|
to reach out. many of 'em in exec positions with competitors.
>through all your years, you'd have a ton of connections and >contacts and such to get another gig.
bout to see about that now.
>Out of curiosity, did you see any sizable changes with IBM >once Chinese ownership got involved?
chinese ownership? we don't have any chinese ownership. sold pc company to lenovo. (and that remained one of my best customers and somewhere i'll be looking).
but generally, nothing like that. our chinese influence was due to the opening of the IT markets in china. that's why i spent a good deal of the early 00's back and forth to china. (need to put that on my resume). that huge foothold into a rapidly industrializing asia led to double digit growth in both hardware and, especially services for years.
but our dumbass execs took that to be the norm and judged future growth by that standard, which was due to the presence of a large, untapped market. once you hit a saturation point (and business was great for a while), those same growth rates were unsustainable.
so you drop to single digit growth and begin defining that as 'failure', and then you go to the only levers you can pull -- increasing profits by expense cutting. but if a huge chunk of your business is services (ie, consulting, ie, PEOPLE), you start systematically cutting off people. well, your business is your people, dummies. we were basically eating our seed corn.
this led to realization of short term (only thing the stock markets recognize and incentivize) profitability at the expense of both revenues and capacity. soo many times i'd do side trips (high profile consulting gigs while fully and overutilized on a major client) and propose work to customers who'd agree that it was a great solution to their problem. but when it came time to sign the deal, we couldn't, because we DID. NOT. HAVE. THE. RESOURCES.
and then the impact of those of us 'left behind' after layoffs where we didn't get hit was that we were doing the work of all of the people who were let go.
or they'd blindly replace resources with folks in india and china. india is currently at about a third of US rates for prices. china is actually a bit more than that. but when i'd go to china, our big centers would be in part of big tech campuses where every other major global and local player would also have offices: ibm, accenture, wipro, hp, micorosoft, google. etc. cats over there told me that they'd get approached literally on lunch break w/ job offers from in the same building.
the upshot of all of that is that while, in general, on an apples for apples basis, you could replace US resources with global resources with the same expertise, the dynamics of the labor markets in china, india and mexico were decidedly different. in the US, a mature market, yeah, i had to fend off headhunter calls and such, but things tend toward stability. nobody's offering to up my salary by 50% at lunchtime. in india and china, with the margins so high, companies were doing EXACTLY that.
so what you ended up with was US resources w/ mad experience and skills (remember, anyone left in ibm past early 2000's had already survived years of layoffs, so the fat had long been gone, and we were cutting meat, tendons, marrow, white blood cells, what the fuck ever they could find to cut) being let go. and replaced by folks from halfway around the world who didn't have the skills -- not because of anything inherent to them -- but because the labor pool dynamics churned the fuck outta the personnel and you ended up with a carousel of newbs. anytime anyone got some good expertise on a project they were GONE. and we'd be up at 2 and 3am trying to get them to do shit, and if they didn't like the stress and pressure, they were GONE.
so we ended up, especially those of us in hot market skills, doing the work to replace departed US colleagues AND to cover for the fuckups of undertrained, inexperienced and 'asymetrically motivated' (they didn't have the same market pressures as US workers to give enough fucks) global resources.
that's been my life, more or less, for more than a decade.
peace & blessings,
x.
www.twitter.com/poetx
========================================= I'm an advocate for working smarter, not harder. If you just focus on working hard you end up making someone else rich and not having much to show for it. (c) mad
|