|
>Overall, I thought the best segment was the Peter Gabriel >stuff. Chris Martin did a good job introducing him, and >Gabriel was extremely classy and humble in accepting the >award. Not that I'm surprised, since he's long been considered >one of the genuine good guys in the music biz. And I liked his >performances quite a bit.
Only caught the tail end of In Your Eyes. The fact that I didn't recogniz it right away, and the fact the he brought Youssou with him, are two positives that tell me I'll like it. Funny thing is, though, I DIDN'T want to like it. Call my respect and appreciation for PG begrudging, if you will.
>>Daryl's comment was the funniest thing of the night >though...
>I liked this part. Both ?uest and Hall and Oates themselves. I >didn't mind ?uest being a music geek, 'cause hey, I'm a music >geek too. He did a good job of explaining the importance of >their music and what made it unique and appreciated beyond >just Top 40 audiences. And what kind of Lesson-head couldn't >appreciate a Dilla shout out?
I agree, I just though it probably went over most of hte audience's head. It's not like it's all music geeks paying for their $500 tickets or whatever.
(The only person I know who's ever been to one is a great lady, but she's more into music as an event rather than as, you know, music. Like, she was psyched to have gone to the event, not necessarily to have seen any of the acts in particular.)
>This was the one segment I wasn't feeling at all. Stevens came >off like a complete pompous ass, and lost me about a minute >into his speech. Garfunkel didn't do him any favors with his >introduction either; he tried to be clever and got too cutesy >with it. He looked even worse after ?uest went on almost >immediately afterwards and succeeding in being everything that >Garfunkel wanted to be with his intro.
I wouldn't be that harsh on Art; he was in a tough spot, really, inducting a guy who everybody loves (well, the 5 or 6 songs that everybody knows, anyway) but pulled a big WTF 30 years ago and hasn't been heard much since. I think it'd be hard to do that without either insulting him or insulting the audience.
>Eh, I liked it well enough, but there was waaaaaay too much >Carrie Underwood.
Shewasn't that bad. And she looked good, I thought!
Particularly Carrie Underwood shrieking over >Bonnie Raitt and Allison Krauss.
Allison Krauss? You mean Emmylou Harris? Or SHeryl Crow? (I know you're not confusing our gal Bonnie...)
>Yeah, I agree, but this was probably my second favorite >segment.
I've never been a huge Boss fan, and this performance really sorta made me understand that while, yeah, that's tight, it's still not really my thing. Gimme Nebraska or the Seeger sessions any day.
>Joan Jett was just as bad. And I could have done without any >Courtney Love. My wife said about the exact same thing about >Grohl and Novoselic. Liked both of their speeches a lot >though.
Yep. Grohl's was probably the best acceptance speech since Flea's. And they both did a great job of expanding the vision of Nirvana to include their whole team.
>>Kiss? meh. > >Well, at least they didn't perform. Jeebus, they looked awful. >Bloated and decrepit. And fuck Gene Simmons. I thought Morello >did a decent enough job introducing them, but framing it as >"Fuck the critics, KISS was a band for the people!!!" is kinda >tired and lame.
Morello's speech & presentation was great, but I disagreed with a lot of it aside from his basic points of why they belonged in it. ------- so I'm in a band now: album ---> http://greenwoodburns.bandcamp.com/releases Soundcloud ---> http://soundcloud.com/greenwood-burns
my own stuff -->http://soundcloud.com/lonesomedstringband
avy by buckshot_defunct
|