|
>i like how you went through my post, seemingly to refute >every point i made, but made no mention or paid no attention >to the fact that I didn't mention the beat used for the crux >of your argument. >
I meant Un and not MA, but either way the argument stands
>Again, I don't hesitate to call Mass Appeal or Unbeleiveable >Classic beats, and i actually prefer them to A Milli, but I >can see how they would be rated Lower, and it doesn't bother >me.
that's not what we're talking about here there is no way that Milli is a better beat than Unbelievable more current? yep, but by any measure you can rate a good beat by, it doesn't even rate
>My original post was to state the rediculousness that is >perpetuated by the fact that a beat like A Milli can't be >better than a primo beat, because its not a primo beat. And >because he did this, this, and that to the beat it is better. >Or because it came out then and not now, it is better.
and again, I didn't say either of those things I said A Milli doesn't belong on this list, and you'd have to dig VERY deep to find a Primo beat that is worse-and it doesn't matter who did it, just going through his catalogue and listening to the music is enough for that __________________________________________ CHOP-THESE-BITCHES!!!! ------------------------------------ Garhart Ivanhoe Poppwell Un-OK'd moderator for The Lesson and Make The Music (yes, I do's work up in here, and in your asscrease if you run foul of this
|