14. "So it's your word against mine then?" In response to In response to 13
You would have to answer why, if I backed down why then did I continue to make the same argument in many posts for a year after?
>I stand by what I said.
And what you said is completely fictional.
>within that post itself...you backed down from the correction >that people like OE and myself where bringing to you and >restated your assertion in a more accurate manner.
LMAO if I were you, I wouldn't ally myself with O_E because he offered no "correction" of any kind... All he did was make post after post calling me an insecure Uncle Tom who hates/is jealous of American Blacks, insult my ethnic background, claim to himself be of Nigerian descent and say that I make him ashamed of that.
Come to think of it: Your responses were pretty much a softer version of that, with the only "correction" you gave being saying over and over that I am "exaggerating" without ever telling me exactly what it is that I am exaggerating or setting me straight on the supposedly accurate series of events might be.
So... pretty much the same thing you're doing now.
Although I >still felt you were not being completely accurate as it was >another attempt to minimize the impact of African American >music by exagerating the impact of elements that were not >distinctly and exclusive born of the Black man's experience in >America.
Yeah... that's what you said last time.
It don't mean shit unless you actually tell me what's been exaggerated.
>um ...there is nothing unfounded or paranoid about it at all. >Everyone has a right to their own school of thought, but when >that school of thought is associated with exagerations, >misrepresentations, and outright falsehoods...one should >expect some push back from those who know better...
What did I exaggerate, misrepresent or lie about?
You still haven't told me.
>again...your inability to actually stand by what you say has >always caused problems. It would be more respectable if a >person with an opinion had the guts to actually stand on it >when confronted rather than flat out lying or denying what >they've said..
LOL I'm standing by it right here and now, playboy. Why don't you tell me exactly what part of my statement is inaccurate so that I can offer a defense?
>I would find it strange that if someone who started posts over >the years like > >"The Myth of Black Church Singing/Rockism in Black Music" >"The Tyranny of 'Cool' in Black Music and Culture" >"Black Americans fucking kill me" >"any black person who says the Beatles were not the shit (is a >RACIST)" (cap locks were in the original post)" >"when did Black music become infected with this highfalutin >idea of Art?" >"James Brown was scared of revolution" > >just to name a few in the other volumes of posts > >now to act super sensative when people correctly state that >you have a lack of respect for Black American culture and >music and are willing to exagerate and mischaracterize >historical facts to support that agenda....
Well... I hope you enjoyed that trek through the archives but hey! You forgot to mention my series about being embarrassed by pro-Black hip-hop!
I also made posts about White Americans fucking killing me, but I guess you will conveniently forget about that because it explodes your whole paranoid theory.
That has been at >the crux of the so-called beef between you and Warren Coolidge >from the very begining....me calling you on that bullshit and >you sinking childish levels in response.
Blah blah blah... it's 2013, man. I SO don't want to have to go through this again.
So I won't.
If you think something I am saying is incorrect, tell me what it is... and tell me what the right thing is. All this other stuff is empty grammar.
>again..you'll deny your agenda....and claim that the content >of those posts nor all the others show graphic evidence of >that agenda...but that doesn't change what folks have been >seeing from you for years.