I don't listen to music enough to pay $10 per month for a streaming service. Some days/moments I just want a taste. They should do $1.99 24 hour subscriptions. So, if I have a backyard boogie I can just subscribe for that day and be done with it.
And since not all artists are on all platforms I could end up spending $30 per month on music. That's wack!
3. "From a business angle, this makes great sense." In response to Reply # 0
In fact, it could pull a whole new audience into streaming music. Plus it's an easy way to pick up extra revenue from people who don't subscribe regularly. I'd say $1.99 for 48 hours though or maybe a different fee for whole weekends, but then again I'd prefer it to all be free so *shrugs*.
#NP: Janelle Monae-DC, Pusha T-Daytona, Royce-Book of Ryan, Blue Note All-Stars-OPOV, Chris Dave/Drumhedz-Glow, Conway-GOAT, Black Milk-Fever, KRIT-4eva Is a Mighty.., Phonte-NNIGN, August Greene, Jericho Jackson @LargesseMorlu
Printer-friendly copy 
Email this topic to a friend
General Discussion
