Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend
Lobby General Discussion topic #13123114

Subject: "STANDING ROCK vs DAPL: GAME OVER!" Previous topic | Next topic
JRennolds
Charter member
17029 posts
Tue Feb-07-17 10:17 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
"STANDING ROCK vs DAPL: GAME OVER!"


  

          

The US Army won; we will utilize our nation's own energy resources instead of depending on other countries to fuel our lives. Pun intended.

Kind of fucked up that sacred lands are in the crosshairs BUT times have changed. You can't halt progress. Maybe all these protestors will finally stop protesting, get jobs and, do something productive with their lives. Hopefully DAPL will employ some of these folks and get them off welfare.

GOMD

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top


Topic Outline
Subject Author Message Date ID
I know you're a troll. I know I shouldn't respond. But here I am.
Feb 07th 2017
1
Here you are.
Feb 07th 2017
2
      RE: Here you are.
Feb 07th 2017
3
           I don't buy it.
Feb 07th 2017
4
                There are oil oligarchs that live here and exploit us too.
Feb 08th 2017
5
                     I guess. Do they fund our enemies?
Feb 08th 2017
9
                          depends on who your enemies are, homie.
Feb 08th 2017
10
                               I doubt AMERICAN corporations and...
Feb 08th 2017
11
                                    islamic extremists aren't who i'm referring to. keep up.
Feb 08th 2017
12
                                         Oh yes. Successful individuals and...
Feb 08th 2017
13
                                              haha
Feb 08th 2017
14
Are we supposed to be surprised that money won over common sense
Feb 08th 2017
6
I hope you die in a fire.
Feb 08th 2017
7
^^^Wow! What a psychopath remark.
Feb 08th 2017
8
if you think that's bad you should read the OP
Feb 08th 2017
15
It's not a threat, I'm just sharing my hopes & dreams here.
Feb 09th 2017
49
Really Dude? That's what you really think?
Feb 08th 2017
37
The irony of this statement:
Feb 08th 2017
16
THE TIRED NARRATIVE:
Feb 08th 2017
17
So you can't address anything he said...
Feb 08th 2017
19
RE: The irony of this statement:
Feb 08th 2017
22
RE: The irony of this statement:
Feb 09th 2017
48
RE: The irony of this statement:
Feb 09th 2017
45
      Are you accusing the left of these things?
Feb 09th 2017
47
           I'm not concerned with group labels
Feb 09th 2017
51
polluting water sources to export oil is hustling backwards
Feb 08th 2017
18
You think this line will pollute the waters?
Feb 08th 2017
20
The largest EPA fine is less than $100 million
Feb 08th 2017
26
That was AMERICA then. A new AMERICA is here.
Feb 08th 2017
27
That's what your rolling with? Pipelines don't pollute?
Feb 08th 2017
28
      It should go unsaid, but he's not trying to argue
Feb 08th 2017
29
      you're right. I'll hold out for some higher level trolling. Haha
Feb 08th 2017
30
      GO DARK NOW!
Feb 08th 2017
32
      RE: That's what your rolling with? Pipelines don't pollute?
Feb 08th 2017
31
           Flint on line one
Feb 09th 2017
40
Appropriate studies have already been done and determined
Feb 09th 2017
43
Dude, unless this is you doing some weird "Captain America in Hydra"...
Feb 08th 2017
21
Dude, this is reality.
Feb 08th 2017
23
      Yeah, you get that in the Cap/Hydra story everything you're championing....
Feb 08th 2017
24
           PLEASE READ:
Feb 08th 2017
25
                PLEASE BAN!
Feb 08th 2017
33
                Let me guess...liberal/democrat?
Feb 08th 2017
36
                If you find that your belief systems are closely aligned with genocidal....
Feb 08th 2017
34
                     HUGE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN NAZIS AND REPUBLICANS.
Feb 08th 2017
35
                          naziism is a type of nationalism but ok
Feb 09th 2017
41
                          How is that when the Republicans funded the Nazis?
Feb 09th 2017
46
Man, I once thought you were a pretty cool comic book dude...
Feb 09th 2017
38
What do you mean when you say "progress"?
Feb 09th 2017
39
FYI to all: the planned pipeline crosses through 0 reservation land
Feb 09th 2017
42
Yup. I get their point though
Feb 09th 2017
44
That's a valid point to make. This isn't:
Feb 09th 2017
50

MEAT
Member since Feb 08th 2008
22256 posts
Tue Feb-07-17 10:34 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
1. "I know you're a troll. I know I shouldn't respond. But here I am. "
In response to Reply # 0
Tue Feb-07-17 10:36 PM by MEAT

  

          

The Dakota Pipeline argument isn't based around energy sources, it's been about diverting a pipeline through indigenous land and polluting their water source instead of having it go through its original path through a white populated area.

Keystone was about energy. Dakota is about land rights.

But you knew that right?

------
“There is no fate that cannot be surmounted by scorn.” -Albert Camus

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
JRennolds
Charter member
17029 posts
Tue Feb-07-17 10:50 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
2. "Here you are."
In response to Reply # 1


  

          

Yes, I realize that. And yes, it is about domestic energy production. People were just impeding progress and catching feelings. I get it but the needs of the many far outweigh the needs of a few.

DAPL is a great opportunity for these bums to work the land which they own and contribute to this country which they reside in...

GOMD

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
Castro
Charter member
50742 posts
Tue Feb-07-17 11:46 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
3. "RE: Here you are."
In response to Reply # 2


  

          

North Dakota's current pipeline infrastructure (not including DAPL), is running under capacity and was forecasted by the state to be enough to account for future transfer of oil. This was a money grab.

------------------
One Hundred.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
JRennolds
Charter member
17029 posts
Tue Feb-07-17 11:51 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
4. "I don't buy it."
In response to Reply # 3


  

          

A money grab in the sense that we (AMERICANS) can hold on to more money instead of handing it over to oil oligarchies,

GOMD

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
Castro
Charter member
50742 posts
Wed Feb-08-17 01:06 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
5. "There are oil oligarchs that live here and exploit us too."
In response to Reply # 4


  

          

------------------
One Hundred.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
JRennolds
Charter member
17029 posts
Wed Feb-08-17 09:53 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
9. "I guess. Do they fund our enemies?"
In response to Reply # 5


  

          

Hmmmm.

GOMD

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                        
KiloMcG
Member since Jan 01st 2008
27561 posts
Wed Feb-08-17 09:56 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
10. "depends on who your enemies are, homie."
In response to Reply # 9


  

          

i'd say they directly fund some, if not all, of mine.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                            
JRennolds
Charter member
17029 posts
Wed Feb-08-17 09:59 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
11. "I doubt AMERICAN corporations and..."
In response to Reply # 10


  

          

...AMERICAN oil barons fund Islamic extremism.
Get real.

GOMD

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                
KiloMcG
Member since Jan 01st 2008
27561 posts
Wed Feb-08-17 10:02 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
12. "islamic extremists aren't who i'm referring to. keep up."
In response to Reply # 11


  

          

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                    
JRennolds
Charter member
17029 posts
Wed Feb-08-17 10:10 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
13. "Oh yes. Successful individuals and..."
In response to Reply # 12


  

          

...the government?
Do tell, please.
This conspiracy theory/hate-fear of the wealthy bs is tired.

GOMD

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                        
KiloMcG
Member since Jan 01st 2008
27561 posts
Wed Feb-08-17 10:11 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
14. "haha"
In response to Reply # 13


  

          

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Atillah Moor
Member since Sep 05th 2013
13825 posts
Wed Feb-08-17 07:31 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
6. "Are we supposed to be surprised that money won over common sense"
In response to Reply # 0


  

          

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Backbone
Charter member
8448 posts
Wed Feb-08-17 08:13 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
7. "I hope you die in a fire."
In response to Reply # 0


  

          

___________________
"So this is what everybody's always talking about! Diablo! If only I'd known. The beauty! The beauty!"

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
JRennolds
Charter member
17029 posts
Wed Feb-08-17 09:52 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
8. "^^^Wow! What a psychopath remark."
In response to Reply # 7
Wed Feb-08-17 10:00 AM by JRennolds

  

          

Get some help, dude.
No need to be mean if you disagree with stuff. And to make threats on a message board? That is some mentally unfit territory.

GOMD

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
Atillah Moor
Member since Sep 05th 2013
13825 posts
Wed Feb-08-17 10:12 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
15. "if you think that's bad you should read the OP"
In response to Reply # 8


  

          

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
Backbone
Charter member
8448 posts
Thu Feb-09-17 01:22 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
49. "It's not a threat, I'm just sharing my hopes & dreams here."
In response to Reply # 8


  

          

Free speech, don't you just love it?

___________________
"So this is what everybody's always talking about! Diablo! If only I'd known. The beauty! The beauty!"

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
Case_One
Charter member
54687 posts
Wed Feb-08-17 10:17 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
37. "Really Dude? That's what you really think?"
In response to Reply # 7


          


.
.
.


If you want to improve your Prayer Life check out my new book PRAYVOLUTION
Order Here: http://tinyurl.com/Amazon-Prayvolution


Order My New Book PRAYVOLUTION from Amazon.com

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

auragin_boi
Member since Aug 01st 2003
20939 posts
Wed Feb-08-17 11:12 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
16. "The irony of this statement:"
In response to Reply # 0


  

          

>BUT times have changed. You can't halt progress. Maybe all these
>protestors will finally stop protesting, get jobs and, do
>something productive with their lives. Hopefully DAPL will
>employ some of these folks and get them off welfare.


1) Times HAVE changed yet extreme conservatives think coal and oil should be our focus
2) If you don't agree that being more inclusive of ALL of America's diversity, thinning the stranglehold of ONE group so that the laws, practices and opportunities of this land are more evenly disbursed and the marginalizing of supremacy groups (even re-branded ones like alt-white, policy parties/orgs and 'nationalist') or that moving to cleaner energy, more modern infrastructure, new tech focused education and overhaul of the American worker skill set is progress...delusion might be ones best ally.

Progress means to move forward.

Regress is when you go back to things that have proven to be less efficient.

3) The welfare assumption is a troll keyword when we all know red states get more welfare. I think a more accurate statement would be, maybe these Trump voters should get back into the workforce, stop complaining that there aren't any 'good jobs' anymore (because their skills are outdated) and get some new training or at least point their anger in the right direction --> at captains of industry who are exploiting the world economy and technology to minimize human capital in exchange for high profit margins.

But sure...let's pursue some pipelines....YEEEEEHAAAAAAAW!!!

____________

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
JRennolds
Charter member
17029 posts
Wed Feb-08-17 07:20 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
17. "THE TIRED NARRATIVE:"
In response to Reply # 16
Wed Feb-08-17 07:21 PM by JRennolds

  

          

NATIONALISM IS THINLY VIELED RACISM.
Enough. Have some pride for your country.

And we (AMERICA) do need this pipeline. It is unfortunate that sacrifices are being made for the greater good of the many. That is life. The NATIVE AMERICANS have been on the short end of the stick numerous times in this country's history; as a nation we should use this pipeline as an opportunity to improve the lives of those effected by its development. Hopefully DAPL can employ many of these people and utilize their input...

GOMD

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
Anonymous
Charter member
23226 posts
Wed Feb-08-17 08:00 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
19. "So you can't address anything he said..."
In response to Reply # 17


  

          

You realize that says more about your intelligence than anything you've ever posted on this site right?

Nah...you don't.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
JRennolds
Charter member
17029 posts
Wed Feb-08-17 08:09 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
22. "RE: The irony of this statement:"
In response to Reply # 16


  

          

>>BUT times have changed. You can't halt progress. Maybe all
>these
>>protestors will finally stop protesting, get jobs and, do
>>something productive with their lives. Hopefully DAPL will
>>employ some of these folks and get them off welfare.
>
>
>1) Times HAVE changed yet extreme conservatives think coal and
>oil should be our focus

Energy resources are a Top 3 priority for our nation. Behind security and education.

>2) If you don't agree that being more inclusive of ALL of
>America's diversity, thinning the stranglehold of ONE group so
>that the laws, practices and opportunities of this land are
>more evenly disbursed and the marginalizing of supremacy
>groups (even re-branded ones like alt-white, policy
>parties/orgs and 'nationalist') or that moving to cleaner
>energy, more modern infrastructure, new tech focused education
>and overhaul of the American worker skill set is
>progress...delusion might be ones best ally.

TIRED NARRATIVE.

>Progress means to move forward.

Socially, economically and finacially.

>Regress is when you go back to things that have proven to be
>less efficient.
>
>3) The welfare assumption is a troll keyword when we all know
>red states get more welfare. I think a more accurate
>statement would be, maybe these Trump voters should get back
>into the workforce, stop complaining that there aren't any
>'good jobs' anymore (because their skills are outdated) and
>get some new training or at least point their anger in the
>right direction -->

Who me? I am a business owner and I own a home in a highly suitable and desired US City.

I was referring to the protestors who do not have jobs other than to meddle in affairs of policy.

at captains of industry who are exploiting
>the world economy and technology to minimize human capital in
>exchange for high profit margins.

Not in AMERICA.

>But sure...let's pursue some pipelines....YEEEEEHAAAAAAAW!!!

Amen..

GOMD

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
auragin_boi
Member since Aug 01st 2003
20939 posts
Thu Feb-09-17 01:02 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
48. "RE: The irony of this statement:"
In response to Reply # 22
Thu Feb-09-17 01:05 PM by auragin_boi

  

          

>Energy resources are a Top 3 priority for our nation. Behind
>security and education.

Yes, but living in the stone ages about the type of energy sources we need isn't progress.


>TIRED NARRATIVE.

Only to White males who are scared sh*tless at census estimates of the next 30 years. All you have to do is look outside your door (US). Minorities will outnumber whites soon, majority of them will be from south of the border...so now MEXICO is a problem (like central and south america don't send people here either). China has Billions of people and are our lien holders...CHINA IS A PROBLEM. Middle east terrorist are making it hard for oil men to get that oil and exploit it to Americans and 'progressives' want to kill the oil industry with safer, cleaner approaches to energy...GLOBAL WARMING IS A HOAX, WE WANT OUR OIL BACK, COAL, JOBS! A half-black man, Ivy league educated, married to a black woman with no baggage talks of hope and bipartisan change to improve the lives of ALL...LAW AND ORDER, BLACK ON BLACK CRIME, WHITE GENOCIDE!

The tired narrative is trickle down economics and expecting greedy 1 percenters to actually give a damn about American workers. Automation is going to be a HUGE wake up call for conservatives.

The guy they elected was producing over seas with no shame, under the guise the regulation forced his hand. Soooo, instead of making a few less million or billion dollars because you have to provide reasonable wages to US employees, you make TIES in China?

That to me is UN-American.

>Socially, economically and finacially.

Conservatives want to bend the constitution for their own self serving agendas which are all built around discrimination, narcissistic, self-aggrandizement and maintaining THEIR power over others. None of that equals social progress. And anything they do economically and financially is with the end goal to bilk the middle class, kill off the lower class and enrich the upperclass.

>Who me? I am a business owner and I own a home in a highly
>suitable and desired US City.
>
>I was referring to the protestors who do not have jobs other
>than to meddle in affairs of policy.

To assume someone who is protesting doesn't have a job is just silly. And protest has been a tried and true method of making voices heard in the US. Only a traitor to the spirit of free speech would deride the act.

> at captains of industry who are exploiting
>>the world economy and technology to minimize human capital
>in
>>exchange for high profit margins.
>
>Not in AMERICA.

LMAO...EVERY company in America is engaging in some form of this. Are you not paying attention? Automation will kill jobs, outsourcing will kill jobs. No amount of deregulation or tax breaks with stop that. And realistically, why should we pander to people who actively seek to cripple the US economy for their own greedy ventures. To me, taking jobs over seas or purposely investing in automation to eliminate workforces (without investing in workers skillsets to maintain the human element) is inherently based in evil power aspirations.

But you continue live in that pretty lil shell of yours.

>>But sure...let's pursue some pipelines....YEEEEEHAAAAAAAW!!!
>
>Amen..

You'll probably get it, when it's too late.

____________

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
Wonderl33t
Member since Jul 11th 2002
21405 posts
Thu Feb-09-17 10:28 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
45. "RE: The irony of this statement:"
In response to Reply # 16


  

          

So regression like removing chlorine from a country's water supply so you have an entire population shitting themselves with cholera?

Regression like protesting and sabotaging agricultural development that makes crops more efficient and pest resistant so we can provide more food to the world?

Regression like trying to outlaw fracking, which has provided us with a far more efficient way to get natural gas which burns far cleaner than its alternatives, and has yet to be linked to any environmental problems?

These things are as anti-science and anti-intelligence as they come. Yet they somehow go unmentioned when "regressive" thinking comes up.

>>BUT times have changed. You can't halt progress. Maybe all
>these
>>protestors will finally stop protesting, get jobs and, do
>>something productive with their lives. Hopefully DAPL will
>>employ some of these folks and get them off welfare.
>
>
>1) Times HAVE changed yet extreme conservatives think coal and
>oil should be our focus
>2) If you don't agree that being more inclusive of ALL of
>America's diversity, thinning the stranglehold of ONE group so
>that the laws, practices and opportunities of this land are
>more evenly disbursed and the marginalizing of supremacy
>groups (even re-branded ones like alt-white, policy
>parties/orgs and 'nationalist') or that moving to cleaner
>energy, more modern infrastructure, new tech focused education
>and overhaul of the American worker skill set is
>progress...delusion might be ones best ally.
>
>Progress means to move forward.
>
>Regress is when you go back to things that have proven to be
>less efficient.
>
>3) The welfare assumption is a troll keyword when we all know
>red states get more welfare. I think a more accurate
>statement would be, maybe these Trump voters should get back
>into the workforce, stop complaining that there aren't any
>'good jobs' anymore (because their skills are outdated) and
>get some new training or at least point their anger in the
>right direction --> at captains of industry who are exploiting
>the world economy and technology to minimize human capital in
>exchange for high profit margins.
>
>But sure...let's pursue some pipelines....YEEEEEHAAAAAAAW!!!


______________________________
http://i.imgur.com/Gj5Wy56.jpg

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
auragin_boi
Member since Aug 01st 2003
20939 posts
Thu Feb-09-17 12:40 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
47. "Are you accusing the left of these things? "
In response to Reply # 45


  

          

____________

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
Wonderl33t
Member since Jul 11th 2002
21405 posts
Thu Feb-09-17 01:31 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
51. "I'm not concerned with group labels"
In response to Reply # 47


  

          


______________________________
http://i.imgur.com/Gj5Wy56.jpg

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

GOMEZ
Member since Feb 13th 2003
5613 posts
Wed Feb-08-17 07:44 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
18. "polluting water sources to export oil is hustling backwards"
In response to Reply # 0


  

          

keep trolling or enjoy the 'victory', i guess.

In a generation of swine, the one-eyed pig is king.
-Hunter S. Thompson

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
JRennolds
Charter member
17029 posts
Wed Feb-08-17 08:03 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
20. "You think this line will pollute the waters?"
In response to Reply # 18


  

          

If "they" did so knowingly, they would be fined out of existence. If this line polluted waters without knowledge of the destruction wrought....it would be fined out of existence!
'Rules and regulations exist for this very reason. To protect our land and people.
Get real, jack.

GOMD

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
MEAT
Member since Feb 08th 2008
22256 posts
Wed Feb-08-17 08:46 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
26. "The largest EPA fine is less than $100 million"
In response to Reply # 20
Wed Feb-08-17 08:55 PM by MEAT

  

          

Energy Transfers Partners (the people building the pipeline) were valuated at 15.05* Billion in their latest filings

------
“There is no fate that cannot be surmounted by scorn.” -Albert Camus

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
JRennolds
Charter member
17029 posts
Wed Feb-08-17 08:49 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
27. "That was AMERICA then. A new AMERICA is here."
In response to Reply # 26


  

          

Reform is here. Especially for our government and it's conduct in general.

GOMD

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
GOMEZ
Member since Feb 13th 2003
5613 posts
Wed Feb-08-17 09:04 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
28. "That's what your rolling with? Pipelines don't pollute?"
In response to Reply # 20


  

          

And they are all well maintained for eternity? There are rotting pipelines right now that are decades old that belong to companies that no longer exist so when they are no longer maintained they burst. Then literally no one is on the hook for it.

In a generation of swine, the one-eyed pig is king.
-Hunter S. Thompson

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
MEAT
Member since Feb 08th 2008
22256 posts
Wed Feb-08-17 09:08 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
29. "It should go unsaid, but he's not trying to argue"
In response to Reply # 28


  

          

He's responding to a single point, often times a single word, and replying to it.

You remember AIMbots? That's basically what he is.

------
“There is no fate that cannot be surmounted by scorn.” -Albert Camus

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
GOMEZ
Member since Feb 13th 2003
5613 posts
Wed Feb-08-17 09:12 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
30. "you're right. I'll hold out for some higher level trolling. Haha"
In response to Reply # 29


  

          

In a generation of swine, the one-eyed pig is king.
-Hunter S. Thompson

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
JRennolds
Charter member
17029 posts
Wed Feb-08-17 09:21 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
32. "GO DARK NOW!"
In response to Reply # 29


  

          

You are up on the AIMbot program?
Hahahaha.

GOMD

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
JRennolds
Charter member
17029 posts
Wed Feb-08-17 09:20 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
31. "RE: That's what your rolling with? Pipelines don't pollute?"
In response to Reply # 28


  

          

>And they are all well maintained for eternity? There are
>rotting pipelines right now that are decades old that belong
>to companies that no longer exist so when they are no longer
>maintained they burst. Then literally no one is on the hook
>for it.


According to? Example please?

Educate us.

GOMD

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
MiracleRic
Member since Oct 21st 2002
45200 posts
Thu Feb-09-17 09:23 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
40. "Flint on line one"
In response to Reply # 31


  

          

Let me sport my Air Hyperbole 2010s in peace. (c) ansomble

Building repetoires (c) spm since 1983

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
Wonderl33t
Member since Jul 11th 2002
21405 posts
Thu Feb-09-17 10:19 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
43. "Appropriate studies have already been done and determined"
In response to Reply # 18


  

          

that there will not be significant impact on the water supply. What other standards can we go by? The feelings of fauxtestors are not a scientific standard. If the standard is no good, I would like to see that argument and science backing it.

>keep trolling or enjoy the 'victory', i guess.


______________________________
http://i.imgur.com/Gj5Wy56.jpg

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

mrhood75
Member since Dec 06th 2004
44713 posts
Wed Feb-08-17 08:05 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
21. "Dude, unless this is you doing some weird "Captain America in Hydra"..."
In response to Reply # 0


  

          

...experimental theater, you need to log off, walk around the block a few times, and soak your head of something. Because otherwise you're reading that storyline and missing the point.

-----------------

www.albumism.com

Checkin' Our Style, Return To Zero:

https://www.mixcloud.com/returntozero/

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
JRennolds
Charter member
17029 posts
Wed Feb-08-17 08:10 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
23. "Dude, this is reality."
In response to Reply # 21


  

          

But the HYDRA CAP story is mighty captivating and well-written so far...

GOMD

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
mrhood75
Member since Dec 06th 2004
44713 posts
Wed Feb-08-17 08:14 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
24. "Yeah, you get that in the Cap/Hydra story everything you're championing...."
In response to Reply # 23


  

          

...is the ideology of the bad guys/Nazis, right? Like, you're not supposed to side with the Red Skull?

-----------------

www.albumism.com

Checkin' Our Style, Return To Zero:

https://www.mixcloud.com/returntozero/

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
JRennolds
Charter member
17029 posts
Wed Feb-08-17 08:27 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
25. "PLEASE READ:"
In response to Reply # 24
Wed Feb-08-17 08:29 PM by JRennolds

  

          

noun, plural Nazis.
1.a member of the National Socialist German Workers' Party, which controlled Germany from 1933 to 1945 under Adolf Hitler and advocated totalitarian government, territorial expansion, anti-Semitism, and Aryan supremacy, all these leading directly to World War II and the Holocaust.
2.(often lowercase) a person elsewhere who holds similar views.
3.(often lowercase) Sometimes Offensive. a person who is fanatically dedicated to or seeks to regulate a specified activity, practice, etc.:
a jazz nazi who disdains other forms of music; health nazis trying to ban junk food.

------> Nationalism
noun
1.spirit or aspirations common to the whole of a nation.
2.devotion and loyalty to one's own country; patriotism.
3.excessive patriotism; chauvinism.
4.the desire for national advancement or political independence.
5.the policy or doctrine of asserting the interests of one's own nation viewed as separate from the interests of other nations or the common interests of all nations.
6.an idiom or trait peculiar to a nation.
7.a movement, as in the arts, based upon the folk idioms, history, aspirations, etc., of a nation.

----->REPUBLICAN
adjective
1.of, relating to, or of the nature of a republic.
2.favoring a republic.
3.fitting or appropriate for the citizen of a republic:
a very republican notion.
4.(initial capital letter) of or relating to the Republican Party.
noun
5.a person who favors a republican form of government.
6.initial capital letter) a member of the Republican Party.

-------->PATRIOTISM
1.devoted love, support, and defense of one's country; national loyalty.


GOMD

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
rdhull
Charter member
33127 posts
Wed Feb-08-17 09:22 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
33. "PLEASE BAN!"
In response to Reply # 25


  

          

>noun, plural Nazis.
>1.a member of the National Socialist German Workers' Party,
>which controlled Germany from 1933 to 1945 under Adolf Hitler
>and advocated totalitarian government, territorial expansion,
>anti-Semitism, and Aryan supremacy, all these leading directly
>to World War II and the Holocaust.
>2.(often lowercase) a person elsewhere who holds similar
>views.
>3.(often lowercase) Sometimes Offensive. a person who is
>fanatically dedicated to or seeks to regulate a specified
>activity, practice, etc.:
>a jazz nazi who disdains other forms of music; health nazis
>trying to ban junk food.
>
>------> Nationalism
>noun
>1.spirit or aspirations common to the whole of a nation.
>2.devotion and loyalty to one's own country; patriotism.
>3.excessive patriotism; chauvinism.
>4.the desire for national advancement or political
>independence.
>5.the policy or doctrine of asserting the interests of one's
>own nation viewed as separate from the interests of other
>nations or the common interests of all nations.
>6.an idiom or trait peculiar to a nation.
>7.a movement, as in the arts, based upon the folk idioms,
>history, aspirations, etc., of a nation.
>
>----->REPUBLICAN
>adjective
>1.of, relating to, or of the nature of a republic.
>2.favoring a republic.
>3.fitting or appropriate for the citizen of a republic:
>a very republican notion.
>4.(initial capital letter) of or relating to the Republican
>Party.
>noun
>5.a person who favors a republican form of government.
>6.initial capital letter) a member of the Republican Party.
>
>-------->PATRIOTISM
>1.devoted love, support, and defense of one's country;
>national loyalty.
>
>
>

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
JRennolds
Charter member
17029 posts
Wed Feb-08-17 10:07 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
36. "Let me guess...liberal/democrat?"
In response to Reply # 33


  

          

Whatever. Do you.

GOMD

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
mrhood75
Member since Dec 06th 2004
44713 posts
Wed Feb-08-17 09:42 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
34. "If you find that your belief systems are closely aligned with genocidal...."
In response to Reply # 25


  

          

...Nazi, even a fictional one, then it's time to re-evaluate your life.

And on that note, I'm out. And I'm going to hope that you somehow learn to shed all of this b.s and reject the hate and fear that you're promoting. Because I'm not spending any more time with it.

-----------------

www.albumism.com

Checkin' Our Style, Return To Zero:

https://www.mixcloud.com/returntozero/

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
JRennolds
Charter member
17029 posts
Wed Feb-08-17 10:06 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
35. "HUGE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN NAZIS AND REPUBLICANS."
In response to Reply # 34


  

          

NATIONALISM IS NOT NAZIISM.
Get real.

GOMD

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                        
MiracleRic
Member since Oct 21st 2002
45200 posts
Thu Feb-09-17 09:24 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
41. "naziism is a type of nationalism but ok"
In response to Reply # 35


  

          

Let me sport my Air Hyperbole 2010s in peace. (c) ansomble

Building repetoires (c) spm since 1983

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                        
Atillah Moor
Member since Sep 05th 2013
13825 posts
Thu Feb-09-17 10:33 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
46. "How is that when the Republicans funded the Nazis? "
In response to Reply # 35
Thu Feb-09-17 10:33 AM by Atillah Moor

  

          

nm

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Jakob Hellberg
Member since Apr 18th 2005
9766 posts
Thu Feb-09-17 12:30 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
38. "Man, I once thought you were a pretty cool comic book dude..."
In response to Reply # 0


          

...turns out your'e one of *them*... Total 'tard...

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Boogie Stimuli
Member since Sep 24th 2010
14014 posts
Thu Feb-09-17 07:11 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
39. "What do you mean when you say "progress"?"
In response to Reply # 0


          

~
~
~
~
~
Days like this I miss Sha Mecca

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Wonderl33t
Member since Jul 11th 2002
21405 posts
Thu Feb-09-17 09:38 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
42. "FYI to all: the planned pipeline crosses through 0 reservation land"
In response to Reply # 0


  

          

This seems like a fact that a lot of people miss.
______________________________
http://i.imgur.com/Gj5Wy56.jpg

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
BigReg
Charter member
62390 posts
Thu Feb-09-17 10:28 AM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
44. "Yup. I get their point though"
In response to Reply # 42


  

          

1)It's under a lake that's adjacent to them where they can't get no guarantees the eco system won't get affected

2)If it was in a place where they have more agency (aka, rich white suburb) everyone involved would have figured out a plan B.

If a bunch of good old boys can pull rifles on the FBI basically claiming reverse eminent domain on federal land and not get charged like Bundy and them...let them fight(c)

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
Backbone
Charter member
8448 posts
Thu Feb-09-17 01:26 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
50. "That's a valid point to make. This isn't:"
In response to Reply # 42


  

          

"Maybe all these protestors will finally stop protesting, get jobs and, do something productive with their lives. Hopefully DAPL will employ some of these folks and get them off welfare."

___________________
"So this is what everybody's always talking about! Diablo! If only I'd known. The beauty! The beauty!"

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Lobby General Discussion topic #13123114 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.25
Copyright © DCScripts.com