A woman defending a serial rapist?

Blasphemy New 2016 Mix>>>> https://soundcloud.com/djvariable/blasphemy

_______________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

cscpov.blogspot.com

"There's a fine line between persistence and foolishness..."
-unknown

"To Each His Reach"

nm

_________________________________________
"Too weird to live.... too rare to die..."

IG: KnowOne215 | PS+ ID: KnowOne215

I don't even understand this post

=================
Official Okay-Super Villainâ„¢

I only play the games that I win at -
Gamertag: Innovator
PSN: DurtyGambino
Steam: Durty Gambino
Twitch.tv/durtygambino

could you put your profession ahead of your values?

Blasphemy New 2016 Mix>>>> https://soundcloud.com/djvariable/blasphemy

=================
Official Okay-Super Villainâ„¢

I only play the games that I win at -
Gamertag: Innovator
PSN: DurtyGambino
Steam: Durty Gambino
Twitch.tv/durtygambino

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

Once you got high in your career, you would have the freedom to pick and choose.

Blasphemy New 2016 Mix>>>> https://soundcloud.com/djvariable/blasphemy

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2_JTzEppKy8

=================
Official Okay-Super Villainâ„¢

I only play the games that I win at -
Gamertag: Innovator
PSN: DurtyGambino
Steam: Durty Gambino
Twitch.tv/durtygambino

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
t.

------------------------------

50+ FREE Mixes on www.DJR-Tistic.com!

Twitter and Instagram - @DJ_RTistic

This is a defense attorney's dream.

-----------------

www.albumism.com

Checkin' Our Style, Return To Zero:

https://www.mixcloud.com/returntozero/

-The Knicks’ coaching search still includes a lone frontrunner, Kurt Rambis, whose qualifications for the position include a strong relationship with Jackson and a willingness to take the job.

-----------------

www.albumism.com

Checkin' Our Style, Return To Zero:

https://www.mixcloud.com/returntozero/

___________________________________________________________


DJTB YOMM

doing the job she was hired to do.

Why would she even be considered a sellout of any kind? She's a lawyer. Does your logic apply to all criminal defense lawyers?
.
.
.

Kinda weird having a male defend an accused male rapist.

-The Knicks’ coaching search still includes a lone frontrunner, Kurt Rambis, whose qualifications for the position include a strong relationship with Jackson and a willingness to take the job.

---
but have you ever checked out my website? www.dtaylorimages.com

Every time I see her give interviews, she just obliterates whatever the interviewer puts in front of her.

He's gonna get off on the criminal case.

_______________________________________

This woman creates reasonable doubt in her sleep. And does it with a smile.

>He's gonna get off on the criminal case.

---
but have you ever checked out my website? www.dtaylorimages.com

^^^^^^

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

then her arguments must be really good.

www.engadgethd.com - the other stuff i'm looking at

doubt.

And she's shown herself to be fully capable of providing a healthy dose of the latter...WELL.

---
but have you ever checked out my website? www.dtaylorimages.com

if you're on the jury, no attorney couldn't get Cosby off.

www.engadgethd.com - the other stuff i'm looking at

keep of the ledge when the verdict comes in... if it ever makes it to trial.

---
but have you ever checked out my website? www.dtaylorimages.com

but you've spent the last few years telling me, it'd be rude to ignore you.


www.engadgethd.com - the other stuff i'm looking at

---
but have you ever checked out my website? www.dtaylorimages.com

you are a massive piece of shit.

.

---
but have you ever checked out my website? www.dtaylorimages.com

i don't share your perspective, thank fuck.

---
but have you ever checked out my website? www.dtaylorimages.com

lol

I believe Cosby did a lot of what he's accused of.
But this fool is about to turn me into a die hard supporter

_______________________________________

.
.
.

to give him a world-class defense. And when he gets convicted, no one will be able to say his side didn't try their best to get him off.

It's funny, if she were defending anybody else, she'd be a straight up celebrity right now, like Moseley was in Baltimore last year.

---
but have you ever checked out my website? www.dtaylorimages.com

she seems to be on TV quite a bit and she's absolutely blowing up on social media.

and is going to give the Montgomery County DA a rough time.)

but she is getting her shine from this case already

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

She believes in her client's innocence and more importantly doesn't believe the plantiffs claims against her client.

If she didn't believe in her clients innocence, she could have chosen to decline.

But she didn't.

End of story.

or are even definitely guilty.

they still deserve representation.



www.engadgethd.com - the other stuff i'm looking at

-----------------

www.albumism.com

Checkin' Our Style, Return To Zero:

https://www.mixcloud.com/returntozero/

I just dont get that feel with this attorney.

I think she really believes that the plantiffs charges are frivolous.

We'll see.

daughter. New Years Day or the day after, back in 2000, she calls them from jail telling them that she's been accused of killing her mom. My dad is like "ok, immediately stop talking, stop calling people...I'll call my Lawyer for you."

My dad talks to the Lawyer, and the first thing he asked was "was there anyone else in the house? OH, her boyfriend? PERFECT....we'll just find a way to put this on him."

I feel like he already knew she was guilty, but he was all about getting her off.

------------------------------

50+ FREE Mixes on www.DJR-Tistic.com!

Twitter and Instagram - @DJ_RTistic

and we'll work back from there

www.engadgethd.com - the other stuff i'm looking at

i normally don't ask.

fuck you.

and he has to defend people accused of all kinds of shit. why ask, when you're already looking for a way to get the charges dropped entirely, etc.



www.engadgethd.com - the other stuff i'm looking at

i'm more concerned w/the prosecution's evidence than i am w/whether my client is actually guilty or actually innocent.

fuck you.

www.engadgethd.com - the other stuff i'm looking at

/found guilty is innocent?

.
http://perspectivesudans.blogspot.com/
i myself would never want to be god,or even like god.Because god got all these human beings on this planet and i most certainly would not want to be responsible for them, or even have the disgrace that i made them.

do we the sitting jury in the court of public opinion also believe Chicago Officer Van Dyke (accused of murdering Laquan McDonald) is innocent until proven guilty?

the 6 Baltimore officers in the Freddie Gray case - innocent?

i ask b/c i see ppl throw around that presumption of innocence bit when discussing the Cosby case as if the fact that judges instruct jurors to presume a criminal defendant is innocent until the prosecution proves guilt beyond reasonable doubt has ANYTHING to do w/whether we the public must or should presume innocent. b/c it don't. b/c we the public have NO duty to presume innocence unless/until we are sitting jurors in a criminal case having been so instructed by a judge. which means all of us sitting at our computers making 'em pute have no duty to presume Bill's innocence. so when ppl throw that bullshit around i tend to LOL @ 'em.

but i digress.

oh, and what about purported defendants where the prosecution submitted a case to a grand jury which declined to return an indictment? i wonder if the same ppl spouting that presumption of innocence horseshit also believe those defendants are innocent.

so...Cleveland Officer Loehmann - innocent? Ferguson Officer Darren Wilson - innocent? NY Officer Pantaleo - innocent?

only those ppl can answer.

i don't really give a shit if they do answer (they shouldn't) b/c i've already rendered my verdict as to their character. i find them lacking. and i want nothing to do w/them. they are deficient as ppl. trolls. cretins. lesser than. idiots. nincompoops. simpletons. doofuses.

bless they hearts.

and fuck 'em.

fuck you.

>b/c i've already rendered my verdict as to their character. i
>find them lacking. and i want nothing to do w/them. they are
>deficient as ppl. trolls. cretins. lesser than. idiots.
>nincompoops. simpletons. doofuses.
>
>bless they hearts.
>
>and fuck 'em.
>
>
>
>

.
http://perspectivesudans.blogspot.com/
i myself would never want to be god,or even like god.Because god got all these human beings on this planet and i most certainly would not want to be responsible for them, or even have the disgrace that i made them.

to the media.

But besides that you can think whatever you want personally

so if the defendant hasn't been convicted in a court of law then the news should report that. and generally the news shouldn't take sides when reporting and should strive for objectivity. of course, it's fine for the news media to take sides when editorializing as long as they make a clear distinction between editorial pieces and news reporting. too often that line gets blurred.

fuck you.

im asking these folk out here who are all
he's gonna walk free and this will prove his innocence
if this is what they are trying to tell us
that they believe everyone who walks out of a court trial is innocent
or to add nuance to it- if they think the result of a court trial means a presumption of innocence

i really would like this answered

.
http://perspectivesudans.blogspot.com/
i myself would never want to be god,or even like god.Because god got all these human beings on this planet and i most certainly would not want to be responsible for them, or even have the disgrace that i made them.

I don't know what evidence the prosecution has.
But given that the media has been firmly against Cosby and his lawyer has been knocking their fast balls out the park, I don't think there's a chance he's found guilty.

He may have assaulted this woman. But I don't think they can prove it.


<
<or to add nuance to it- if they think the <result of a court trial means a <presumption of innocence
<

This part of your question is really interesting. I'd be nice to talk about this outside the context of Cosby since that issue is so charged.

But I think the result of the trial should add substantial credence to your case for absolving yourself from the alleged crime.

At some point, there needs to be a resolution. And a trial is a decent enough stage to get that. If an adversary is not able to convince your peers that you did the crime, then (in most cases) that should be sufficient to demonstrate your innocence.

_______________________________________

you say this:

>I don't know what evidence the prosecution has.

but also this:

> he's gonna skate on the charges.

...how do you know he's gonna 'skate' w/o knowing the prosecution's evidence?

then you said this:

>But given that the media has been firmly against Cosby and his
>lawyer has been knocking their fast balls out the park, I
>don't think there's a chance he's found guilty.

...and that's after you'd said this:

>I don't know what evidence the prosecution has.

so why do think the fact that his lawyer has 'knock(ed the media's) fast balls out of the park' means 'he's gonna skate'? why don't you think 'there's a chance he's found guilty' just b/c his lawyer is giving good tv interviews on his behalf as she's paid to do?

then you said this:

>He may have assaulted this woman. But I don't think they can
>prove it.

and this is after you said:

>I don't know what evidence the prosecution has.

...so you don't think the prosecution can prove Bill's guilt even though you haven't seen the evidence?

How, Sway? (c) Kanye.

fuck you.

Just like most everyone else. I only know what the media has disclosed.

And my perception from the little I do know (and his lawyer's appearances) is that there is lots of reasonable doubt.

I'm making uninformed speculations just like we do for everything around here

_______________________________________

fuck you.

>But I think the result of the trial should add substantial
>credence to your case for absolving yourself from the alleged
>crime.
>
>At some point, there needs to be a resolution. And a trial is
>a decent enough stage to get that. If an adversary is not able
>to convince your peers that you did the crime, then (in most
>cases) that should be sufficient to demonstrate your
>innocence.

.
http://perspectivesudans.blogspot.com/
i myself would never want to be god,or even like god.Because god got all these human beings on this planet and i most certainly would not want to be responsible for them, or even have the disgrace that i made them.

Someone says you did something. You say you didn't do it. This conflict needs to be resolved somehow.

Prosecution puts together evidence trying to prove that you did it.

Your peers get together and determine that, given the evidence, they don't believe you did it.
That process and outcome is a demonstration of your innocence (but definitely not proof).

Of course there are occasional failings in the system. But I think it's fair for a person who comes through with a not guilty verdict to claim their innocence. I mean what else can they do to prove it?

_______________________________________

>I think the result of the trial should add substantial
>credence to your case for absolving yourself from the alleged
>crime.
>
>At some point, there needs to be a resolution. And a trial is
>a decent enough stage to get that. If an adversary is not able
>to convince your peers that you did the crime, then (in most
>cases) that should be sufficient to demonstrate your
>innocence.

absolutely not!

there could be all sorts of reasons a fact-finder acquits any given defendant - some of them are just/right/fair and plenty of them aren't at all. and most of those reasons may not have anything at all to do w/the defendant's actual guilt or innocence. which is why courts of law generally are not concerned w/determining actual guilt or innocence. instead the court is concerned w/determining relative guilt considering the charge(s) brought by a prosecutor (as allowed by laws written by a legislature) and based on laws and rules (written by appellate judges and legislatures) as applied to facts presented at trial (as limited by rules written by appellate judges and also by the various constitutions (state and federal)) among other factors and considerations. given all of that i wouldn't necessarily go too far ascribing actual guilt or innocence to any defendant based on a trial verdict.

fuck you.

I get that it's not perfect. There could be clear evidence that someone committed a murder. But if that evidence is improperly collected, she could get a not guilty verdict.
Clearly guilty, but got off on a technicality.

But in general, if someone is put through the rigors of trial and comes out unscathed, I think they deserve some benefit of innocence in the matter

_______________________________________

Niggas will sit here and act like it but we know.

There could be tons of evidence that the jury isn't allowed to hear about. The media should be free to report that as relevant.

-The Knicks’ coaching search still includes a lone frontrunner, Kurt Rambis, whose qualifications for the position include a strong relationship with Jackson and a willingness to take the job.

In the case of cops that have murdered unarmed citizens where clear video exists of that murder that millions have seen and can determine that, yes the cop murdered said citizen yet no charges are ever brought; those cops are guilty as fuck. I saw it with my own eyes, there's nothing else needed.

In OJ's case, I do believe he was innocent of the actual murder, but he's covering for one of his sons that actually did it. He's guilty as an accomplice, or for hiding evidence, but not of murder.

In Cosby's case, I believe at least a few of those women were unwillingly drugged and raped, though not necessarily the one he's brought up on charges for. For the women he drugged without their knowledge, yes, he's guilty. For the rest, worst case he's guilty of being an admitted drug dealer and cheating on his wife.

---------------------------

"Where was the peace when we were getting shot? Where's the peace when we were getting laid out?
Where is the peace when we are in the back of ambulances? Where is the peace then?
They don't want to call for peace then.

>In Cosby's case, I believe at least a few of those women were
>unwillingly drugged and raped, though not necessarily the one
>he's brought up on charges for. For the women he drugged
>without their knowledge, yes, he's guilty. For the rest, worst
>case he's guilty of being an admitted drug dealer and cheating
>on his wife.

so you believe he should beat the case?
not go to jail? because of the statute of limitations? or because what?

.
http://perspectivesudans.blogspot.com/
i myself would never want to be god,or even like god.Because god got all these human beings on this planet and i most certainly would not want to be responsible for them, or even have the disgrace that i made them.

>so you believe he should beat the case?

If the facts presented during trial show Bill guilty in this particular case then that's it; he's guilty.

>not go to jail?

If convicted, he can spend the rest of his life there and I wouldn't so much as raise an eyebrow.

>because of the statute of limitations? or
>because what?

what the fuck are you talking about? Do you even know???


---------------------------

"Where was the peace when we were getting shot? Where's the peace when we were getting laid out?
Where is the peace when we are in the back of ambulances? Where is the peace then?
They don't want to call for peace then.

>>because of the statute of limitations? or
>>because what?
>
>what the fuck are you talking about? Do you even know???

you mentioned are becuase of the statute of limitations
otherwise he would've probably have been facing more than one woman on trial
the reason *this* is happening is because time was running out

so.... its not so much that *this* woman is not credible- or whatever you wrote.
its unfortunate that there are time limits

.
http://perspectivesudans.blogspot.com/
i myself would never want to be god,or even like god.Because god got all these human beings on this planet and i most certainly would not want to be responsible for them, or even have the disgrace that i made them.

>you mentioned are becuase of the statute of limitations
>otherwise he would've probably have been facing more than one
>woman on trial
>the reason *this* is happening is because time was running
>out
>
>so.... its not so much that *this* woman is not credible- or
>whatever you wrote.
>its unfortunate that there are time limits


Nothing you wrote applies to any of my statements. Connect the dots here 'cause I never once mentioned shit about the statute of limitations.



---------------------------

"Where was the peace when we were getting shot? Where's the peace when we were getting laid out?
Where is the peace when we are in the back of ambulances? Where is the peace then?
They don't want to call for peace then.

you wrote this "few of those women were unwillingly drugged and raped, though not necessarily the one he's brought up on charges for."

the reason the other women cannot take him to trial,
even if they may have a better case than *this* woman is because
the statute of limitations has expired on their cases.

geez.

>Nothing you wrote applies to any of my statements. Connect the
>dots here 'cause I never once mentioned shit about the statute
>of limitations.

how about you connect some dots
reading is fundamental
what i wrote is appropos
perhaps you just dont comprehend

.
http://perspectivesudans.blogspot.com/
i myself would never want to be god,or even like god.Because god got all these human beings on this planet and i most certainly would not want to be responsible for them, or even have the disgrace that i made them.

>
>you wrote this "few of those women were unwillingly drugged
>and raped, though not necessarily the one he's brought up on
>charges for."

No, what I wrote was this: "... I believe at least a few of those women were unwillingly drugged and raped, though not necessarily the one he's brought up on charges for."


>
>the reason the other women cannot take him to trial,
>even if they may have a better case than *this* woman is
>because
>the statute of limitations has expired on their cases.

But I wasn't talking about whether or not he can be brought up on charges for any of the other cases, I was simply stating whether or not I believed he was guilty in a few of those cases, which I do.

>
>geez.
>
>>Nothing you wrote applies to any of my statements. Connect
>the
>>dots here 'cause I never once mentioned shit about the
>statute
>>of limitations.
>
>how about you connect some dots
>reading is fundamental

Start with yourself. What you wrote was clearly out of context with the post I replied to and what I wrote.

>what i wrote is appropos
>perhaps you just dont comprehend

see above.

---------------------------

"Where was the peace when we were getting shot? Where's the peace when we were getting laid out?
Where is the peace when we are in the back of ambulances? Where is the peace then?
They don't want to call for peace then.

that is to say, in any case where we have an actual conversation with an ability to freely and objectively review the facts at hand without court motions, judicial discretion, jury selection, and handcrafted attorney narratives designed to emotionally manipulate said juries, we should be able to arrive at a conclusion based on the facts themselves.

and she's about to be this generations Johnnie Cochran. it really doesn't matter if you think Bill did it or not, they still have to prove it. call her whatever you want, i'm sure she can handle it.

as she should. if i were in Bill's position i'd want a vigorous defense. it appears she'll give him one.

fuck you.

<<<<"Nothings more attractive than a heavy praying woman" © Andre 3000

Mike Tyson often talks about sex as a means of violence and/or control. He did so in his Broadway show in talking about he didn't know whether to "fuck or fight" Brad Pitt when he caught Brad with Robin Givens. What's so bizarre about this is that the entire audience was laughing on the HBO show.

Not to mention, him recounting, with the laughte,r the story of him grabbing a teenage girl's ass when he was younger and the girl's uncle putting a gun to him about it.

Given how Mike Tyson views women and sex and the circumstances of the accusation, it's not at all a far reach to believe he raped her. I'm sure he doesn't categorize what he did as rape, though.

at 2 a.m., in her hoochie-fied dress and tossed it to him like a Frisbee.

Where Mike screwed up is that he played her like a 2-bit ho', instead of a black beauty contestant princess.

At least that's my view, but I really don't KNOW, but neither do you, because neither one of us was there.


As for his shows, Mike is just giving the people what the want. They want to believe that he's some type of subhuman monster, so that's what he's giving them. What else he gonna do to make a living?

<<<<"Nothings more attractive than a heavy praying woman" © Andre 3000

you basically just said she was a slut who came on to him. smh

Tyson is "acting" like a person who has distorted views on sex and women to make a living. ooooooooooo...k

who has been in a rape situation.

It is possible for her to be a slut (or act in a slutty manner) and still be raped. The two are not mutually exclusive.

However, I do not think that's the case here. Ms. Washington felt that she was played by Mike after he got his and she acted like a woman who had been scorned.

Mike acts a fool and plays up the monster role in general because he knows that people will pay to hear him speak in such a manner and see him act that way.

Believe it or not, Mike is a fairly intelligent man. Not the most articulate man, but intelligent nonetheless. Who is gonna pay to hear him recite Shakespeare or quote the Quran?

<<<<"Nothings more attractive than a heavy praying woman" © Andre 3000

I thought that was bullshit.

I think the trial even exposed her dad was a huge boxing fan.

I find it hard to believe she didn't know who Tyson was at the time

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*