Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend
Lobby Pass The Popcorn topic #577161

Subject: "Venice, Toronto, maybe Telluride too." Previous topic | Next topic
ricky_BUTLER
Member since Jul 06th 2003
16899 posts
Tue Aug-23-11 05:34 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
"Venice, Toronto, maybe Telluride too."


          

Film festival season is upon us.

I am not going to any of these far off and wonderful places, but I will be closely following the happenings at their film festivals during the next month or so. I will post each movie as a reply and then come back and update with early critical response after the various screenings. Also, some of the films to be posted here already debuted at other festivals, but I will be including them just the same. If there's anything I'm not following, feel free to add on. Yes, this post has failure written all over it.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top


Topic Outline
Subject Author Message Date ID
The Ides Of March (Clooney)
Aug 23rd 2011
1
Carnage (Polanski)
Aug 23rd 2011
2
Intriguing trailer. Does the whole flick take place in a single setting?
Aug 24th 2011
21
It's a Tony-winning play. Hysterical on Broadway.
Aug 24th 2011
22
Venice reviews.
Sep 01st 2011
23
W.E. (Madonna)
Aug 23rd 2011
3
Some reviews in.
Sep 01st 2011
24
Clips.
Sep 11th 2011
42
A Dangerous Method (Cronenberg)
Aug 23rd 2011
4
Contagion (Soderbergh)
Aug 23rd 2011
5
Contagion inspires spirit of this post: can't stop, won't stop.
Sep 03rd 2011
25
Shame (McQueen)
Aug 23rd 2011
6
Picked up by Fox Searchlight for release in December. n/m
Sep 11th 2011
31
Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy (Alfredson)
Aug 23rd 2011
7
The one to beat?
Sep 05th 2011
27
Venice recap + taking a break.
Sep 05th 2011
29
Wuthering Heights (Arnold)
Aug 23rd 2011
8
Won cinematography award at Venice + clips.
Sep 11th 2011
32
Damsels in Distress (Stillman)
Aug 23rd 2011
9
RE: Damsels in Distress (Stillman)
Sep 11th 2011
33
360 (Meirelles)
Aug 23rd 2011
10
TIFF reviews.
Sep 11th 2011
34
Moneyball (Miller)
Aug 23rd 2011
11
Most reviews have called film a "triple."
Sep 11th 2011
35
Trishna (Winterbottom)
Aug 23rd 2011
12
Doesn't seem to have interested many critics to seek it out.
Sep 11th 2011
36
Salmon Fishing in the Yemen (Hallstrom)
Aug 23rd 2011
13
CBS Films picked it up for US distribution today.
Sep 11th 2011
37
Take This Waltz (Polley)
Aug 23rd 2011
14
2 clips + reviews: love it or hate it.
Sep 11th 2011
38
Rampart (Moverman)
Aug 23rd 2011
15
Clips + mixed reviews.
Sep 11th 2011
39
50/50 (Levine)
Aug 23rd 2011
16
Early press screening held; response positive.
Sep 11th 2011
40
      Seeing this tomorrow. I'm strangely excited.
Sep 12th 2011
43
The Lady (Besson)
Aug 23rd 2011
17
Jeff Who Lives At Home (Duplass Bros.)
Aug 23rd 2011
18
Opens March of 2012.
Sep 11th 2011
41
The Already-Debuted (Sundance, Cannes, etc.)
Aug 23rd 2011
19
Teasers and trailers for listed films available as of today.
Aug 23rd 2011
20
Will be seeing the following at TIFF
Sep 05th 2011
26
Very cool.
Sep 05th 2011
28
5 new films to the mix + Venice hands out awards.
Sep 11th 2011
30

ricky_BUTLER
Member since Jul 06th 2003
16899 posts
Tue Aug-23-11 05:37 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
1. "The Ides Of March (Clooney)"
In response to Reply # 0


          

Venice: 08/31
TIFF: 09/09, 09/10

George Clooney is back in the director’s chair for this edgy political drama set in the days leading up to a fictional presidential primary. Clooney also stars as a Democratic candidate who schools his idealistic campaign press secretary (Ryan Gosling) in the dubious machinations of modern politics.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

ricky_BUTLER
Member since Jul 06th 2003
16899 posts
Tue Aug-23-11 05:39 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
2. "Carnage (Polanski)"
In response to Reply # 0


          

Venice: 09/01

The film follows two sets of parents (Kate Winslet, Christoph Waltz and Jodie Foster, John C. Reilly) who meet up to talk after their children have been in a fight that day at school.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
jigga
Charter member
31583 posts
Wed Aug-24-11 11:26 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
21. "Intriguing trailer. Does the whole flick take place in a single setting?"
In response to Reply # 2
Wed Aug-24-11 11:36 AM by jigga

  

          

Those are tough sells sometimes. I'm not a big Polanski fan but I'll check it out for the cast more than likely.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
Frank Longo
Member since Nov 18th 2003
86673 posts
Wed Aug-24-11 01:42 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
22. "It's a Tony-winning play. Hysterical on Broadway."
In response to Reply # 21


  

          

Can't wait for the film.

My movies: http://russellhainline.com
My movie reviews: https://letterboxd.com/RussellHFilm/
My beer TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@thebeertravelguide

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
ricky_BUTLER
Member since Jul 06th 2003
16899 posts
Thu Sep-01-11 10:51 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
23. "Venice reviews."
In response to Reply # 2


          

Theme: Feels like a play, effective in its simplicity, however stagey, while letting the actors do what they do well.

Most acting praise for Jodie Foster and Christoph Waltz.

http://blogs.indiewire.com/theplaylist/archives/2011/09/01/venice_11_review_carnage/
. . . A film of very little ambition, a minor entry in the director’s canon. Perhaps it was just the desire to shoot something fast and quick after his brush with justice, which is certainly understandable, but he has essentially taken a pre-existing script, cast four A-listers, locked them in a room, and shot it.

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/film/review-23982982-carnage-venice-film-festival---first-review.do
The film celebrates an old-fashioned, underrated cinematic pleasure: the chance to see an ensemble cast of fine actors sparring with each other, and at the top of their game.

http://whatculture.com/film/venice-2011-review-roman-polanskis-carnage.php
Polanski’s direction is simple and makes good use of the hand held camera and some authentic Polanski compositions of the frame, his clear directorial signature voice he hasn’t lost over the decades. He lets the story and the actor do all the job, confirming that to make a good film all you really need is a good story and good acting.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2011/sep/01/carnage-review-polanski-kate-winslet
Arguably, it does turn a shade too shrill – and therefore too obviously farcical – in the final stretch, once the alcohol has been brought out and the mobile phone dumped in the vase of water. That aside, the film barely puts a foot wrong. The acting comes at full throttle while the pacing cranks up the tension in agonising, incremental degrees.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/filmreviews/8735059/Venice-Film-Festival-2011-Carnage-review.html
It’s well-acted and giddily enjoyable, if slightly less so once the characters start to analyse their descent into barbarism.

http://incontention.com/2011/09/01/review-carnage-12/
Polanski’s straight-ahead, self-effacingly stagy treatment has a tendency to magnify this grandly amusing play’s slight pettiness and narrowness of focus.

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/reviews/carnage-venice-film-festival-2347819.html
Adapted from Yasmina Reza's play, it is a chamber piece, lasting barely 80 minutes. Thanks to the coruscating dialogue and four tremendous central performances, the film transcends its stage origins.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/carnage-venice-film-review-230266
Snappy, nasty, deftly acted and perhaps the fastest paced film ever directed by a 78-year-old, this adaptation of Yasmina Reza's award-winning play God of Carnage fully delivers the laughs and savagery of the stage piece while entirely convincing as having been shot in New York, even though it was filmed in Paris for well-known reasons.

http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117945929/
The real battle in Roman Polanski's brisk, fitfully amusing adaptation of Yasmina Reza's popular play is a more formal clash between stage minimalism and screen naturalism, as this acid-drenched four-hander never shakes off a mannered, hermetic feel that consistently betrays its theatrical origins.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

ricky_BUTLER
Member since Jul 06th 2003
16899 posts
Tue Aug-23-11 05:40 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
3. "W.E. (Madonna)"
In response to Reply # 0


          

Venice: 09/01
TIFF: 09/12, 09/13

Second-time director Madonna returns with W.E., featuring Abbie Cornish as Wally Winthrop, a woman in 1998 who is infatuated with the 1930s marriage of King Edward VIII (James D'Arcy) and American divorcée Wallis Simpson (Andrea Riseborough). Spanning six decades, W.E. gracefully weaves the past and present into two parallel love stories.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
ricky_BUTLER
Member since Jul 06th 2003
16899 posts
Thu Sep-01-11 11:02 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
24. "Some reviews in."
In response to Reply # 3


          

Perhaps it's because it had to play second fiddle to Carnage today, but there haven't been many reviews filed thus far for W.E. Or maybe critics were simply left unaroused / unmotivated. Guy Lodge, for instance, of incontention.com, only has so far managed a few choice tweets (@GuyLodge) on the film: "Absurd charm-bracelet film in which we learn how little Madonna knows about love, history, humanity, narrative."

Theme: Messy, amateurish with nice costuming.

In hindsight, this film shouldn't even be considered in this post. Madonna as a director certainly never inspired me with much hope, but I did get caught up in the hype of the Weinsteins pulling the trigger on and purchasing it before it ever formally debuted. Guess I was as wrong as they were.

http://blogs.indiewire.com/theplaylist/archives/venice_11_review_w.e_madonna_abbie_cornish_premiere/
Madonna's visual approach could best be described as “throw it at the wall and see what sticks.” The camera barely sits still, stock changes from shot to shot, people walk down corridors in slow motion, all without rhyme or reason. And she can’t really block a scene either, which is most notable during a crucial declaration of love staged with David chasing Wallis around a tree. It doesn’t help that the editing is virtually nonsensical, and never misses an opportunity for a half-assed match cut.

http://whatculture.com/film/venice-2011-review-madonnas-w-e.php
The film feels a little long and that is a problem for a movie that runs only for two hours. Other than that it was very interesting to watch. Visually stunning, with great set decorations and costume design that brought back to life the splendor of those years.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2011/sep/01/w-e-madonna-wallis-simpson-review.
A primped and simpering folly, the turkey that dreamed it was a peacock. What an extraordinarily silly, preening, fatally mishandled film this is. It may even surpass 2008's Filth and Wisdom, Madonna's calamitous first outing as a film-maker. Her direction is so all over the shop that it barely qualifies as direction at all. W.E. gives us slo-mo and jump cuts and a crawling crane shot up a tree in Balmoral, but they are all just tricks without a purpose.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/filmreviews/8735064/Venice-Film-Festival-2011-W.E.-review.html
A curious notion, and not truly an enticing one. Yet W.E. is rather better than expected; it’s bold, confident and not without amusing moments.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/we-venice-film-review-230267
The film most closely resembles a sumptuous documentary about a young beauty on an exclusive shopping expedition.

http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117945931/
Burdened with risible dialogue and weak performances, pic doesn't have much going for it apart from lavish production design and terrific, well-researched costumes -- and it's in focus, which is more than can be said for the script.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
ricky_BUTLER
Member since Jul 06th 2003
16899 posts
Sun Sep-11-11 11:28 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
42. "Clips."
In response to Reply # 3


          

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5RPL2_L6H4

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

ricky_BUTLER
Member since Jul 06th 2003
16899 posts
Tue Aug-23-11 05:41 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
4. "A Dangerous Method (Cronenberg)"
In response to Reply # 0


          

Venice: 09/02
TIFF: 09/10, 09/12

For his third consecutive collaboration with Viggo Mortensen, David Cronenberg adapts Christopher Hampton's 2002 stage play concerning the turbulent relationship between Carl Jung (Michael Fassbender) and his mentor Sigmund Freud (Mortensen) as they struggle to treat a troubled patient (Keira Knightley).

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

ricky_BUTLER
Member since Jul 06th 2003
16899 posts
Tue Aug-23-11 05:43 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
5. "Contagion (Soderbergh)"
In response to Reply # 0


          

Venice: 09/03

Contagion follows the rapid progress of a lethal airborne virus that kills within days. As the fast-moving epidemic grows, the worldwide medical community races to find a cure and control the panic that spreads faster than the virus itself. At the same time, ordinary people struggle to survive in a society coming apart. This film stars Marion Cotillard, Matt Damon, Laurence Fishburne, Jude Law, Gwyneth Paltrow, and Kate Winslet.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
ricky_BUTLER
Member since Jul 06th 2003
16899 posts
Sat Sep-03-11 12:30 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
25. "Contagion inspires spirit of this post: can't stop, won't stop."
In response to Reply # 5


          

They're saying: Engrossing, creates a real sense of unease but some characters are a bit thin.

Most acting praise for Jennifer Ehle. Damon, Fishburne, and Winslet also get some recognition.

http://blogs.indiewire.comhttp://blogs.indiewire.com/theplaylist/archives/venice_11_review_contagion_soderbergh_propulsive_terrifying_picture/
On the whole, like “Ocean’s Eleven” a decade ago, the film is the kind of smart, grown-up entertainment that mostly doesn’t get made anymore, a firmly entertaining, commercial project made with impeccable craft. Unlike that film, it’s also got a good deal of substance going for it, and it lingers on the mind, and on the skin, for some time afterwards.

http://www.timeout.com/film/reviews/89625/contagion.html
There’s a naivety to the film’s epilogue . . . that edges this into wishy-washy anti-globalisation territory and a couple of story-strand resolutions are more sappy than expected. Mostly, though, it’s a level-headed, energetic and enjoyable tale of terror and a world gone wrong.

http://whatculture.com/film/venice-2011-review-steven-soderberghs-contagion.php
Contagion does not contain Soderbergh’s touch, his usual rhythm is lost, the film works slowly and plainly and nothing really big happens. If it was a heart rate monitor it would be almost flat, no pulse. However it is a watchable film, that leaves room for many questions but that at least can be a good starting point of discussion.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2011/sep/03/contagion-steven-soderbergh-review
With Soderbergh shooting and editing his own films, Contagion is well assembled and propulsive, though like the virus, it loses momentum. Refreshingly, the virus doesn't appear to be a metaphor for consumerism or politics. This is a straight-up movie, serious but, crucially, also slightly silly in the knowing Soderbergh style, always aware that it's a disaster movie, not a documentary.

http://incontention.com/2011/09/02/contagion-keeps-you-at-arms-length-by-design/
I feel like the film comes in for a soft landing ultimately and you could even say it pulls a punch or two in resolution, but that’s also very much by design, merely working against your expectations of fiction. Reality was a goal here, which is ultimately what sets the film apart in the genre. On the whole, it’s a well-crafted piece of work from a unique script by Soderbergh-collaborator-as-of-late Burns

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/contagion-film-review-230993
A shrewd, unsensationalistic, non-visual effects-dependent global disaster melodrama, Contagion creates a credible picture of how the world might react (and, up to a point, has reacted) in the face of a rapidily spreading mystery disease for which no cure exists. Director Steven Soderbergh and screenwriter Scott Z. Burns create unease and simmering tension without going over the top into souped-up suspense or gross-out moments.

http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117945945/
Without fully rounded characters, it's hard to care who lives or dies in what amounts to an extended procedural on how disease prevention orgs might respond to such a scenario.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

ricky_BUTLER
Member since Jul 06th 2003
16899 posts
Tue Aug-23-11 05:44 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
6. "Shame (McQueen)"
In response to Reply # 0


          

Venice: 09/04
TIFF: 09/11, 09/13

Michael Fassbender plays a New York man confronting his sexual compulsions and the self-destructive acts of his sister (Carey Mulligan). From the director of Hunger.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
ricky_BUTLER
Member since Jul 06th 2003
16899 posts
Sun Sep-11-11 11:01 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
31. "Picked up by Fox Searchlight for release in December. n/m"
In response to Reply # 6


          

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

ricky_BUTLER
Member since Jul 06th 2003
16899 posts
Tue Aug-23-11 05:45 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
7. "Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy (Alfredson)"
In response to Reply # 0


          

Venice: 09/05

Set in the 1970s, Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy finds George Smiley (Gary Oldman), a recently retired MI6 agent, doing his best to adjust to a life outside the secret service. However, when a disgraced agent reappears with information concerning a mole at the heart of the Circus, Smiley is drawn back in to the murky field of espionage. Tasked with investigating which of his trusted former colleagues has chosen to betray him and their country, Smiley narrows his search to four suspects – all experienced, urbane, successful agents – but past histories, rivalries and friendships make it far from easy to pinpoint the man who is eating away at the heart of the British establishment.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
ricky_BUTLER
Member since Jul 06th 2003
16899 posts
Mon Sep-05-11 12:01 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
27. "The one to beat?"
In response to Reply # 7


          

They're saying: A thinking person's spy flick with great acting all around.

Most acting praise for Gary Oldman, who had been touted in the role for a while now.

http://blogs.indiewire.com/theplaylist/archives/2011/09/05/venice_11_review_tinker_tailor_soldier_spy/
Few films here at Venice had such high expectations beforehand, so it gives us great pleasure to report that “Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy” is, on first viewing at least, incredibly rich and perfectly constructed, sitting with “The Conversation” and “The Ipcress File” in the very upper reaches of the genre. Alfredson appeared to be a major talent after “Let The Right One In,” and he exceeds his break-out here, never letting the style get in the way of the storytelling (as happened once or twice in the vampire film), while retaining an impeccable eye for period.

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/film/review-23983841-tinker-tailor-soldier-spy-venice-film-festival---review.do
Alfredson, who made the virtuoso vampire movie Let The Right One In, succeeds in showing us a world within a world where office jealousies, interminable bureaucracy and polite double-dealing are the order of the day. It is an effective celebration of Le Carré's artful story-telling, acted by one and all with a quiet panache that strikes home.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2011/sep/05/tinker-tailor-soldier-spy-review
. . . Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy, a marvellously chill and acrid cold war thriller from Swedish director Tomas Alfredson. Right here, right now, it's the film to beat at this year's festival.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/venice-film-festival/8741941/Venice-Film-Festival-Tinker-Tailor-Soldier-Spy-first-review.html
A superb adaptation of John le Carré’s brilliant, intricate Cold War spy novel, the film is a triumph. It’s packed with superb British actors, all at the top of their game, with the lengthy book skilfully condensed into just over two hours of riveting narrative.

http://incontention.com/2011/09/05/review-tinker-tailor-soldier-spy-12/
Alfredson was an inspired but sensitive choice to direct this potentially outmoded material, and his delicate mood-cultivating sensibility reaps the same rare rewards that it did in his previous hit. A classy throwback to the pleasures of long-view tale-spinning, and an evocation of a time and place fading before its occupants’ own eyes, this is as inactively riveting a thriller as anyone is allowed to make these days.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/tinker-tailor-soldier-spy-venice-231215
It is one of the few films so visually absorbing, felicitous shot after shot, that its emotional coldness is noticed only at the end, when all the plot twists are unraveled in a solid piece of thinking-man’s entertainment for upmarket thriller audiences.

http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117945968/
It was a stroke of genius to hire the Swedish Alfredson to direct this oh-so-English material, not only for the sideways-angle European sensibility he brings to the table, but also for the flair for suspense, off-center framing and gloomy sympathy for outsiders he demonstrated in the pre-teen-vampire story "Let the Right One In."

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
ricky_BUTLER
Member since Jul 06th 2003
16899 posts
Mon Sep-05-11 12:10 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
29. "Venice recap + taking a break. "
In response to Reply # 7


          

For those few of you that are interested, most of the big name flicks have now debuted at Venice. I'm going to stop posting updates for a couple days but then come back next weekend hopefully to finish the Venice rundown and pick up a couple days into Toronto's festivities.

In the meantime, here's a solid run-down on the Venice happenings as of yet.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2011/sep/04/venice-film-festival-2011

Maybe it's the prosaic peril of mid-budget film-making, or it could be that many of the early films at Venice have been based on plays, but this has so far been a festival of interiors. I've seen a lot of furniture, trinkets and wallpaper, from Wallis Simpson's dressing table and cocktail shakers to Freud's couch and Jodie Foster's coffee table. In the rooms, people come and go and, while Venice might be an appropriate place to be talking of Michelangelo, they've actually been discussing politics, spies, sex and chaos.

It is always dangerous to divine themes from a collection of disparate films at a festival, but there is a case at Venice, mainly as a result of festival director Marco Mueller's careful curation of the selection. So internalised has the cinema been so far that one might think the world's film-makers have got together to tell us that the world's problems can be solved first by sorting out one's home affairs, that the personal is the political once more.

The best film, and surely the favourite for the Golden Lion, is Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy. A clammy and classy adaptation of John Le Carré's novel, it conjures up a lost world of early 1970s London, a film of sealed rooms, Wimpy bars and shadowy Islington houses. These spies have their meetings in leak-proof, smoke-filled Portakabins encased in a vast bunker they call "the circus". The plot hangs on a "rotten apple", a mole in the MI6 system that needs to be weeded out.

Gary Oldman's inscrutable George Smiley studies his suspects: Ciaran Hinds, Colin Firth, Tom Hardy, Benedict Cumberbatch, Mark Strong, Toby Jones, Kathy Burke. It's a mouthwatering cast, and they are all quite brilliant in it. The production design is a marvel, the costumes are perfect, and just how Swedish director Tomas Alfredson got under the skin of British behaviour so intuitively is remarkable. They certainly, er, let the right one in there. I don't think there's a duff note in the whole piece, not even in the choice of Almodóvar's usual composer, Alberto Iglesias, to do the score. Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy premieres in Venice on Monday, and if I have been a bit leaky and sneaky in reviewing this excellent film now, then cart me off to Moscow.

George Clooney's The Ides of March, which opened the festival, bears many similarities in terms of chicanery and skullduggery, but is set in the world of American politics. Clooney himself stars as Mike Morris, a liberal candidate whose ideals and looks make him an ideal president but whose path to the top is littered with right-wing smears and power deals. Do you think George is telling us something about Obama?

The political game, conducted in campaign offices, airless hotel rooms and sports bars, doesn't come out of it well, but the film is a good one, based on a stage play, Farragut North, and boasting as good an American cast as Tinker does a British one: Ryan Gosling is terrific as the young spin doctor getting a lesson in hardball from veteran campaigners Paul Giamatti and Philip Seymour Hoffman. Evan Rachel Wood is strong, too, but as happens so often with girls in the clubby, male world of Clooney films, her character doesn't end well.

Claustrophobia is the dominant emotion of Roman Polanski's Carnage, a film he made while technically under house arrest. Based on a Yasmina Reza play, this is a stomach-churning peek into bourgeois life, viewed almost entirely through the keyhole of a tasteful Brooklyn apartment in which Jodie Foster and her husband (John C Reilly) bicker with Christoph Walz and his second wife, played by Kate Winslet.

Their initially civilised conversation, over apple cobbler and coffee, concerns what they should do after Walz's 11-year-old son has hit and wounded Foster's son in a fight in the Brooklyn Bridge Park. Polanski ratchets up the polite tension and barbs until Winslet can take no more and lets fly with an astonishing on-screen "barf" to rival The Exorcist or The Witches of Eastwick.

I was with her. Carnage is like a night at the theatre, full of unbearable people guffawing away, but it is clever, superbly performed in Polanski's slightly stylised manner, and it scratches away at the surface of things – Pinter's weasel under the cocktail cabinet replaced by a pet hamster.

I spent much of Carnage admiring the pictures, coffee-table books and kitchen appliances, all of which contribute perfectly to the atmosphere and theme of the film. Madonna's W.E. is obsessed with jewels and trophies, too, but the Material Girl never really sees beyond the shininess. An hour or so of Madonna's directing goes by quite smoothly. Yes, there's an annoying tendency for dolly shots and jumpy cuts, and stock changes as if someone's given her a box of new toys, but her twin stories – of a young woman, Wally (Abbie Cornish), in 1998 New York obsessed with "the romantic legend" of the affair between Wallis Simpson (Andrea Riseborough) and the Prince of Wales in 1930s England – seem to work for a while.

Cornish wanders around a Sotheby's exhibition that re-creates Simpson's boudoirs and salons, stroking her lockets and cigarette cases, her jewelled crucifixes and Schiaparelli gowns. It's when Riseborough starts appearing to Wally as a ghost on her own soon-to-be auctioned sofa and jabbering "I'll always be here for you" that the film begins unravelling horribly.

It's as if Madonna got good help for half the movie and then an editor quit, presumably in exasperation, telling her to get on with it herself. It's an ego trip, a vanity project, all of the things which work for short bursts of pop but which fatally scupper movies about real people. It looks good but it is self-regarding, chronically lacking in self-awareness and oh-so-painfully vacant.

With creeping horror as the film progresses, you realise Madonna clearly identifies with and admires both a modern woman who is borderline insane and an American woman who came to London and carried off the king. Both are to be pitied, it seems, for being trapped by their wealth and living in gilded cages of their own making.

Weirdly, for a star who gave us the book Sex, Madonna shows no intimate details of what might really have made Edward obsessed enough to give up the throne for a woman who "made the most of what she's got".

At least no actors were harmed in the making of this movie. If the modern-day Wally story is banal and inert, Andrea Riseborough gives it her all as Wallis, like a Joan Crawford impersonator on benzedrine.

Almost as a riposte, David Cronenberg's A Dangerous Method gets right in the psyche. Based on Christopher Hampton's play, The Talking Cure, it stars Keira Knightley as Sabina Spielrein, a patient of Michael Fassbender's Carl Jung, in turn a keen follower of Sigmund Freud (played against type by Viggo Mortensen).

The film has a clinical precision to its dialogue yet throbs with repressed desire. It is as ordered and tidy as a Viennese garden on the surface, and Cronenberg, perhaps surprisingly, doesn't unleash the maelstrom within, apart from the odd bit of spanking sex between Knightley and Fassbender.

I liked this strange film, and I liked Keira in it. She juts out her chin so fiercely when playing "mad" at the beginning but smartly tones her performance down to a reposed beauty. If, again, we spend much time with men talking in rooms, at least their conversation is fascinating. I particularly liked that (surely not coincidentally) Jung makes an appointment with Ms Spielrein to "see you next Tuesday".

Out of competition here were two Paris-set pleasures. Lou Ye, the Chinese director, premiered Love and Bruises, featuring Tahar Rahim having lots of sex with a former model, Corinne Yam, as market worker Mathieu and translator Hua respectively. The film has a dizzying, intimate style that is compelling in a mysterious way, a love story so far from cutesy romance that I found it deeply touching and sad. Rahim is as good here as Romain Duris was in The Beat That My Heart Skipped.

American documentary maker Fred Wiseman is expert in the minute observation of the inner workings of institutions. In his latest, Crazy Horse, he revels in the underground "temple of nude chic" that is the titular Paris night spot. His study of breasts, buttocks, artistic endeavour and female power is hypnotic and beautiful.

I was worried for his heart, but the camera remained admirably still throughout, and the 81-year-old director himself seemed perfectly happy at the film's premiere, walking in flanked by two of the dancing girls from the club.

After a career spent examining abattoirs, mental asylums and local government offices, you could hardly blame him.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

ricky_BUTLER
Member since Jul 06th 2003
16899 posts
Tue Aug-23-11 05:46 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
8. "Wuthering Heights (Arnold)"
In response to Reply # 0


          

Venice: 09/07
TIFF: 09/09, 09/10, 09/16

No starched lace, no panoramic views, no sweeping score — Andrea Arnold takes Emily Brontë’s classic novel and strips it to the root of youthful passion, restoring its stark power for a contemporary audience. Following her bracing portraits of female desire in Red Road and Fish Tank, Arnold pushes even further here, portraying love as a rush of heart-stopping beauty, cruelty and impulsive acts.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
ricky_BUTLER
Member since Jul 06th 2003
16899 posts
Sun Sep-11-11 11:05 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
32. "Won cinematography award at Venice + clips."
In response to Reply # 8


          

Clips: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsE2uyX2geM&feature=related

They're saying: Beautiful to look at, inventive, but loses force in second half.

Most acting praise for James Howson, playing the young Heathcliff.

http://blogs.indiewire.com/theplaylist/archives/venice_11_review_wuthering_heights_andrea_arnold_james_howson/
It’s not quite a tearjerker, Arnold playing up the anger of the novel, and we sort of feel that’s the way that it should be. It is, however, incredibly powerful, extremely sexy (there’s one scene
that takes place between Cathy and Heathcliff after the latter has been caned that’s more erotic than anything we’ve seen in a while), and a truly remarkable reinvention of a text that beforehand,
we weren’t sure we ever needed to see on screen again.

http://whatculture.com/film/venice-2011-review-andrea-arnolds-wuthering-heights.php
Overall the latest Wuthering Heights is very well made, even though for some people it may be be a little boring as the story spans through many years and there are many moments of absolutely no
music or dialogue and some long scenes where not a lot happens. But I guess that is the novel and if you have read Wuthering Heights and you liked it, then you will enjoy this version. If you are
not a fan of impossible love stories and films with lots of silence, then you may want to stay away from this.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2011/sep/06/wuthering-heights-review
What comes back is a beautiful rough beast of a movie, a costume drama like no other. This might not be warm, or even approachable, but it is never less than bullishly impressive.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/venice-film-festival/8745302/Venice-Film-Festival-2011-Wuthering-Heights-review.html
The first half of the film focuses on Heathcliff’s early years as he and Cathy run wild on the moors. Arnold likes casting non-actors and has coaxed wonderful performances from her two young leads.
Solomon Glave is a find as the young Heathcliff, wordlessly conveying the character’s pain as he suffers beatings and humiliations. . . . The second half is weak by comparison, as the adult
Heathcliff (James Howson) returns to find Cathy married. Howson gives a creditable performance for someone making his acting debut but fails to convey his character’s tortured soul.

http://incontention.com/2011/09/07/short-take-wuthering-heights-12/
This is a “Wuthering Heights” of weather and flesh and grass and locked eyes, one that has the simple common sense and staggering cinematic wherewithal to know that great adaptations don’t beat
great writers at their own game; they play a new game entirely.

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/reviews/wuthering-heights-venice-film-festival-2350178.html
What really fascinates is how Arnold has completely deprived the story of any romance. This is a story of emotional repression. The protagonists only realise the cost of love when it's way too
late. When Heathcliff returns as an adult (James Howson) his motivations are as grey as the clouds. However, in pushing the story so far in this direction, Arnold has lost some of the magic of the
text, which makes it far more difficult to have any emotional connection with the characters.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/wuthering-heights-venice-film-review-231615
Andrea Arnold’s Wuthering Heights shows how 21st century cinema can — and should — go about boldly revitalizing even the most familiar literary properties. Emily Brontë’s oft-filmed, multi-
generational 1847 tale of forbidden passions in rural northern England may deal with fictional events set 300 years in the past, but Arnold and her collaborators depict them with a vivid, urgent
vibrancy that instantly and absorbingly erases the gap of centuries.

http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117945980/
Working with mostly non-professional thesps whose inexperience drains away much of the material's intrinsic passion, pic is dramatically flat and almost stylized in its austere excision of
dialogue, non-source music and, strangest of all given the book's romantic rep, overt love scenes.

http://www.hitfix.com/blogs/motion-captured/posts/review-andrea-arnolds-wuthering-heights-is-beautiful-but-disappointing
The problem is that aside from the cinematography and that sensual quality it lends to the film, there's nothing else about "Wuthering Heights" that I can recommend. You might as well re-title the picture "Andrea Arnold's Photography Exhibit On Themes From 'Wuthering Heights'," because this is a still life. It's a non-motion picture. It is dramatically inert, and almost baffling in the way it misses the mark.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

ricky_BUTLER
Member since Jul 06th 2003
16899 posts
Tue Aug-23-11 05:47 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
9. "Damsels in Distress (Stillman)"
In response to Reply # 0


          

Venice: 09/10
TIFF: 09/13, 09/14

Back after a thirteen-year hiatus, Whit Stillman returns with Damsels in Distress- a film that is distinctly offbeat, even manic, compared to his classic nineties comedies of manners, and yet retains his precise wit and refined dialogue. Damsels in Distress takes a unique look into the psyche of privileged American youth, focusing on a group of undergraduates at a leafy East Coast university that has only recently begun to accept female students.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
ricky_BUTLER
Member since Jul 06th 2003
16899 posts
Sun Sep-11-11 11:08 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
33. "RE: Damsels in Distress (Stillman)"
In response to Reply # 9


          

*Most critics seemed to have left Venice well in advance of the festival's closing night, when Damsels in Distress had its premiere.

Clips: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Q46nNv7THyI

They're saying: Delightful, wry, though tech-credits are bland.

Most acting praise for Sacramento's own, Greta Gerwig.

http://incontention.com/2011/09/10/venice-delicious-damsels-breaks-the-closing-night-curse/
For it gives me no small amount of pleasure to report that Stillman’s latest is an unequivocal delight — a warmly off-kilter and wholly unique campus comedy that has not only redeemed an otherwise
sluggish final few days on the Lido, but has provided the purest shot of joy in the entire festival.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/damsels-distress-venice-film-review-233723
(With this) material, some silly, some over familiar, Stillman proceeds to spin a frothy confection whose flavors are simultaneously tart and sweet. He treads a tricky comic line between exaggeration and caricature, ensuring the film’s many absurdities are generally more delightful than grating.

http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117946036/
Pic is chockfull of daft digressions and sweetly silly subplots, but the ensemble goes at it all with such deadpan rigor, it plays like vintage screwball comedy minus the pratfalls . . . Stillman's screenplay is a thing of beauty. Helmer's comic timing is likewise right on the money, but in a largely self-effacing, quietly efficient way that recalls the old-school craftsmen of Hollywood's golden age, like Howard Hawks in a breezy mood.

http://www.soundonsight.org/tiff-2011-the-skin-i-live-in-restless-damsels-in-distress/
All involved are perfectly cast and Gerwig shines, but it will come as little surprise to Stillman fans that it’s Damsels meticulously mordant dialogue that truly steals the show. Evidently, despite a 13-year hiatus, Stillman’s rapier wit and delicately skewed sensibilities remain firmly intact.

http://www.screendaily.com/reviews/the-latest/damsels-in-distress/5031917.article
As it is we get another Whit Stillman movie: droll and precious, erudite and talky, occasionally hilarious but more often annoyingly mannered in its deliberately stilted dialogue, stiff TV-soap-style camerawork and editing rhythm, and frustratingly meandering script structure.

http://exclaim.ca/Reviews/TIFF/damsels_in_distress-directed_by_whit_stillman
The dialogue is consistently hilarious, making the awkward pacing and dreadful direction somewhat palatable.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

ricky_BUTLER
Member since Jul 06th 2003
16899 posts
Tue Aug-23-11 05:49 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
10. "360 (Meirelles)"
In response to Reply # 0


          

TIFF: 09/09, 09/10

Director Fernando Meirelles (City of God) reunites with his Constant Gardener star Rachel Weisz, who stars opposite Jude Law, Anthony Hopkins, and Ben Foster in this uncompromising dramatic thriller fueled by the notion of how sexual relationships can transgress social boundaries.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
ricky_BUTLER
Member since Jul 06th 2003
16899 posts
Sun Sep-11-11 11:09 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
34. "TIFF reviews."
In response to Reply # 10


          

They're saying: Globe-trotting appeal let down by over-stuffed story.

No one in the cast has really been singled out in any consistenly positive way.

http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117946033/
With a multilingual cast of mostly unfamiliar faces, plus a few stars, "360" feels too abstract, orchestrating break-ups and hook-ups in a passionless vacuum. For screenwriter Peter Morgan, it's the same problem that plagued "Hereafter" spread across an even more unwieldy ensemble.

http://movies.yahoo.com/blogs/the-projector/toronto-2011-review-360-193029141.html
The individual vignettes are handled with a masterful eye for composition and pacing, but "360" has so little emotional resonance beneath its coincidences, ironic parallels, and "hey, ain't life random?" musings that you mostly sit there wasting time thinking about composition and pacing. Meirelles is an immensely talented filmmaker, but with "360" he's a filmmaker too busy throwing his talent around in a showy way.

http://www.screendaily.com/reviews/the-latest/360/5031893.article
The film is inspired by Arthur Schnitzler’s classic La Ronde, but is elegantly updated by screenwriter Peter Morgan and director Fernando Meirelles for a modern-day medley of stories that take in love, passion, chance, temptation and friendship all set against a stunning backdrop of vivid locations.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/360-toronto-review-233747
With a starry international cast and multinational locations, you never take your eyes off the screen for a second. On the other hand, this is a cold and cerebral movie, where one’s attachment to any particular character or story is tentative at best. You watch the film rather than get absorbed by it. It’s art house with Hollywood credentials.

http://collider.com/360-review/110911/
It’s another tired anthology of uninspired vignettes that show us how we’re all connected especially if the script is written that way. The movie manages to waste a talented cast, its director’s abilities, and two hours of the viewer’s time.

http://www.themortonreport.com/entertainment/film/the-tiff-spew-god-bless-america-and-360/
Hey kids, did you know that even though it feels like we live in a bubble, all of humanity is actually interconnected? In fact, every little decision we make can actually have an impact across the globe. Mercifully the deeply disappointing, multi-character mosaic movie 360 stops short of actually saying that regurgitated nonsense out loud though sadly the well worn theme is hammered home so hard that it might be a good idea for theater owners to hand out vomit bags with each purchased ticket.

http://film500.wordpress.com/2011/09/10/236-360/
Like Crash, Traffic, and a number of similarly styled films, the many stories in 360 share a thematic thread, but this one is looser than most. The film also unravels a bit at the end, undermining what should have been a tense dramatic moment with a light and goofy score. The visual treatment using reflections and seamless split-screens does grease the story along, but when the film finally comes full circle, it stops short of saying anything profound.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

ricky_BUTLER
Member since Jul 06th 2003
16899 posts
Tue Aug-23-11 05:50 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
11. "Moneyball (Miller)"
In response to Reply # 0


          

TIFF: 09/09, 09/10, 09/17

Bennett Miller’s follow-up to 2005’s Capote stars Brad Pitt as Billy Beane, the Oakland Athletics’ general manager whose unorthodox approach to fielding a team had a major impact on the game. Jonah Hill and Philip Seymour Hoffman co-star in this clever and compelling work of sports realism.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
ricky_BUTLER
Member since Jul 06th 2003
16899 posts
Sun Sep-11-11 11:12 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
35. "Most reviews have called film a "triple.""
In response to Reply # 11


          

Most reviewers also have admitted to not knowing baseball.

They're saying: Avoids conventional storytelling in its smart presentation of the game of baseball, though occasional narrative over-simplificaiton still remains.

Most acting praise for Brad Pitt as Billy Beane.

http://www.indiewire.com/article/2011/09/09/toronto_review_moneyball_finds_commerciality_in_unlikely_places
“Moneyball” translates statistics into the formula for a crowdpleaser by simply glossing over them. Although focused on a reinvention of major league rules, as commercial entertainment, it’s still
the old ballgame.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2011/sep/09/moneyball-review-aaron-sorkin
Overall though, Moneyball is more melodramatic than one might expect from the pen of Sorkin (who massaged an earlier draft by Steven Zaillian), gooier in the middle and coshing the audience with
emotional wallops.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/moneyball-toronto-review-233013
Director Bennett Miller, who coaxed a satisfying movie out of unlikely material with Capote, puts Moneyball through a workman-like pace. If the movie fails to achieve the knockout punch of Social
Network, this may be because another film altogether was originally imagined. Steven Soderbergh was set to direct Zaillian’s script when Columbia pulled the plug due to concerns with the budget and
changes in the original screenplay. One can only wonder what that version would look like as Soderbergh, like Beane, is not one to do things according to old formulas. Nevertheless, this Moneyball
stands on its own as a strong, rewarding effort to pull unusual personalities and a timeless story from a welter of Inside Baseball.

http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117946003/
Moneyball" is content to draw back the curtain and find drama in the dealings. Miller's low-key style suits that strategy nicely, breaking up shop-talk scenes with artful, quiet moments in which
Beane steps away from the action, nicely captured by d.p. Wally Pfister.

http://hollywood-elsewhere.com/2011/09/moneyball_seren.php
Bennett Miller's Moneyball (Sony, 9.23) is my idea of a triumph. A triumph of surprise and deception, I should add. It's an emotionally low-key, thinking man's Field of Dreams -- a smart, true-to-
life, business-of-baseball movie with a touch of the mystical and the sublime, and propelled along by a highly pleasurable lead performance by Brad Pitt.

http://blogs.indiewire.com/theplaylist/archives/tiff_11_review_moneyball_brad_pitt_jonah_hill_bennett-miller_sorkin/
It has been a long time since we’ve had a great baseball movie, but “Moneyball” is one for our age. Smart and witty, Miller’s film finds the excitement in the sport that has long been missing from
the actual game, and, thanks to Sorkin, comes at it from an angle that is frequently fresh, funny and invigorating. It turns out the best place to see baseball, is at your local multiplex.

http://social.entertainment.msn.com/movies/blogs/the-hitlist-blogpost.aspx?post=fc2598bd-ce19-4db0-ba88-b1029b08cd94
Miller, to his credit, does a great job with the direction (the sound mix alone is a thing of beauty, and he can make a baseball stadium seem like both a playground and a workplace), but at a
certain point, watching the film, I felt like a frustrated 8th grade math teacher -- I knew the film was showing the correct answers, but I wanted to see the work. Miller occasionally shows us a
graph or a plotted set of numbers, but mostly we're told Brand's theories should work and then shown that they do.

http://blog.moviefone.com/2011/09/08/moneyball-review-toronto-international-film-festival
. . . (There is a ) brief moment where Brand shows Beane a tape of a young prospect hitting a home run without even realizing it. "It's a metaphor," Brand says, and Beane speaks for the audience
when he snaps back, "I know it's a metaphor." Still, it applies to more than just Beane; audience members, too, may look back on this deceptively quiet, even plodding film and realize that, like a
pitcher's duel on a long summer day, it meant more than they realized -- and maybe more than anyone had a right to expect.

http://whatculture.com/film/toronto-2011-review-moneyball-brad-pitts-entertaining-baseball-romp.php
It is a little saddening to see that Mr Sorkin’s usual razor sharp wit and machine gun patter is upsettingly absent, but the script serves its purpose. It takes a very complicated subject that
wouldn’t be of interest to a lot of others and moulds it into something relatable. Much like Sorkin did last year with The Social Network, minus the brilliance.

http://www.comingsoon.net/news/reviewsnews.php?id=81871
"Moneyball" is a movie that lives or dies by its killer screenwriting and the equally satisfying performance by Brad Pitt, and there's little doubt it wouldn't have worked even in the slightest
without both those elements in place. It may not feel quite like the classic baseball movie others have achieved, but it's certainly pleasant enough to be enjoyable even by non-sports fans.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

ricky_BUTLER
Member since Jul 06th 2003
16899 posts
Tue Aug-23-11 05:51 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
12. "Trishna (Winterbottom)"
In response to Reply # 0


          

TIFF: 09/09, 09/10, 09/18

Self-effacing British auteur Michael Winterbottom sets his unique spin on Thomas Hardy’s Tess of the D’Urbervilles against a contemporary Indian backdrop. Freida Pinto stars as the titular Trishna, a young woman who is seduced by the wealthy son of a property developer. As the romance develops, their relationship also becomes increasingly sordid and volatile.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
ricky_BUTLER
Member since Jul 06th 2003
16899 posts
Sun Sep-11-11 11:14 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
36. "Doesn't seem to have interested many critics to seek it out."
In response to Reply # 12


          

Yes, I'm using tweets, but only from film-related folks.

They're saying: Visually pleasing, distinct, but tonally disjointed.

Most acting praise for Freida Pinto; they're saying she can actually act.

http://www.screendaily.com/reviews/the-latest/trishna/5031895.article
Trishna does feel overlong and starts to drift in a slightly repetitive, doom-laden second half but that makes the surprisingly steamy sex and violent denouement all the more shocking. What begins as an infatuation similar to In The Mood For Love ends much closer to the destructive obsession of In The Realm of The Senses.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/trishna-toronto-review-233759
Visually and aurally, the film benefits from a strong sense of place, without overworking the ethnic exotica. If this transposition of Hardy comes up a little short in emotional impact, it nonetheless is a distinctive new take on a classic story.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2011/sep/11/trishna-review-michael-winterbottom-film
Trishna is Winterbottom's take on Tess of the d'Urbervilles, filmed previously by Roman Polanski in Tess, an epic, slow but hypnotic period movie. Winterbottom's version is shorter, set very much in the present, and diverts from Hardy's text in many ways, but is just as compelling. The technical qualities are superb. India is more than just a backdrop, the camera captures a studious, almost documentary-style vision of the country, one that never segues into kitsch, post-Slumdog cultural tourism.

http://twitter.com/#!/glennsumi/status/112380058777292800
Director Winterbottom said he was working on finishing TRISHNA up til 1.5 weeks ago. It shows. Terribly uneven.

http://twitter.com/#!/TwitchFilm/status/112592576103714816
Trishna is low key even for Winterbottom, but he gets the details of urban bustle and rural domesticity right.

http://twitter.com/#!/RylandAldrich/status/112599556864212992
TRISHNA is a beautiful vision of India but the story far too rambling. Not one of Winterbottom's more compelling.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

ricky_BUTLER
Member since Jul 06th 2003
16899 posts
Tue Aug-23-11 05:52 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
13. "Salmon Fishing in the Yemen (Hallstrom)"
In response to Reply # 0


          

TIFF: 09/10, 09/11

Ewan McGregor stars as a fisheries scientist who finds himself saddled with the task of introducing salmon fishing to the Highlands of Yemen. Director Lasse Hallström adapts this charming British comedy from Paul Torday’s acclaimed novel.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
ricky_BUTLER
Member since Jul 06th 2003
16899 posts
Sun Sep-11-11 11:16 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
37. "CBS Films picked it up for US distribution today."
In response to Reply # 13


          

Note: reaction from Twitter folks was stronger than critical response.

They're saying: Generally crowd-pleasing, if overly sweet; diverges from the book.

Most acting praise for Kristin Scott Thomas in a supporting role.

http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117946044/
Like one of those kitchen machines that can turn nearly any ingredient into ice cream, Lasse Hallstrom has sweetened the satire right out of Paul Torday's side-splitting political sendup "Salmon Fishing in the Yemen." Hallstrom has built a respectable career bringing surface polish to feel-good stories, and he's not about to get all philosophical now.

http://www.hitfix.com/blogs/awards-campaign/posts/review-salmon-fishing-in-the-yemen-unsuccessfully-tries-to-duplicate-working-title-formula
The big problem with "Salmon Fishing" is that it doesn't really know what sort of movie it wants to be. On the one hand, the relationship between Fred and Harriet seems right out of any Working Title romantic comedy from the past 15 years. Fine. In theory, Blunt and McGregor are more than capable of pulling that off. On the flip side, the political shenanigans are so over the top they seem like they are in a completely different film.

http://www.screendaily.com/reviews/the-latest/salmon-fishing-in-the-yemen/5031922.article?referrer=RSS
Veteran director Lasse Halstrom has a strong track record with soft-centred tearjerkers (Chocolat, Dear John etc) and the combination of the source material and the cast should help place Salmon Fishing as a solid, middlebrow attraction. Torday’s novel was notable for its flippant satire of British politics, blithe spin doctors, cant and hypocrisy. Those qualities are still evident in Simon Beaufoy’s screen adaptation but sit uneasily with the sentimental odd couple love story.

http://collider.com/salmon-fishing-in-the-yemen-review/114283/
Salmon Fishing in the Yemen does so much right for its first two-thirds that we’re able to accept its stumbling finish. For adults who feel like the only comedies they’re getting are raunchy R-rated flicks, Yemen is a nice change of pace. Thanks to Hallström, the cast, and the writing, Salmon Fishing in the Yemen finds its humor without being abrasive and its romance without being too sappy.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2011/sep/11/salmon-fishing-in-the-yemen
Hallström wheels out the "swimming against the tide" visual metaphor once too often, too, and there's some drop-off in pace towards the end. But this isn't half as gooey as one might expect, and its standing ovation at Toronto suggests that even if some Brits find the whole thing a bit rich, the export market looks likely to lap it up.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

ricky_BUTLER
Member since Jul 06th 2003
16899 posts
Tue Aug-23-11 05:53 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
14. "Take This Waltz (Polley)"
In response to Reply # 0


          

TIFF: 09/10, 09/11

Sarah Polley makes a welcome return to directing with her first feature since 2006 Festival favorite Away from Her. Luke Kirby, Seth Rogen, Sarah Silverman and two-time Oscar®-nominee Michelle Williams star in this bittersweet story about a married woman struggling to choose between her husband and a man she's just met.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
ricky_BUTLER
Member since Jul 06th 2003
16899 posts
Sun Sep-11-11 11:18 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
38. "2 clips + reviews: love it or hate it."
In response to Reply # 14


          

Husband and wife take a rickshaw ride led by the other guy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OdYfCZAjeg4

The other guy and the wife walking in the Toronto streets
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHQYr26GWh8

They're saying: Williams' character can be unlikable and threatens this tough, unconventional film.

Most acting praise for Seth Rogen's dramatic turn.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/take-waltz-toronto-film-review-233892
Sarah Polley’s banal second feature is emotionally fraudulent and far too infatuated with its own preciousness.

http://www.awardsdaily.com/2011/09/tiff-2011-day-3-the-artist-the-descendants-moneyball-take-the-waltz/
As Margot navigates the steps of her desires, Take this Waltz builds a sweet and honest tale of complicated love.

http://collider.com/take-this-waltz-review/113009/
It’s nice to see a movie like this that makes you draw your own conclusions, but there’s a pretty big catch. You see, because it’s difficult to tell if the main character makes the right decision, it’s also difficult to tell if she’s even a character even worth liking. Ambiguity is nice, but walking out of a theater feeling like you despise a character who you just spent two hours with isn’t particularly satisfying.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2011/sep/11/take-this-waltz-film-review
As with Away From Her, the focus is narrow and intense – Sarah Silverman pitches in with light relief as Lou's ex-alcoholic sister – but the plot mimics the all-consuming focus of infatuation, highly alive to the colour and light in the everyday. Cliches are steered away from at key moments, and the whole project feels grounded in humane observation. Polley is to liberal Canadian couples in their late 20s who cook organic and dig Leonard Cohen what Joanna Hogg is to repressed upper middle class English families: a translator, an explainer.

http://blacksheepreviews.blogspot.com/2011/09/tiff-review-take-this-waltz.html
Margot is an unhappy sap, who sees her marriage to a supportive man as a true burden and who portends that the path she has taken holds her back without admitting it was of her own making or doing a single thing to change it. To watch her debate the greener grass across the street from her is an exercise in great patience as she comes off as unappreciative, immature and unaware. Granted, yes, people just like Margot exist in real life but the sympathy with which Polley demands for Margot is too much to ask and Margot never does one thing to deserve it.

http://www.hollywoodnews.com/2011/09/11/sarah-polleys-take-this-waltz-the-first-misfire-of-tiff-2011/
Polley wants to, and occasionally does, set a heartbreaking mood as Margot fluctuates between what the heart wants and what her marriage deserves. But I couldn’t connect with “Waltz” because I found the Margot character to be detestable, and Polley’s tendency to lean on Young Adult, harlequin expressions of squeamish “passion” rang false. “

http://www.movies.com/movie-news/take-this-waltz-review/4437?wssac=164&wssaffid=news
By offering up no moral certainty, no distinct message or condemnation, Polley is free to dance with all of life’s little quirks, even comedy. Take This Waltz uses humor and irony as its fuel, plucking out real-life laughs from both its seasoned comedic talent (Rogen and Sarah Silverman, who plays Geraldine, his sister and Margot’s friend) and its dramatic backbone (Williams).

http://www.screendaily.com/reviews/the-latest/take-this-waltz/5031950.article
A bittersweet tale of a young woman in love with her playful husband, yet tantalised by a new lover, Sarah Polley’s Take This Waltz is not as mature as her auspicious debut Away From Her. But the film is still a worthy second effort, continuing the actress-turned-director’s sensitive investigation into the endurance - and limits - of love over time.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

ricky_BUTLER
Member since Jul 06th 2003
16899 posts
Tue Aug-23-11 05:53 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
15. "Rampart (Moverman)"
In response to Reply # 0


          

TIFF: 09/10, 09/12, 09/18

Woody Harrelson gives a ferocious performance as a dirty cop, balancing a home life with two ex-wives as he becomes embroiled in the Los Angeles Police Department's infamous Rampart corruption scandal.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
ricky_BUTLER
Member since Jul 06th 2003
16899 posts
Sun Sep-11-11 11:20 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
39. "Clips + mixed reviews."
In response to Reply # 15


          

I'm a big fan of The Messenger, but it looks like I may have to lower my expectations for this one.

3 clips delivering on promise of an intense time: http://bcove.me/0t3hq0fj

They're saying: Praise for Harrelson; the rest is self-conscious and hard-boiled to a fault.

Most acting praise for Woody Harrelson, who is in every scene apparently.

http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117946049/
Woody Harrelson is excellent as a cynical, trigger-happy officer oblivious to the fresh winds of change and accountability sweeping through his embattled department. But while the film is drenched in atmosphere and packs a verbal and visceral punch, its relentless downward spiral makes for an overdetermined, not entirely satisfying character study.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/rampart-toronto-film-review-233877
Where The Messenger found that truth within the trauma of war and its aftermath, Rampart finds only emptiness. Thanks to a fine cast and solid production values that plunge a viewer into a complex environment of pungent sights and sounds, Rampart could speak to some but most viewers may regard the film’s obsession with such a corrupt soul as more pretentious than enlightening.

http://www.screendaily.com/reviews/the-latest/rampart/5031919.article?referrer=RSS
Among the film’s problems, however, are that their lines are often overstated and that they are always overshadowed by the ambience. Their efforts are undermined by Moverman’s contrived, extremely busy approach. Too many self-conscious set-ups and jump cuts, lighting either overly dim or brashly lit, and an unrelentingly magnified soundtrack spoil the party.

http://blogs.indiewire.com/theplaylist/archives/tiff_11_review_rampart_woody_harrelson_review_premiere
As writer and director, Moverman isn’t just concerned with a singular breakdown of a character but the ramifications that spread out like oil slick to his family and his colleagues, all pitched against a real life backdrop. It’s a wildly ambitious slow burn that succeeds immensely, powered by one of the best performances of Woody Harrelson’s career.

http://www.movieline.com/2011/09/letter-from-toronto-woody-harrelson-disarms-in-rampart-sokurov-gets-wiggy-with-faust.php
There’s a lot more filmmaking in Rampart, with lots of jiggly handheld camera work, plenty of extreme close-ups and some craftily edited circular pans. Moverman doesn’t have to work that hard. Still, he keeps us following this somewhat shaggy story to its abrupt but appropriate ending. And Harrelson thrives within this nonstructured structure. His performance is disarming, at times borderline unhinged — the character’s unlikability fuses with Harrelson’s innate ragamuffin charm, and the result is both unnerving and alluring.

http://twitter.com/#!/DavidPoland/status/112759141524705280
Oren Moverman's Rampart is the west coast version of Bad Lieutenant. Harrelson deserves awards love, but not likely to get past tough movie.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

ricky_BUTLER
Member since Jul 06th 2003
16899 posts
Tue Aug-23-11 05:54 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
16. "50/50 (Levine)"
In response to Reply # 0


          

TIFF: 09/12, 09/13

As far as movie formulas go, cancer and comedy shouldn't mix. But 50/50 defies these odds by finding the perfect balance of humour and honesty. Joseph Gordon-Levitt stars as a 27-year old nice guy who's been diagnosed with a rare form of cancer. Luckily, he doesn't have to face this dark journey alone: by his side are his best friend (Seth Rogen), his doctor (Philip Baker Hall) and a therapist-in-training (Anna Kendrick).

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
ricky_BUTLER
Member since Jul 06th 2003
16899 posts
Sun Sep-11-11 11:22 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
40. "Early press screening held; response positive."
In response to Reply # 16


          

They're saying: Uneven at times but emotionally-charged and impacting.

Most acting praise for Joseph Gordon-Levitt.

http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117946047?refcatid=31
Will Reiser's semiautobiographical script initially prescribes too artificial a story treatment for its characters but is rescued by a genial, low-key vibe that builds in sensitivity and emotion up through the final reels.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/5050-toronto-film-review-231741
Strangely, the movie achieves its greatest success in its third act, the place where most movies collapse. Perhaps because the seriousness of Adam’s condition is more apparent by then, it’s able to better convey the dark comedy promised earlier. The emotional balance is more stable and everything feels more real and less … well, sitcom-ish.

http://www.avclub.com/articles/tiff-11-day-0,61477/
Some of it feels a little buffed-out and commercially minded to read as real—and the film errs severely by depicting the protagonist’s reluctant girlfriend (Bryce Dallas Howard) as two-timing and villainous, rather than merely overwhelmed by a commitment she can’t make—but damned if it doesn’t get the laughter-through-tears effect it wants anyway.

http://incontention.com/2011/08/18/5050-draws-laughs-and-tears-but-gordon-levitt-owns-it/
This is Gordon-Levitt’s show. He gives is best portrayal to date here, mining rich emotional beats when they count and capably driving forward a character that could have come off a bit cliched. I was particularly moved by his display when heading off to a scary procedure late in the film and couldn’t keep the tear ducts dry there to save my life. He really finds something special in the emotionally charged areas of this performance.

http://collider.com/5050-review-seth-rogen/113412/
There’s something sweetly genuine about the way the characters use comedy as a self-defense mechanism against a terminal illness and it probably comes closer to capturing how those suffering from the disease actually react than any melodrama.

http://hollywood-elsewhere.com/2011/09/5050.php
Jonathan Levine's 50/50 is an exceptionally honest, no-punches-pulled, very honorably acted adult drama about a young guy (Joseph Gordon Levitt) grappling with The Big C. It's seasoned with occasional laughs, for sure, but there's no way this is a light mood comedy, as the 50/50 trailers have implied. And I mean that with the utmost respect.

http://blogs.indiewire.com/theplaylist/archives/tiff_11_review_the_admirable_low-key_50_50_splits_the_difference_between_ge/
In hopes of making a balanced and fully dimensional, living, breathing movie, the congenial and even-handed picture ends up not particularly funny or especially effective in its hoping-to-be-quietly-devastating moments.

http://www.hitfix.com/blogs/motion-captured/posts/review-seth-rogen-and-joseph-gordon-levitt-star-in-affecting-understated-50-50
It's not often that I think a "here's my experience of something horrible but ultimately life-affirming" movie has the potential to really break out commercially, but "50/50" is the sort of film that audiences love to experience together. It's powerful, and there's a real release to sharing this, which is one of the points of making the movie in the first place.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
Frank Longo
Member since Nov 18th 2003
86673 posts
Mon Sep-12-11 11:14 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
43. "Seeing this tomorrow. I'm strangely excited."
In response to Reply # 40


  

          

My movies: http://russellhainline.com
My movie reviews: https://letterboxd.com/RussellHFilm/
My beer TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@thebeertravelguide

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

ricky_BUTLER
Member since Jul 06th 2003
16899 posts
Tue Aug-23-11 05:55 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
17. "The Lady (Besson)"
In response to Reply # 0
Tue Aug-23-11 05:55 PM by ricky_BUTLER

          

TIFF: 09/12, 09/13, 09/17

Luc Besson takes on the inspiring true story of Burmese pro-democracy activist, leader and political prisoner Aung San Suu Kyi (Michelle Yeoh) and the tenacious long-distance bond she maintained with her British husband, Michael Aris (David Thewlis) while under house arrest for over a decade.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

ricky_BUTLER
Member since Jul 06th 2003
16899 posts
Tue Aug-23-11 05:57 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
18. "Jeff Who Lives At Home (Duplass Bros.)"
In response to Reply # 0


          

TIFF: 09/14, 09/15, 09/17

When he leaves his house on a banal errand for his mother, Jeff (Jason Segel) discovers that the universe might be sending him messages about his destiny.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
ricky_BUTLER
Member since Jul 06th 2003
16899 posts
Sun Sep-11-11 11:24 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
41. "Opens March of 2012."
In response to Reply # 18


          

They're saying: Likable, heartfelt, slow-going initially.

Most acting praise for Jason Segel, as Signs-obsessed lead.

http://www.firstshowing.net/2011/toronto-review-duplass-brothers-comedy-jeff-who-lives-at-home/?amp%3Butm_campaign=FlickDaily.com
It was an enjoyable ride. I laughed quite a bit, mostly at Segel's amazing delivery of almost every line, and enjoyed where the film ends up. It's a wacky but amusing journey that the Duplass Brothers take us on, but is packed full of moments that actually make you think, make you wonder whether you're missing the signs of destiny and need to take another look at your life.

http://www.screendaily.com/reviews/the-latest/jeff-who-lives-at-home/5031915.article?referrer=RSS
The Duplass brothers make a quirkily delightful leap into the almost-mainstream with Jeff, Who Lives At Home, a charmingly oddball gem of a movie that is funny, tender and ultimately moving as takes a fresh look at family and relationships.

http://toromagazine.com/features/tiff/tiff-11/daf527c8-5d10-64b4-adb1-2686d931042d/TIFF-11-Day-3/
The Duplass Brothers are known to make decidedly unhurried movies, but Jeff is a quick and busy story, with more emotional highs and lows (and gut laughs) than they’ve ever reached for. A strange mix of their own sensibility at the speed of Judd Apatow with a lot of whimsy, Jeff is every bit as earnest and loopy as its title character.

http://www.boxofficemagazine.com/reviews/2011-09-jeff-who-lives-at-home
A family drama that looks for answers in coincidence (is it really ever coincidence?), this endearing and breezy comic fable watches Jeff's coming of age and promises nothing after his moment of truth. Some might feel shortchanged by this but most will be too charmed to notice. Jeff is bound to attract attention, popularity, affection and box office dollars in spades.

http://www.indiewire.com/article/2011/09/10/toronto_review_the_duplass_brothers_jeff_who_lives_at_home_is_secretly_bett
“Jeff, Who Lives at Home” is another fascinating, occasionally transcendent example of the Duplass’ unique ability to infiltrate Hollywood cinema with their brand of filmmaking techniques. While unquestionably a lesser effort by their standards, it nonetheless manages unexpectedly satisfying results.

http://twitter.com/#!/scott_tobias/status/112662670712377344
Jeff, Who Lives At Home (Duplasses, C) Segel/Helms take this wisp as far as it goes, and where it goes is one dopey deus ex machina.

http://twitter.com/#!/akstanwyck/status/112654104421085184
The Duplass Bros' Jeff Who Lives At Home is an amiable family drama that ends up in a good place but takes its time getting there.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

ricky_BUTLER
Member since Jul 06th 2003
16899 posts
Tue Aug-23-11 06:06 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
19. "The Already-Debuted (Sundance, Cannes, etc.)"
In response to Reply # 0


          

The Artist (Hazanavicius)
French director Michel Hazanavicius' black-and-white silent film follows George Valentin (Jean Dujardin), a silent-era film star struggling to make it in the talkies. This witty and visually enthralling homage to early cinema features supporting performances by Malcolm MacDowell, John Goodman and James Cromwell.
TIFF: 09/09, 09/10; Debuted at Cannes

We Need to Talk About Kevin (Ramsey)
Based on the best-selling novel, Tilda Swinton gives a strong performance as a mother who always knew her son was different, angry and perhaps evil.
TIFF: 09/09, 09/11; Debuted at Cannes

Melancholia (von Trier)
Denmark's most celebrated and notorious filmmaker returns with a fantasy/domestic drama about depression, severely dysfunctional families, and the end of the world.
TIFF: 09/10, 09/17; Debuted at Cannes

Drive (Refn)
Ryan Gosling plays a stunt driver by day, getaway driver by night in this lean and mean crime thriller by the director of Valhalla Rising that won Best Direction in Cannes.
TIFF: 09/10, 09/11; Debuted at Cannes

Martha Marcy May Marlene (Durkin)
This graceful portrait of a young woman trying to extricate herself from a cult has the flavor of an early Terrence Malick film like Days of Heaven.
TIFF: 09/11, 09/12, 09/17; Debuted at Sundance

Like Crazy (Doremus)
Anna (Felicity Jones) notices Jacob (Anton Yelchin) in one of her college classes in Los Angeles. In a move worthy only of her youth, she scribbles a love poem and leaves it on his car. The pair soon catapults into that most potent brand of romance: naïve, pure and possibly fleeting.
TIFF: 09/13, 09/14, 09/17; Debuted at Sundance

Take Shelter (Nichols)
Overwhelmed by visions of an impending apocalypse, a young father and husband (Michael Shannon) channels his anxieties into obsessively constructing a storm shelter in the family’s backyard. As he does this, the entire community begins to lash out against his erratic behavior.
TIFF: 09/15, 09/16; Debuted at Sundance

Tyrannosaur (Considine)
An angry, cynical alcoholic who has reached rock-bottom is surprisingly brought back into life by a complete stranger: a middle-class woman with a strong belief in Christ. Eventually the fissures in her marriage come to the surface.
TIFF: 09/16, 09/17; Debuted at Sundance

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

ricky_BUTLER
Member since Jul 06th 2003
16899 posts
Tue Aug-23-11 06:29 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
20. "Teasers and trailers for listed films available as of today."
In response to Reply # 0


          

I think I got everything. In some cases, I've linked to teasers or international trailers when no full-blown US trailer exists so far.

50/50
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_FJIMxFEfLY

The Artist
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OID2-ySsXHw

Carnage
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xxX02-KdsXM

Contagion
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bdzWcrXVtwg

A Dangerous Method
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IsSP82TV3Bo

Drive
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UahvF-KoWMo

The Ides Of March
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=McCt-_yYLpo

The Lady
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zsa3BE67TsE

Like Crazy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ujl81D4JoyA

Martha Marcy May Marlene
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERREgOobLOs

Melancholia
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wzD0U841LRM

Moneyball
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AiAHlZVgXjk

Take Shelter
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1B6VleLDh0I

Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sUP1TiYl2VQ

Trishna
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gdFiV9yDHG4

We Need To Talk About Kevin
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M7UD_WThLME

There are also clips on-line for some of these films: Drive, We Need To Talk About Kevin, The Artist, Take This Waltz, etc.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Mageddon
Charter member
4018 posts
Mon Sep-05-11 03:09 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
26. "Will be seeing the following at TIFF"
In response to Reply # 0


  

          

Martha, Marcy, May, Marlene (Sean Durkin)
Himizu (Sion Sono)
Sleeping Beauty (Julia Leigh)
Melancholia

Will drop brief thoughts after viewing them.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
ricky_BUTLER
Member since Jul 06th 2003
16899 posts
Mon Sep-05-11 12:05 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
28. "Very cool."
In response to Reply # 26


          

>Himizu (Sion Sono)

This is debuting at Venice tomorrow, I believe.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

ricky_BUTLER
Member since Jul 06th 2003
16899 posts
Sun Sep-11-11 11:01 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
30. "5 new films to the mix + Venice hands out awards."
In response to Reply # 0


          

In following these festivals, a couple films I initially disregarded or didn't know about have garnered serious attention.

Miss Bala
TRAILER: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g357MHuj8WE
Debuted at Cannes. THR calls it a "tense art house actioner."

A Separation
TRAILER: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjTkXGRhy9w
Won top prize plus two acting nods back at Berlin fest.

Into The Abyss
Herzog death row doc, got strong reviews out of Telluride.

The Descendants
TRAILER: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWHNXJ1K4yA
Alexaner Payne plus Clooney. Strong Oscar-buzz from Telluride.

The Raid
TRAILER: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSlHltatA_4
Midnight Madness favorite; hitflix says, action is "unrelenting and punishing."


VENICE FILM FESTIVAL AWARDS
Golden Lion (Best Film)
“Faust”

Silver Lion (Best Director)
Cai Shangjun, “Ren shan ren hai (People Mountain People Sea)”

Coppa Volpi (Best Actor)
Michael Fassbender, “Shame”

Coppa Volpi (Best Actress)
Deanie Yip, “Tao Jie (A Simple Life)”

Special Jury Prize
“Terrafirma”

Osella (Best Screenplay)
“Alps” (Giorgos Lanthimos, Efthymis Filippou)

Osella (Best Cinematography)
“Wuthering Heights” (Robbie Ryan)

Marcello Mastroianni Award (Best Young Actor)
Shota Sometani, Fumi Nikaido, “Himizu di Sion Sono”

FIPRESCI Award
Best Film, Venezia 68: “Shame”
Best Film, Orizzonti and International Critics’ Week: “Two Years”

SIGNIS Award
“Faust”
Special Mention: “A Simple Life”

Premio del pubblico “Kino” – International Critics Week Award
“Là-Bas”

Label Europa Cinemas Award
“Présumé Coupable (Guilty)”

Leoncino d’Oro Agiscuola (Golden Lion Cub) Award
“Carnage”
Cinema for UNICEF Commendation: “Terraferma”

Francesco Pasinetti (SNGCI) Award
“Terraferma”
SNGCI Commendation: “L’ultimo terrestre”

Brian Award
“The Ides of March”

Queer Lion Award (Best Gay Film)
“Wilde Salome”

Arca CinemaGiovani Award
Best Film Venezia 68: “Shame”
Best Italian Film: “L’ultimo terrestre”

Biografilm Lancia Award
“Black Block”
Jury Award: “Pivano Blues – Sulla strada di Nanda”

C.I.C.T. UNESCO “Enrico Fulchignoni” Award
“Tahrir 2011″

CICAE Award
“O le tulafale (The Orator)”

CinemAvvenire Award
Best Film Venezia 68: “Shame”
Best Film – Il cerchio non è rotondo Award: “O le tulafale (The Orator):

FEDIC Award
“Io sono Li”
Special Mention: “Pasta nera”

Fondazione Mimmo Rotella Award
“L’ultimo terrestre”

Future Film Festival Digital Award
“Faust”
Special Mention: “Kotoko”

Nazareno Taddei Award
“Tao jie (A Simple Life)”

Lanterna Magica Award (CGS)
“Io sono Li”

Open Award
Marco Müller

La Navicella – Venezia Cinema Award
“Tao jie (A Simple Life)”

Lina Mangiacapre Award
“Io sono Li”
Special Mention: Fabrizio Cattani – “Maternity Blues”

Gianni Astrei pro life Award
“Tao jie (A Simple Life)”

AIF – FORFILMFEST Award
“Scialla!”

Mouse d’Oro Award
“Killer Joe”
Mouse d’Argento: “Kotoko”

UK – Italy Creative Industries Award – Best Innovative Budget
“L’arrivo di Wang”

Equal Opportunity Award
“Tao jie (A Simple Life)”

Gillo Pontecorvo Award – Arcobaleno Latino
Gaetano Blandini, Nicola Borrelli, Gian Marco Committeri, Roberto Lo Surdo, Mario La Torre

Christopher D. Smithers Foundation Special Award
“Himizu”

Interfilm Award for Promoting Interreligious Dialogue
“Girimunho (Swirl)”

Vittorio Veneto Film Festival Award
“Scialla!”
Special Mention: “Eva”

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Lobby Pass The Popcorn topic #577161 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.25
Copyright © DCScripts.com