i often use eminem as an example. he grew up and Detroit and liked the hip hop.
when he decided to make music, that's the type of music he made. what other music could he have possibly made? should he have been a folk singer?
rap is what he was exposed to, so that's what he made.
that being said, the color of your skin does matter. culture and art is learned behavior. whether or not your take on black art is offensive boils down to convincing your act is.
and yes, everybody in show business (and maybe everybody alive) is acting to some degree. even if the act is that you're not acting. that's life.
i have no opinion on iggy, but the claims that she's a culture vulture are a bit much.
i'd say the same for robin thicke and JT. the only reason it comes up is they aren't as good at what they do as George Michael or Teena Marie.
5. "[copied response from GD]" In response to Reply # 0
the thing you are overlooking.... is... what is culture? is it the products (music, dance, food) or is the a priori paradigms and collective experiences that have led to the creation of the products?
so when azalea banks says she created hip hop she's saying black folks went through a specific set of circumstances and have a different worldview that made hip hop possible in the first place. no other group of folks would have done it.
so... yes you can LISTEN and be influenced by hip hop but you are dealing with it on its most simplest of levels I.e. the actual product. you have not experienced the black American experience nor were you raised with what would consider a black worldview.
ownership of culture means you have been through it.
you can't understand hip hop the way a black person does because you haven't been dehumanized... you haven't had generations go through slavery... you didn't populate housing projects in the south Bronx harlem or Bk. (not you per se... but a typical white american)
also...a plane is an invention.... culture evolves. too different to make analogies.
Joe Corn Mo Member since Aug 29th 2010 15139 posts
Sat Dec-20-14 02:31 PM
6. "once it's released it don't belong to you no more. " In response to Reply # 5
i mean maybe i didn't experience the disillusionment that led to "there's a riot going on."
but once it's out there, everybody is gonna have a reaction to it. so if somebody (white) hears that album and it touches them, it's gonna come out in their music.
it SHOULD come out in their music. are they supposed to pretend they didn't hear it?
Black music is worldwide. it has been from sometime. from jazz to soul to hip hop, it's difficult to find any element of the pop music landscape that wasnt directly touched by black music.
yeah, the way you relate to Black music might be different, but you aren't the only one hearing this music.
it's gonna affect other ppl, whether you like it or not.
8. "you didn't understand what i wrote or i wasn't clear enough" In response to Reply # 6 Sat Dec-20-14 03:50 PM by howardlloyd
the important part of culture can't be heard or touched.
the culture that can be touched...is the tip of the iceberg so to speak.
the heart of culture is how you define the world, the collective consciousness of a group with a shared history etc....
when blacks came here the tip of the iceberg were taken (you can't have drums, not going to be eating cassava and yam etc, speak your language etc)...but we immediately took the heart of our culture (i.e. the worldview) and applied to the physical things we COULD have here
black people speak english with west african grammar and syntax black people took european instruments and made very african music black people took christianity and flipped it so it fit we OUR definition of the world
etc etc
so again hip hop wouldn't exist if it wasn't for what blacks in the diaspora went through.
to OWN it you have to be a part of that collective consciousness. its the reason so many hip hop lovers are just tourists and eventually make their way back home (cage anyone?)
can you participate? sure. is it american culture? sure. does it mean something totally different to the group who's collective consciousness spawned it? you would be foolish to think otherwise.
i'm sure there are customs that jews adopted during the holocaust because of the experience. some of those things may have been integrated/used by other folks. it won't mean the same thing to them as it does to the jews. not even close
11. "RE: [copied response from GD]" In response to Reply # 5
>the thing you are overlooking.... is... what is culture? is >it the products (music, dance, food) or is the a priori >paradigms and collective experiences that have led to the >creation of the products?
i'd say it's a collective & organic (meaning the level of exposure is sufficient that people can engage the experience beyond pure imitation & regularly engage others that are the same) experience of a group that radiates out & can impact more i grained aspects of culture
>so when azalea banks says she created hip hop she's saying >black folks went through a specific set of circumstances and >have a different worldview that made hip hop possible in the >first place. no other group of folks would have done it.
i agree w/ the idea & substance of this (ie Hip-Hop is non-existenct w/o Black American AND Diasporic cultural roots--which feels like a gross understatement by the way) but the blood that flowed in the veins of the creators of HIP-HOP culture was not solely African
>so... yes you can LISTEN and be influenced by hip hop
A LOT
but you >are dealing with it on its most simplest of levels I.e. the >actual product. you have not experienced the black American >experience nor were you raised with what would consider a >black worldview.
this is correct but in my experience most (by a lot) non-Black folks that engage the art, artists, if less frequently listeners, make a genuine attempt to engage (surprise) real life Black People
>ownership of culture means you have been through it.
what's the limit on this?
how many freestyle battles does a white guy have to rap in?
how perceptive & engaging of (shock) real like Black People does a white rap listener have to be to speak their mind on the music/culture?
>you can't understand hip hop the way a black person does >because you haven't been dehumanized...
the issue isn't whether i have or not, but to what extent & of what nature...that's one reason white folks still relate to hip-hop (it's Universal as stated by many)
we all face levels of this as people but i make no claim ever that Black folks don't face a pernicious & unique variety
you haven't had >generations go through slavery... you didn't populate housing >projects in the south Bronx harlem or Bk. (not you per se... >but a typical white american)
but this doesn't mean a white person can't competently engage the culture, fan or artist
>also...a plane is an invention.... culture evolves. too >different to make analogies.
************************* your ERA never low enough