can't sit through another Pirates movie....
May 28th 2017
3
Pirates is a great example of a piece of shit franchise that should DIE
May 28th 2017
4
only reason i'll someday watch this on basic cable w/ commercials
May 30th 2017
5
^^This is why you bootleg it
May 30th 2017
6

Frank Longo
Member since Nov 18th 2003
86672 posts
Sun May-28-17 12:30 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
1. "A few clever action scenes. Def better than Baywatch."
In response to Reply # 0


  

          

The guillotine bit made me laugh out loud, it was such a clever action set-up.

The movie can't maintain a lot of its frenetic action bits, and there wasn't as much swashbuckling as I've enjoyed in past installments, but I'm sure fans will be pleased and the indifferent will find nothing to enjoy.

My movies: http://russellhainline.com
My movie reviews: https://letterboxd.com/RussellHFilm/
My beer TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@thebeertravelguide

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

handle
Charter member
18951 posts
Sun May-28-17 01:32 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
2. "Yes, these movies should be 88 minutes long"
In response to Reply # 0


          

I liked the first one but it was way too long. 142 minutes!

The the second one (which I hated - but it got full price admission from me) was 8 minutes longer!! 150 minutes!!

The third one (which I've seen parts of on TV) is almost 3 hours long? 168 minutes!!!

The fourth one (never seen) is shorter, but still too long. 137 minutes.

This fifth one is down even shorter. 129 minutes. (Which is the median lenght for an Apatow film.)

If this trend continues they'll get down to 90-100 minutes in about 8 more installments.

But if the trend reverses then the 13th on will be 549 minutes!

------------


Gone: My Discogs collection for The Roots:
http://www.discogs.com/user/tomhayes-roots/collection

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
rorschach
Member since Nov 10th 2004
7723 posts
Sun May-28-17 07:32 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
3. "After part 3's length, I can't sit through another Pirates movie...."
In response to Reply # 2


  

          

I enjoyed the first two enough to make it through the run time even though I can admit that the plot wasn't heavy enough to earn those times.

At World's End had such a bloated run time...ridiculous. There's an entire subplot that could've been cut. Not to mention that final battle was so long because it was supposed to be the final battle of the series.

A lot of these studio tentpoles follow that 'me too' logic so I'm not surprised that the time is shorter. Whenever one film comes out and it's successful without following the norms, everyone tries to do that. I don't know what film started this but everyone's pushing to get their films down to two hours or less now whereas that was the minimum in the 2000s.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

araQual
Charter member
42162 posts
Sun May-28-17 10:56 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
4. "Pirates is a great example of a piece of shit franchise that should DIE"
In response to Reply # 0


  

          

i dont think anyone will dispute the first film as being unexpectedly fun, hilarious and has Depp being Depp and killin it. everything after that, tho? pure hollywood bullshit.
y'all need to stop paying money to see these films, first of all.
and the industry heads need to stop being so fucking soft on the criticism. these shits have sucked.ass since movie #2.
i remember seeing On Stranger Tides at the drive-ins, only cos it was the 2nd film and u basically get to see it for free (u pay for the first but then u just drive around to another screen and catch another one). i was heavily stoned. and ive seen all KINDS of movies at the drive-ins, just cos it ups the enjoyment factor (and the aforementioned heavily stoned, of course). its gotta be one of the rarest moments where i was completely.fucking.bored by a movie. at the drive-ins. heavily stoned. shit's like my fav thing to do, even when i see shitty movies (like that Denzel stopping an out of control train flick, shit was HILARIBAD but it was still thoroughly enjoyed, cos no matter how much it sucked, it retained a sense of dumb fun).
Pirates? fucking sink them shits to the bottom of the sea already and leave em there. or at LEAST figure out how to write one as entertaining, fun and loose as the original w/out completely bloating the fuck out of the story and the cast.

V.

---
http://confessionsofacurlymind.com
https://soundcloud.com/confessionsofacurlymindredux
https://soundcloud.com/generic80sbadguy
https://soundcloud.com/miles_matheson

DROkayplayerâ„¢

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

The Analyst
Member since Sep 22nd 2007
4621 posts
Tue May-30-17 01:37 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
5. "only reason i'll someday watch this on basic cable w/ commercials"
In response to Reply # 0


  

          

is that i'm a diehard paul mccartney fan and want to see him in this shit, even tho I presume it's only for a few mintues...

----

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
handle
Charter member
18951 posts
Tue May-30-17 04:57 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
6. "^^This is why you bootleg it"
In response to Reply # 5


          

or get a Redbox $1 rental.

------------


Gone: My Discogs collection for The Roots:
http://www.discogs.com/user/tomhayes-roots/collection

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Lobby Pass The Popcorn topic #722256 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.25
Copyright © DCScripts.com