|
For a guy who can't stand what this board has become you sure don't mind contributing mightily to the mess. In fact, you're oblivious to your current contribution to said mess.
Sounds an awful lot like Trump to me.
>Like Donald, the more you call someone a liar, the more you >expose your own bullshit.
No, see, I exposed *your* bullshit by posting everything I wrote in response to your laughable and inarguably incorrect assertions.
>I reread my response and stand by what I wrote. Did I cover >everything? No. But I think you're deluding yourself that your >responses weren't dismissive, especially given your initial >post in the thread which dismissed other posts as bad ideas.
...you didn't cover much of anything. I already broke down what I wrote and won't rehash it for your lying, disingenuous ass.
>If you think sentences like: "I can’t think of a single side >character that needed more screen time." "For what?", "Nor >should they be," "What about this makes the show better or >tells the story 90% of us actually care about more >effectively?" aren't dismissive but are actually invitations >for further discussion, well, sorry, I'm not buying that shit >you're shoveling.
SMH. This is proof positive that the issue here is that you simply didn't like being challenged. That's all this is about. Those were perfectly fair and respectful statements and questions. I didn't agree, said as much, and asked questions about your stance. I guess I forgot to suck your dick and massage your ego in the process, but then again I'm not accustomed to such fragile ass egos either. You listed a direct question and your response is "sorry, not buying it!".
Instead of answering a clear question about your idea you threw a tantrum over it. Talk about Trump!
>And if you can't see it; "tells the story >90% of us actually care about" is the bitchy part of that >response.
lol WHAT? You've got to be kidding. Holy shit, talk about mountains of molehills. You're insanely sensitive, talk about "Trump" with this skinned bullshit. The only thing bitchy about this is your bitchy response.
>And I've never seen a discussion start with "Each his own i >guess." That's what you say at the end of a discussion.
again... what. the. fuck. Each his own is about as fair as fair gets, you must REALLY need to be coddled. Goddamn. You're being unreasonable to absurd levels. Again: only thing bitchy in here is you.
>And LOL at your hypocrisy at the end; telling me not to >respond but not being able to not have the last word to the >point that you're saying you'd post a boilerplate response >rather than heed your own advice.
LOL@hypocrisy. I was just letting you know we were past the point of no return and where we were headed from there. That's transparency, not hypocrisy. Remember- you're the guy who supposedly dislikes what this board has become but doesn't seem to realize he's a contributor.
Talk about a fucking hypocrite! That's just about the definition.
So,again, for a guy who supposedly doesn't like what this board has become you've been a rather exemplary catalyst for just that sort of mess.
Great job, hypocrite!
|