"Did u believe that whole Cosby was gonna buy NBC nonsense?"
If Bill Cosby can't put up money to own a grocery store in neighborhoods where folks look like him, how the fuck is he gonna buy one of the biggest networks? I don't see Cosby producing shows or movies so I say that was all bs.
1. "Nobody with a functioning brain beleives that bullshit. " In response to Reply # 0
Even if he wanted to he would have had to orchestrate a hostile takeover of some kind with partners. Absent some sort of loophole he could exploit its not like he could just buy it with people signing off to sale the dann thing.
you cry in one thread about not dealing with an alias and now you will not go away. The substance is the link to the gossip rag I posted below. How did you miss it given that I was not replying to you ?
>You can choose to opt out at any time. Still waiting on you >to provide something of substance.
20. "Hypocrite? no. I chose not to interact with you in one thread. " In response to Reply # 17
>you cry in one thread about not dealing with an alias and now
I cried about not dealing with an alias? Reading that link shows me actively dismissing your input and choosing not to interact with you. Hardly crying, Kweli.
>you will not go away.
Psst...you can stop replying to me. Funny how a back and forth works, other quotes a back...and.... A forth.
The substance is the link to the gossip >rag I posted below. How did you miss it given that I was not >replying to you ?
No, I said substance. Bill Cosby buying NBC is a myth because it would have taken an investment group to pull off.....something I've consistently said and something supported by your own links.
It's a myth because it's consistently misrepresented.
Further, this is commonly linked to some conspiracy to bring him down and an accurate portrayal of events shoots holes into that theory.
It's telling that this is usually framed "Bill Cosby was going to buy NBC" and not "Bill Cosby and probable investment group looked into the possibility of buying NBC".
>>You can choose to opt out at any time. Still waiting on you >>to provide something of substance.
22. "LMAO I'm not dealing with an alias, once" In response to Reply # 20
> >I cried about not dealing with an alias? >Reading that link shows me actively dismissing your input and >choosing not to interact with you. Hardly crying, Kweli.
Keep trying to save face, continue to explain why you announced you were not going to deal with an alias for one thread.
>>you will not go away. > >Psst...you can stop replying to me. Funny how a back and forth >works, other quotes a back...and.... A forth.
It didn't take all that last time remember. You would not participate anymore, future hypocrite cold should have given past hypocrite cold some of that advice about just stopping instead of announcing it. Psst that's how you stop participating in a thread, you stop replying,hypocrite.
>The substance is the link to the gossip >>rag I posted below. How did you miss it given that I was not >>replying to you ? > >No, I said substance. Bill Cosby buying NBC is a myth because >it would have taken an investment group to pull >off.....something I've consistently said and something >supported by your own links. > >It's a myth because it's consistently misrepresented.
The goal posts are moving even faster now. the OP didn't ask what it would take to pull it off. 81 questioned if Cosby even had enough money to do it.
>Further, this is commonly linked to some conspiracy to bring >him down and an accurate portrayal of events shoots holes into >that theory. > >It's telling that this is usually framed "Bill Cosby was >going to buy NBC" and not "Bill Cosby and probable investment >group looked into the possibility of buying NBC". > >>>You can choose to opt out at any time. Still waiting on you >>>to provide something of substance. >
Yes it's obvious you wanted this so that you could go after those using it to defend Cosby but that still does not make the statement Cosby tried to buy NBC a myth. Hypocrite
23. "Talk about moving goalposts. " In response to Reply # 22
>I cried about not dealing with an alias? >>Reading that link shows me actively dismissing your input >and >>choosing not to interact with you. Hardly crying, Kweli. > >Keep trying to save face, continue to explain why you >announced you were not going to deal with an alias for one >thread.
Saving face from..... What exactly? What is there to save face from, Talib Kweli?
>It didn't take all that last time remember.
That was then. This is now, Talib Kweli.
You would not >participate anymore, future hypocrite cold should have given >past hypocrite cold some of that advice about just stopping >instead of announcing it. Psst that's how you stop >participating in a thread, you stop replying,hypocrite.
Yes, dummy, that's how you can stop interacting with me.
>Yes it's obvious you wanted this so that you could go after >those using it to defend Cosby but that still does not make >the statement Cosby tried to buy NBC a myth. Hypocrite
No, it makes "going to buy NBC" a myth because kicking tires and buying are two different things.
There's nothing to indicate Bill was anywhere close to buying. Plenty to indicate he was kicking tires.
That's not "moving goal posts", Talib Kweli. That's called context. Wanting to buy and Going to it are very different things.
26. "All you hypocrite own it" In response to Reply # 23
> >Saving face from..... What exactly? What is there to save face >from, Talib Kweli?
The OK board bubble who knows,hypocrite. You were the one announcing you would not participate like you was playing to an audience. Don't ask me to explain it.
>That was then. This is now, Talib Kweli.
LOL more hypocrisy
> >Yes, dummy, that's how you can stop interacting with me.
Idiot feel free to take your own advice the next time you are not participating.
> >No, it makes "going to buy NBC" a myth because kicking tires >and buying are two different things.
LOL proceed with the pretzel logic Governor hypocrite that will not make it a myth.
>There's nothing to indicate Bill was anywhere close to buying. >Plenty to indicate he was kicking tires. > >That's not "moving goal posts", Talib Kweli. That's called >context. Wanting to buy and Going to it are very different >things.
Its called moving the goal posts. You keep trying to force the square facts into that round hole in your head.
27. "Lamo. Ok Talib Kweli. " In response to Reply # 26 Mon Sep-05-16 01:44 PM by Cold Truth
>The OK board bubble who knows,hypocrite. You were the one >announcing you would not participate like you was playing to >an audience. Don't ask me to explain it.
I was playing to an audience?
What audience?
No, dummy, I said that to YOU.
>>That was then. This is now, Talib Kweli. > >LOL more hypocrisy
You have a pretty low bar for hypocrisy.
>>Yes, dummy, that's how you can stop interacting with me. > >Idiot feel free to take your own advice the next time you are >not participating.
...psst... I never said I wasn't participating in this thread. So, you know, yeah.
>LOL proceed with the pretzel logic Governor hypocrite that >will not make it a myth.
No that's just called logic.
>Its called moving the goal posts. You keep trying to force >the square facts into that round hole in your head.
Note how you don't actually argue the actual logic, instead falling back on vague generalities.
You're terrible at this. Stick to making God awful albums like that hideous train wreck you so unfortunately titled Beautiful Struggle, Talib.
31. "More from the hypocrite" In response to Reply # 27
> >No, dummy, I said that to YOU.
ROFLMAO because when stopped participating that wouldn't prove it.
> >You have a pretty low bar for hypocrisy.
If it was a big deal in that thread you, wouldn't reply to me in any thread otherwise why cry about it.
> >...psst... I never said I wasn't participating in this thread. >So, you know, yeah. >
Then you cried for nothing in that thread.
>No that's just called logic.
No it's a waste of time.
>>Its called moving the goal posts. You keep trying to force >>the square facts into that round hole in your head. > >Note how you don't actually argue the actual logic, instead >falling back on vague generalities.
You can down that rabbit hole alone. Going to buy or window shopping and tied to defending him is just moving the goal posts no matter how much you try to dress it up. What did 81 DUN ask ?
>You're terrible at this. Stick to making God awful albums like >that hideous train wreck you so unfortunately titled Beautiful >Struggle, Talib.
You are desperate to rehash the Cosby thread that went platinum over and over. It was was obvious in your first reply to the OP,and it's obvious in your ridiculous responses to me. Btw calling me Talib does not bother me I consider it a compliment and you can talk about all his albums as much as you call a Black man a savage I wouldn't expect anything different from a hypocrite like you.
34. "Lol you're really focused on me choosing not to interact with you for be..." In response to Reply # 31 Mon Sep-05-16 02:48 PM by Cold Truth
...in one post, one time.
>>No, dummy, I said that to YOU. > >ROFLMAO because when stopped participating that wouldn't prove >it. > > >> >>You have a pretty low bar for hypocrisy. > >If it was a big deal in that thread you, wouldn't reply to me >in any thread otherwise why cry about it.
Nobody made it a big deal here or there... Except you. It's an oddly large point of contention for you.
If you don't want to ineract with me....don't interact with me. Simple, Talib.
>Then you cried for nothing in that thread.
Still hung up on that? And no, I didn't "cry". I simply chose not to interact with you in that threa
>You can down that rabbit hole alone.
Going to buy or window >shopping
....are two very different things. Which means the answer to his question is NO.
>and tied to defending him is just moving the goal >posts no matter how much you try to dress it up.
No. The goal post is the same and it's been answered accurately based on the avilable information.
>What did 81 DUN ask ?
I answered exactly what he asked.
>You are desperate to rehash the Cosby thread that went >platinum over and over.
Lol what? I'm "desperate to rehash" that?
That makes no sense.
>you call a Black man a savage I wouldn't expect anything >different from a hypocrite like you.
False. Typically reductionist take though and I'd expect no less.
I say that to a confessed misogynist who self-described himself as being a savage for the summer and said he doesn't feel bad about it for the rodicous reason that there are women who charge men for their company.
So unless I hear otherwise from a mod it's fair game to needle him with that until autumn equinox hits.
35. "Not focused just laughing at you" In response to Reply # 34
>...in one post, one time.
the way you are trying to pretend what you said and did is anything but ridiculous is on another level. I'm going to stop dealing with this alias until the next time I deal with this alias. LOL
> >Nobody made it a big deal here or there... Except you. It's an >oddly large point of contention for you. > >If you don't want to ineract with me....don't interact with >me. Simple, Talib. > >>Then you cried for nothing in that thread. > >Still hung up on that? And no, I didn't "cry". I simply chose >not to interact with you in that threa
So you was saying, I'm done in that thread only ? LOL
>>You can down that rabbit hole alone. > >Going to buy or window >>shopping > >....are two very different things. Which means the answer to >his question is NO.
You do know that you can't prove he was window shopping ?
>>and tied to defending him is just moving the goal >>posts no matter how much you try to dress it up. > >No. The goal post is the same and it's been answered >accurately based on the avilable information. >
Yeah right, you didn't answer it.
>>What did 81 DUN ask ? > >I answered exactly what he asked.
I didn't ask what you did, I said what did 81 DUN ask. Don't be a hypocrite answer the question.
> >>You are desperate to rehash the Cosby thread that went >>platinum over and over. > >Lol what? I'm "desperate to rehash" that? > >That makes no sense.
Your first reply in this thread is an overreaction.
>>you call a Black man a savage I wouldn't expect anything >>different from a hypocrite like you. > >False. Typically reductionist take though and I'd expect no >less.
You didn't say savage to BK ?
>I say that to a confessed misogynist who self-described >himself as being a savage for the summer and said he doesn't >feel bad about it for the rodicous reason that there are women >who charge men for their company. > >So unless I hear otherwise from a mod it's fair game to needle >him with that until autumn equinox hits.
If he substituted porch monkey for savage would you call him that over and over ?
36. "Its weird that you're so fixated on that. " In response to Reply # 35
>the way you are trying to pretend what you said and did is >anything but ridiculous is on another level. I'm going to stop >dealing with this alias until the next time I deal with this >alias. LOL
I said that in one post regarding our interaction in that post.
Keep obsessing over it though.
>So you was saying, I'm done in that thread only ? LOL
It's not like I anticipated the next interaction. It's obvious that I was referring to that thread.
>You do know that you can't prove he was window shopping ?
Do you have evidence showing that he was going to buy it? Because he didn't buy it.
So you have evidence showing him getting close to completing that purchase?
You have to have a seller to buy.
Is there evidence that NBC was interesting in selling to him or his group?
Was there ever a group put together who then made a formal offer that was accepted?
>I didn't ask what you did, I said what did 81 DUN ask. Don't >be a hypocrite answer the question
Lmao you throw out the term hypocrite so loosely it's amusing.
I answered his question.
>Your first reply in this thread is an overreaction.
Considering the only evidence you've provided shows interest and nothing to show he was anywhere close.....no.
>You didn't say savage to BK ?
Yes, like 50 times. Oh and I love how you reduced him to "black man" as opposed to "person".
>If he substituted porch monkey for savage would you call him >that over and over ?
I can't imagine a scenario where he would refer to himself as a porch monkey to justify his own wretched treatment of women.
Since your hypothetical amounts to a non sequitur I am unable to answer. Ask a more realistic question with a more reasonable possibility of happening and I'll try to answer that.
My "savage" cracks are a running joke at his expense about his confessed misogyny, but you clearly need to find a way to reduce that to racism.
It says something that you need to run I am illogical extreme instead of relying on the information at hand.
>>the way you are trying to pretend what you said and did is >>anything but ridiculous is on another level. I'm going to >stop >>dealing with this alias until the next time I deal with this >>alias. LOL > >I said that in one post regarding our interaction in that >post.
It was unnecessary that's why it's so bad. This is not some court room where you are getting permission from a judge to do something. If you do not deal with alias and you believe I am an alias you just stop. You don't tell me only to come back later and deal with me when I am not responding to you in the thread. Even when I posted to someone else you popped up right there.
>Keep obsessing over it though.
The more you explain the more you prove my point.
>>So you was saying, I'm done in that thread only ? LOL > >It's not like I anticipated the next interaction. It's obvious >that I was referring to that thread. >
That is what makes me laugh the most you keep saying it like it was a expiration date on dealing with an alias.
>>You do know that you can't prove he was window shopping ? > >Do you have evidence showing that he was going to buy it? >Because he didn't buy it.
NY Times
>So you have evidence showing him getting close to completing >that purchase?
This is what I mean by moving the goal posts. Buying means close to completing ?
> >You have to have a seller to buy. > >Is there evidence that NBC was interesting in selling to him >or his group? > >Was there ever a group put together who then made a formal >offer that was accepted? >
Here we are in the rabbit hole
>>I didn't ask what you did, I said what did 81 DUN ask. Don't >>be a hypocrite answer the question > >Lmao you throw out the term hypocrite so loosely it's amusing. >
Another dodge
>I answered his question.
No you didn't.
> >>Your first reply in this thread is an overreaction. > >Considering the only evidence you've provided shows interest >and nothing to show he was anywhere close.....no.
So you only use buy when someone is close ? That's a rule ?
>>You didn't say savage to BK ? > >Yes, like 50 times. Oh and I love how you reduced him to >"black man" as opposed to "person".
I didn't reduce him to savage.
>>If he substituted porch monkey for savage would you call him >>that over and over ? > >I can't imagine a scenario where he would refer to himself as >a porch monkey to justify his own wretched treatment of women. >
No answer from you. You ask questions but you don't answer.
>Since your hypothetical amounts to a non sequitur I am unable >to answer. Ask a more realistic question with a more >reasonable possibility of happening and I'll try to answer >that.
Some Italian whites use guido and some southern whites use redneck so it's realistic, now answer, if he self described as any black racial slur would you call him that over and over ?
>My "savage" cracks are a running joke at his expense about his >confessed misogyny, but you clearly need to find a way to >reduce that to racism.
So in other words it's ok to do it if it's a joke.
>It says something that you need to run I am illogical extreme >instead of relying on the information at hand.
Stop running from your words. You said you call him Savage because he self described as savage.
You believe Denny is on to something when he said I am Talib ? LMAO
Talib has a twitter account with a million followers why would he hide on Okayplayer ?
Comcast spent over $13B aquiring 51%. Unless Cosby was part of a larger investment company, he wasn't "buying" NBC. He could have conceivably bought a stake that gave him so say so, however.
18. "Was Bill Cosby going to buy NBC or not?" In response to Reply # 15
Did he have the money and the position to buy from either a willing seller or a seller powerless to stop him?
If he was "going to buy NBC", that means he had the money and ability to complete the transaction, which means it was up for sale and there was the utual interest.
There's a stark difference between window shopping something that isn't up for sale and having the means to purchase something that's actually on the market with a seller willing to take your money.
Unless that criteria can be met then no, he wasn't buying NBC. He may have wanted to and looked into the possibility but it was never happening.
19. "Reaching hypocrite" In response to Reply # 18
stop moving the goal post, this is what the OP asked
Did u believe that whole Cosby was gonna buy NBC nonsense?"
If Bill Cosby can't put up money to own a grocery store in neighborhoods where folks look like him, how the fuck is he gonna buy one of the biggest networks? I don't see Cosby producing shows or movies so I say that was all bs
NY Times answered that.
Bill Cosby, NBC's biggest star of the 80's, is trying to buy the television network from its current owner, the General Electric Company.
21. "Lol@reaching. He kicked tires. He wasn't "going to buy NBC". " In response to Reply # 19
>stop moving the goal post
I didn't move shit.
>this is what the OP asked > >Did u believe that whole Cosby was gonna buy NBC nonsense?" > >If Bill Cosby can't put up money to own a grocery store in >neighborhoods where folks look like him, how the fuck is he >gonna buy one of the biggest networks? I don't see Cosby >producing shows or movies so I say that was all bs > > >NY Times answered that.
>Bill Cosby, NBC's biggest star of the 80's, is trying to buy >the television network from its current owner, the General >Electric Company.
"Trying to buy" and "gonna buy" are two very different things.
25. "Oh theres nondoubt he could have gotten the people. " In response to Reply # 24
>To be able to kick the tires at buying NBC.
No doubt. That isn't the same as "going to buy" though.
>Seems kinda powerful.
I don't doubt that at all.
>NBC wasn't going to sell, but that doesn't mean Bill didn't >have the loot or clout to be in the conversation.
Well there were rumors of them thinking of selling at the time but the story of how he was "going to buy NBC" is grossly overstated. He kicked tires but there's very little suggesting he got all that far. Plus it's usually tied to the conspiracy to bring him down because they were afraid of him buying.
legsdiamond Member since May 05th 2011 79554 posts
Mon Sep-05-16 09:09 PM
42. "so vanity fair was trolling? " In response to Reply # 28
**************** TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*
legsdiamond Member since May 05th 2011 79554 posts
Mon Sep-05-16 07:22 PM
38. "fucking idiots... smh" In response to Reply # 29
**************** TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*
legsdiamond Member since May 05th 2011 79554 posts
Mon Sep-05-16 09:07 PM
41. "lmao, nah... not you" In response to Reply # 40
it's hilarious how people joke about how crazy it was for Cosby "trying" to buy NBC (like it wasn't possible to find investors to try and buy it)
yet Lurkmode is thought to be Kweli based on one post...
**************** TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*
>it's hilarious how people joke about how crazy it was for >Cosby "trying" to buy NBC (like it wasn't possible to find >investors to try and buy it) > >yet Lurkmode is thought to be Kweli based on one post... > > >
**************** TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*
46. "Except thats not the argument, #1 Stan" In response to Reply # 41
>it's hilarious how people joke about how crazy it was for >Cosby "trying" to buy NBC (like it wasn't possible to find >investors to try and buy it) > >yet Lurkmode is thought to be Kweli based on one post...
47. "Dre gave $30M to USC but how many Whole Foods he open in Bompton?" In response to Reply # 0
>If Bill Cosby can't put up money to own a grocery store in >neighborhoods where folks look like him, how the fuck is he >gonna buy one of the biggest networks? I don't see Cosby >producing shows or movies so I say that was all bs.
48. "Yall see how this white man in here trying to belittle Black bill cosby?" In response to Reply # 0
basically saying that Black bill cosby could in no way shape form or fashion buy NBC he was only "kicking tyres" but this is during the time his white ass was delivering pizzas in a 1982 Ford Escort getting stiffed for tips they wouldn't even let his white ass IN THE BUILDING where Black bill cosby went to negotiate this deal and "kick the tyres" but this white man going to sit up here and pop shit about a wealthy black man
okp okp LAWD JESUS okp
i know yall see this shit, right?
white man always trying to keep his foot on a nigga neck
just as jay-z "owned" the nets, cosby would have "owned" nbc who fucking cares if he don't own the shit 100% outright do oprah own OWN network outright? i dont fucking know but that's a BOSS MOVE anyway you shake it white ppl man fucking white ppl
**************** TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*
legsdiamond Member since May 05th 2011 79554 posts
Mon Sep-05-16 10:35 PM
50. "like Puffy in videos in the 90's" In response to Reply # 49
**************** TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*
legsdiamond Member since May 05th 2011 79554 posts
Mon Sep-05-16 11:03 PM
54. "take that, take that, take that" In response to Reply # 50
**************** TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*
**************** TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*
legsdiamond Member since May 05th 2011 79554 posts
Tue Sep-06-16 08:07 AM
59. "The lights on!! Get em while they're soft!!!" In response to Reply # 58 Tue Sep-06-16 08:12 AM by legsdiamond
half the replies in here are yours and most of them are arguing over if Lurkmmode is Talib Kweli and why its ok to argue with an alias THIS time but not last time.
stop lying and own your crazy.
always blaming other people cause you cant walk away from an argument regardless of how stupid and juvenile it is...
you argued with the alias of Talib Kweli...
son, SON!!! lmao.
**************** TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*
dude will have 50 post in a throw away thread and then say people are following him.
dude is off. type a dude to follow you home and tell you he didnt appreciate being cut off on the free way an hour ago.
this dude be arguing with homeless people who talk to themselves during his lunch break.
**************** TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*
63. "RE: just to Get By? " In response to Reply # 61
>dude will have 50 post in a throw away thread and then say >people are following him. > >dude is off. type a dude to follow you home and tell you he >didnt appreciate being cut off on the free way an hour ago. > >this dude be arguing with homeless people who talk to >themselves during his lunch break.
70. "No, I say YOU follow me. Because you're usually in those posts" In response to Reply # 61
>dude will have 50 post in a throw away thread and then say >people are following him.
Allllll the posters on OKP and yet you're the guy who openly talks to and about me the most.
When you're not posting the 50 replies that rode shotgun with mine you're making thinly veiled references and jumping up and down doing hypeman duties for other posters with the other 50 posts in those exchanges like the perennial weed carrying sidekick you are.
>dude is off. type a dude to follow you home and tell you he >didnt appreciate being cut off on the free way an hour ago.
Cool made up story, bro. That's amusing coming from Mr. Yeah, What They Said!
You're the guy who cuts people off and tailgates and floors the gas to get the fuck out of dodge the second someone looks you in the eyes for half a second.
The sidekick who talks shit in a group when his alpha buddies are busy flexing on someone but quiet as fuck otherwise. You're the dude who does the shoulder bump on someone if you're in a group but keeps his distance solo.
You're that insecure dude who desperately needs to fit in. You're a follower. A sidekick. A pussy.
62. "RE: The lights on!! Get em while they're soft!!!" In response to Reply # 59
>half the replies in here are yours and most of them are >arguing over if Lurkmmode is Talib Kweli and why its ok to >argue with an alias THIS time but not last time. > >stop lying and own your crazy. > >always blaming other people cause you cant walk away from an >argument regardless of how stupid and juvenile it is... > >you argued with the alias of Talib Kweli... > >son, SON!!! lmao. >
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ All true
Even when I responded to someone else he jumped down in the thread and responded to what I was saying.
I thought when kept calling me Talib he was trolling, then he said Denny was on to something. smh
legsdiamond Member since May 05th 2011 79554 posts
Tue Sep-06-16 08:50 AM
64. "Crosby buying NBC is crazy talk but you are Kweli.... lol" In response to Reply # 62
that dude is gone... and denny, well he doesnt really give a shit if you are kweli but Rob Ford made him an expert so it must be true.
**************** TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*
69. "Yet... every post you've written in here is about me. As usual. " In response to Reply # 59
>half the replies in here are yours
...and every reply you have in here is to me or about me. Lately you’ve started doing that mealy mouthed shit where you dance around it but it’s no different. You're historically consistent with that.
>and most of them are >arguing over if Lurkmmode is Talib Kweli
I'm arguing whether or not he's Talib Kweli? I don’t see that anywhere.
Again: You're basic bob who consistently falls on the most low common denominator conclusion . I'm not arguing with him about that at all.
I'm calling him Talib, Kweli and what not but that's just for shits and giggles. It's not like I'm in here debating his writing style and arguing his identity. I referenced Denny's post and that was that.
and why its ok to >argue with an alias THIS time but not last time.
Funny thing Bob, that’s his argument. Not mine. He’s the one who introduced that. He’s the one fixated on that. Here you are, yet again, pretending it doesn’t take two to tango.
>stop lying and own your crazy.
>always blaming other people cause you cant walk away from an >argument regardless of how stupid and juvenile it is...
….says the guy who engages in those arguments more often and consistently than anyone.
Again, it takes two for that. Stop lying and own your consistently dumb conclusions.
>you argued with the alias of Talib Kweli...
….and here you are, yet again, talking to me…. About me…. More often, more passionate, and more consistently than anyone on the fucking board. …..At least when Beetlejuice isn’t on his bimonthly time out, that is
legsdiamond Member since May 05th 2011 79554 posts
Tue Sep-06-16 10:58 AM
71. "the cold truthed effect^^^" In response to Reply # 69
make 40 or 50 post so the thread stays at the top of the first page and when people finally open it and see the shit show and post jokes you accuse them of following you.
**************** TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*
i came in here and responded to Kilo and you hollared...
once again, you all up and down the thread so anytime someone chimes in you have to respond because you are batshit
**************** TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*
80. "Yes, Basic Bob. Like I said- you're mealy mouthed on topic. " In response to Reply # 79 Tue Sep-06-16 02:14 PM by Cold Truth
You came in and danced around it with thin and obvious references like you've been doing lately.
This is a relatively new tact for you to do it so consistently and but it's been pretty prominent in your playbook since that post you made where you referred to a victim of statutory rape at the hands of cops as a "teen prostitute".
Again, I'm responding to YOU specifically about YOU and specific things YOU do. Not "people".
Edit: I just realized you most likely don't know what "mealy mouthed" means, because you're so basic. That's probably where you got confused.
65. "Yall should google "LBO" and multiples on Grocery stores versus Media Co..." In response to Reply # 0
before trying to figure out how all this works.
>If Bill Cosby can't put up money to own a grocery store in >neighborhoods where folks look like him, how the fuck is he >gonna buy one of the biggest networks? I don't see Cosby >producing shows or movies so I say that was all bs.
********** "Everyone has a plan until you punch them in the face. Then they don't have a plan anymore." (c) Mike Tyson
legsdiamond Member since May 05th 2011 79554 posts
Tue Sep-06-16 09:07 AM
67. "All you have to do is look at a few sports franchise "owners"" In response to Reply # 65
Nelly owns a minority stake in the Charlotte Hornets.
Some of the Rooneys had to sell their racetracks in florida or their shares in the Steelers. A group of 5 or so investors bought their shares and one of those guys was John Stallworth.
I know these are smaller buyouts but my point is "buying" NBC wasnt impossible for Cosby given who he was in 1992. Once you are in that 1% you have access to people who have insane amounts of money.
but then again OKP didnt even know Nelly was a minority owner of the Hornets and someone posted about Jordan shitting on him after a game.
unfortunately some people camt fathom Black people having that type of wealth.
hell, we all joked JayZ for buying Tidal and predicted failure. These people know people with Billions to play with. Its how Dame Dash ends up selling out for 25 mill when it was worth 250 mill. Jay knew people Dame didnt know.
**************** TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*
Printer-friendly copy 
Email this topic to a friend
General Discussion
