Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend
Lobby General Discussion topic #13161301

Subject: "Faces of the $15 " Previous topic | Next topic
legsdiamond
Member since May 05th 2011
79560 posts
Wed May-31-17 02:26 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
"Faces of the $15 "


          

http://www.facesof15.com/

Consequences of the $15 minimum wage hike

Unions and activists say the costs of minimum wage hikes are negligible. But the real faces of $15—and of other dramatic hikes in the minimum wage—are the employers who struggle to offset those costs. As these stories show, their actions often mean fewer opportunities for the employees these laws are meant to help.


------------------

bullshit or nah? I'm still on the fence. Wage hikes for large corps are easy but for small businesses? I still think it's insane to expect a burger flipper to make $15

so is this website some right wing conservative idea? Is it just the price of being small biz and some fail and some thrive every year cause that's how biz works or is there some truth in this?

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top


Topic Outline
Subject Author Message Date ID
the big issue I have with the con statement
May 31st 2017
1
if you have a business that depends on exploiting people and paying
May 31st 2017
2
that's bull. If I have a small biz and offer $9 an hour
May 31st 2017
6
      same logic that sweatshop owners use to legitimize their immorality
May 31st 2017
20
           nah.. but feel free to keep reaching
Jun 01st 2017
43
I don't understand what's crazy about $15 for flipping burgers
May 31st 2017
3
Big business using little business as a human shield once again
May 31st 2017
4
well played
May 31st 2017
8
same thing with healthcare
May 31st 2017
18
Executive Director is a restaurant industry lobbyist
May 31st 2017
5
I am all about a living wage and I don't think $15/hr is necessary
May 31st 2017
7
this is where I'm at with it. Seattle, SF, DC, LA.. sure
May 31st 2017
9
Chick Fil A is expensive...
May 31st 2017
11
That's relative. The average meal is $8.
May 31st 2017
14
      no doubt. Chik Fil A is the best in the biz IMO
May 31st 2017
16
           hold up, Chik Fil A doesn't pay $15 an hour in NC or NYC
Jun 01st 2017
39
the feds already know the cost of living per state...
May 31st 2017
19
If you can't afford the electric bill
May 31st 2017
10
uh.. no. A CEO making 60 mill is fucking infuriating
May 31st 2017
12
These are the places where it makes sense
May 31st 2017
15
      see, I don't know if exploiting is the right word for a mom and pop shop
May 31st 2017
17
           it is exploitation, though Legs
May 31st 2017
21
                well said!!!
May 31st 2017
22
                RE: it is exploitation, though Legs
Jun 01st 2017
40
                     I'm not saying it is simple by any means
Jun 01st 2017
71
I don't know how many times I can say this
May 31st 2017
13
It's bs
May 31st 2017
23
Huh?
May 31st 2017
24
      The OP asked
May 31st 2017
25
           Why do you think this?
Jun 01st 2017
58
                bingo, I'm thinking of all the towns outside of rust belt cities
Jun 01st 2017
60
                I don't believe 15 an hour is
Jun 01st 2017
76
                     I don't think that it would put them out of business per se,
Jun 02nd 2017
134
                          I can see where it would be a challenge
Jun 03rd 2017
141
I'm waiting for my Grubhub, so let's see what some of the faces are
May 31st 2017
26
Walmart - Washington DC
May 31st 2017
27
Competitive Edge Research & Communications - San Diego, CA
May 31st 2017
28
Clarion Hotel - SeaTac, WA
May 31st 2017
29
A.G. Ferrari - Berkeley, CA
May 31st 2017
30
good riddance - hasn't been poppin since it was lucas
May 31st 2017
38
Match Analysis - Emeryville, CA
May 31st 2017
31
piece of shit place i ordered my food from is out of cheese ravioli
May 31st 2017
32
Thrift Town - San Francisco CA
May 31st 2017
33
they actually just closed down too.
Jun 01st 2017
45
Thrift Shops in San Francisco probably should adjust their prices to mar...
Jun 01st 2017
51
Encuentro - Oakland CA
May 31st 2017
34
Quizno’s - Central Point, OR
May 31st 2017
35
Cascade Designs - South Seattle, WA
May 31st 2017
36
McDonald’s - San Francisco, CA
May 31st 2017
37
      That 'we will replace em with robots' is the most infuriating lie
Jun 01st 2017
41
           Walmart just gutted their cashiers for self check out
Jun 01st 2017
42
           It's a matter of degree.
Jun 01st 2017
49
                We've been marching towards automation without all of that though
Jun 01st 2017
52
If a business cannot afford to pay proper wages...
Jun 01st 2017
44
This is all due to gross negligence
Jun 01st 2017
46
      Congrats.
Jun 01st 2017
47
      Your daughter/spousal partner isn't going to be working full time tho
Jun 01st 2017
48
           Don't know about the states...
Jun 01st 2017
50
                You miss my point
Jun 01st 2017
53
                     Right....
Jun 01st 2017
57
                          ^^^^^
Jun 01st 2017
59
      now this is something I can rock with...
Jun 01st 2017
55
30k a year
Jun 01st 2017
54
of course not in LA, SF and NYC
Jun 01st 2017
56
Where is 30k enough to live?
Jun 01st 2017
61
      the south
Jun 01st 2017
62
      deep deep south
Jun 01st 2017
63
           well.. if you make 30K
Jun 01st 2017
64
           damn Legs, that sounds like Fox news
Jun 01st 2017
66
                when did i say poor people shouldn't have kids?
Jun 01st 2017
68
                     in the post above?
Jun 01st 2017
69
                          I'm just being honest and sometimes the truth hurts
Jun 01st 2017
72
           or the midwest
Jun 01st 2017
67
                these people must live in NYC or LA
Jun 01st 2017
70
                     won't get much for that in atl.
Jun 01st 2017
79
                          hmm... not downtown but how about surrounding areas?
Jun 02nd 2017
85
      $30k you can afford an apartment & used car here and still have a little...
Jun 01st 2017
65
I'm dying at the affected businesses being Bay Area donut shops
Jun 01st 2017
73
lol
Jun 01st 2017
74
Crossed my mind too lol.
Jun 01st 2017
75
everything listed is like "how the fuck did they ever stay in business"
Jun 02nd 2017
136
Re: Small Business
Jun 01st 2017
77
So small businesses should raise prices to accomodate wages.
Jun 01st 2017
78
      please, no. Not the inflation boogie man.
Jun 01st 2017
80
           RE: please, no. Not the inflation boogie man.
Jun 01st 2017
81
           prices never go DOWN, homie.
Jun 01st 2017
82
                They certainly do.
Jun 01st 2017
83
                     This is false equivalency though Denny
Jun 02nd 2017
84
                          demand and competition determine the price
Jun 02nd 2017
87
                          ?
Jun 02nd 2017
88
                          RE: ?
Jun 02nd 2017
93
                               RE: ?
Jun 02nd 2017
94
                                    Walmart is a bad example
Jun 02nd 2017
132
                          Also...
Jun 02nd 2017
92
                               ^^^^^ it's all about cornering the market
Jun 02nd 2017
95
           price of the qtr pounder went down and they introduced a dollar menu
Jun 02nd 2017
86
                That was because of the economy
Jun 02nd 2017
89
                     True.
Jun 02nd 2017
90
                     LOL
Jun 02nd 2017
98
                          Everyone can benefit from basic economics knowledge.
Jun 02nd 2017
100
                               Especially you
Jun 02nd 2017
102
                               Dude....the point you are arguing against is in the article.
Jun 02nd 2017
103
                                    Keep cherry picking Russian bot
Jun 02nd 2017
109
                                         What is this in response to?
Jun 02nd 2017
110
                                              No you didn't
Jun 02nd 2017
111
                                                   Cutting prices has been McD's business model since inception.
Jun 02nd 2017
112
                                                        You've goin full Rusian bot
Jun 02nd 2017
129
                               You can only go so far with econ 101
Jun 02nd 2017
125
                                    For sure it's more complicated....
Jun 02nd 2017
127
                                         Nah...not a certainty. It is very much in debate
Jun 02nd 2017
133
                                              Both cases cited showed price increases.
Jun 02nd 2017
137
                     it's all tied to demand. Less money, less demand
Jun 02nd 2017
91
                          Yeah
Jun 02nd 2017
96
                               Totally.
Jun 02nd 2017
97
                                    Lmao
Jun 02nd 2017
99
                                         Why are you laughing your ass off?
Jun 02nd 2017
101
                                              It's not a fair comparison
Jun 02nd 2017
104
                                                   lol
Jun 02nd 2017
105
                                                   Roflmao
Jun 02nd 2017
106
                                                        That's clearly not the argument.
Jun 02nd 2017
108
                                                             LOL then why did you add it
Jun 02nd 2017
117
                                                                  RE: LOL then why did you add it
Jun 02nd 2017
122
                                                                       That wasn't the question
Jun 02nd 2017
126
                                                                            I need to know what point your making.
Jun 02nd 2017
128
                                                                                 You said what the argument was not
Jun 02nd 2017
131
                                                                                      The argument is that minimum wage hikes....
Jun 02nd 2017
135
                                                                                      Anything can result in a level
Jun 02nd 2017
138
                                                                                      Not true.
Jun 02nd 2017
139
                                                   To be fair you did say prices "never" go down in replay 82...
Jun 02nd 2017
107
                                                        yeah, not sure what he is arguing
Jun 02nd 2017
113
                                                        He's not 'arguing' or 'debating'
Jun 02nd 2017
115
                                                             wait, isn't this the dude you think is Kweli?
Jun 02nd 2017
116
                                                             LOL
Jun 02nd 2017
118
                                                             It certainly is.
Jun 02nd 2017
119
                                                                  man, why do you think you know this dude?
Jun 02nd 2017
123
                                                                  It's hard to say with this lump in my cheek
Jun 02nd 2017
140
                                                                  So scared I'm going to link to it
Jun 02nd 2017
124
                                                             Roflmao
Jun 02nd 2017
120
                                                             Gotta call shenanigans here
Jun 02nd 2017
121
                                                                  Agreed.
Jun 02nd 2017
130
                                                        I'm not J Stew
Jun 02nd 2017
114
The cost of everything has gone up and the cost of production is exploit...
Jun 03rd 2017
142
So what is Singapore's, Japan's, South Korea's and Hong Kong's
Jun 03rd 2017
144
      Lol you literally named the countries where cheap labor is
Jun 03rd 2017
145
Crabs in a barrel
Jun 03rd 2017
143
Patrice Oneal called it the promise of middle management
Jun 05th 2017
147
all this means is ...
Jun 05th 2017
146

double negative
Member since Dec 14th 2007
22151 posts
Wed May-31-17 02:36 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
1. "the big issue I have with the con statement "
In response to Reply # 0


  

          

is that they never offer a counter argument

"employers will suffer...."

ok, and, well, what is the solution then?

***********************************************************
https://soundcloud.com/swageyph/yph-die-with-me

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

J_Stew
Member since Jul 06th 2002
22363 posts
Wed May-31-17 02:58 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
2. "if you have a business that depends on exploiting people and paying"
In response to Reply # 0


          

them a non-livable wage, you don't have a business, you have a hustle/scam/con.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
legsdiamond
Member since May 05th 2011
79560 posts
Wed May-31-17 03:12 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
6. "that's bull. If I have a small biz and offer $9 an hour"
In response to Reply # 2


          

and people apply I'm not exploiting them.

They don't have to apply.

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
J_Stew
Member since Jul 06th 2002
22363 posts
Wed May-31-17 04:07 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
20. "same logic that sweatshop owners use to legitimize their immorality"
In response to Reply # 6


          

you just gave an almost textbook definition/example of what exploitation is by saying, "hey if I offer and they accept" it must be ok.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
legsdiamond
Member since May 05th 2011
79560 posts
Thu Jun-01-17 08:11 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
43. "nah.. but feel free to keep reaching "
In response to Reply # 20


          

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Cold Truth
Member since Jan 28th 2004
44831 posts
Wed May-31-17 03:09 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
3. "I don't understand what's crazy about $15 for flipping burgers"
In response to Reply # 0


  

          

I lean away from the details of he job itself as far as wages go and toward whether or not the job can bear a given wage.

To me that's the only detail that matters.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

BigReg
Charter member
62390 posts
Wed May-31-17 03:11 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
4. "Big business using little business as a human shield once again"
In response to Reply # 0


  

          

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
legsdiamond
Member since May 05th 2011
79560 posts
Wed May-31-17 03:13 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
8. "well played"
In response to Reply # 4


          

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
ambient1
Member since May 23rd 2007
41077 posts
Wed May-31-17 03:55 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
18. "same thing with healthcare"
In response to Reply # 4


  

          

=======================================
Coolin...

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Walleye
Charter member
15521 posts
Wed May-31-17 03:12 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
5. "Executive Director is a restaurant industry lobbyist"
In response to Reply # 0


          

He... doesn't seem like he actually cares about small businesses. Or possibly has ever met a small business owner.

Also, flipping burgers is fucking hard. I was young and energetic when I did it and I came home hot, smelly, and exhausted at the end of the day. Throw in a watch-every-dime management strategy that would cut staff every time the crowd was light and it becomes extremely difficult to supplement that income meaningfully.

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Rick_Berman

Richard B. (Rick) Berman is a former labor management attorney and restaurant industry executive who, with his firm Berman & Co., currently works as a Washington, D.C. lobbyist for the food, alcoholic beverage, and tobacco industries as well as hotels, beer distributors, taverns, and restaurant chains. Berman & Co. has lobbied for companies such as Cracker Barrel, Hooters, International House of Pancakes, Olive Garden, Outback Steakhouse, Red Lobster, Steak & Ale, TGI Friday's, Uno's Restaurants, and Wendy's.

Berman has earned the nicknames "Dr. Evil," the "Conservatives' Weapon of Mass Destruction" and the "Astroturf Kingpin" for his repeated use of the strategy of forming dozens of non-profit front groups, attack-dog web sites, and alleged think tanks that defend his corporate clients' interests by attacking their critics, allowing his paying clients to remain out of public view.
Berman's many front groups work to counteract minimum wage campaigns, keep wages low for restaurant workers, and to block legislation on food safety, secondhand cigarette smoke, and drunk driving and more.

Since 2013, Berman and his Employment Policy Institute "think tank" have led a national fight against campaigns to raise the minimum wage and to provide paid sick leave for workers with renewed attacks on proponents (including the Center for Media and Democracy, publisher of SourceWatch), misleading reports, op-eds, TV and radio ads, and more, as reported by the New York Times. The New York Times has also reported that he "receives millions of dollars from business" in order to wage these campaigns.

Berman has also actively campaigned against any attempts to limit smoking in restaurants and bars. In testimony before the New York City Health Oversight Committee, Berman said, "The level of exposure to secondhand smoke for bartenders, waiters and waitresses is considerably lower than the federal air quality limits established by the federal government."

______________________________

"Walleye, a lot of things are going to go wrong in your life that technically aren't your fault. Always remember that this doesn't make you any less of an idiot"

--Walleye's Dad

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

StephBMore
Member since Sep 11th 2014
1373 posts
Wed May-31-17 03:13 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
7. "I am all about a living wage and I don't think $15/hr is necessary "
In response to Reply # 0


  

          

in every state. For a state such as NY or Cali? Yes because it's expensive to live there and even at $15/hr a person can't afford the basic necessities. The living wage in West VA or the Dakotas should be lower than the $15 because of the cost of living. this definitely should be a state issue, not a federal issue. The federal government should mandate all states pay the minimum cost of living hourly wage. And states should determine what that is, and enforce it.

With that said, I don't feel bad for small businesses who can't afford to pay their employees a living wage. That's part of owning a business, and as such, should be accounted for as they move forward in their business plan. If it's impossible to pay employees, then the owners have to work themselves. it is, after all, their business. so websites like those don't sway me in either way. it sucks BUT that's the cost of being a boss.

Also, $15 to flip hamburgers is kinda elitist considering that McDonalds and other fast food chains make millions on millions a day. They can definitely afford it. Chickfila pays all of their employees a minimum of $15 an hour...so if they can do it, so can these other places.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
legsdiamond
Member since May 05th 2011
79560 posts
Wed May-31-17 03:14 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
9. "this is where I'm at with it. Seattle, SF, DC, LA.. sure"
In response to Reply # 7


          

Pittsburgh?
Richmond?
Columbia, SC?

good luck with that

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
legsdiamond
Member since May 05th 2011
79560 posts
Wed May-31-17 03:15 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
11. "Chick Fil A is expensive..."
In response to Reply # 7


          

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
StephBMore
Member since Sep 11th 2014
1373 posts
Wed May-31-17 03:21 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
14. "That's relative. The average meal is $8."
In response to Reply # 11


  

          

That's a NY price I'm quoting, I pay $8 for a meal at McDonalds too. it's the same price. They just don't have cheaper options like an MCD however, they do have this cute calendar that costs $10 that gets you a free entree once a month.

regardless if you think they are expensive or not, they aren't hurting for business at all. 80% of the time when I go, the lines are packed. That's in ANY state, not just here in NYC. Their employees are happy, their restaurants are clean, and the food is good. What's funny is McDonalds will up their prices if they have to pay $15, making them more expensive than Chickfila who has been paying that wage all along. Interesting.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
legsdiamond
Member since May 05th 2011
79560 posts
Wed May-31-17 03:28 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
16. "no doubt. Chik Fil A is the best in the biz IMO"
In response to Reply # 14


          

they stay ahead of the curve too.

Sundays off, friendly service and they have people standing outside to take your order during rush hour

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
legsdiamond
Member since May 05th 2011
79560 posts
Thu Jun-01-17 07:21 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
39. "hold up, Chik Fil A doesn't pay $15 an hour in NC or NYC"
In response to Reply # 16


          

https://www.glassdoor.com/Salary/Chick-fil-A-New-York-City-Salaries-EI_IE5873.0,11_IL.12,25_IM615.htm

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
ambient1
Member since May 23rd 2007
41077 posts
Wed May-31-17 04:04 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
19. "the feds already know the cost of living per state..."
In response to Reply # 7


  

          

they pay THEIR employees that way

https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/salaries-wages/2017/general-schedule/

=======================================
Coolin...

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Stadiq
Member since Dec 21st 2005
4873 posts
Wed May-31-17 03:14 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
10. "If you can't afford the electric bill"
In response to Reply # 0
Wed May-31-17 03:15 PM by Stadiq

          

Your mom n pop pizza shop has to close up shop.


If you can't afford to pay your employees? Same result.


Its odd that as a society we kind of expect the workers to make less than they deserve so that the ideal of small business is never hurt.


I think the "small business" argument is made, very effectively, by the right and moderates to scare people out of making changes.

Like, "we can't possibly ask the hoagie spot to pay their employees more, what would happen?"


Again, same thing that would happen if their bread supplier increased prices.

So, yeah, I think the "small business" thing is a scam...a very effective one because it even causes folks on the left to pause.


You think $15 is outrageous, but it is because it hasn't kept up.

Like, why is it so outrageous to consider someone flipping burgers makes $15, but a CEO making 60 million or whatever is just kind of accepted at this point?




**However, I don't think the $15 dollar switch can be flipped over night. It would be chaos, especially in small towns.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
legsdiamond
Member since May 05th 2011
79560 posts
Wed May-31-17 03:17 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
12. "uh.. no. A CEO making 60 mill is fucking infuriating"
In response to Reply # 10


          

I def believe money should rain down from large companies but a mom and pop? Nah...

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
Sepia.
Member since Feb 25th 2009
12896 posts
Wed May-31-17 03:22 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
15. "These are the places where it makes sense"
In response to Reply # 12


  

          

that the workers are only working part-time, as teens making pocket money or whatever.

Or else they have fewer employees who are there full time, earning a living wage, to help that mom&pop shop flourish.

But I just can no longer try to make excuses for anyone trying to exploit their employees with underpaid labor, good intentions or not.

If you can't afford to fairly pay someone to help you run your shop, then run it by yourself.
If you need someone to help with that, then you need to reevaluate how much that work is worth.


Now let me get out of here before I seriously get in my feelings as a currently exploited low-wage worker.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
legsdiamond
Member since May 05th 2011
79560 posts
Wed May-31-17 03:31 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
17. "see, I don't know if exploiting is the right word for a mom and pop shop"
In response to Reply # 15


          

and when that shop closes...

you can't eat off that "they don't deserve to be open"

maybe more people on OKP need to start businesses to fill the void?

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
Stadiq
Member since Dec 21st 2005
4873 posts
Wed May-31-17 05:23 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
21. "it is exploitation, though Legs"
In response to Reply # 17
Wed May-31-17 05:27 PM by Stadiq

          

The minimum wage has not kept up, do you disagree?

If you agree, then by definition, folks currently working minimum wage are being exploited....because their wage is not where it should be.

Because their wage hasn't kept up.

So the person making 8 bucks an hour at pizza hut AND the guy making 8 bucks at Legs pizza shop are under paid.

Now, if you say "okay, let the big corps pay more" I agree- they certainly deserve to pay more and are more guilty of exploitation simply because their profit shows they can afford to pay more RIGHT TODAY.

That said?

We don't expect that the small mom and pop burger place pay less for their electricity, water, etc.

But you think, in theory, it is okay that they pay their workers less?

The bills go up they have to figure it out. Same with labor.

As long as people keep this "but small business!" we won't get anywhere serious, because as someone creatively put it small business is basically used as a human shield by big business.

I wonder if "but small business!" is ever used to stop a flour supplier or something from increasing prices. (Just noticed all my small business examples are food related...guess I'm hungry? haha)


Now, maybe there could be some penalty tax for businesses based on CEO to employee pay ratio or whatever.

But at the end of the day, its time for that minimum wage to go up and everyone should have to pay it.


I don't think it can realistically be 15 next year, but there should be a plan to have it at 15 very soon, with a mechanism to have it rise more consistently.


Its crazy to me how well scare tactics and pie in the sky stuff works on Americans. Small business has become the placeholder for job creators....

That small business can't afford to pay their rent? their taxes? their supplier? Guess its time to shut down.

They can't afford to pay their workers, and have to shut down? "Those greedy workers!"

Makes no sense to me. Pro-business thinking is so ingrained in all of us, even folks on the left are willing to let their neighbors continue to make sh!t wages...


As far as your OKPs should open more businesses to fill the void, I get it. But again, if I can't afford to pay my bills, I can't open a business.

I can't tell the landlord "look, I'm a small business so cut me a break?"

We only ask that of workers. It's sad if you ask me.

I don't care who you are, if you can't pay your bills you shouldn't open a business. That includes paying people a fair wage.


  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
StephBMore
Member since Sep 11th 2014
1373 posts
Wed May-31-17 07:14 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
22. "well said!!!"
In response to Reply # 21


  

          

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
legsdiamond
Member since May 05th 2011
79560 posts
Thu Jun-01-17 07:48 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
40. "RE: it is exploitation, though Legs"
In response to Reply # 21


          

>The minimum wage has not kept up, do you disagree?

definitely agree
>
>If you agree, then by definition, folks currently working
>minimum wage are being exploited....because their wage is not
>where it should be.

OK, I guess I can buy that
>
>Because their wage hasn't kept up.
>
>So the person making 8 bucks an hour at pizza hut AND the guy
>making 8 bucks at Legs pizza shop are under paid.
>
>Now, if you say "okay, let the big corps pay more" I agree-
>they certainly deserve to pay more and are more guilty of
>exploitation simply because their profit shows they can afford
>to pay more RIGHT TODAY.
>
>That said?
>
>We don't expect that the small mom and pop burger place pay
>less for their electricity, water, etc.

they do pay less tho.. not per kilowatt but they use far less energy.

>
>But you think, in theory, it is okay that they pay their
>workers less?

yes, I actually think it's ok for a mom and pop to pay less than a big box if it keeps their doors open. most times minimum wage is entry level, you aren't supposed to stay at a job that doesn't increase your pay once you show you are competent.
>
>The bills go up they have to figure it out. Same with labor.
>
>As long as people keep this "but small business!" we won't get
>anywhere serious, because as someone creatively put it small
>business is basically used as a human shield by big business.

but small business IS small business. I would like to think there is a way to enforce higher wages for big box vs mom and pops. It's not like tax advantages and incentives and writes offs are the same for big vs small biz. There should be flexibility and one doesn't have to be tied to the other.
>
>
>I wonder if "but small business!" is ever used to stop a flour
>supplier or something from increasing prices. (Just noticed
>all my small business examples are food related...guess I'm
>hungry? haha)
>
>
>Now, maybe there could be some penalty tax for businesses
>based on CEO to employee pay ratio or whatever.

yup

>
>But at the end of the day, its time for that minimum wage to
>go up and everyone should have to pay it.
>

I agree minimum wage needs to increase but $15 isn't going to solve the problem. Wages go up that fast and people get laid off, replaced by self check out and robots (burger flippers are already in the works and Walmart will install self checkout at every store)
>
>I don't think it can realistically be 15 next year, but there
>should be a plan to have it at 15 very soon, with a mechanism
>to have it rise more consistently.

I still think $15 in Ohio isn't sustainable. Some folk on here say businesses need to close but who wants to see businesses close? $15 minimum is great if I have a job BUT if 3 mom and pops close in Duluth Oh wtf am I supposed to do?
>
>Its crazy to me how well scare tactics and pie in the sky
>stuff works on Americans. Small business has become the
>placeholder for job creators....
>
>That small business can't afford to pay their rent? their
>taxes? their supplier? Guess its time to shut down.
>
>They can't afford to pay their workers, and have to shut down?
> "Those greedy workers!"
>
>Makes no sense to me. Pro-business thinking is so ingrained in
>all of us, even folks on the left are willing to let their
>neighbors continue to make sh!t wages...
>
>
>As far as your OKPs should open more businesses to fill the
>void, I get it. But again, if I can't afford to pay my bills,
>I can't open a business.
>
>I can't tell the landlord "look, I'm a small business so cut
>me a break?"
>
>We only ask that of workers. It's sad if you ask me.
>
>I don't care who you are, if you can't pay your bills you
>shouldn't open a business. That includes paying people a fair
>wage.
>
>
>
I feel you but I think we need to open more businesses. I work for a small business and while I would like to make more it's really up to me to stay or leave if I can't get what I think I'm worth.

I just think more of us need to take that risk/chance to own a small biz if it's as simple as some make it out to be.

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                        
Stadiq
Member since Dec 21st 2005
4873 posts
Thu Jun-01-17 12:55 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
71. "I'm not saying it is simple by any means"
In response to Reply # 40


          


A lot of reasons I haven't done it. That isn't my point. I honestly don't think it is anyone's point.

The point is, if you are going to own a business, you should be able to pay your employees a fair wage.


I will say that I can see your point about regional/state differences. I can see the merit in tying it to some kind of localized cost-of-living.


I wonder if we would see a lot of companies move their warehouses, etc to cheap areas?...well even more than we currently see that.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
Sepia.
Member since Feb 25th 2009
12896 posts
Wed May-31-17 03:18 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
13. "I don't know how many times I can say this"
In response to Reply # 10


  

          


>You think $15 is outrageous, but it is because it hasn't kept
>up.
>
>Like, why is it so outrageous to consider someone flipping
>burgers makes $15, but a CEO making 60 million or whatever is
>just kind of accepted at this point?
>

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Lurkmode
Member since May 07th 2011
5186 posts
Wed May-31-17 07:42 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
23. "It's bs"
In response to Reply # 0


  

          

and so is the suggestion that companies should pay different minimum wages in different states.

---------------------------
Signature

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
Cenario
Member since Aug 24th 2005
59176 posts
Wed May-31-17 09:43 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
24. "Huh?"
In response to Reply # 23


  

          

-The Knicks’ coaching search still includes a lone frontrunner, Kurt Rambis, whose qualifications for the position include a strong relationship with Jackson and a willingness to take the job.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
Lurkmode
Member since May 07th 2011
5186 posts
Wed May-31-17 09:53 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
25. "The OP asked "
In response to Reply # 24


  

          

if the faces of 15 is bullshit or not. I answered yes, employers who struggle to offset those costs is bullshit.

Someone else in the thread said states should offer living wages state by state instead of all the states making the minimum wage 15 an hr I disagree with that.

---------------------------
Signature

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
Sleepy
Charter member
6947 posts
Thu Jun-01-17 11:10 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
58. "Why do you think this?"
In response to Reply # 25


  

          

>Someone else in the thread said states should offer living
>wages state by state instead of all the states making the
>minimum wage 15 an hr I disagree with that.

Cost of living varies wildly in this country. There is no reason to this to be a federal issue though. It's just unsustainable for many places.

You're such pests...now, what is it you want? In your depths of your ignorance, what is it you want? Well, whatever it is you want, I can't deliver because I just don't see it. - Orson Welles


Never Tired, Always Sleepy

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
legsdiamond
Member since May 05th 2011
79560 posts
Thu Jun-01-17 11:25 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
60. "bingo, I'm thinking of all the towns outside of rust belt cities"
In response to Reply # 58


          

$15 for Burger King and McDonalds?

the UE will increase and you know who will suffer the most? Black folk

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
Lurkmode
Member since May 07th 2011
5186 posts
Thu Jun-01-17 02:01 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
76. "I don't believe 15 an hour is"
In response to Reply # 58


  

          

going to put them out of business even if they are a mom and pop business. This data supports my opinion.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/no-raising-the-local-minimum-wage-doesnt-hurt-local-businesses/2016/02/26/4d6cabd0-dbed-11e5-925f-1d10062cc82d_story.html?utm_term=.ad1f4c2bf5d8

"Second, there are other ways to absorb higher wage costs than by laying off workers. Some evidence, for instance, suggests that companies raise prices, generally by less than 1 percent per every 10 percent increase in the wage. They may also become more efficient. The prospect of higher labor costs can incentivize employers to eliminate waste and to raise performance standards, while at the same time higher wages enhance workers’ motivation. Companies end up with less turnover and shorter vacancy periods when filling job slots."

"Finally, companies can cut profit margins or top-level salaries to meet higher wage mandates. This last mechanism is one reason such policies get so much pushback from business"

It's just greed

---------------------------
Signature

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
Sleepy
Charter member
6947 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 03:40 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
134. "I don't think that it would put them out of business per se,"
In response to Reply # 76


  

          

>going to put them out of business even if they are a mom and
>pop business. This data supports my opinion.
>
>https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/no-raising-the-local-minimum-wage-doesnt-hurt-local-businesses/2016/02/26/4d6cabd0-dbed-11e5-925f-1d10062cc82d_story.html?utm_term=.ad1f4c2bf5d8

First off, thanks for this link. I will definitely check it out.
>
>"Second, there are other ways to absorb higher wage costs than
>by laying off workers. Some evidence, for instance, suggests
>that companies raise prices, generally by less than 1 percent
>per every 10 percent increase in the wage. They may also
>become more efficient. The prospect of higher labor costs can
>incentivize employers to eliminate waste and to raise
>performance standards, while at the same time higher wages
>enhance workers’ motivation. Companies end up with less
>turnover and shorter vacancy periods when filling job slots."
>
>"Finally, companies can cut profit margins or top-level
>salaries to meet higher wage mandates. This last mechanism is
>one reason such policies get so much pushback from business"
>
>It's just greed

I think that many businesses probably are unprepared to take the initial hit to their profits. They would eventually recover, but without cash reserves available to cover to initial jumps to the $15, they could possibly find themselves in a bad position.

Also, it depends on the type of margins the company is running on.

But your link has some information that is worth considering. I will take it under consideration. Thanks again for it.

You're such pests...now, what is it you want? In your depths of your ignorance, what is it you want? Well, whatever it is you want, I can't deliver because I just don't see it. - Orson Welles


Never Tired, Always Sleepy

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                        
Lurkmode
Member since May 07th 2011
5186 posts
Sat Jun-03-17 09:43 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
141. "I can see where it would be a challenge "
In response to Reply # 134


  

          

for some business.

>First off, thanks for this link. I will definitely check it
>out.

You're welcome


>
>I think that many businesses probably are unprepared to take
>the initial hit to their profits. They would eventually
>recover, but without cash reserves available to cover to
>initial jumps to the $15, they could possibly find themselves
>in a bad position.

Fair enough, it can't be rushed.

>Also, it depends on the type of margins the company is running
>on.

True all companies are different.

>But your link has some information that is worth considering.
>I will take it under consideration. Thanks again for it.
>

You're welcome and thank you for the civil conversation.

---------------------------
Signature

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

shygurl
Member since Oct 08th 2002
13361 posts
Wed May-31-17 09:55 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
26. "I'm waiting for my Grubhub, so let's see what some of the faces are"
In response to Reply # 0


          

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
shygurl
Member since Oct 08th 2002
13361 posts
Wed May-31-17 09:56 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
27. "Walmart - Washington DC"
In response to Reply # 26


          

“…behind closed doors, Walmart officials were more frank about the reasons the company was …the company cited the District’s rising minimum wage, now at $11.50 an hour and possibly going to $15 an hour if a proposed ballot measure is successful in November.”

http://www.facesof15.com/business/walmart/

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
shygurl
Member since Oct 08th 2002
13361 posts
Wed May-31-17 09:57 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
28. "Competitive Edge Research & Communications - San Diego, CA"
In response to Reply # 26


          

“We’re moving the call center to El Paso because California has become inhospitable to (telephone) interviewing jobs,” Nienstedt said. “Rather than moving it offshore, I wanted to move my call center somewhere in the United States.”

In June, San Diego city voters increased the city’s minimum wage from $10 to $10.50 per hour, rising to $11.50 on Jan. 1. Meanwhile, California is scheduled to lift its wage floor to $15 an hour by 2022, a level San Diego may or may not surpass with its inflation-adjusted formula. …

El Paso offered generally lower business costs, yet California’s rising wage floor was the deciding factor in moving the company’s call center, Nienstedt said Tuesday.

http://www.facesof15.com/business/competitive-edge-research-communications/

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
shygurl
Member since Oct 08th 2002
13361 posts
Wed May-31-17 09:58 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
29. "Clarion Hotel - SeaTac, WA"
In response to Reply # 26


          

“The 215-room Clarion Hotel closed its full-service restaurant in December, laying off 15 people, said general manager Perry Wall. The hotel also let go a night desk clerk and maintenance employee and is considering a 10 percent increase in room rates for the spring travel season, Wall said.”

http://www.facesof15.com/business/clarion-hotel/

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
shygurl
Member since Oct 08th 2002
13361 posts
Wed May-31-17 10:07 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
30. "A.G. Ferrari - Berkeley, CA"
In response to Reply # 26


          

Italian deli and grocer A.G. Ferrari is closing the doors on all its shops after 98 years, in what the brand says is a move to focus on the national growth of its packaged goods. That includes four locations: Montclair Village and Piedmont Avenue in Oakland, and Laurel Village and SoMa in SF.

The shop has been serving customers in the Bay Area since 1919. Ahead of this announcement, Berkeley’s College Ave. location was closed in February due to “high overhead costs,” and employees were redistributed throughout its other stores.

http://www.facesof15.com/business/a-g-ferrari/

(In the sourced link, nowhere does it mention the minimum wage increase)

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
dba_BAD
Charter member
14873 posts
Wed May-31-17 11:33 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
38. "good riddance - hasn't been poppin since it was lucas"
In response to Reply # 30


          

n/m

__

fairweather

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
shygurl
Member since Oct 08th 2002
13361 posts
Wed May-31-17 10:09 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
31. "Match Analysis - Emeryville, CA"
In response to Reply # 26


          

Match Analysis, an Emeryville business with around 35 local staff, collects data on soccer matches, which it sells globally alongside analytical software. … the higher minimum wage has forced the firm to shed 13 data-collection jobs. This has mainly been achieved with a hiring freeze, but this month Mr Brunkhart had to lay-off six staff. These were the first redundancies in the firm’s history.

http://www.facesof15.com/business/match-analysis/

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
shygurl
Member since Oct 08th 2002
13361 posts
Wed May-31-17 10:10 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
32. "piece of shit place i ordered my food from is out of cheese ravioli"
In response to Reply # 26


          

smfh!!

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
shygurl
Member since Oct 08th 2002
13361 posts
Wed May-31-17 10:14 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
33. "Thrift Town - San Francisco CA"
In response to Reply # 26


          

“The minimum wage has been really hard on us. We sell $3 items and we have to sell a lot of them,” Thrift Town owner Wendy Steinmetz explained. “The labor increases one after another have been hard to absorb.”

http://www.facesof15.com/business/thrift-town/

(for perspective, the average rent for an apartment in San Francisco is $3,548 a month, according to the Cost of Living Index. <according to Kiplinger>

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
double negative
Member since Dec 14th 2007
22151 posts
Thu Jun-01-17 09:37 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
45. "they actually just closed down too. "
In response to Reply # 33


  

          

***********************************************************
https://soundcloud.com/swageyph/yph-die-with-me

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
flipnile
Member since Nov 05th 2003
13565 posts
Thu Jun-01-17 10:30 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
51. "Thrift Shops in San Francisco probably should adjust their prices to mar..."
In response to Reply # 33


          

>We sell $3 items and we have to sell a lot of them

$3 for shit at the thrift is what I pay around here, where I can also buy a crib for $125k. Charge more then, I'm sure the folks around there can afford it.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
shygurl
Member since Oct 08th 2002
13361 posts
Wed May-31-17 10:15 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
34. "Encuentro - Oakland CA"
In response to Reply # 26


          

Encuentro began as a wine bar in Jack London Square in 2009; it later made the move down the street to a larger space, with an expanded menu of vegan and vegetarian offerings in 2014.

Now, almost three years later, the restaurant will shut its doors due to “the rising costs of doing business.” It’s a familiar phrase these days as minimum wage rises (now $12.86 in Oakland as of January 1, 2017), and rents follow suit.

http://www.facesof15.com/business/encuentro/

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
shygurl
Member since Oct 08th 2002
13361 posts
Wed May-31-17 10:17 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
35. "Quizno’s - Central Point, OR"
In response to Reply # 26


          

The owner’s of the Quizno’s Bear Creek location announced that, “after 11 years operating here, the store will be permanently closed as of Monday May 16th 2016. (Our last day open will be Sunday May 15th) Unfortunately due to a string of crippling equipment repair bills, severe staffing issues, continually increasing costs due to the $15 minimum wage law, the near arrival of a new family member and two full time college schedules severely limiting the availability of both myself and my husband we just cannot stay open.

http://www.facesof15.com/business/quiznos/

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
shygurl
Member since Oct 08th 2002
13361 posts
Wed May-31-17 10:19 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
36. "Cascade Designs - South Seattle, WA"
In response to Reply # 26


          

The company said it needs to expand, but doing so in the Seattle area is too expensive. The main reason is increasingly expensive real estate, especially for the space it leases around the city to house its merchandise. ….

But labor costs — recently subject to a minimum wage of $15 per hour — also add up, especially as Cascade competes with brands that rely on cheap overseas labor, Maisonpierre said.

http://www.facesof15.com/business/cascade-designs/

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
shygurl
Member since Oct 08th 2002
13361 posts
Wed May-31-17 10:20 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
37. "McDonald’s - San Francisco, CA"
In response to Reply # 26


          

A new McDonald’s on Sutter Street in San Francisco uses touch-screen kiosks rather than entry-level employees to take customer orders. San Francisco’s minimum wage increased to $12.25 an hour in May, one of the highest wage floors in the nation.

http://www.facesof15.com/business/mcdonalds/

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
BigReg
Charter member
62390 posts
Thu Jun-01-17 08:00 AM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
41. "That 'we will replace em with robots' is the most infuriating lie"
In response to Reply # 37


  

          

Like they aren't trying to replace as many jobs with machines, lol. Niggas have been replacing jobs with self service kiosks in supermarkets even before this livable wage thing became a thing.

Like there's some tear eyed CEO snorting lines of cokes in a stripclub during his kids baseball game torn between cutting his employee and insurance fees by half and fucking over the poors.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
legsdiamond
Member since May 05th 2011
79560 posts
Thu Jun-01-17 08:10 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
42. "Walmart just gutted their cashiers for self check out"
In response to Reply # 41


          

there used to 25% self checkout. Now it's 60% self checkout.

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
denny
Member since Apr 11th 2008
11281 posts
Thu Jun-01-17 10:18 AM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
49. "It's a matter of degree."
In response to Reply # 41


          

Companies will certainly employ a cost-benefit analysis. If wages increase...companies will invest more money on infrastructure that lessens their demand for workers. Their incentive to develop and implement that infrastructure is directly tied to wages. So it's completely reasonable to include that factor in any decision to hike minimum wages.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
BigReg
Charter member
62390 posts
Thu Jun-01-17 10:30 AM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
52. "We've been marching towards automation without all of that though"
In response to Reply # 49


  

          

the goal is the minimal amount of workers possible because that's where a bunch of the overhead is and the market punishes you for not keeping those margins low.

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-american-airlines-raises-20170427-story.html

Adjusted for inflation American workers in 2017 are cheaper* then they were 30 years ago.

*we can make the argument though that the stupid tradition of marrying healthcare and employment offsets the 'cheaper' prices companies are paying for labor since keeping them insured costs an arm and a leg.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

TheAlbionist
Member since Jul 04th 2011
3306 posts
Thu Jun-01-17 08:23 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
44. "If a business cannot afford to pay proper wages..."
In response to Reply # 0


  

          

... it's not a proper business and it's not a properly functioning part of an economy either.

Any job that takes up 40hrs of a person's life every week must pay what it costs for that person to live - to afford food and appropriate shelter for a family. That's just common sense.

That's not the case with rock-bottom wages over there and over here too; if companies don't pay enough, people have to lean on the State for the shortfall (housing assistance, medicaid, kids programs whatever) or they have to turn to crime for the shortfall, also passing the cost onto the State through policing and prisons.

Whatever way you cut it, paying workers shitty wages doesn't work long term. I don't know what the "magic" figure is (it's probably different for every zipcode, let's face it), but the majority of the rhetoric against minimum/living wages at the very least is bullshit.

_______________________________

))<>((
forever.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
auragin_boi
Member since Aug 01st 2003
20939 posts
Thu Jun-01-17 09:40 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
46. "This is all due to gross negligence"
In response to Reply # 44
Thu Jun-01-17 09:41 AM by auragin_boi

  

          

Federal and local government doesn't want to piss off big business so they cower to them and go soft on regulation because capitalism rules American economics.

Inflation has outpaced wages for years now.

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/07/21/adjusted-for-inflation-the-federal-minimum-wage-is-worth-less-than-50-years-ago.html

"Despite periodic increases, the buying power of the federal minimum wage hasn't kept up with inflation, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Data show that in 1968, the federal minimum was equivalent to $10.90 in 2015 dollars, nearly $4 higher than today's rate."

Add to that the real estate, medical and pharma industries have been allowed to pretty much run amok with pricing practices and the issue is compounded. Then put some automation and out-sourcing to foreign labor as the cherry on top and voila...clusterfudge.

A lot of these companies have made record profits over the last 10 yrs yet increasing wages is going to force them to lay people off? As stated earlier, they've BEEN eliminating jobs in retail with the self check out lines.

As far as small business goes, they should seek efficiency and save on costs where possible to meet wage demands. If you can't then you shouldn't be in business.

I personally think the wage floor should be based on a formula that weighs the cost of living (rent/mortgages, groceries, utilities, transportation, education, medical treatment and pharmaceutical costs). They should have one formula for Metropolitan areas (determine a population size, something like 1 mil people or more) and one for rural areas (hundred mile rural radius portion of any state, applied to all rural areas within the state with less than 1 mil people).

On top of that, if a business takes labor out of the US, they should pay a stiff penalty that practically offsets the loss of wages for those impacted for at least 2 years. And a continual tax penalty for selling in the US but not employing in the US (or employing more now employing less).

____________

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
denny
Member since Apr 11th 2008
11281 posts
Thu Jun-01-17 10:10 AM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
47. "Congrats."
In response to Reply # 46
Thu Jun-01-17 10:11 AM by denny

          

This is the first post in this whole thread that actually makes a legitimate argument without resorting to fruitless moralism.

I support a minimum wage increase....but the arguments on both sides tend to be really weak. Also of note....there are numerous examples wherein people don't need a 'living wage' in seeking employment. I want my 16 year old daughter to have a job this summer. Noone is going to pay her a 'living wage' and she doesn't need a 'living wage'. Same goes for spousal partners who aren't breadwinners. There are millions of jobs for which people don't depend on their living expenses for and eliminating all those jobs would be very bad.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
BigReg
Charter member
62390 posts
Thu Jun-01-17 10:15 AM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
48. "Your daughter/spousal partner isn't going to be working full time tho"
In response to Reply # 47


  

          

So the yearly salary would balance out if we achieved a 'liveable wage'

>There are millions of jobs
>for which people don't depend on their living expenses for and
>eliminating all those jobs would be very bad.

Again, that's assuming that paying more money would lead to a stark elimination of low level jobs which has been happening anyway without a livable wage.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
denny
Member since Apr 11th 2008
11281 posts
Thu Jun-01-17 10:25 AM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
50. "Don't know about the states..."
In response to Reply # 48
Thu Jun-01-17 10:27 AM by denny

          

But Ontario just announced that we will have a $15 minimum wage by 2018 and there is no exception for part-time workers. Are there exceptions in San Francisco?

To your last point...it's not sufficient to say 'lower paying jobs are being replaced by tech anyways'. It's the EXTENT of the erosion of those jobs.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
BigReg
Charter member
62390 posts
Thu Jun-01-17 10:42 AM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
53. "You miss my point"
In response to Reply # 50
Thu Jun-01-17 10:44 AM by BigReg

  

          

The 'liveable wage' will balance out because secondary employed household members won't be working full time; the 32 grand a year they would be getting under a livable wage would only matter if they were working 40 hours, working 15 hours a week equals to around 12k a year..they are gonna have to return that Maybach, lol.

>To your last point...it's not sufficient to say 'lower paying
>jobs are being replaced by tech anyways'. It's the EXTENT of
>the erosion of those jobs.

I just disagree at the apocalyptic drop that big business is selling. In a world economy where every quarter MUST beat the next or the stock price gets a hit (with employees being such a big drain on margins) those changes are coming regardless. That's why I find the Mcdonald's story disingenuous for an example. This has been a long time coming and all that's happened is a 'rebranding' of this future.

So we get stories like this in forbes blaming those assholes asking for a reasonable pay bump adjusted for inflation:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2016/11/29/thanks-to-fight-for-15-minimum-wage-mcdonalds-unveils-job-replacing-self-service-kiosks-nationwide/#6f8ee1e34fbc

but ten years ago the excuse was it would bring, lolz, more jobs:

https://www.fastcompany.com/49359/toll-new-machine

but even politicians know the truth; this is coming and it is inevitable.

https://www.wired.com/2016/10/obama-aims-rewrite-social-contract-age-ai/

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                        
denny
Member since Apr 11th 2008
11281 posts
Thu Jun-01-17 11:10 AM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
57. "Right...."
In response to Reply # 53
Thu Jun-01-17 11:12 AM by denny

          

But even in supporting minimum wage hikes...we shouldn't be naïve that there WILL be costs. The stay-at-home mom who wants to teach Yoga three nights a week will lose her job. Teenagers like my kids will have a tough time finding work. The factory worker who teaches an instrument on weekends will lose the side gig. The stuff listed in the OP Etc. That stuff adds up.

In the same way....arguments like the one listed in the OP are blind to the BENEFITS of a wage increase and only list the costs. A few small businesses shutting down is likely out-weighed by the larger increased quality of life for the average non-skilled worker.

My thing....is that ANY argument that focuses solely on either the costs OR benefits of a minimum wage increase don't constitute a good argument. There are costs and benefits for EVERY economic policy decision. The apocalyptic conservative arguments are just as weak as the 'raising wages ALWAYS helps the poor' arguments. Raising wages does not always help the poor despite the good intentions that might motivate those raises. On the other hand....an increase in unemployment is also not ALWAYS bad for the poor either.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                            
legsdiamond
Member since May 05th 2011
79560 posts
Thu Jun-01-17 11:16 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
59. "^^^^^"
In response to Reply # 57


          

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
legsdiamond
Member since May 05th 2011
79560 posts
Thu Jun-01-17 10:58 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
55. "now this is something I can rock with..."
In response to Reply # 46


          

cause I think $15 across the board will do major damage in smaller markets.

and housing/pharma prices are insane in a lot of markets.

when I see $1500 for a studio in Uptown Charlotte??? Charlotte?? That's crazy.

but folks are paying that shit.

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

tariqhu
Charter member
17883 posts
Thu Jun-01-17 10:48 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
54. "30k a year"
In response to Reply # 0


          

is too much for money for working in a fast food joint?

What in LA, San Fran, or NYC?

Y'all buy those labels, I was born supreme

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
legsdiamond
Member since May 05th 2011
79560 posts
Thu Jun-01-17 11:00 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
56. "of course not in LA, SF and NYC"
In response to Reply # 54


          

but what about St. Louis? Columbus, OH?

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
rhchick
Charter member
15057 posts
Thu Jun-01-17 11:37 AM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
61. "Where is 30k enough to live?"
In response to Reply # 54


          

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
legsdiamond
Member since May 05th 2011
79560 posts
Thu Jun-01-17 11:57 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
62. "the south"
In response to Reply # 61


          

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
rhchick
Charter member
15057 posts
Thu Jun-01-17 12:04 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
63. "deep deep south"
In response to Reply # 62


          

and depending on the size of the family

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
legsdiamond
Member since May 05th 2011
79560 posts
Thu Jun-01-17 12:12 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
64. "well.. if you make 30K"
In response to Reply # 63


          


you prolly shouldn't have a large family.

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
Stadiq
Member since Dec 21st 2005
4873 posts
Thu Jun-01-17 12:35 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
66. "damn Legs, that sounds like Fox news"
In response to Reply # 64


          


"poor people shouldn't have kids" now?

I mean, I get the point but that, in addition to being a little harsh, ignores that someones the sh!t goes the other way around.

Laid off...divorce....death..etc, etc.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                        
legsdiamond
Member since May 05th 2011
79560 posts
Thu Jun-01-17 12:45 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
68. "when did i say poor people shouldn't have kids? "
In response to Reply # 66


          

i definitely think having a lot of kids and little money is a recipe for hard times.

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                            
Stadiq
Member since Dec 21st 2005
4873 posts
Thu Jun-01-17 12:49 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
69. "in the post above?"
In response to Reply # 68


          


Of course it is a recipe for hard times.


My point is that you are using a decent amount of right wing logic to fight this min wage thing.

"Maybe you shouldn't have a large family if you only make 30k"

My answer is, sometimes the 30k comes after the family.


Just came off as blaming people for some choice they made, rather than accepting that sh!t happens.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                
legsdiamond
Member since May 05th 2011
79560 posts
Thu Jun-01-17 01:03 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
72. "I'm just being honest and sometimes the truth hurts"
In response to Reply # 69


          

unfortunately when you have a large family you assume more risk.

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
tariqhu
Charter member
17883 posts
Thu Jun-01-17 12:44 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
67. "or the midwest"
In response to Reply # 63


          

but can't do a lot with that in the big cities.

Y'all buy those labels, I was born supreme

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
legsdiamond
Member since May 05th 2011
79560 posts
Thu Jun-01-17 12:51 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
70. "these people must live in NYC or LA"
In response to Reply # 67


          

cause in Charlotte you can get a 2BR for $700 on the bus line.

https://www.forrent.com/apartment-community-profile/1000005841

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                        
tariqhu
Charter member
17883 posts
Thu Jun-01-17 03:22 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
79. "won't get much for that in atl."
In response to Reply # 70


          

not anything good anyway.

Y'all buy those labels, I was born supreme

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                            
legsdiamond
Member since May 05th 2011
79560 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 09:02 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
85. "hmm... not downtown but how about surrounding areas? "
In response to Reply # 79


          

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
flipnile
Member since Nov 05th 2003
13565 posts
Thu Jun-01-17 12:15 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
65. "$30k you can afford an apartment & used car here and still have a little..."
In response to Reply # 61


          

Philly.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

IkeMoses
Charter member
70875 posts
Thu Jun-01-17 01:31 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
73. "I'm dying at the affected businesses being Bay Area donut shops"
In response to Reply # 0


  

          

Y'all falling for this shit.

These ain't mom and pops that been around for decades.

These gentrification pop ups.

-30-
You know it's drama, but it sound real good.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
legsdiamond
Member since May 05th 2011
79560 posts
Thu Jun-01-17 01:33 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
74. "lol"
In response to Reply # 73


          

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
denny
Member since Apr 11th 2008
11281 posts
Thu Jun-01-17 01:55 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
75. "Crossed my mind too lol."
In response to Reply # 73


          

A family of 4 can now make ends meet every month....but what about 'Ye Little Hole in the Wall Pub and Eatery'?

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
Rjcc
Charter member
94963 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 03:52 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
136. "everything listed is like "how the fuck did they ever stay in business""
In response to Reply # 73


          


www.engadgethd.com - the other stuff i'm looking at

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

auragin_boi
Member since Aug 01st 2003
20939 posts
Thu Jun-01-17 02:18 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
77. "Re: Small Business"
In response to Reply # 0
Thu Jun-01-17 02:19 PM by auragin_boi

  

          

Lights: $X
Gas: $X
Taxes: $X
Insurance: $X
Materials: $X
Rent/Mortgage: $X
Wages: $X

^^^That's how they should look at all of their expenses. Then they should price accordingly. Most times, they don't even need to make drastic price kicks to maintain balance.

Payroll = 10 ee's @ $12/hr = $4800 a week before
Payroll = 10 ee's @ $15/hr = $6000 a week now

Sales = $25,000 a week on 2000 items (avg price of $12.50 per item)

To make the same margins to cover, roughly, an extra $62K annually in salary, is an extra $0.60 per item OR you try to increase the number of items sold weekly to offset it (an additional 96 items per week). I'm pretty sure the paying public isn't going to panic over a $0.60 increase. And if you are a business owner worth your weight, you'll figure out ways to supplement the cost increase. Even if it means eating into your own profits. I firmly believe that the owner should be willing to accept the same wage they pay their employees and should use that as motivation to drive business (to make more personal salary). Not penalize the workers due to inflation.

It's like no one wants to make small business accountable for growing. That's literally their job.

____________

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
denny
Member since Apr 11th 2008
11281 posts
Thu Jun-01-17 02:50 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
78. "So small businesses should raise prices to accomodate wages."
In response to Reply # 77
Thu Jun-01-17 02:51 PM by denny

          

Then what's the point of having higher wages with higher prices? All we'd be doing is printing more money.

Hypothetically...if all businesses adjust prices to accommodate a raise in minimum wage than there would be absolutely zero change in the real standard of living for workers. The only change would be a decrease in the relative worth of American currency.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
Stadiq
Member since Dec 21st 2005
4873 posts
Thu Jun-01-17 03:22 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
80. "please, no. Not the inflation boogie man. "
In response to Reply # 78


          

Cmon.

I don't even mean this as snark at you are anyone, but I am legit surprised at how many right wing points are being used on OKP.


First of all, the idea that an increase in wages will increase prices is often presented as if it is not only a guarantee, but it will happen immediately.

It is a classic scare tactic because not only can 'Murricans not stand the idea of the french-fry guy making $12-15,

they really hate the idea of a $10 Big Mac.


So I usually like to flip the question. If we lowered wages, by the "prices will go up" logic, I suppose prices will go down?


Of course not. Because companies don't set price on cost. It is a factor, yes- but not the only factor.

The argument assumes that a) companies are dead-set on a fixed profit

or

b) that they aren't already charging what the market supports.


It's....bull$hit.


If McDonalds could charge $10 for a Big Mac, they would already be doing it.

Over time will prices rise? Of course.

Inflation happens- even without increases in the minimum wage.

So the idea is that it should go up, and consistently go up with inflation. Cost of living raises, once it is caught up.


Folks are in here really saying "yes minimum wage hasn't kept up, but we can't make it fair because some small companies may close and, over-time, prices will go up..."


Again, it is crazy to me that 'Murrica has reached a point where even on the left these scare tactics and business hero worship are used to argue against progress.

The country has gone harder right than I even realized.


Between that and the article Brew posted that even Nixon was open to BI (Nixon!!!!) , this country really is f*cked in 2017 and beyond.

We just love business too much.

We love profit too much.

We love our factory jobs too much.

We love being able to buy our sh!t at consistent prices too much.

Crazy.



  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
denny
Member since Apr 11th 2008
11281 posts
Thu Jun-01-17 03:50 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
81. "RE: please, no. Not the inflation boogie man. "
In response to Reply # 80
Thu Jun-01-17 03:53 PM by denny

          

I was replying to someone who specifically suggested that companies off-set rising overhead costs by increasing prices.

And BTW....the answer to your question is yes. If wages went down so would prices. I'm not sure you know (or perhaps believe in) economic theory. Mcdonald's doesn't 'decide' the price of their big mac. Prices are determined by supply and demand. Sure, they can 'decide' not to lower the price of the bigmac if their overhead costs decrease. But the theory holds that someone else will (other Burger joints). And no one's going to buy a $10 bigmac if they can get a Wendy's burger for $5.

Economics isn't a moral science. It's a behavioral science. It doesn't tell how us how people SHOULD act. It tells us how people DO act.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
J_Stew
Member since Jul 06th 2002
22363 posts
Thu Jun-01-17 03:56 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
82. "prices never go DOWN, homie. "
In response to Reply # 81


          

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
denny
Member since Apr 11th 2008
11281 posts
Thu Jun-01-17 04:11 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
83. "They certainly do."
In response to Reply # 82
Thu Jun-01-17 04:13 PM by denny

          

How much did you pay in long distance calls last year? How about 1990? How much did a flatscreen tv cost 15 years ago?

If we abolished the minimum wage all together....Mcdonald's would have NO CHOICE but to lower prices. If they didn't...they'd get priced out of the market by competitors.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                        
auragin_boi
Member since Aug 01st 2003
20939 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 08:58 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
84. "This is false equivalency though Denny"
In response to Reply # 83
Fri Jun-02-17 09:00 AM by auragin_boi

  

          

Prices don't go down due to wages declining. They go down due to competition, product upgrades and market demand. When a product is 'new', businesses charge more for it and when the market is saturated and the product becomes more common, demand declines the price to equilibrium (unless it's a luxury item).

Here's a perfect example of how cheap labor doesn't decrease prices:

https://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x1220221
^^^This list was compiled in 2004. Do you honestly think any of these companies charged LESS due to this?

Do you really think a guy like Donald Trump, who makes products overseas, is going to charge LESS because of it? C'mon.

You grossly underestimate American Greed.

>If we abolished the minimum wage all together....Mcdonald's
>would have NO CHOICE but to lower prices. If they
>didn't...they'd get priced out of the market by competitors.

Not sure if this is completely true. The consumer demand would determine the cost and with no minimum wage, the jobs might not be valued as much and people might not work them...especially if the wage facilitates cost of living LESS than it does now.


And to your point about my OP and cost increases...as Stadiq stated, wage increase doesn't have to mean a price increase. My point was just to say that a small increase in prices isn't the end of the world. You missed that I also suggested business owners eat the losses in profit as a 'cost of doing business' or businesses focus on growth to cover the increase in wages as well if they want to maintain their margins.

Personally, any CEO making millions or Business owner that's pulling in 6 figures should be less focused on that margin for wages and more focused on making it work within reasonable parameters. But I also think broad strokes over the minimum wage isn't the way to go as well. There should be a cutoff workforce size like they do with certain regulations. Maybe have a minimum for company size (50 ee's or less have a min wage of X, 51-1000 ee's pay min Y, 1000+ pay min Z) as well as cost of living.

This requires a creative, multifaceted, progressive solution, not a conservative one.

____________

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                            
legsdiamond
Member since May 05th 2011
79560 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 09:07 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
87. "demand and competition determine the price"
In response to Reply # 84


          

its all related tho.

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                            
denny
Member since Apr 11th 2008
11281 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 09:52 AM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
88. "?"
In response to Reply # 84
Fri Jun-02-17 10:05 AM by denny

          

Prices go down because of competition but not wage decreases? That doesn't make any sense. The competition is ABLE to lower prices often BECAUSE they decrease gross wages (finding inefficiencies, whatever the case may be).

I'm not underestimating 'greed'. Theoretically, it's not 'greedy' to refuse to adjust prices when supply/demand change....it's stupid. And it will be at your own peril. There are several examples of prices going down. When adjusted for inflation ('real prices')...there are even more examples of prices for a good/service going down. It literally happens all the time. Not because the businesses that provide them are not 'greedy'. They have no choice.

Prices aren't determined by ethics or morality. They're determined by all factors affecting supply and demand. Wage floors and ceilings are one of those factors. One thing is for certain...if a national minimum wage of $15 is implemented....prices of low-waged goods and services will go up. For example...getting your nails done in a mall. That's not to say the minimum wage SHOULDN'T be implemented. Again, it's a cost-benefit analysis.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                
auragin_boi
Member since Aug 01st 2003
20939 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 11:04 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
93. "RE: ?"
In response to Reply # 88


  

          

>Prices go down because of competition but not wage decreases?
> That doesn't make any sense. The competition is ABLE to
>lower prices often BECAUSE they decrease gross wages (finding
>inefficiencies, whatever the case may be).

LOL...if you work for me and I pay you $10/hr but you quit and I hire the next guy at $7.50/hr, I'm NOT inclined to drop the price of my product to match the lowered cost of labor. I'm taking the extra profit and either reinvesting to grow business or putting it in my pocket. The link I showed you basically proved these companies are globalizing employment for the SAKE of record profit.

And if my next best competitor goes out of business, I'll increase the cost, keep the $7.50 guy and make MORE. It doesn't work in the inverse here Denny. Companies are greedy.

>I'm not underestimating 'greed'. Theoretically, it's not
>'greedy' to refuse to adjust prices when supply/demand
>change....it's stupid. And it will be at your own peril.
>There are several examples of prices going down. When
>adjusted for inflation ('real prices')...there are even more
>examples of prices for a good/service going down. It
>literally happens all the time. Not because the businesses
>that provide them are not 'greedy'. They have no choice.

Prices go down for all of the reasons you, legs and me stated. But wages declining has little if any significance to it.

>Prices aren't determined by ethics or morality. They're
>determined by all factors affecting supply and demand. Wage
>floors and ceilings are one of those factors. One thing is
>for certain...if a national minimum wage of $15 is
>implemented....prices of low-waged goods and services will go
>up. For example...getting your nails done in a mall. That's
>not to say the minimum wage SHOULDN'T be implemented. Again,
>it's a cost-benefit analysis.

Wage ceilings...yes. Floors...not so much. Ultimately, if companies are going to be force to eat paying more, they are probably going to need to be forced into doing things to protect against raising water for the sake of raising water.

As I said, this issue needs a multifaceted solution.

____________

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                    
denny
Member since Apr 11th 2008
11281 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 11:23 AM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
94. "RE: ?"
In response to Reply # 93
Fri Jun-02-17 11:29 AM by denny

          

Companies are
>greedy.

Read below. Greed is just as likely a motivation to lower prices as it is to raise prices. IE Mcdonalds, Walmart. According to you....Walmart is a virtuous company because they're prices are so low. How can Walmart have the lowest prices and ALSO be greedy? My explanation accounts for it. Your's doesn't. By your logic...a ma'n'pa hardware store is more greedy than Walmart because their prices are higher. By your logic...Walmart isn't greedy because they constantly lower prices as their overhead decreases.

>Prices go down for all of the reasons you, legs and me stated.
> But wages declining has little if any significance to it.


This is just patently false. Walmart lowered the real prices of all sorts of goods. This is what made them successful. Low wages played a HUGE role in how they lowered those prices.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                        
auragin_boi
Member since Aug 01st 2003
20939 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 03:33 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
132. "Walmart is a bad example"
In response to Reply # 94
Fri Jun-02-17 04:01 PM by auragin_boi

  

          

I actually studied a case on Walmart in school. The reason they are so successful is because they tighten their margins on the products they buy. They negotiate the manufacturers prices. THAT'S how they can sell cheap and because they are the biggest kid on the block, manufacturers eat it. Because if they don't play, the miss out on all the opportunity to be IN Walmart. It has little to do with wages being low.

Do you know how many items they sell? If they are offering you a chance to be on their shelves nationwide and you normally sell your product for $3.50, Walmart is gonna say "for this product, we will only pay $2.90 and no more or we won't do business", you're not walking away. Even if your profit is cut, the amount you'll sell makes up for it.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/wal-mart-ratchets-up-pressure-on-suppliers-to-cut-prices-1427845404
http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/negotiating-with-wal-mart

>This is just patently false. Walmart lowered the real prices
>of all sorts of goods. This is what made them successful.
>Low wages played a HUGE role in how they lowered those
>prices.
>

____________

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                            
denny
Member since Apr 11th 2008
11281 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 10:33 AM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
92. "Also..."
In response to Reply # 84


          

I want to correct something I'm seeing in a lot of people's assumptions here:

Companies lower prices because they are moral
Companies raise prices because they are greedy.

This is a very over-simplified view. It's much more accurate to say

Companies are always greedy. They lower prices because of greed and they raise prices because of greed.

McDonald's built an EMPIRE by lowering prices. So did Walmart. That's how they killed their competitors.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                
legsdiamond
Member since May 05th 2011
79560 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 11:27 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
95. "^^^^^ it's all about cornering the market"
In response to Reply # 92


          

hell, Uber is losing money trying to corner the market.

it's all greed.

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
legsdiamond
Member since May 05th 2011
79560 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 09:06 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
86. "price of the qtr pounder went down and they introduced a dollar menu"
In response to Reply # 80


          

definitely a price drop IMO.




****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
Lurkmode
Member since May 07th 2011
5186 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 10:02 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
89. "That was because of the economy"
In response to Reply # 86


  

          

it was bad so they had to lower the prices. Same thing happen with pizza places.

---------------------------
Signature

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
denny
Member since Apr 11th 2008
11281 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 10:23 AM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
90. "True."
In response to Reply # 89
Fri Jun-02-17 10:25 AM by denny

          

Otherwise known as a shift in demand. For Mcdonald's, in particular, there was also a shift in demand the past 15 years because of growing awareness of health issues.

But Legs is addressing the assertion that prices never go down....which is patently false.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                        
Lurkmode
Member since May 07th 2011
5186 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 11:52 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
98. "LOL"
In response to Reply # 90


  

          

>Otherwise known as a shift in demand. For Mcdonald's, in
>particular, there was also a shift in demand the past 15 years
>because of growing awareness of health issues.

Right the lack of demand because of the bad economy. Many of these fast food places offer a dollar menu. Health issues is a small part of it.

>But Legs is addressing the assertion that prices never go
>down....which is patently false.

You and legs can say prices do go down but how does that connect to a stance against raising the min wage to 15 ? Don't use long distance and flat screen t.v. to make your point.

---------------------------
Signature

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                            
denny
Member since Apr 11th 2008
11281 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 12:34 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
100. "Everyone can benefit from basic economics knowledge."
In response to Reply # 98
Fri Jun-02-17 12:59 PM by denny

          

No snark. It's very valuable to be familiar with.

Stewie claimed 'prices always go up'. For all I know...he was referring to inflation. But this is why economists use 'real prices' which takes into account for inflation. Even so....there IS such a thing as deflation (usually occurs during war or civil unrest). Like when Europe was conquered by the Nazis and people needed a wheelbarrow full of local currency to buy a sack of potatoes. But I digress.

For our intents and purposes...our relatively healthy economy ALWAYS inflates. Money becomes less valuable every year. And this generally causes prices to raise every year. But the 'real price' of something may not raise. For example....if a litre of milk costs a dollar in 2017 and our inflation is .27%....then that same litre of milk will cost $1.27 next year JUST because of inflation. However, the 'real price' (accounting for inflation) of that litre would remain unchanged.

So....'real prices' fluctuate. They go up and down. (we needed to prove that they also go down and provided examples) These fluctuations are caused by the relationship between supply and demand. EVERY SINGLE reason a 'real price' changes can be explained as 1 of 4 causes:

1)an increase in demand (prices drop)
2)a decrease in demand (prices rise)
3)an increase in supply (prices drop)
4)a decrease in supply (prices rise)

That established....imposing a minimum wage of ANY sort causes the supply to decrease. Businesses will decrease the supply of a good when the cost to produce that good rises. Wages are a cost. So when wages go up....costs go up....supply goes down....prices rise.

I would encourage anyone unfamiliar with the supply/demand curve to check this out:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g9aDizJpd_s

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                
Lurkmode
Member since May 07th 2011
5186 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 01:32 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
102. "Especially you"
In response to Reply # 100


  

          

>No snark. It's very valuable to be familiar with.

You need help with everything like politics, common sense, context, the list goes on and on.

This is what you said

"Mcdonald's doesn't 'decide' the price of their big mac. Prices are determined by supply and demand. Sure, they can 'decide' not to lower the price of the bigmac if their overhead costs decrease. But the theory holds that someone else will (other Burger joints). And no one's going to buy a $10 bigmac if they can get a Wendy's burger for $5.

Yes McDonald does, the economy and competition will factor into the price they set but that does not mean MCDonalds is hands off and market is determining the price. It cost around 2 dollars for the pizza chain to make a pizza. They could have offered these deals the same way McDolnalds and the burger chains offered the 1 dollar menu a long time ago, even even when the economy wasn't bad.

The problem with using the price of long distance and flat screens as an example of prices going down and connecting that to a debate about what happens when the min wage is increased to 15, is you didn't address the cost has always been way less for the Bell telephone companies to provide long distance service to its customers. It wasn't until they broke up and the telephone company monopoly that long distance rates started to go down.

>
>So....'real prices' fluctuate. They go up and down. (we
>needed to prove that they also go down and provided examples)
>These fluctuations are caused by the relationship between
>supply and demand.
>

You just got your examples that go beyond supply and demand and I didn't even include brand loyalty.

>That established....imposing a minimum wage of ANY sort causes
>the supply to decrease. Businesses will decrease the supply
>of a good when the cost to produce that good rises. Wages are
>a cost. So when wages go up....costs go up....supply goes
>down....prices rise.
>

Yeah and they cried about minimum wage ever since Roosevelt signed the first minimum wage law in 1938. The same way they cried about Social Security when that was created and now the whole PC thing. Yet we are still here.

>I would encourage anyone unfamiliar with the supply/demand
>curve to check this out:
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g9aDizJpd_s

I would encourage you to start here

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/no-raising-the-local-minimum-wage-doesnt-hurt-local-businesses/2016/02/26/4d6cabd0-dbed-11e5-925f-1d10062cc82d_story.html?utm_term=.f1b7c98451f4


>

---------------------------
Signature

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                    
denny
Member since Apr 11th 2008
11281 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 01:43 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
103. "Dude....the point you are arguing against is in the article."
In response to Reply # 102
Fri Jun-02-17 01:53 PM by denny

          

'Some evidence, for instance, suggests that companies raise prices'

Are you really this obtuse? You're killing me. We just had a series of exchanges in which we are debating the tie between minimum wages and prices. A relationship described as a 'boogeyman' and a 'right wing talking point' above lol.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                        
Lurkmode
Member since May 07th 2011
5186 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 02:05 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
109. "Keep cherry picking Russian bot"
In response to Reply # 103


  

          

The article starts off with

In 1938, President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the nation’s first minimum-wage law. It set the wage at $0.25 an hour and covered only a fifth of the workforce. Speaking to the country the night before he signed the bill, Roosevelt told listeners to “not let any calamity-howling executive with an income of $1,000 a day” tell them “that a wage of $11 a week is going to have a disastrous effect on all American industry.”

LOL

---------------------------
Signature

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                            
denny
Member since Apr 11th 2008
11281 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 02:08 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
110. "What is this in response to?"
In response to Reply # 109
Fri Jun-02-17 02:08 PM by denny

          

I've already expressed my support of a $15 minimum wage. I merely stated that it will also raise prices. An assertion that YOU are challenging.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                
Lurkmode
Member since May 07th 2011
5186 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 02:20 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
111. "No you didn't"
In response to Reply # 110


  

          

You support a wage increase. Which could be anything between 15 and the current min wage. You also said

"If we abolished the minimum wage all together....Mcdonald's would have NO CHOICE but to lower prices. If they didn't...they'd get priced out of the market by competitors."

Which is stupid

---------------------------
Signature

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                    
denny
Member since Apr 11th 2008
11281 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 02:22 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
112. "Cutting prices has been McD's business model since inception."
In response to Reply # 111
Fri Jun-02-17 02:34 PM by denny

          

I'm sorry you aren't aware of that. Same with Walmart.

And this is how it becomes apparent that you aren't interested in the actual issue of minimum wages. You are interested in signaling your virtue by undertaking the most simplified version of reality possible...and then aligning yourself with what appears to be 'the good guys'. You will cover your ears and refuse to listen to any nuanced elements of the issue because they call into question which side of the debate is more virtuous. And that is the only level upon which you engage.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                        
Lurkmode
Member since May 07th 2011
5186 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 03:04 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
129. "You've goin full Rusian bot"
In response to Reply # 112


  

          

>I'm sorry you aren't aware of that. Same with Walmart.

Make sure to use SJW

>And this is how it becomes apparent that you aren't interested
>in the actual issue of minimum wages. You are interested in
>signaling your virtue by undertaking the most simplified
>version of reality possible...and then aligning yourself with
>what appears to be 'the good guys'. You will cover your ears
>and refuse to listen to any nuanced elements of the issue
>because they call into question which side of the debate is
>more virtuous. And that is the only level upon which you
>engage.

The issues of minimum wages is in the article I provided that you cherry picked from. This virtue argument is just the usual straw man thing you do. McDonalds, Walmart and most business cut prices because they have to due to bad economy, competition. Most of your reply is just projection.

---------------------------
Signature

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                
PimpTrickGangstaClik
Member since Oct 06th 2005
15894 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 02:47 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
125. "You can only go so far with econ 101"
In response to Reply # 100


          

Look up "sticky prices". Your simple description doesn't match how the world behaves

>
>So....'real prices' fluctuate. They go up and down. (we
>needed to prove that they also go down and provided examples)
>These fluctuations are caused by the relationship between
>supply and demand. EVERY SINGLE reason a 'real price' changes
>can be explained as 1 of 4 causes:
>
>1)an increase in demand (prices drop)
>2)a decrease in demand (prices rise)
>3)an increase in supply (prices drop)
>4)a decrease in supply (prices rise)
>
>That established....imposing a minimum wage of ANY sort causes
>the supply to decrease. Businesses will decrease the supply
>of a good when the cost to produce that good rises. Wages are
>a cost. So when wages go up....costs go up....supply goes
>down....prices rise.
>
C

_______________________________________

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                    
denny
Member since Apr 11th 2008
11281 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 02:58 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
127. "For sure it's more complicated...."
In response to Reply # 125


          

But Sticky prices doesn't apply to industries fueled by low-waged work. I would have to review cause it's been a long time...but sticky prices are relevant to industries with the following characteristics:

1)Imperfect information (low-waged industries have the BEST information)
2)Goods/services that fluctuate in price rapidly (again, not the case for your Walmarts and Mickey d's)
Pretty sure I'm forgetting a third....alas.

In anycase...minimum wage increases contribute to price increases. That's a pretty good certainty even after subtleties and complexities are considered.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                        
PimpTrickGangstaClik
Member since Oct 06th 2005
15894 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 03:35 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
133. "Nah...not a certainty. It is very much in debate"
In response to Reply # 127


          

They find very little to no impact on prices:
http://www.washington.edu/news/2016/04/18/early-analysis-of-seattles-15-wage-law-effect-on-prices-minimal-one-year-after-implementation/

They find there are some price increase. In San Jose, a 25% increase in the wage leads to on average a 1.45% in prices:
http://www.irle.berkeley.edu/files/2015/Are-Local-Minimum-Wages-Absorbed-by-Price-Increases.pdf


>
>In anycase...minimum wage increases contribute to price
>increases. That's a pretty good certainty even after
>subtleties and complexities are considered.

_______________________________________

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                            
denny
Member since Apr 11th 2008
11281 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 03:52 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
137. "Both cases cited showed price increases."
In response to Reply # 133
Fri Jun-02-17 04:20 PM by denny

          

I probably wasn't specific enough (though I have been in other posts). The certainty is that there will be SOME sort of level of price increase.

I'll check out these studies though

On first glance...the second case that resulted in nominal price increases was conducted after a 25% increase in minimum wage. In some states....the national 15 will constitute a 100% increase in minimum wage.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
legsdiamond
Member since May 05th 2011
79560 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 10:26 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
91. "it's all tied to demand. Less money, less demand"
In response to Reply # 89


          

just sayin' priced do come down

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                        
Lurkmode
Member since May 07th 2011
5186 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 11:43 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
96. "Yeah"
In response to Reply # 91


  

          

>just sayin' priced do come down

Stew went too far when he said prices never come down and Denny went too far when he used long distance and flat screens to prove that point.

---------------------------
Signature

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                            
denny
Member since Apr 11th 2008
11281 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 11:49 AM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
97. "Totally."
In response to Reply # 96


          

I went too far when I gave examples of prices going down. I nearly lost myself there.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                
Lurkmode
Member since May 07th 2011
5186 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 12:08 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
99. "Lmao"
In response to Reply # 97


  

          

"How much did you pay in long distance calls last year? How about 1990? How much did a flatscreen tv cost 15 years ago?"

How much did you pay for walkman cassette player in 1979 ? How about 2017 ?

How much did 128mb flash drive cost in 2000 ? How about 2017 ?

---------------------------
Signature

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                    
denny
Member since Apr 11th 2008
11281 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 12:45 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
101. "Why are you laughing your ass off?"
In response to Reply # 99
Fri Jun-02-17 12:45 PM by denny

          

Those are also examples of prices going down. For walkmans...the price went down because demand went down. For flat screen tvs...the price went down because the supply went up.

Why is this funny? What is the point you're making?

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                        
Lurkmode
Member since May 07th 2011
5186 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 01:45 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
104. "It's not a fair comparison"
In response to Reply # 101


  

          

You went back to 1990 and 15 years ago to prove prices go down.

That's ridiculous.

---------------------------
Signature

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                            
denny
Member since Apr 11th 2008
11281 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 01:54 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
105. "lol"
In response to Reply # 104
Fri Jun-02-17 02:03 PM by denny

          

I didn't know the years 1990 and 2002 should be excluded from our working definition of the 'past'. This must be the most surreal exchange in the history of OKP.

But let's keep going. Why is reference to something 15 or 25 years ago 'ridiculous' in showing how prices can go down?

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                
Lurkmode
Member since May 07th 2011
5186 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 02:01 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
106. "Roflmao"
In response to Reply # 105


  

          

Case closed end the post.

Min wage should not be raised to 15 because a floppy disc cost less then it did when it first came out.

---------------------------
Signature

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                    
denny
Member since Apr 11th 2008
11281 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 02:05 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
108. "That's clearly not the argument."
In response to Reply # 106
Fri Jun-02-17 02:06 PM by denny

          

For a refresher...the argument is that minimum wage hikes will increase prices. I'd link you to the Washington Post article cited earlier as evidence.....but it was YOU that posted it. lol

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                        
Lurkmode
Member since May 07th 2011
5186 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 02:36 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
117. "LOL then why did you add it"
In response to Reply # 108


  

          

that's your words.

>For a refresher...the argument is that minimum wage hikes
>will increase prices. I'd link you to the Washington Post
>article cited earlier as evidence.....but it was YOU that
>posted it. lol

Why did you add this

"Also of note....there are numerous examples wherein people don't need a 'living wage' in seeking employment. I want my 16 year old daughter to have a job this summer. Noone is going to pay her a 'living wage' and she doesn't need a 'living wage'. Same goes for spousal partners who aren't breadwinners. There are millions of jobs for which people don't depend on their living expenses for and eliminating all those jobs would be very bad."

Are those people(spousal partners, 16 year old daughter doing a summer job) asking for a min 15 hr wage ?

---------------------------
Signature

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                            
denny
Member since Apr 11th 2008
11281 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 02:43 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
122. "RE: LOL then why did you add it"
In response to Reply # 117
Fri Jun-02-17 02:48 PM by denny

          

"Are those people(spousal partners, 16 year old daughter doing a summer job) asking for a min 15 hr wage ?"

Many of them are not. But implementing a national $15 wage goes across the board. (please tell me you know that)

Meaning...companies won't be allowed to pay someone less than the 15. Which would eliminate many of those jobs...which is why many low-paid workers DON'T want the increase in minimum wage. PLEASE tell me you were aware of this.

Edit...the only logical reason I can think of for someone to ask this question is if they were under the assumption that workers would be allowed to work under 15 if they wanted to.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                
Lurkmode
Member since May 07th 2011
5186 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 02:54 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
126. "That wasn't the question"
In response to Reply # 122


  

          

This variation has provided opportunities for something rare in empirical economics: quasi-experimental studies. In one famous paper, economists Alan Krueger and David Card compared fast-food employment in New Jersey, which raised its minimum wage in 1992, with that in Pennsylvania, which did not. “We find no indication that the rise in the minimum wage reduced employment,” they concluded.

---------------------------
Signature

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                    
denny
Member since Apr 11th 2008
11281 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 03:04 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
128. "I need to know what point your making."
In response to Reply # 126


          

How is this related to this question you asked of me:

"Are those people(spousal partners, 16 year old daughter doing a summer job) asking for a min 15 hr wage ?"

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                        
Lurkmode
Member since May 07th 2011
5186 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 03:29 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
131. "You said what the argument was not"
In response to Reply # 128


  

          

so I asked why add that to the argument.

---------------------------
Signature

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                            
denny
Member since Apr 11th 2008
11281 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 03:42 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
135. "The argument is that minimum wage hikes...."
In response to Reply # 131
Fri Jun-02-17 03:43 PM by denny

          

result in some level of unemployment. I provided examples of who might be affected by referring to yoga instructers, teenagers.

It MAY be true that a national minimum wage hike doesn't result in more unemployment in the fast food industry specifically. (I doubt it) But that case study is certainly not an assurance of what will happen when a national minimum of 15 is rolled out. And even if it's findings end up being true of the fast food industry....it might not apply to all the other industries (like the ones I mentioned, department stores, lifeguards, hairdressers, data entry clerks, etc etc etc)

The question isn't if a minimum wage hike will increase unemployment. The question is how much. Admittedly, it's possible that it's minimal. But it won't be non-existant and that is a CERTAINTY.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                            
Lurkmode
Member since May 07th 2011
5186 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 03:58 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
138. "Anything can result in a level"
In response to Reply # 135


  

          

of some unemployment. A chicken little approach does not help those making minimum that is too low.

---------------------------
Signature

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                            
denny
Member since Apr 11th 2008
11281 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 08:16 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
139. "Not true."
In response to Reply # 138


          

Not 'everything' certainly destines us to an increase of unemployment. Certain policy decisions do. And making them depends on properly weighing them in the balance between intentions and outcomes.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                            
Brew
Member since Nov 23rd 2002
24419 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 02:02 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
107. "To be fair you did say prices "never" go down in replay 82..."
In response to Reply # 104


          

>You went back to 1990 and 15 years ago to prove prices go
>down.
>
>That's ridiculous.

----------------------------------------

"Fuck aliens." © WarriorPoet415

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                
legsdiamond
Member since May 05th 2011
79560 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 02:25 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
113. "yeah, not sure what he is arguing "
In response to Reply # 107


          

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                    
denny
Member since Apr 11th 2008
11281 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 02:32 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
115. "He's not 'arguing' or 'debating'"
In response to Reply # 113
Fri Jun-02-17 02:33 PM by denny

          

He's undertaken the most simplified version of reality which makes clear which side is virtuous and which side is evil....and then invested himself fully with the 'good side'.

Nuance just blurs the border between good guys and bad guys. So nuance and any complexities of the debate are unwelcome. He doesn't care about the actual OUTCOME. He cares about what people are motivated by. He's motivated by the plight of the poor....therefor he is virtuous and his opponents are evil. The actual OUTCOME of the policy is secondary. It's all posturing. He doesn't actually care about what the policy results in....he cares about what he looks like by taking a certain position.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                        
legsdiamond
Member since May 05th 2011
79560 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 02:35 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
116. "wait, isn't this the dude you think is Kweli? "
In response to Reply # 115


          

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                            
Lurkmode
Member since May 07th 2011
5186 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 02:37 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
118. "LOL"
In response to Reply # 116


  

          

He has proof

---------------------------
Signature

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                            
denny
Member since Apr 11th 2008
11281 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 02:39 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
119. "It certainly is."
In response to Reply # 116


          

I got him running scared right now.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                
legsdiamond
Member since May 05th 2011
79560 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 02:43 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
123. "man, why do you think you know this dude? "
In response to Reply # 119


          

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                    
denny
Member since Apr 11th 2008
11281 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 08:28 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
140. "It's hard to say with this lump in my cheek"
In response to Reply # 123


          

Don't make me.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                                
Lurkmode
Member since May 07th 2011
5186 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 02:44 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
124. "So scared I'm going to link to it"
In response to Reply # 119


  

          



http://board.okayplayer.com/okp.php?az=show_mesg&forum=4&topic_id=13059548&mesg_id=13062830&page=

---------------------------
Signature

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                        
Lurkmode
Member since May 07th 2011
5186 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 02:41 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
120. "Roflmao"
In response to Reply # 115


  

          

Good vs Evil more strawmen

---------------------------
Signature

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                        
BigReg
Charter member
62390 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 02:42 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
121. "Gotta call shenanigans here"
In response to Reply # 115
Fri Jun-02-17 02:43 PM by BigReg

  

          

While we went deep into mystery forest if we are debating if prices ever go up or ever go down, I do find the 'HEY, BUT PRICES WILL GO UP' argument kinda myopic. ANY increase in costs of production and delivery will cause prices to rise. But companies weather the fluctuations in manufacturing, the dollar vs, tarrifs, basic supplies etc.

Of course if you raise the minimum wage prices will go up; but it's a horribly selfish way to look at things and kinda sums up the 'What about me and mines?!?' that has us in the current state of world affairs. Perhaps if the argument was that goods would rise up to the point that it negates the minimum wage was the argument but you niggas seem to be arguing from the 'Im trying to get on these walmart blue light specials' corner, lol. We can throw out examples of places paying a 'fair' wage verses your fast food joints and while I won't argue there's generally a difference in price it's what, 10-15? lol. We gonna leave large swaths of American society behind to save bar money?

Ultimately if we want social nets prices and also TAXES should rise also, and we should be willing to pay that price.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                            
denny
Member since Apr 11th 2008
11281 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 03:21 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
130. "Agreed."
In response to Reply # 121
Fri Jun-02-17 03:23 PM by denny

          

And this leads me to a very important distinction.

There are two main consequences to a proposed minimum wage hike

1)unemployment
2)Price increases

The latter is heavily favorable to the former and here's why. The burden of the unemployment element is felt solely by the lower class...namely the people that the policy is supposed to benefit. The burden of price increases is shared across the income spectrum. EVERYONE pays the higher prices so the the lower classes are only burdened with the costs of higher prices in proportion to how much they buy which is obviously not a very big slice of the pie.

So any decision about minimum wage hikes to benefit the poor usually revolve around how much of the impact will manifest as unemployment and how much of the impact will manifest as price increases. The more heavily this balance falls towards price increases...the better off the poor will be (generally speaking).

So the analysis I've read about the $15 seems to suggest that currently, the minimum wage hike will result in relatively more price increases than it will in unemployment. That's why I support it.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                                
Lurkmode
Member since May 07th 2011
5186 posts
Fri Jun-02-17 02:26 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
114. "I'm not J Stew "
In response to Reply # 107


  

          

J_Stew
Member since Jul 06th 2002
21768 posts Thu Jun-01-17 04:56 PM


82. "prices never go DOWN, homie.

---------------------------
Signature

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Musa
Member since Mar 08th 2006
15789 posts
Sat Jun-03-17 11:13 AM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
142. "The cost of everything has gone up and the cost of production is exploit..."
In response to Reply # 0


  

          

the back end so exploiting the workers on the front end and you have capitalism in a nutshell.

the minimum wage should really be closer to 35k to 40k per year why because of the cost of living

housing
food
transportation

if you have a family compound the cost.

But this country like most European nations was founded on illogical exploitation and idiots who think a few more crumbs makes them better than the next person.

The inferiority complex of whiteness and capitalism has infected too many.

<----

Soundcloud.com/aquil84

(HIP HOP)
http://aquil.bandcamp.com

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
Shaun Tha Don
Member since Nov 19th 2005
18289 posts
Sat Jun-03-17 08:01 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
144. "So what is Singapore's, Japan's, South Korea's and Hong Kong's"
In response to Reply # 142


          

excuse?


>But this country like most European nations was founded on
>illogical exploitation and idiots who think a few more crumbs
>makes them better than the next person.


What do you mean "most" European nations? Only 7-8 nations actually ever exploited anything. And all of them happen to be on the Western half of the continent. England, France, Germany, Spain, Portugal, the Netherlands, and Belgium.


>The inferiority complex of whiteness and capitalism has
>infected too many.




Rest In Peace, Bad News Brown

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
Musa
Member since Mar 08th 2006
15789 posts
Sat Jun-03-17 10:58 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
145. "Lol you literally named the countries where cheap labor is "
In response to Reply # 144


  

          

exported to.

And Sweden benefited from the exploitation of other European nations so did Austria. The only countries with clean hands are Finland Norway and Poland.

<----

Soundcloud.com/aquil84

(HIP HOP)
http://aquil.bandcamp.com

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

AFRICAN
Charter member
11871 posts
Sat Jun-03-17 06:51 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
143. "Crabs in a barrel "
In response to Reply # 0


  

          

People have internalized class divisions and biases so much that they fight against their own interests.

http://perspectivesudans.blogspot.com/
instagram:@3rdworldview
Blessed be the Lord /who believe any mess they read up on the message board

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
Musa
Member since Mar 08th 2006
15789 posts
Mon Jun-05-17 05:11 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
147. "Patrice Oneal called it the promise of middle management"
In response to Reply # 143


  

          

In his Mr P stand up.

As long as one has it a little better than the next they can look down on someone else.

<----

Soundcloud.com/aquil84

(HIP HOP)
http://aquil.bandcamp.com

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

TR808
Member since Oct 24th 2012
2012 posts
Mon Jun-05-17 04:00 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
146. "all this means is ..."
In response to Reply # 0


  

          

instead of going to D.R. for vacation some of these small business owners will go to Cancun...


this is just another cop out to paying people fair wages...

You take the blue pill, the story ends. You wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill, you stay in Wonderland, and I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Lobby General Discussion topic #13161301 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.25
Copyright © DCScripts.com