Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend
Lobby Okay Sports topic #2157966

Subject: "How Would You Change the NBA Lottery?" Previous topic | Next topic
Guinness
Charter member
26270 posts
Thu Apr-04-13 01:56 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
"How Would You Change the NBA Lottery?"


  

          

obviously there's a problem with the current system when a team like the cavs tanked to get bron, tanked to get kyrie, tanked last year and is tanking this season. if i had my druthers, the franchise would be contracted and the stadium burned to the ground with as many clevelanders inside as possible. it's the only way they'll learn.

but is there a better way to distribute college talent than the weighted lottery?

my solution would be to give the team with the worst record 30 balls, the team with the second-worst record 29, and so forth until the champion (who gets 1). it would eliminate tanking and give teams mired in mediocrity the chance to get a top pick without plunging into the abyss of ineptitude. the system of rewarding the worst-run organizations with the most valuable commodities in the sport is fucking ridiculous.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote


How Would You Change the NBA Lottery? [View all] , Guinness, Thu Apr-04-13 01:56 PM
 
Subject Author Message Date ID
Ive actually been thinking about this
Apr 04th 2013
1
But that still penalizes the teams with less talent.
Apr 04th 2013
3
      it is weighted by record now
Apr 04th 2013
6
           No its weighted by place in the standings, based on record.
Apr 04th 2013
9
                Yea I get what youre saying now
Apr 04th 2013
12
But how often does the worst team get the best pick?
Apr 04th 2013
2
You still guarantee yourself a top 4 pick
Apr 04th 2013
4
it's not about the number one pick overall.
Apr 04th 2013
5
tanking (and getting TBPA) doesn't = titles
Apr 05th 2013
53
The wolves have NEVER moved up in the lottery
Apr 04th 2013
7
I don't know if there is a way to really fix it
Apr 04th 2013
8
What about an NBA BPI?
Apr 04th 2013
10
who would qualify as a star?
Apr 04th 2013
13
      It's far too subjective.
Apr 04th 2013
14
      Well, BPI measures the top three statistical contributors.
Apr 04th 2013
28
there's no way to fix it.
Apr 04th 2013
11
IWhy not just let everyone have a chance at picks 1-14
Apr 04th 2013
15
Get rid of it completely....there's no need for it anymore....
Apr 04th 2013
16
Shiiit Lebron James coming out this year
Apr 04th 2013
17
How often does a player like that come along though?
Apr 04th 2013
18
Oden/Durant
Apr 04th 2013
20
      Yeah, but teams weren't tanking in most of those cases
Apr 04th 2013
21
what would stop someone from tanking for more ping pong balls?
Apr 04th 2013
43
agreed 100%.
Apr 05th 2013
52
Lakers would always get the first pick and cap room for 1 max contract
Apr 04th 2013
19
Cash Value the lottery...
Apr 04th 2013
22
just don't weight it. each team that misses the playoffs gets ONE ball
Apr 04th 2013
23
problem for eight seeds.
Apr 04th 2013
24
the players get more money for making the playoffs.
Apr 04th 2013
26
They already tried that and scrapped it though
Apr 04th 2013
25
What I suggested:
Apr 04th 2013
27
RE: How Would You Change the NBA Lottery?
Apr 04th 2013
29
YOOOOO that would be dope...
Apr 04th 2013
30
LMAO @ an NBDL team doing better than a wack NBA team even
Apr 04th 2013
31
there are four huge issues (and i started with two but more came up)
Apr 04th 2013
33
      The only valid issue I would see is the #1 pick not playing in the
Apr 04th 2013
34
      you're not really understanding/thinking this through
Apr 04th 2013
39
           hey, look, it's just an idea. are there flaws, sure
Apr 04th 2013
42
      But if small market teams suck ass...so be it
Apr 04th 2013
36
           then there should just be 20 teams
Apr 04th 2013
40
           ^^^^
Apr 05th 2013
55
           RE: But if small market teams suck ass...so be it
Apr 04th 2013
47
           RE: OKC and SAN
Apr 05th 2013
60
                find out how many Sonics fans root for the Thunder
Apr 05th 2013
61
                     I'm not sure we're on different sides of the same argument
Apr 05th 2013
64
horrible idea
Apr 05th 2013
58
2 things I see wrong with that
Apr 05th 2013
65
      the NBDL sucks is the main point.
Apr 05th 2013
68
Relegate the worst team to the D League for a season
Apr 04th 2013
32
I think people are also overstating the prevalence of tanking too
Apr 04th 2013
35
Pretty much this
Apr 04th 2013
37
yup. who cares if someone tanks?
Apr 04th 2013
41
I don't think so
Apr 04th 2013
44
Again, most of the tanking teams suck anyway
Apr 04th 2013
45
yeah and its reflective of the nba being a star driven league
Apr 04th 2013
46
but *shouldn't* they be using that dead time to evaluate talent?
Apr 05th 2013
49
also agreed.
Apr 05th 2013
54
each team starts with 82 balls.
Apr 04th 2013
38
haha I'll consign this
Apr 04th 2013
48
lol can you re-explain this sober?
Apr 08th 2013
70
Get rid of the refrigerator backstage.
Apr 05th 2013
50
^^^^
Apr 05th 2013
56
hang yourself.
Apr 05th 2013
51
that's the problem.
Apr 05th 2013
57
      it's bullshit. it's not even 'real'. some teams actually do suck.
Apr 05th 2013
59
           I still have yet to hear one decent piece of evidence
Apr 05th 2013
62
                Last year wasn't one I would say was 'rigged'
Apr 05th 2013
63
                the real crazy shit about 2003 was the Grizz/Pistons angle
Apr 05th 2013
66
                While I don't believe its really rigged, I agree with Doc and others...
Apr 05th 2013
67
NBA writers would be doomed if there was no tanking
Apr 05th 2013
69
I honestly like Simmons idea
Apr 08th 2013
71

Lobby Okay Sports topic #2157966 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.25
Copyright © DCScripts.com