Better than the last one, for what that's worth to some of you. It has some nifty action sequences-- in one scene, Frank fights two axe-wielding henchmen with naught but a life preserver-- and it has Ray Stevenson, who makes every movie better by his mere presence.

It's essentially Mad Max: Fury Road in terms of basic premise, but without the feminism and the George Miller direction and, you know, most everything that made Fury Road the best movie to date this year.

BUT in terms of Transporter movies, it's not sniffing the second one (by FAR the best one), but it may be on par with the first. If someone argued this one is better, I wouldn't fight back.

I'd rank them 2 >>>>> 1, 4 >> 3.

My movies: http://russellhainline.com
My movie reviews: https://letterboxd.com/RussellHFilm/
My beer TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@thebeertravelguide

____________________________________________________


Steph: I was just fooling about

Kyrie: I wasn't.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8OWNspU_yE

I think there was almost too much plot. Just give me the action scenes please. Don't overcomplicate things

>I'd rank them 2 >>>>> 1, 4 >> 3.

You have this right, Transporter 3 is even more substantially worse than the other movies, it was so bad that it killed the franchise for years.

twitter: lategordon

Check out my podcast Long and Late Movie Show: http://itunes.com/podcast?id=498789655