Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend
Lobby The Lesson topic #2852250

Subject: "RE: new paradigm ftw!" Previous topic | Next topic
double 0
Member since Nov 17th 2004
7010 posts
Wed Oct-30-13 06:56 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
23. "RE: new paradigm ftw!"
In response to In response to 15


          

Nah son... All this means is the correction of the industry. They can pool around their blockbusters and still bank. The fat is trimmed though.

You figure back in the days a label could have a group like No doubt as a tent pole while BEP was still tryna figure it out. Even though BEP hadn't figured it out they were still given nice as hell advances. Still treated like major label artists. Because the label could afford the fluff.

Now a days you get Katy Perry. Budget is still big, opportunities are still big. Then you have let's say a colin monroe. While they are both on the same label who knows if Colin's budget is even open.

It was like that previous post about that producer airing MMG out on twitter. The idea that Meek Mill a successful upstart not being able to get his budget open because he can't make a hit is a very legitimate rumor. The label would much rather you spend you bread "figuring it out" then come to them with the hit.

so basically... the Button doesn't get pushed until you are much more of a "sure thing" or have a proven track record.

i.e. Blockbuster Syndrome
more links to lefsetz

http://lefsetz.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/2013/10/01/the-blockbuster-syndrome/

Double 0
DJ/Producer/Artist
Producer in Kidz In The Hall
-------------------------------------------
twitter: @godouble0
IG: @godouble0
www.thinklikearapper.com

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote


Majority of music online goes unpurchased (swipe) [View all] , Errol Walton Barrow, Wed Oct-30-13 09:01 AM
 
Subject Author Message Date ID
This surprises anybody?
Oct 30th 2013
1
this is like being surprised CDs weren't moving in 1996
Oct 30th 2013
2
uh... they were, though. mightily.
Oct 30th 2013
3
      how do these numbers compare to 2012 and 2010?
Oct 30th 2013
4
           ???
Oct 30th 2013
5
           because this was before spotify the article suggests it gets worse
Oct 30th 2013
6
                as much as I loathe to give credit to bavid dammer
Oct 30th 2013
8
                     Dude makes a lot of really good points I just feel like he personally
Oct 30th 2013
10
                     I agree
Oct 30th 2013
14
                     you loathe to give me credit because...
Oct 30th 2013
16
                          lol ok pal.
Oct 30th 2013
18
                               RE: lol ok pal.
Oct 30th 2013
19
                                    i said ok.
Oct 30th 2013
20
                                         have a nice night.
Oct 30th 2013
21
                                         ok fair enough.
Oct 30th 2013
26
Is this including random garage bands
Oct 30th 2013
7
RE: It does say "all digital music."
Oct 30th 2013
9
Yeah, quite a misleading stat
Oct 30th 2013
11
But this is how the long tail of music is suppose to work?
Oct 30th 2013
12
RE: But this is how the long tail of music is suppose to work?
Oct 30th 2013
17
RE: But this is how the long tail of music is suppose to work?
Oct 30th 2013
22
not sure what this means though
Oct 30th 2013
13
RE: not sure what this means though
Oct 30th 2013
24
new paradigm ftw!
Oct 30th 2013
15
      RE: new paradigm ftw!
Oct 30th 2013
25
the old model had some advantages.
Oct 30th 2013
27

Lobby The Lesson topic #2852250 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.25
Copyright © DCScripts.com