|
I love Ridley Scott, love the actors, love Wolski, love McCarthy, and I love films that are dense, cold, novelistic, and philosophical (Cosmopolis was one of my favorite films last year).
But it's bleaker than any McCarthy film on screen to date (which says something), its philosophical blather doesn't add up to much, the events are predictable, and it sprawls shapelessly like... well, a novel. It feels like an adaptation of a McCarthy novel with no edits made for cinematic considerations-- just thrown right onto the screen, every word.
It's also a film that for 75-90 minutes contains nothing but people talking about what happened or what will happen. Until the motorcycle incident, it's almost more like a play. Which, again, normally I would like.
Brad Pitt is the best with the McCarthy dialogue in the film by far. Some of the actors don't seem to be striking the right tone, so the novelistic lines sound stilted. Pitt home runs every line he has, though. And obviously the movie looks gorgeous with Wolski as d.p....
... but yeah, I didn't like it. And I'd ignored all the reviews too. I figured it'd be a Cosmopolis type of flick-- talky, novelistic, cold-- which is 100% my bag. And it is all of those things... but it just plain didn't work for me. My movies: http://russellhainline.com My movie reviews: https://letterboxd.com/RussellHFilm/ My beer TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@thebeertravelguide
|