Do ya'll really fear this?

I mean, its not like other species can consent or anything so you're effectively telling on yourselves at that point.

We're doomed!

~
~
~
~
~
Days like this I miss Sha Mecca

they're not supposed to think about it

www.engadgethd.com - the other stuff i'm looking at

because folk are really using that, like it's a real point...

www.anthologyfmn.com

Enter the Written World of Fahim Malik Nassar

The House of Caine (available)

Melancholoy Funk (available)

Tha Anthology (Words 2001-2003) Poetry inspired by OKP and Wash, DC
(available)

The Spook who sat by the Radio Poetry (av

***********************************************************
https://soundcloud.com/swageyph/yph-die-with-me

.

♚♚♚♚

#BYLUG >>> https://goo.gl/1ooFp6

♚♚♚♚

screamin' mothafuck a 12 /
bitches ain't shit /
cops ain't neither /
they huntin' my people /

- i. rashad

♚♚♚♚

i mean deep secret desire for good ol fashion non christian, sodom/gomorrah sex, not beastiality



well maybe


nevermind

Fixed it for you

Lets be honest...you're no less crazy than they are.

that spectrum as well.

'Two consenting adults,' etc.

No real argument against it besides, 'ew!' and, 'They shouldn't have children.'

Which was pretty much the old argument against gay marriages.

----------------------------------
I have a webcomic: www.watchthecomic.com

My webcomic has a page: www.facebook.com/watchyourheadcomic

>'Two consenting adults,' etc.
>
>No real argument against it besides, 'ew!' and, 'They
>shouldn't have children.'
>
>Which was pretty much the old argument against gay marriages.
>
>

relatives shouldn't have children together for real though.


**********
"Everyone has a plan until you punch them in the face. Then they don't have a plan anymore." (c) Mike Tyson


"One of the most important things in life is what Judge Learned Hand described as 'that ever-gnawing inner doubt as to whether you're

and the rules vary widely based on where you are

www.engadgethd.com - the other stuff i'm looking at

If it did then humans and animals would produce offspring correct?

This does not happen though therefore it can be argued that nature does not consent can it not?

Now that that's out of the way. I'm not sure whose "fearing" it as it's been around as long as just about anything else humans do with their bodies that gets them into trouble. It's the public acceptance of it that will come to pass as people are already doing it and I suspect some of them are over in LA right now turning down any movie that would show black people in a state of progress as opposed to struggling in the past and or present.

How is it done? By slowly getting people comfortable with it through media 'programming'. Ted, Bojack Horseman, Gun With Occasional Music, Family Guy, The Man Show, etc. All of these have portrayed human animal sexual relations as humorous and or normal, but not repulsive.

Lastly as it was in the beginning so shall it be in the end. We humans are masters of sliding down the slippery slope.

______________________________________

Everything looks like Oprah kissing Harvey Weinstein these days

I'd bang you even if you were an animal

www.engadgethd.com - the other stuff i'm looking at

Cuz it's on if that's the case.

______________________________________

Everything looks like Oprah kissing Harvey Weinstein these days

Let me sport my Air Hyperbole 2010s in peace. (c) ansomble

Building repetoires (c) spm since 1983

So I don't care if the "parts fit" ...its not a viable argument.

I'm assuming you don't believe in anything greater than yourself that's capable of sentient thought so we'll just say nature, evolution, the natural order, etc.

And is an animal not one of natures creations?

______________________________________

Everything looks like Oprah kissing Harvey Weinstein these days

Stop speaking in gibberish

It's a yes or no question. I'm not sure where the confusion lies. Nature, evolution, the natural order, or whatever you want to call it is responsible for the animal's existence as it is for ours correct?

Therefore based on the fact that humans and animals can not create offspring does this mean that "nature" does or does not consent to the the act?

The reasoning being that if nature consented then it would be biologically possible for there to be another creature produced as a result.

I can't make it any simpler.

______________________________________

Everything looks like Oprah kissing Harvey Weinstein these days

cuz if it doesn't your argument is very childlike, as usual


but go ahead and explain why nature allows for one ridiculous act such as bringing a guy back to life, but not to people sticking they dick into any and everything, like many of your christian brethren like to preach about but get caught for lol

You'd have answered the question by now if you had anything resembling cognitive thought.

______________________________________

Everything looks like Oprah kissing Harvey Weinstein these days

you & case and y'alls personal thoughts are always revealed thru cowardice


its why i love this place and only fuck with y'all

______________________________________

Everything looks like Oprah kissing Harvey Weinstein these days

The only reasons we can't mate is due to protein coatings and enzymatic pairings in our gametes. Thats it.

Nature doesn't have a "goal" in mind...theres only things that work and things that don't work and things that "kinda" work.

I mean you're doing all this typing for what really is a simple question.

If nature allowed for sex between humans and animals to produce offspring then it could be argued that nature allows or consents to the act.

That however is not the case so is it fair to say nature does not consent?

We are looking to nature because it's greater than the animal and if one does not believe in any sort of creator then nature is responsible for said animal. One could maybe even argue does the animal's body (proteins, enzymes, etc.) consent since the animal itself can not.

______________________________________

Everything looks like Oprah kissing Harvey Weinstein these days

Nature isn't some "thinking" entity.

its all chemicals.

The only reasons humans and dogs can't create kids is because proteins don't have the right spatial confirmation to allow it.

Is it not? Is it not a force we must adhere to more often than not?

How about does nature allow for it? If nature allowed for it that would mean it was ok to do right? However nature does not allow for it beyond the act of intercourse which is in a sense a violation due to the fact that absolutely nothing productive can come from the union of man and beast.

I don't really have a dog in this fight. The only point I'm making is that our natural environment does not sanction it therefore why should we? If you support it than by all means do you.

______________________________________

Everything looks like Oprah kissing Harvey Weinstein these days

>
>I don't really have a dog in this fight.
>
>

---
"though time has passed, im still the future" (c) black thought

in fact...i almost never does lol

not to mention the fact that cross-breeding is a thing that happens...it's how some species exist in the first place

if offspring is the determining factor of "nature's consent"

(sounds like a hippy rape kit btw)

then most human sex isn't consented to by nature

toss that whole fuckery of thought in the trash or keep that crazy locked up

Let me sport my Air Hyperbole 2010s in peace. (c) ansomble

Building repetoires (c) spm since 1983

>not to mention the fact that cross-breeding is a thing that
>happens...it's how some species exist in the first place

Some like species correct? I.e. Horse and Donkey, Tiger and Lion, etc.

>
>if offspring is the determining factor of "nature's consent"
>
>(sounds like a hippy rape kit btw)

I Wouldn't know much about either subject.

>
>then most human sex isn't consented to by nature

That is a terrible jump in logic. The fact that humans may not be able to have children does not equal humans are not supposed to have children.

>toss that whole fuckery of thought in the trash or keep that
>crazy locked up

I'll do that if you stop by PetSmart on the way home since that makes just about as much sense.

______________________________________

Everything looks like Oprah kissing Harvey Weinstein these days

I'm not aware of anything else humans can breed with, but who the fuck knows... there might be an ape out there.

But Lions and Tigers can interbreed.
Donkeys, Ponies, Zebras and Horses can interbreed.
Cows and Yaks
Sheep and Goats (these even belong to different genera)

We cross breed plants ALL THE TIME.

So yeah, if you want to go down this route, nature absolutely consents to beastiality.

But that has *fuck all* to do with humans marrying humans unless you're fucked in the head.

_______________________________

))<>((
forever.

and personally I don't believe we should be trying to find it if it does in fact exist. Just-- no.

What do humans and humans have to do with humans and animals? Nothing-- you are correct.

The argument it seems breaks down along two lines those who view male to male sex as normal and those that don't.

Those who see it as normal will likely see little connection to beastiality.

Those who see it as abnormal are drawing what they believe to be a moral (or lack thereof) connection between both acts. To this group sex with animals is as depraved as men having sex with men in their minds and this mindset is often if not always tied to 'religion' for lack of a better word.

Why man to man and not woman to woman? Because a man can physically play the role of a woman i.e. receive pleasure via penetration whereas a woman can not truly play the mans role. A man can actually lay down and get fucked as if he were a woman. A woman can not penetrate a woman as if she were a man. The woman making finger puppets is in no way getting pleasure from her fingers. Make sense?

They say it's next or among the things that are next because public acceptance of male to male sex to them is a sign of an overall decrease in moral fiber within society. As that fiber weakens more depraved acts will become accepted.

______________________________________

Everything looks like Oprah kissing Harvey Weinstein these days

All of a sudden cannot reproduce.

You need sperm and ovum..period.



*****************************************
. . . If I have something to say when there is a reason involved, I am perfectly willing to talk. Katherine Hepburn

not humans and humans.

______________________________________

Everything looks like Oprah kissing Harvey Weinstein these days

I was wondering why people who are against gay marriage say its because two same gender people can NOT reproduce. Does the ability to procreate magically disappear if one is LGBTQ.

All you need is sperm and ovum to reproduce a human
*****************************************
. . . If I have something to say when there is a reason involved, I am perfectly willing to talk. Katherine Hepburn

as a married couple.

______________________________________

Everything looks like Oprah kissing Harvey Weinstein these days

people been fuckin animals since forever sweetheart, even in your pathetic little cult lol


the media aint makin nobody fuck more/less animals, thats a pretty weak view you championin slick



Ted is part of the conspiracy??? lol that tinfoil hat is fittin a little too tight around feeble little noodle of yours

>people been fuckin animals since forever sweetheart, even in
>your pathetic little cult lol

I said this already you R.I.F. dropout.


>the media aint makin nobody fuck more/less animals, thats a
>pretty weak view you championin slick

I didn't say that it was making anyone do anything. It's presenting something as comfortable and benign. Once you get into your winter years you'll have probably (hopefully) gotten your GED by then so come back and read what I posted after that. The post should still be there then.


>Ted is part of the conspiracy??? lol that tinfoil hat is
>fittin a little too tight around feeble little noodle of yours

No one said a conspiracy was in effect. But I'll let you cook you sorry excuse for anything sentient and capable of rational thought. And speaking of cooking the way one cooks frogs is to slowly turn up the heat over time-- this way the frog does not jump out of the water and dies comfortably.

That metaphor is likely lost on your feeble, dim witted, mind capable of nothing more than satisfying your need for food and sex, but perhaps there is someone out there who will get it.

______________________________________

Everything looks like Oprah kissing Harvey Weinstein these days

>How is it done? By slowly getting people comfortable with it
>through media 'programming'. Ted, Bojack Horseman, Gun With
>Occasional Music, Family Guy, The Man Show, etc. All of these
>have portrayed human animal sexual relations as humorous and
>or normal, but not repulsive.



and you feel like this is an intelligent stance on the matter??


like for real, read that out loud and try not to laugh



wait a minute, you believe you're gonna meet a black man called the king of jews by an apple tree, you'll believe anything lol


just was checkin to see if you would defend this shit and you did lol

You haven't answered my one. Probably due to those aforementioned* missing chromosomes.

So stop wasting our time and go back to sucking on your 6th webbed toe.

*Aforementioned means said before or previously.

______________________________________

Everything looks like Oprah kissing Harvey Weinstein these days

only you can answer that sweetheart, not the media



but you can't even answer if you really think what you said is actually intelligible, which is telling



yeah, my 6th grade education lol. This coming from a nigga that follows white oppressions most symbolic book of slavery towards black people. you sure got me with that one lol

That Zimbabwe is how to get to a location of some sort

That Dogon is a missing canine

And that Zaire is just a cool sounding name.

So spare me these paltry attempts at portraying yourself as knowledgeable of anything African. Let alone anything at all.

Class dismissed Nimrod.

______________________________________

Everything looks like Oprah kissing Harvey Weinstein these days

ashanti?


the movie ted?



thats all you can do to defend your faith?


no wonder you can't even get christian mingle pussy, you TOO pussy to even defend your own faith, much less you respond with ashanti?? lol



aint looking too good sport

You got Ruy Lopezed.

______________________________________

Everything looks like Oprah kissing Harvey Weinstein these days

***********************************************************
https://soundcloud.com/swageyph/yph-die-with-me

dude thinks black people are wrong in not knowing the history of black jesus lol


how can you be double wrong tho

clutch the pearls!!!!! Where da white women ??

"You used to be so cool, but now, you know you're so cold"

thats pretty much it in a nutshell

http://soundcloud.com/djshinobishaw
http://www.rareformnyc.com
http://twitter.com/DJShinobiShaw
https://twitter.com/RareFormNYC
PSN: ShinobiShaw

"Arm Leg Leg Arm How you doin?" (c)T510

& if they are saying this why are you taking it so literal?

And they take it seriously.
*****************************************
. . . If I have something to say when there is a reason involved, I am perfectly willing to talk. Katherine Hepburn

have managed to isolate / are isolated along with

significant parts of our community.

www.engadgethd.com - the other stuff i'm looking at

Or even be able to explain what his relationship with X is like?

I don't mean any disrespect to your relatives, but they're not thinking critically.

cuz they makin themselves known allay/eryday on there, hell they got twitter poppin right now with this bullshit lol

Bout that craziness

prototype

stand ur ground, believe in urself,
believe in love, prepare urself for love, remove the negativity from ur life, and accept the love u kno u deserve

Like having people teach your kids, serve your food, sign your paycheck, lead your country, and have animal intercourse as part of their daily activities?

______________________________________

Everything looks like Oprah kissing Harvey Weinstein these days

Do you not want to live in a world where gay people can get married?

But you are right the two, generally speaking, have nothing to do with each other. I think people that are linking the two are doing so along what they believe to be moral lines. See #94.

______________________________________

Everything looks like Oprah kissing Harvey Weinstein these days

Heaven's NAW!!!!

"We don't make mistakes, we just have happy little accidents" - Bob Ross

"I'm wearing a MSU Tshirt because I went to MSU, you are wearing a UM Tshirt because you went to Walmart!" -unknown.

http://bjsquirrelchronicles.blogspot.com

gun control, taxes, gay rights, etc...

if they have no reasonable argument for or against the matter at hand, they can just link it to whatever extreme nonsense they want to pretend it will lead to, then ask people to defend that instead.

"If two adults are in love and not hurting anyone, what's your reason for wanting to deny them basic rights?"

"What if if a man wanted to marry an ostrich? Would you support that?"

they didn't first bring Africans here as indentured servants

then took their personal rights to be treated equally

then took their children's rights to be treated equally

then made sure anyone of African ancestry in America could never be treated equally

nope-- no slippery slope there. Certainly not a pattern Americans could possibly fall in to.


I mean there was really just the gulf war

then the Iraq war

then Afghanistan

and now perpetual war in the Middle East.

You right-- I don't see it at all.

______________________________________

Everything looks like Oprah kissing Harvey Weinstein these days

>they didn't first bring Africans here as indentured servants
>
>then took their personal rights to be treated equally
>
>then took their children's rights to be treated equally
>
>then made sure anyone of African ancestry in America could
>never be treated equally
>
>nope-- no slippery slope there. Certainly not a pattern
>Americans could possibly fall in to.
>
>
>I mean there was really just the gulf war
>
>then the Iraq war
>
>then Afghanistan
>
>and now perpetual war in the Middle East.
>
>You right-- I don't see it at all.

In that illustration?

______________________________________

Everything looks like Oprah kissing Harvey Weinstein these days

the point is 'slippery slope' is too often used as a tactic, mostly by conservatives or religious types to ignore matter at hand, and the go-to excuse to resist social change every time it's even suggested.

So when someone suggests someone with a mental illness will have to take an extra step before purchasing an AK47, the conversation turns to the inevitably of the government taking all our guns away, so somehow by supporting a common sense background check, you ultimately support tyranny.

Same shit with the phony inevitability of bestiality. People bringing it up are only doing so because they don't have a reasonable argument against gay marriage, so the next best thing is to make it seem like if you support, A, you now somehow support B because B is coming.

But of course, instead of addressing my actual point, you dropped a bunch of examples of just shit that's happened, and asked me to point out what is and isn't true. Bestiality is next because, what about the slave trade and the wars in the middle east? lol.
i suppose you're trying to argue that there IS such thing as a slippery slope, when it was never my point that there is no such thing, or that something can't lead to something else. my point is that more often than not, it's a bullshit tactic, only really pulled out to divert from or ignore the thing they can't argue against.\

Please don't reply though. I can already tell this is a waste of time.

And since you asked that I not respond I of course now have to based on GP.

I actually agree that it is used a lot and it's not always applicable as your Illustration pointed out. I just think to not weigh it is also equally presumptuous.

I stated this already but the people who say it's next or otherwise forthcoming are doing so (I would guess) based on their views on morality and when it comes to issues of that nature the "slippery slope" is perhaps more the crux of the argument when orienting from that perspective.

Some would say that when it comes to issues of personal ethics or rationalizations it is easy and perhaps more often than not that we humans will push what we would consider to be our boundaries if consequences related to the overstepping of those boundaries are removed.

______________________________________

Everything looks like Oprah kissing Harvey Weinstein these days

fuck you.

it's possible.

---------------------------------------
blog: www.wonderfullyhorrible.blogspot.com
instagram: Fishgrease
twitter: wooly_caesar
Podcast www.soundcloud.com/circlegang

Swimming around looking all seductive n shit under the sea

------------------------------

50+ FREE Mixes on www.DJR-Tistic.com!

Twitter and Instagram - @DJ_RTistic

>Swimming around looking all seductive n shit under the sea


lol

They think it will be okay to marry relatives and all types of fuckery. I've got more important things to do than rally against something that already passed.

.
.
.
"Romans 10 : 9 says, "If you declare
with your mouth, “Jesus is Lord,”
and believe in your heart that
God raised him from the dead,
you will be saved."

The fire and brimstone preachers who are secretly sleeping with multiple people in their congregations.

The anti-gay campaigners who are sending underarmour pxts to young boys and going on dates to the nail salon.

Men choking out their daughters.

When you're that depraved and struggling that hard to maintain a public veneer that's consistent with your message, it's easy to imagine the rest of society is the same as you or worse.

Especially when you combine those traits with hypocrisy, condescension and a judgemental attitude.

If you're warped enough your worldview warps with you, and it can be strong enough to warp those who follow you.

It's a sad state of affairs.

Just IMO though.

>The fire and brimstone preachers who are secretly sleeping
>with multiple people in their congregations.
>
>The anti-gay campaigners who are sending underarmour pxts to
>young boys and going on dates to the nail salon.
>
>Men choking out their daughters.
>
>When you're that depraved and struggling that hard to maintain
>a public veneer that's consistent with your message, it's easy
>to imagine the rest of society is the same as you or worse.
>
>Especially when you combine those traits with hypocrisy,
>condescension and a judgemental attitude.
>
>If you're warped enough your worldview warps with you, and it
>can be strong enough to warp those who follow you.
>
>It's a sad state of affairs.

____________________________

FUCK DONALD TRUMP