Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend
Lobby General Discussion topic #13266096

Subject: "Question about 2018 Taxes: Standard Deduction goes to $12,000?" Previous topic | Next topic
handle
Charter member
18950 posts
Wed Jun-13-18 11:51 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
"Question about 2018 Taxes: Standard Deduction goes to $12,000?"
Wed Jun-13-18 11:54 AM by handle

          

2017:The standard deduction for single taxpayers and married couples filing separately is $6,350 in 2017.

2018: The standard deduction amounts will increase to $12,000 for individuals, $18,000 for heads of household, and $24,000 for married couples filing jointly and surviving spouses.

So right now I have a mortgage where the interest payments are $7400 a year. My taxes on it are $2400 a year. That totals $9800 a year. I have less (on average) less than $2200 in other deductions a year. (My state income tax is a different situation - we can pretend it's 0 right now.)

So I itemize.

But if I'm reading this correctly my tax advantage for my modest condo will be wiped out next year - am I reading this correctly?

I could , in theory, pay off the mortgage and not see any disadvantage tax wise (assuming no other changes.)

------------


Gone: My Discogs collection for The Roots:
http://www.discogs.com/user/tomhayes-roots/collection

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top


Topic Outline
Subject Author Message Date ID
I had the same interpretation. I'm getting screwed royally in this
Jun 13th 2018
1
it sucks for folks that live in places with high RE prices
Jun 13th 2018
2
exactly!
Jun 13th 2018
3
Is your overall tax bill lower?
Jun 13th 2018
4
      RE: Is your overall tax bill lower?
Jun 13th 2018
5
           No doubt
Jun 13th 2018
6
                Mortgage deduction
Jun 13th 2018
7
                Not true. "Well off" as defined by the tax code in America is very unbal...
Jun 14th 2018
8
                     "Well off' is a state of mind
Jun 14th 2018
9
                     In order to move you have to have a job lined up...it's a catch 22..
Jun 14th 2018
10
                          shit.. I been peaking at Maryland but this shit scares me
Jun 14th 2018
14
                     Let me explain what I mean. Tale of two homeowners in the same location
Jun 14th 2018
11
                     Income is an incomplete measure of wealth anyway
Jun 14th 2018
12
                          MAN..I don't disagree with y'all...all EYE know is..my tax situation is ...
Jun 14th 2018
13
it's because there's no personal exemptions for 2018.
Jun 14th 2018
15

FLUIDJ
Member since Sep 18th 2002
44615 posts
Wed Jun-13-18 11:58 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
1. "I had the same interpretation. I'm getting screwed royally in this "
In response to Reply # 0


  

          

We itemize...and a $24K standard deduction is a fraction of our itemized deductions when you factor in real estate.
But they pushing this shit like it's a win win for everyone.
It's not...not by any stretch of the imagination.

>2017:The standard deduction for single taxpayers and married
>couples filing separately is $6,350 in 2017.
>
>2018: The standard deduction amounts will increase to $12,000
>for individuals, $18,000 for heads of household, and $24,000
>for married couples filing jointly and surviving spouses.
>
>So right now I have a mortgage where the interest payments are
>$7400 a year. My taxes on it are $2400 a year. That totals
>$9800 a year. I have less (on average) less than $2200 in
>other deductions a year. (My state income tax is a different
>situation - we can pretend it's 0 right now.)
>
>So I itemize.
>
>But if I'm reading this correctly my tax advantage for my
>modest condo will be wiped out next year - am I reading this
>correctly?
>
>I could , in theory, pay off the mortgage and not see any
>disadvantage tax wise (assuming no other changes.)
>


"Get ready....for your blessing....."

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
Cocobrotha2
Charter member
10884 posts
Wed Jun-13-18 01:36 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
2. "it sucks for folks that live in places with high RE prices"
In response to Reply # 1


          

We were going to try to pre-pay our RE taxes for this year but the county wasn't clear on whether they'd credit it properly.

<-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><->
<-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><->

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
FLUIDJ
Member since Sep 18th 2002
44615 posts
Wed Jun-13-18 01:44 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
3. "exactly! "
In response to Reply # 2


  

          


"Get ready....for your blessing....."

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
PimpTrickGangstaClik
Member since Oct 06th 2005
15894 posts
Wed Jun-13-18 01:57 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
4. "Is your overall tax bill lower?"
In response to Reply # 1
Wed Jun-13-18 01:59 PM by PimpTrickGangstaClik

          

I'm no longer going to itemize. But that's cool with me. The new standard deduction is much higher than all my itemized stuff.

_______________________________________

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
handle
Charter member
18950 posts
Wed Jun-13-18 02:16 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
5. "RE: Is your overall tax bill lower?"
In response to Reply # 4


          

>I'm no longer going to itemize. But that's cool with me. The
>new standard deduction is much higher than all my itemized
>stuff.
Well, it takes away the advantage of owning a lower price house - the fuckers will million dollar houses (and mortgages) are still getting the benefits. Except strangely not the property taxes.

These changes hurt the people in the middle more than the low end or the high end.

------------


Gone: My Discogs collection for The Roots:
http://www.discogs.com/user/tomhayes-roots/collection

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
PimpTrickGangstaClik
Member since Oct 06th 2005
15894 posts
Wed Jun-13-18 02:24 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
6. "No doubt"
In response to Reply # 5


          

I can't complain that my tax bill has decreased. But the game definitely got more unfair.

If we're being really real, the mortgage deduction is/was unfair all together.

It was a tax break only for those that can itemize. Who can itemize? For the most part, only those who are pretty well off

_______________________________________

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
handle
Charter member
18950 posts
Wed Jun-13-18 05:30 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
7. "Mortgage deduction"
In response to Reply # 6


          

>If we're being really real, the mortgage deduction is/was
>unfair all together.

Well this is becuase part of the old "American Dream' was to own a house and this evened out the interest penalty of trying to buy a house. Wasn't long ago that a "good rate" was 6.5% - and that was a penalty on people trying to buy a house.

And remember there's property tax increases each time a property is sold at a higher price so it benefits the (local) government sometimes too.

So "unfair" in one sense - but understandable in another.

The really poor get fucked in any case.


>It was a tax break only for those that can itemize. Who can
>itemize? For the most part, only those who are pretty well
>off

------------


Gone: My Discogs collection for The Roots:
http://www.discogs.com/user/tomhayes-roots/collection

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
FLUIDJ
Member since Sep 18th 2002
44615 posts
Thu Jun-14-18 06:09 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
8. "Not true. "Well off" as defined by the tax code in America is very unbal..."
In response to Reply # 6


  

          

It doesn't account for so many factors...
Our household income is over $200K yes....
So according to the tax code we're "wealthy"?
That doesn't take into account the following:
-We live in one of THE most expensive regions of the country because this is where the job opportunities were in our field of study. To own a home in this region is dumb expensive. So a HUGE chunk of our income goes to just owning a home...
-We have two kids. HUGE expense in daycare alone. And because of our income, the dependent deduction is negated.
-Student loan debt
-Cost of living in this EXPENSIVE region.

So our $200k here is the equiv. of maybe $80K somewhere like say N.C. It's good yes....but it's hardly wealthy.

The middle class stay getting screwed over basically.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
handle
Charter member
18950 posts
Thu Jun-14-18 12:33 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
9. ""Well off' is a state of mind"
In response to Reply # 8


          

Income is an absolute.

Cost of living + psychological comfortableness don't have anything to do with the tax code

200k+ is a lot of income based on what people actually earn in the U.S.

Now, if you have expenses that overwhelm that then you have to change your spending habits.

Note:I live in San Diego - the only way to change spending habits is to move.

------------


Gone: My Discogs collection for The Roots:
http://www.discogs.com/user/tomhayes-roots/collection

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                        
FLUIDJ
Member since Sep 18th 2002
44615 posts
Thu Jun-14-18 12:41 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
10. "In order to move you have to have a job lined up...it's a catch 22.."
In response to Reply # 9


  

          

Moving to a cheaper region of the country = losing current job & current pay
Moving to a "cheaper" location within the region = higher commuting and incidental expenses = no change in expenses...just a shift & likely a lower quality of life.

>Income is an absolute.
>
>Cost of living + psychological comfortableness don't have
>anything to do with the tax code

i will be paying more money in taxes next year as a direct result of the change. That will directly affect my cost of living and our psychological "comfort" for sure.

>200k+ is a lot of income based on what people actually earn in
>the U.S.
>
>Now, if you have expenses that overwhelm that then you have to
>change your spending habits.
>
>Note:I live in San Diego - the only way to change spending
>habits is to move.


"Get ready....for your blessing....."

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                            
legsdiamond
Member since May 05th 2011
79586 posts
Thu Jun-14-18 01:32 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
14. "shit.. I been peaking at Maryland but this shit scares me"
In response to Reply # 10


          

need to find a place to settle before these kids start school.

prolly need to keep our asses right in Charlotte.

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
PimpTrickGangstaClik
Member since Oct 06th 2005
15894 posts
Thu Jun-14-18 12:50 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
11. "Let me explain what I mean. Tale of two homeowners in the same location"
In response to Reply # 8
Thu Jun-14-18 12:52 PM by PimpTrickGangstaClik

          

2017 tax code.

Blue collar worker. $50,000 income. Buys $125,000 house. 5% interest rate
White collar worker. $180,000 income. Buys $400,000 house. 5% interest rate.

Everything else about these two people is identical. Same number of kids, same location, everything is the same.

They are both paying interest on their homes. But who is able to use that interest expense to reduce their tax bills? The one who able to buy the more expensive home (white collar worker).

Blue collar worker has mortgage interest expenses ($6250), but it isn't high enough to overtake the standard deduction, so it is not in her favor to itemize. So even though she is a home owner, there is no tax benefit for her.

White collar worker has much higher interest expense ($20,000). This is much larger than the standard deduction, so she is able to benefit from the mortgage interest deduction.

How is it even the least bit fair that these two people are doing the exact same thing (owning a home). But the benefit that comes from that flows only to those wealthy enough to buy expensive homes?

Literally the more wealth you have, the more the government will subsidize you.

_______________________________________

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
Cocobrotha2
Charter member
10884 posts
Thu Jun-14-18 01:00 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
12. "Income is an incomplete measure of wealth anyway"
In response to Reply # 8


          

Source of income is the real determinant.

Someone who makes 100k from dividends and interest is likely wealthier than someone who makes 250k on a W2 but the person living off of their assets will get taxed less.

I wouldn't say the tax code punishes the middle class but it does favor investors over wage earners.

<-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><->
<-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><->

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                        
FLUIDJ
Member since Sep 18th 2002
44615 posts
Thu Jun-14-18 01:14 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
13. "MAN..I don't disagree with y'all...all EYE know is..my tax situation is ..."
In response to Reply # 12


  

          

to be jacked up in 2019...
all that technical mumbo jumbo aside...
lol...

"Get ready....for your blessing....."

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

PROMO
Charter member
30966 posts
Thu Jun-14-18 06:17 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
15. "it's because there's no personal exemptions for 2018."
In response to Reply # 0
Thu Jun-14-18 06:20 PM by PROMO

  

          

so, you don't get 3.5-4 racks (whatever the amount was) for you, your wife, your kids, etc.

edit: Trump sittin back like "got 'eem!"

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Lobby General Discussion topic #13266096 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.25
Copyright © DCScripts.com